`
`AO450 (NVD Rev. 2/18) Judgment in a Civil Case
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
`
`Case Number: : 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB
`
`NEXRF Corp.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`Playtika Ltd., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and
`the jury has rendered its verdict.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
`or heard and a decision has been rendered.
`
`
`
`
` X Decision by Court. This action came for consideration before the Court. The issues have been
`
`considered and a decision has been rendered.
`
`IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Defendant Caesars Interactive Entertainment's motion to
`
`dismiss (ECF No. 26) is granted. Defendants Playtika Holding Corp. and Playtika Ltd.'s motion to
`dismiss (ECF No. 28) is granted. Defendants Playtika Holding Corp. and Playtika Ltd.'s motion for Rule
`11 sanctions (ECF No. 53) is denied. Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed, in its entirety, with
`prejudice, as amendment would be futile. This case is now closed in favor of the Defendants’.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7/7/2021
`
`Patent Owner NexRF Exhibit 2005, Page 1 of 1
`
`