throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS LLC
`Patent Owner
`_________________
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF DR. BENJAMIN B. BEDERSON
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 1
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`I, Benjamin B. Bederson, hereby declare the following:
`
`1. My name is Benjamin B. Bederson, Ph.D and I am over 21 years of age
`
`and otherwise competent to make this Declaration. I make this Declaration based on
`
`facts and matters within my own knowledge and on information provided to me by
`
`others.
`
`2.
`
`I submitted an initial declaration in support of Apple’s petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,533,079 (“the ’079 Patent”). I understand the
`
`PTAB instituted the requested review and that the proceeding involves the full scope
`
`of the proposed grounds addressed in my initial declaration. I have been asked to
`
`address a few additional issues in response to Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 13)
`
`and Patent Owner’s expert’s declaration (Ex. 2002).
`
`Numazaki’s eighth embodiment’s “photo-detection sensor unit”
`implements the first embodiment’s photo-detection sensors
`
`I.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`As set forth in my initial declaration (Ex. 1010) at ¶ 35, Numazaki
`
`describes a unique image differencing structure configured with two photo-detection
`
`units 109, 110 and a lighting unit 101:
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 2, 11:9-11 (noting Fig. 2 illustrates an “information input generation
`
`apparatus”). I also explained at ¶ 36 that Numazaki’s photo-detection units 109, 110
`
`are imaging sensors. More specifically, they are electro-optical sensors that convert
`
`captured light into electrical signals. At ¶¶ 40-43, I explained that Numazaki’s eighth
`
`embodiment (directed to allowing users to control portable devices through gestures)
`
`incorporates “the controlled light and two-camera configuration described in its first
`
`embodiment.” Namely, the eighth embodiment’s “photo-detection sensor unit” 702
`
`and light source 701 are implemented using the components depicted in Fig. 2 and
`
`described with respect to the first embodiment.
`
`4.
`
`I understand that Patent Owner and its expert, Mr. Occhiogrosso, have
`
`suggested that a PHOSITA would not have agreed that Numazaki’s eighth
`
`embodiment implements the structure depicted in Fig. 2 based on an alleged
`
`terminology discrepancy. Namely, Patent Owner and its expert take issue with the
`
`
`
`3
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`fact that Numazaki describes component 702 in its eighth embodiment as a “photo-
`
`detection sensor unit” and the components within reflected light extraction unit 102
`
`in its first embodiment as “photo-detection units.” Paper 13, 9-11; Ex. 2002, 48-51.
`
`In fact, Numazaki’s terminology is entirely consistent—both internally consistent
`
`and consistent with my conclusion that Numazaki’s eighth embodiment implements
`
`the structure from Fig. 2.
`
`5.
`
`As illustrated below, the first embodiment’s information input
`
`generation apparatus includes lighting unit 101 (green) and reflected light extraction
`
`unit 102 (orange):
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 2 (annotated). Numazaki’s eighth embodiment utilizes lighting unit
`
`701 (green) and a photo-detection sensor unit 702 (orange):
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 4
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`
`
`Id. at Fig. 74 (annotated). As I explained in my original declaration at ¶¶ 42-43,
`
`“Numazaki’s eighth embodiment portable devices incorporate the controlled
`
`lighting and two-camera sensor structure described with respect to the first
`
`embodiment.” Numazaki clearly states that the eighth embodiment incorporates the
`
`apparatus of the earlier embodiments, including the first embodiment. “This eighth
`
`embodiment is directed to a system configuration incorporating the information
`
`input generation apparatus of the present invention as described in the above
`
`embodiments.” Id. at 50:21-24. Furthermore, Numazaki describes its eighth
`
`embodiment’s photo-detection sensor unit 702 as consisting of multiple “photo-
`
`detection sections.” Id. at 50:34. Accordingly, Numazaki’s “photo-detection sensor
`
`unit” 702 includes both photo-detection units 109 and 110. And, as noted above,
`
`photo-detection units 109 and 110 are sensors. Specifically, they are electro-optical
`
`sensors.
`
`
`
`5
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 5
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`6.
`
`Given the above, rather than a terminology conflict or discrepancy as
`
`Patent Owner suggests, Numazaki uses the phrase “photo-detection sensor unit” to
`
`describe a photo-detection unit that includes sensors—an entirely consistent and
`
`easy to understand designation. Accordingly, not only is Numazaki internally
`
`consistent, referring to a sensor-containing unit as a “sensor unit,” but it also fully
`
`supports my conclusion that a PHOSITA would have understood Numazaki’s Fig.
`
`74 photo-detection sensor unit includes the photo-detecting sensors depicted in Fig.
`
`2.
`
`II. Numazaki’s multi-camera gesture detection accomplishes the same goals
`as a single camera system with improved accuracy
`
`7.
`
`I understand Patent Owner and its expert argue that Numazaki’s gesture
`
`detection system falls outside the scope of the ’079 Patent claims because it employs
`
`multiple cameras/imaging sensors. Paper 13, 11-12; Ex. 2002, 53-54. I disagree.
`
`Numazaki teaches a system that captures images of an illuminated object in order to
`
`detect gestures performed by that object. This is precisely what is described in the
`
`’079 Patent and evidences that the prior art was more sophisticated than the
`
`Challenged Patent.
`
`8.
`
`As I stated in my initial declaration at ¶ 43, Numazaki uses its
`
`controlled lighting and two-camera arrangement to illuminate the target object (e.g.,
`
`the user’s hand) in a controlled manner such that a precise image of the user’s
`
`hand and hand movement can be ascertained. Ex. 1004, 11:9-23. A timing control
`
`
`
`6
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 6
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`unit turns lighting unit 101 on to illuminate a target object while Numazaki’s first
`
`camera unit 109 is active, then off when the second camera unit 110 is active. Id. at
`
`11:20-32. Using this lighting control, the first camera captures an image of a target
`
`object illuminated by both natural light and directed light from lighting unit 101,
`
`while the second camera captures an image of the target object illuminated by only
`
`natural light. Id. at 11:33-39. The difference calculation unit 111 extracts and outputs
`
`a “reflected light image” created by subtracting the first camera’s captured aggregate
`
`of natural and reflected light image information from the second camera’s captured
`
`natural light-only image information. Id. at 11:43-55. Numazaki’s two-sensor
`
`structure thus improves upon a single sensor structure by ensuring that resulting
`
`image reflects only
`
`the
`
`illuminated gesture, excluding extraneous
`
`image
`
`information.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`9.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my knowledge are true, and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true, and that
`
`these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements and the
`
`like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of
`
`Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Date:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 7
`
`

`

`By: _______________________________
`Dr. Benjamin B. Bederson
`
`IPR2021-00922
`U.S. Patent No. 8,553,079
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00922
`Apple EX1017 Page 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket