throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CLOUDFLARE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SABLE NETWORKS, INC.,
`Patent Owner,
`____________
`
`Case IPR2021-00909
`Patent 8,243,593 B2
`____________
`
`
`NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION
`TO MODIFY SCHEDULE
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to a joint stipulation of Petitioner and Patent Owner (“Parties”),
`
`and in accordance with the guidance provided in the Scheduling Order (Paper 17),
`
`the Parties hereby stipulate to modify DUE DATES 1-2 as follows:
`
`• DUE DATE 1 will be changed from February 11, 2022 to March 4, 2022.
`
`• DUE DATE 2 will be changed from May 6, 2022 to May 27, 2022.
`
`A revised DUE DATE APPENDIX is attached showing the changes made
`
`relative to the latest schedule in redline. This stipulation does not affect or
`
`otherwise modify the dates for DUE DATES 3-8. As further agreed by the Parties,
`
`Patent Owner files this Notice on behalf of both Parties.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`______/ James L. Day /______________
`James L. Day, Reg. No. 72,681
`FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`____/ Kenneth J. Weatherwax /_______
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Date: January 25, 2022
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 ....................................................... February 11, 2022 March 4, 2022
`
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 .................................................................... May 6, 2022May 27, 2022
`
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE .......................................................................................... June 17, 2022
`
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend
`(or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)
`
`DUE DATE 4 .......................................................................................... July 8, 2022
`
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................................ July 29, 2022
`
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 6 ..................................................................................... August 5, 2022
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`Request for prehearing conference
`
`DUE DATE 7 .................................................................................... August 12, 2022
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 8 ................................................................................ September 7, 2022
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the following documents were served
`
`by electronic service on the date signed below:
`
`NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION
`TO MODIFY SCHEDULE
`
`
`The names and address of the parties being served are as follows:
`
`James L. Day
`Daniel Callaway
`Winston Liaw
`
`jday@fbm.com
`dcallaway@fbm.com
`wliaw@fbm.com
`calendar@fbm.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` / Colette Woo /
`
`Date: January 25, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket