throbber

`
`www.archive.org
`
`415.561.6767
`
`415.840-0391 e-fax
`
`
`
`Internet Archive
`
`300 Funston Avenue
`
`San Francisco, CA 94118
`
`_____________________
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF DUNCAN HALL
`
`
`
`1. I am a Records Request Processor at the Internet Archive, located in San Francisco,
`California. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge.
`
`
`2. The Internet Archive is a website that provides access to a digital library of Internet
`sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form. Like a paper library, we provide
`free access to researchers, historians, scholars, and the general public. The Internet
`Archive has partnered with and receives support from various institutions,
`including the Library of Congress.
`
`
`3. The Internet Archive has created a service known as the Wayback Machine. The
`Wayback Machine makes it possible to browse more than 450 billion pages stored
`in the Internet Archive's web archive. Visitors to the Wayback Machine can search
`archives by URL (i.e., a website address). If archived records for a URL are
`available, the visitor will be presented with a display of available dates. The visitor
`may select one of those dates, and begin browsing an archived version of the Web.
`Links on archived files in the Wayback Machine point to other archived files
`(whether HTML pages or other file types), if any are found for the URL indicated
`by a given link. For instance, the Wayback Machine is designed such that when a
`visitor clicks on a hyperlink on an archived page that points to another URL, the
`visitor will be served the archived file found for the hyperlink’s URL with the
`closest available date to the initial file containing the hyperlink.
`
`
`4. The archived data made viewable and browseable by the Wayback Machine is
`obtained by use of web archiving software that automatically stores copies of files
`available via the Internet, each file preserved as it existed at a particular point in
`time.
`
`
`5. The Internet Archive assigns a URL on its site to the archived files in the format
`http://web.archive.org/web/[Year in yyyy][Month in mm][Day in dd][Time code in
`hh:mm:ss]/[Archived URL] aka an “extended URL”. Thus, the extended URL
`http://web.archive.org/web/19970126045828/http://www.archive.org/ would be the
`URL for the record of the Internet Archive home page HTML file
`(http://www.archive.org/) archived on January 26, 1997 at 4:58 a.m. and 28
`seconds (1997/01/26 at 04:58:28). A web browser may be set such that a printout
`from it will display the URL of a web page in the printout’s footer. The date
`indicated by an extended URL applies to a preserved instance of a file for a given
`URL, but not necessarily to any other files linked therein. Thus, in the case of a
`page constituted by a primary HTML file and other separate files (e.g., files with
`images, audio, multimedia, design elements, or other embedded content) linked
`within that primary HTML file, the primary HTML file and the other files will each
`have their own respective extended URLs and may not have been archived on the
`same dates.
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`6. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and accurate copies of printouts of
`screenshots of the Internet Archive's records of the archived files for the URLs and
`the dates specified in the attached coversheet of each printout.
`
`
`7. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE: ________________________
`
`
`________________________
`Duncan Hall
`
`01/20/2021
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, |PR2021-00881
`Page 3
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 3
`
`

`

`https://web.archive.org/web/20110408231012/http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0101297
`3
`
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
`.._ n m. r
`-. u: u I \ II
`httpflclinicaltrialsgcvfctzjfshowaCTD1012923
`
`
`
`
`iauimllnmnmu __
`
`I
`
`II
`
`8 Apr 2-31; — 14 \Icv 20:3
`
`II
`
`II
`
`
`ClinicalTrifllS.gov
`Home Search Study Topics Glossary
`Assn-lice ofthe us. National Institutes of Health
`ll Search l
`
`
`FU" TEXT View
`
`Tabular View
`
`No Study Results Posted
`
`Related Studies
`
`Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
`{CRVO} (GALILEOj
`
`This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
`First Received on October 30, 2009. Last Updated on January 25, 2011 History of Changfi
`
`
`
`F Purpose
`To determine the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGFj Trap-Eye injected into the eye on vision function in subjects with macular edema as a consequence of central retinal
`vein occlusion
`
`MM Ln» Retinal Vein Occlusion
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap—Eye (SAVES—5321)
`Other: Sham treatment
`
`Phase III
`
`lnterventional
`Study Type:
`Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
`Endpoint Classification: Safetnyfficacy Study
`Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
`Masking: Double Blind (Subject. Investigator, Outcomes Assessor}
`Primary Purpose: Treatment
`
`Official Title:
`
`A Randomized. Double—masked. Sham—controlled Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Repeated Intravitreal Administration of VEGF Trap-Eye in
`Subjects With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)
`
`Resource links provided by NLM:
`
`Genetics Home Reference related topics: Stargardt macular degeneration X-linked juvenile retinoschisis
`MedlinePlus related topics: Edema
`
`D_rug Information available for: Aflibercem
`US FDA Resources
`
`Further study delalls as provided by Bayer:
`
`Primary Outcome Measures:
`. The proportion of subjects who gain at least 15 letters in BCVA on the EDTRS chart compared with baseline at the Week 24 endpoint [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]
`[ Designated as safety issue: No]
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures:
`. Change from baseline in BCVA score [ Time Frame: week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`Absolute change from baseline in central retinal thickness. assessed by OCT [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`Proportion of subjects progressing to anterior segment neovascularization, neovascularization of the optic disc two). or neovascularization of the retina elsewhere
`(NVEj requiring pan—retinal photocoagulation [Time Frame: Week 24] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`Change in the NEl-VFO-25 total score from baseline [Time Frame: Week 24 ][ Designated as safety issue: No]
`Change in the EO-5D score from baseline [Time Frame: Week 24] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`
`165
`Estimated Enrollment:
`October 2009
`Study Start Date:
`March 2012
`Estimated Study Completion Date:
`Estimated Primary Completion Date: February 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
`
`m Assigned Interventions
`Arm 1: Experimental
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye [BAY86-5321)
`Intervention:
`lntravitreal injection. Weeks 0 to 20 injection of VEGF Trap-Eye every 4 weeks; weeks 24 to 52 every 4 weeks plus additional on week 60
`Drug: VEGF
`and 68 re—assessment and either [PRNj injection of VEGF Trap-Eye or sham injection; last visit [no treatment) at week ?6.
`Trap-Eye
`(BAYSB—
`5321}
`Arm 2: Sham
`
`Other: Sham treatment
`
`treatment
`
`Comparator
`Intervention:
`Other: Sham
`
`Sham treatment. Weeks 0 to 2G sham treatment every 4 weeks; weeks 24 to 43 every 4 weeks re—assessment and sham injection; week
`52 VEGF Trap—Eye injection [unless investigator declines for medical reasons}. weeks 60 and Ba re-assessment and either [PRN)
`injection of VEGF Trap—Eye or sham injection; last visit {no treatment) at week 'r'S.
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, |PR2021-00881
`Page 5
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 5
`
`

`

`b Eligibility
`Ages Eligible for Study:
`Genders Eligible for Study:
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
`Criteria
`Inclusion Criteria:
`
`18 Years and older
`Both
`No
`
`. Center—involved macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion {CRUD} for no longer than 9 months with mean central subfield thickness >= 250 pm on optical
`coherence tomography {OCT}
`. Adults >=1B years
`. early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20.?40 to 20:32:] (its to 24 letters) in the study eye
`Exclusion Criteria:
`
`. Any prior treatment with anti—VEGF agents in the study eye {Pegaptanib sodium, aneco rtave acetate, bevacizumabI ranibizumabI etc_] or previous administration of
`systemic anti-angiogenic medications
`. Prior panretinal laser photocoagulati on or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye
`. CRVO disease duration > 9 months trom date of diagnosis
`. Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye or use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within the 3 months prior to Day 1
`.
`Iris neovascularization; vitreous hemorrhage, traction retinal detachment; or preretinal fibrosis involving the macula in either the study eye or fellow eye
`
`D Contacts and Locations
`
`Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT010129?3
`
`fl Show 73 Study Locations
`
`Sponsors and Collaborators
`Bayer
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`
`Investigators
`Study Director: BayerStudy Director Bayer
`
`F More Information
`Additional Information:
`
`Click here and search tor drug information provided by the FDA. fl
`
`Click here and search tor intormation on any recalls market or product safety alerts by the FDA which might have occurred with this product. M
`
`Click here to find results tor studies related to marketed products. w
`
`No publications provided
`
`Bayer HealthCare AG {Therapeutic Area Head )
`Responsible Party:
`ClinicalTrials_gov Identitier: NCT010129?3
`History of Changfi
`Other Study ID Numbers:
`14130, EudraCT: 2009—0109?3—19
`Study First Received:
`October 30, 2009
`Last Updated:
`January 25, 2011
`Health Authority:
`Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices; Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration; Austria: Agency
`for Health and Food Safety: France: Afssaps — French Health Products Safety Agency; Hungary: National Institute ot Pharmacy;
`Italy: Ministry at Health;
`Latvia: State Agency ot Medicines;
`Japan: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency: Singapore: Health Sciences Authority: South Korea: Korea Food
`and Drug Administration {KFDA}
`
`Keywords provided by Bayer:
`Macular Edema
`Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
`CRVO
`VEG F Trap—Eye
`best-corrected visual acuity
`Additional relevant MeSH terms:
`Macular Edema
`Retinal Vein Occlusion
`Macular Degeneration
`Retinal Degeneration
`Retinal Diseases
`Eye Diseases
`Venous Thrombosis
`Thrombosis
`
`Embolism and Thrombosis
`Vascular Diseases
`Cardiovascular Diseases
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Growth Substances
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`Pharmacologic Actions
`
`ClinicalTrials_gov processed this record on April 0?. 2011
`
`
`coniact Help Desk
`LISICI HI” NaIIOI'IEII CONE” TOY BIDITIDUICEII communications. US. National LINE“!I 0‘ MEDICINE.
`us. Naiionai lnsiliutcs m Health. 0.5. Department or Health a Human services.
`usagov Gomgni. anacy. Accessibility. Freedom ct Imcrmatlon Act
`
`£32£3
`‘—
`Gemg“ NLM ..'U.5. Depanmcnt 01' Health 3n Human SGWICBS
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, |PR2021-00881
`Page 6
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 6
`
`

`

`https://web.archive.org/web/20090813064936/https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT006373
`77
`
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 7
`
`

`

`.._ n m. r
`
`-. u: u I \ II
`
`Illillllllllllllllllll
`
`
`
`httpsgffclinicaltrialsgovfctflshowfNCT0063?3??
`
`
`
`
`21_cmu_
`
`ZEJan 200'} - 231m 20 L?
`
`ClinicalTrialsgov
`A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
`
`
`Fun TEXT View
`
`Tabular View
`
`No Study Results Posted
`
`Related Studies
`
`
`Home Search
`study Topics Glossary
`
`H Search I
`
`Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration (AMD) (VIEW 2)
`
`This study is currently recruiting participants.
`Verified by Bayer, .July 2009
`
`First Received: March 12. 2003 Last Updated: July 3, 2009 History of Changfi
`
`
`
`F Purpose
`This study is a phase III. double—masked. randomized. study of the efficacy and safety of VEGF Trap—Eye in patients with neovascular age—related macular degeneration. Approximately
`1200 patients will be randomized in Europe. Asia. Japan, Australia and South America.
`
`Mm— Macular Degeneration
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap—Eye
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`
`Phase III
`
`lnterventional
`Study Type:
`Study Design: Treatment. Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator. Outcomes Assessor), Active Control. Parallel Assignment. Safetyi'Efficacy Study
`
`Official Title:
`
`A Randomized. Double Masked, Active Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Doses of lntravitreal VEGF Trap in Subjects With
`NeovascularAge-Related Macular Degeneration {AMDL
`
`Resource links provided by NLM:
`
`Genetics Home Reference related topics: X-linked juvenile retinoschisis
`
`MedlinePlus related topics: Macular Degeneration
`
`D_rug Information available for: Ranibizumab Aflibercem
`US FDA Resources
`
`Further study delalls as provided by Bayer:
`
`Primary Outcome Measures:
`. The proportion of subjects who maintain vision at Week 52. where a subject is classified as maintaining vision if the subject has lost fewer than 15 letters on the ETDRS
`chart compared to baseline fie. prevention of moderate vision loss) [ Time Frame: week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures:
`. Mean change from baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score at Week 52 [Time Frame: week 52] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes]
`. The proportion of subjects who gain at least 15 letters of vision at Week 52 [ TIme Frame: week 52] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`. Mean change from baseline in total NEI UFO—25 score at Week 52 [Time Frame: week 52] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
`. Mean change from baseline in CN\.Ir area at Week 52 [ TIme Frame: week 52] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`
`Estimated Enrollment:
`Study Start Date:
`Estimated Study Completion Date:
`Estimated Primary Completion Date:
`
`1200
`April 2008
`September 2011
`July 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
`
`L Assigned Interventions
`Arm 3:
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`Experimental
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 8 weeks [including one additional 2.0 mg dose at Week 4} during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be
`administered as frequently as every 4 weeks. but no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`Arm 1:
`Experimental
`
`Arm 2:
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`0.5 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but
`no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but
`no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`Arm 4:Active
`Comparator
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`0.5 mg administered every 4 weeks during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks. but no less
`
`b Eligibility
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, lPR2021-00881
`Page 8
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Ages Eligible for Study:
`Genders Eligible for Study:
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
`Criteria
`
`50 Years and older
`Both
`No
`
`Inclusion Criteria:
`. Signed intormed consent.
`. Men and women >I=50 years ot age.
`. Active primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to AMD. including juxtafoveal lesions that attect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye.
`. ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity of: 20MB to 201820 [letter score ot ?a to 25) in the study eye at 4 meters.
`. Willing, committed. and able to return tor ALL clinic visits and complete all study—related procedures.
`. Able to read. (or. if unable to read due to visual impairment. be read to verbatim by the person administering the informed consent or a family member] understand and
`willing to sign the informed consent form.
`Exclusion Criteria:
`
`. Any prior ocular [in the study eye] or systemic treatment or surgery for neovascular AMD. except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`. Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agent to treat neovascularAMD in the study eye.
`. Any prior treatment with anti—VEGF agents in the study eye.
`. Total lesion size >12 disc areas (30.5 mm&#xiffd;. including blood. scars and neovascularization} as assessed by FA in the study eye.
`. Subretinal hemorrhages that is either 50% or more of the total lesion area. or if the blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more disc areas in size in the study eye [it the blood
`is under the fovea, then the tovea must be surrounded by 2?0 degrees by visible CNV).
`. Scar or fibrosis making up >50‘3’u ot the total lesion in the study eye.
`. Scar_. tibrosis. or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye.
`. Presence of retinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the macula in the study eye.
`. History ot any vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 in the study eye.
`. Presence of other causes ot CNV in the study eye.
`. Prior vitrectomy in the study eye.
`. History ot retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment in the study eye.
`. Any history ot macular hole of stage 2 and above in the study eye.
`. Any intraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months ot Day 1 on the study eye. except lid surgery. which may not have taken place within 1 month ot Day 1, as long as it is
`unlikely to interfere with the injection.
`. History or clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy. diabetic macular edema or any retinal vascular disease other than AMD in either eye.
`
`> Contacts and Locations
`
`Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCTOOBSTGW
`
`Contacts
`
`Contact: Bayer Clinical Trials Contact
`
`
`clinical—trials—contact@bayerheaithcare.com
`
`fl Show 212 Study Locations
`Sponsors and Collaborators
`Bayer
`
`Investigators
`Study Director: Bayer Study Director Bayer
`
`F More Information
`Additional Information:
`
`Click here and search tor drug information provided by the FDA fl
`
`Click here and search tor intormation on any recalls market or product safety alerts by the FDA which might have occurred with this product fl
`
`Click here to find results tor studies related to marketed products w
`
`No publications provided
`
`Bayer Schering Pharma AG (Therapeutic Area Head }
`Responsible Party:
`91689, EurdaCT No.1 2007-000583—25
`Study ID Numbers:
`March 12, 2008
`Study First Received:
`July 3. 2009
`Last Updated:
`History of Changfi
`ClinicalTrials.gov ldentitier: NCTDOSSTBT?
`Health Authority:
`Switzerland: Ethikkommission
`
`Keywords provided by Bayer:
`Eye diseases
`Vision Impairment and Blindness
`Eyes and Vision
`
`Seniors
`NeovascularAge-Related Macular Degeneration {AMD}
`Retinal Disease
`
`Study placed in the tollowing topic categories:
`Eye Diseases
`Mitogens
`Retinal Degeneration
`Macular Degeneration
`Additional relevant MeSH terms:
`Growth Substances
`Macular Degeneration
`Eye Diseases
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`Pharmacologic Actions
`Retinal Degeneration
`Retinal Diseases
`ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on August 12, 2009
`CDnIflC‘I Help DESK
`LISICI HI” NEIIOI'IEII CCHICI TOY BIDITIDGICEII CDITII'flUI'IICalIDI'IS. Us. National Library 0‘ MEDICINE.
`U.S. National Institutes of Health. US. moment of Health & Human Sermons.
`
`Blindness
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Retinal Diseases
`Vision, Low
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 9
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 9
`
`

`

`
`USAgmr comgn: anacy. ACCESS-IDIIIIY. Freedom mlmormanonnct
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, |PR2021-00881
`Page 10
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 10
`
`

`

`https://web.archive.org/web/20090911163626/https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT005097
`95
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 11
`
`

`

`i-. n k‘-| r
`
`-. u: u | \ II
`
`Illllllllllllllllllllll
`
`
`
`httpswclinicaltrialsgovfthfshowfNCTOOSDQFSS
`
`
`
`
`21_cmu_
`1 Dec 26-05 — 23 Sec 2020
`
`
`
`
`ClinicalTrifllS.gov
`Home Search
`study Topics Glossary:
`Iservice ofthe us. National Institutes of Health
`[I Search I
`
`
`FU" TEXT View
`
`Tabular View
`
`No Study Results Posted
`
`Related Studies
`
`Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor(VEG F)Trap-Eye:lnvestigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular
`Degeneraticn(AMD) (VIEW 1)
`
`This study is currently recruiting participants.
`Verified by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. April 2009
`
`First Received: July 31. 200? Last Updated:April 28. 2009 History of Changfi
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`
`F Purpose
`This study is a phase III. double—masked. randomized. study of the efficacy and safety of VEGF Trap—Eye in patients with neovascular age—related macular degeneration. Approximately
`1200 patients will be randomized in the US and Canada.
`
`Mm—
`Macular Degeneration
`Drug: VEGF Trap—Eye
`Phase III
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`
`
`
`lnterventional
`Study Type:
`Study Design: Treatment. Randomized. Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver. Investigator. Outcomes Assessor). Active Control. Parallel Assignment. Safetyi'Efficacy Study
`
`Official Title:
`
`A Randomized. Double Masked. Active Controlled Phase III Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Doses of lntravitreal VEGF Trap in Subjects With
`NeovascularAge-Related Macular Degeneration
`
`Resource links provided by NLM:
`
`Genetics Home Reference related topics: X-linked juvenile retinoschisis
`
`MedlinePlus related topics: Macular Degeneration
`
`D_rug Information available for: Ranibizumab Aflibercem
`US FDA Resources
`
`Further study details as provided by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals:
`
`Primary Outcome Measures:
`. The proportion of subjects who maintain vision at Week 52. where a subject is classified as maintaining vision if the subject has lost fewer than 15 letters on the ETDRS
`chart compared to baseline {i.e. prevention of moderate vision loss} [Time Frame: Week 52 ][ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures:
`. Mean change from baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score at Week 52 [Time Frame: Week 52] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`. The proportion of subjects who gain at least 15 letters of vision at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`. Mean change from baseline in total NEI UFO—25 score at Week 52 [Time Frame: Week 52] [ Designated as safety issue: No]
`. Mean change from baseline in CNV area at Week 52 [ Time Frame: Week 52 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
`
`1200
`Estimated Enrollment:
`August 2007
`Study Start Date:
`December 2011
`Estimated Study Completion Date:
`Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
`
`Assigned Interventions
`
`1:
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`0.5 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but
`no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`than every 12 weeks.
`
`.
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks, but
`no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`.
`Experimental
`
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`2.0 mg VEGFTrap-Eye administered every 8 weeks [including one additional 2.0 mg dose at week 4) during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be
`administered as frequently as every 4 weeks. but no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`
`4: Active
`Comparator
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`0.5 mg administered every 4 weeks during the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as every 4 weeks. but no less frequently
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, lPR2021-00881
`Page 12
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 12
`
`

`

`' Eligibility
`
`Ages Eligible for Study:
`Genders Eligible for Study:
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
`Criteria
`
`lder
`
`50 Years and o
`Both
`No
`
`Key Inclusion Criteria:
`1. Signed Informed Consent.
`Men and women 2 50 years ot age.
`Active primary or recurrent subfoyeal CNV lesions secondary to AMD. including juxtafoyeal lesions that attect the foyea as eyid enced by FA in the study eye.
`ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity of: 20MB to 203320 [letter score ot 1’3 to 25) in the study eye.
`Willing, committed. and able to retu
`rn tor ALL clinic visits and complete all study—related procedures.
`Able to read. (or. if unable to read due to visual impairment. be read to verbatim by the person administering the informed consent or a family member. See Appendix J.4}
`understand and willing to sign the informed consent form.
`
`FENP'Q’N
`
`sheets—-
`99:4?“ Presence of retinal pigment epitheli
`
`Key Exclusion Criteria:
`. Any prior ocular [in the study eye] or systemic treatment or surgery for neoyascular AMD except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investig ational agent to treat neoyascular AMD in the study eye. except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`Any prior treatment with anti—VEGF
`agents in the study eye.
`Total lesion size > 12 disc areas {30.5 mm2. including blood. scars and neoyascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye.
`Subretinal hemorrhage that is either 50% or more of the total lesion area, or if the blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more disc areas in size in the study eye. (If the blood
`is under the foyea, then the tovea must be surrounded 2?!) degrees by visible CNV.)
`Scar or fibrosis. making up > 50% of total lesion in the study eye.
`Scar. tibrosis. or atrophy involving the center of the foyea.
`al tears or rips involving the macula in the study eye.
`within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 in the study eye.
`9. History at any vitreous hemorrhage
`10. Presence of other causes ot CNV in the study eye.
`11. History or clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy. diabetic macular edema or any other vascular disease affecting the retina.other than AMD. in either eye.
`12. Prior vitrectomy in the study eye.
`13. History at retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment in the study eye.
`14. Any history ot macular hole of stage 2 and above in the study eye.
`15. Any intraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months ot Day 1 on the study eye. except lid surgery. which may not have taken place within 1 month ot day 1, as long as its
`unlikely to interfere with the injection.
`
`> Contacts and Locations
`
`Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00509?95
`
`Contacts
`
`Contact: Regeneron
`
`866—549-3439 VlEW1study®rtp.ppdi.com
`
`fl Show 191 Study Locations
`Sponsors and Collaborators
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`Bayer
`
`Investigators
`Study Director: Avner lngerman, MD Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`
`> More Information
`
`No publications provided
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [ Dr. Ayner lngerman ]
`Responsible Party:
`VGFT—OD—0605
`Study ID Numbers:
`July 31, 200?
`Study First Received:
`April 28. 2009
`Last Updated:
`History of Changfi
`ClinicalTrialsgov ld entitier: NCT00509795
`Health Authority:
`United States: Food and Drug Administration: Canada: Health Canada
`
`Study placed in the tollowing topic categories:
`Eye Diseases
`Mitogens
`Retinal Degeneration
`Additional releyant MeSH terms:
`Growth Substances
`Eye Diseases
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`Retinal Degeneration
`
`Macular Degeneration
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Retinal Diseases
`
`Macular Degeneration
`Endothelial Growth Factors
`Pharmacologic Actions
`Retinal Diseases
`
`tember 11 _. 2009
`ClinicalTrialsgov processed this record on Sep
`
`
`Conlac‘t Help Desk
`LIsrcr Hlll Nallcnal ccnlcr tor Biomedical communications. 0.5. National Library or Medicine.
`U.S. National Il'lSlIlUIDS at Health. US. Dcpar‘n'ncnt of Health &. Human Sermons.
`USAgW ccmgnl. anacy. Accessmlllty. Freedom ct Intcrmatlcn Act
`
`E3
`dun-u.
`ewe NLM %
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, lPR2021-00881
`Page 13
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 13
`
`

`

` JURAT
`
`State/Commonwealth of _____________________
`
` City County of ______________________
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`On __________________, before me, _________________________________________ ,
`Date
`Notary Name
` the foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me by:
`
`________________________________________________________________________.
`Name of Affiant(s)
`
` Personally known to me -- OR --
`
` Proved to me on the basis of the oath of _____________________________ -- OR --
`Name of Credible Witness
` Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence: ________________________________
`Type of ID Presented
`
`WITNESS my hand and official seal.
`
`Notary Public Signature: _________________________
`
`Notary Name:__________________________________
`Notary Commission Number:______________________
`Notary Commission Expires:______________________
`Notarized online using audio-video communication
`
`DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
`
`Title or Type of Document: ____________________________________________________
`
`Document Date: ________________________________
`
`Number of Pages (including notarial certificate): _____________
`
`VIRGINIA
`
`Virginia Beach
`
`01/20/2021
`
`William Scott
`
`Duncan D Hall
`
`driver_license
`
`William Scott
`7897791
`01/31/2024
`
`Affidavit of Authenticity
`
`01/20/2021
`
`14
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1070
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket