`Patent 8,243,593
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CLOUDFLARE, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SABLE NETWORKS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2021-00909
`Patent 8,243,593
`____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) and the Federal Rules of Evidence
`
`(“FRE”), Patent Owner objects to the following documents submitted by Petitioner
`
`Cloudflare, Inc.
`
`Nothing in this paper should be construed as an admission that any rights of
`
`Patent Owner would have been waived or forfeited had the paper or any objection
`
`herein not been filed, or that 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b) applies to any of the objections
`
`herein if § 42.64(b) would not otherwise apply. The objections herein are
`
`premised upon § 42.64 potentially being determined to apply to the document in
`
`question and are submitted solely to preserve the rights of Patent Owner should
`
`§ 42.64(b) be determined to apply.
`
`1.
`
`Exhibit 1003
`
`Under FRE and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document is inadmissible to the
`
`extent that it is conclusory and does not disclose bases for the opinions offered
`
`therein. Under FRE 401/402/403/702, this document, including for example and
`
`without limitation the paragraphs identified earlier in this objection, includes
`
`testimony not reliable and not relevant to the instituted review, because, among
`
`other things, it has not been shown that the purportedly expert declarant is
`
`qualified to testify competently regarding the matters the opinions are said to
`
`address, or that the declarant’s testimony is based on sufficient facts or data or
`
`arrived at by reliable legal or art principles, procedures, or methods reliably
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`applied to the facts of this case, or that the declarant’s opinion will assist the trier
`
`of fact to understand the evidence or to determine any fact in issue and does not
`
`have a greater potential to confuse and/or mislead than to enlighten. Under FRE
`
`602/701/801/802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, this document includes testimony that is
`
`not shown to be based on first-hand knowledge including of how relied-upon data
`
`was generated, is based on speculation, and constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document does not
`
`disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65,
`
`this document includes testimony on patent law and practice.
`
`2.
`
`Exhibit 1006 – Declaration
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403/702, this document or documents include
`
`testimony not relevant to the instituted review, because, among other things, it has
`
`not been shown that the purportedly expert declarant is qualified to testify
`
`competently regarding the matters the opinions are said to address, or that the
`
`declarant’s testimony is based on sufficient facts or data or arrived at by reliable
`
`principles, procedures, or methods reliably applied to the facts of this case, or that
`
`the declarant’s opinion will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to
`
`determine any fact in issue and does not have a greater potential to mislead than to
`
`enlighten. Under FRE 602/701/801/802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, this document
`
`includes testimony that is not shown to be based on first-hand knowledge including
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`of how relied-upon data was generated, is based on speculation, and constitutes
`
`and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1006 – Exhibit A
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents constitute and contain
`
`inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document or documents are
`
`inadmissible because they have not been shown to be authenticated or identified.
`
`The document or documents are relied upon as evidence of prior art or of common
`
`knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the priority date at issue, but
`
`are inadmissible because they have not been shown to qualify as prior art under,
`
`inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting documentation to
`
`demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the priority date.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1010
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. The document is relied upon as evidence of prior art or of common
`
`knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the priority date at issue, but is
`
`inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify as prior art under, inter alia,
`
`35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting documentation to demonstrate
`
`common knowledge or understanding as of the priority date. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant because, among other
`
`things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and its probative value is
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`outweighed by other considerations including prejudice, confusion and waste of
`
`time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document does not disclose
`
`underlying facts and data.
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit 1013
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`6.
`
`Exhibit 1016
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 1017
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 1019
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5),
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(1), this document is incomplete and is not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original.
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1019 – Declaration
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403/702, this document or documents include
`
`testimony not relevant to the instituted review, because, among other things, it has
`
`not been shown that the purportedly expert declarant is qualified to testify
`
`competently regarding the matters the opinions are said to address, or that the
`
`declarant’s testimony is based on sufficient facts or data or arrived at by reliable
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`principles, procedures, or methods reliably applied to the facts of this case, or that
`
`the declarant’s opinion will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to
`
`determine any fact in issue and does not have a greater potential to mislead than to
`
`enlighten. Under FRE 602/701/801/802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, this document
`
`includes testimony that is not shown to be based on first-hand knowledge including
`
`of how relied-upon data was generated, is based on speculation, and constitutes
`
`and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`10. Exhibit 1022
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`11. Exhibit 1031
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`12. Exhibit 1032
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`13. Exhibit 1033
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`14. Exhibit 1034
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`15. Exhibit 1038
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`16. Exhibit 1040
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`17. Exhibit 1041
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`18. Exhibit 1044
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and contains inadmissible
`
`hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible because it has not been
`
`shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is relied upon as evidence
`
`of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of persons in the art at the
`
`priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not been shown to qualify
`
`as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is a lack of supporting
`
`documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or understanding as of the
`
`priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document does not disclose underlying facts and data.
`
`19. Exhibit 1047
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document is incomplete and is not a copy which accurately
`
`reproduces the original. Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and
`
`contains inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible
`
`because it has not been shown to be authenticated or identified. The document is
`
`relied upon as evidence of prior art or of common knowledge or understanding of
`
`persons in the art at the priority date at issue, but is inadmissible because it has not
`
`been shown to qualify as prior art under, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), and there is
`
`a lack of supporting documentation to demonstrate common knowledge or
`
`understanding as of the priority date. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is
`
`inadmissible as irrelevant because, among other things, it does not form a basis of
`
`the instituted grounds, and its probative value is outweighed by other
`
`considerations including prejudice, confusion and waste of time. Under FRE
`
`401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document does not disclose underlying facts
`
`and data.
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`20. Exhibit 1048
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`21. Exhibit 1049
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`22. Exhibit 1050
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`23. Exhibit 1051
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`- 14 -
`
`
`
`24. Exhibit 1052
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`25. Exhibit 1053
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`26. Exhibit 1054
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`27. Exhibit 1055
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`- 15 -
`
`
`
`28. Exhibit 1056
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`29. Exhibit 1057
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`30. Exhibit 1058
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`31. Exhibit 1047
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document is incomplete and is not a copy which accurately
`
`reproduces the original. Under FRE 801/802, this document constitutes and
`
`contains inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 901, this document is inadmissible
`
`- 16 -
`
`
`
`because it has not been shown to be authenticated or identified. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant because, among other
`
`things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and its probative value is
`
`outweighed by other considerations including prejudice, confusion and waste of
`
`time.
`
`32. Exhibit 1062
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`33. Exhibit 1063
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`34. Exhibit 1064
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`35. Exhibit 1065
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`36. Exhibit 1066
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`37. Exhibit 1067
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`38. Exhibit 1068
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`- 18 -
`
`
`
`39. Exhibit 1069
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403, this document is inadmissible as irrelevant
`
`because, among other things, it does not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and
`
`its probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`____/ Kenneth J. Weatherwax /_________
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP
`
`Date: December 7, 2021
`
`- 19 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00909
`Patent 8,243,593
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the following documents were served
`by electronic service, by agreement between the parties, on the date signed below:
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`The names and address of the parties being served are as follows:
`
`James L. Day
`Daniel Callaway
`Winston Liaw
`
`
`
`jday@fbm.com
`dcallaway@fbm.com
`wliaw@fbm.com
`calendar@fbm.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` / Colette Woo /
`
`Date: December 7, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`