`____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC
`Patent Owner
`___________
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`____________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`Pursuant to the Board’s November 29, 2021, Scheduling Order (Paper 11),
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument for the trial currently scheduled on
`
`September 13, 2022. Petitioner requests oral argument for this IPR (IPR2021-00922)
`
`be back-to-back with oral argument for IPR2021-00920 (for which a Request for
`
`Oral Argument will be filed July 25, 2022). Petitioner requests forty-five (45)
`
`minutes of argument for each party. If the Board is allowing in-person hearings,
`
`Petitioner further requests the hearing take place in Denver, Colorado.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner specifies the following issues,
`
`without intent to waive consideration of any issue not requested, to be argued for this
`
`proceeding:
`
`1. Whether Claims 1, 2, 4-14, 17, 19, 21-22, 24-28, and 30 are obvious under
`
`§ 103 over U.S. Patent No. 6,144,366 to Numazaki, et al. (“Numazaki”) in view of the
`
`knowledge of a PHOSITA (“PHOSITA”);
`
`2. Whether Claims 3, 15, and 23 are obvious under § 103 over Numazaki in
`
`view of U.S. Patent No. 5,900,863 to Numazaki (“Numazaki ’365);
`
`3. Whether Claims 16 and 29 are obvious under § 103 over Numazaki in
`
`view of U.S. Patent No. 6,064,354 to DeLuca (“DuLuca”);
`
`4. Whether Claim 18 is obvious under § 103 over Numazaki in view of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,008,018 to DeLeeuw, et al. (“DeLeeuw”);
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`5. Whether Claim 20 is obvious under § 103 over Numazaki in view of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,191,773 to Maruno, et al. (“Maruno”);
`
`6.
`
`Any claim constructions, unpatentability grounds, or other issues raised in
`
`the Petition or Petitioner Reply, the Patent Owner Preliminary Response, the Patent
`
`Owner Response, the Patent Owner Sur-Reply, or the Board’s Institution Decision;
`
`7.
`
`Any issues regarding motions to exclude or motions to strike that may be
`
`filed or pending; and
`
`8.
`
`Any issues otherwise raised by the Board.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`
`
`BY: /s/Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`7015 College Blvd., Suite 700
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`P: (913) 777-5600
`F: (913) 777-5601
`adam.seitz@eriseip.com
`Paul R. Hart, Reg. No. 59,646
`5299 DTC Blvd., Ste. 1340
`Greenwood Village, CO 80111
`P: (913) 777-5600
`F: (913) 777-5601
`paul.hart@eriseip.com
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on July 18,
`
`2022, the foregoing Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument was served via
`
`electronic filing with the Board and via Electronic Mail on the following
`
`practitioners of record for Patent Owner:
`
`
`Todd E. Landis (tlandis@wsltrial.com)
`John Wittenzellner (johnw@wsltrial.com)
`IPRGTPWSL@wsltrial.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
