throbber
USOO7300653B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Wiegand et al.
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 7,300,653 B2
`Nov. 27, 2007
`
`(54) METHOD OF TREATING CORNEAL
`TRANSPLANT REUECTION
`
`(75) Inventors: Stanley Wiegand, Croton on Hudon,
`NY (US); Jingtai Cao, Chappaqua, NY
`(US); Claus Cursiefen, Erlangen (DE)
`(73) Assignee: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`Tarrytown, NY (US)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 544 days.
`(21) Appl. No.: 10/830,902
`(22) Filed:
`Apr. 23, 2004
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2005/OOO4O27 A1
`Jan. 6, 2005
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(60) Provisional application No. 60/492.865, filed on Aug.
`6, 2003, provisional application No. 60/473,734, filed
`on May 28, 2003.
`
`(51) Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`A638/8
`(2006.01)
`C07K I4/7
`(2006.01)
`CI2N 5/62
`(52) U.S. Cl. ............................... 424/134.1; 424/192.1;
`514/2; 514/12:530/350,536/23.4
`(58) Field of Classification Search ..................... None
`See application file for complete search history.
`References Cited
`
`(56)
`
`2005/O1972.91 A1*
`2006/0172944 A1*
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`9/2005 Wiegand et al. .............. 514/12
`8/2006 Wiegand et al. .............. 514/12
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`3, 1999
`WO99/13909 A1
`WOOO,75319 A1 12/2000
`WOO3,O72O29 A2
`9, 2003
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Phillips, A.J. (2001). The challenge of gene therapy and DNA
`delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 53:1169-1174.*
`Stagner et al. (2004). Beta-cell sparing in transplanted islets by
`vascular endothelial growth factor. Transplant. Proc. 36:1178
`1180.*
`Yietal. (2007). VEGF gene therapy for the survival of transplanted
`fat tissue in nude mice. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 60:272
`2.78.*
`Paluet al. (1999). In pursuit of new developments for gene therapy.
`J. Biotechnol. 68:1–13.
`de Freitas et al. (2006). Causes and risk factors for graft failure in
`Surgeries performed by physicians in fellowship training. Cornea.
`25(3):251-256.*
`Yatoh, et al., TRANSPLANTATION, Vol. 66, No. 11, pp. 1519
`1524, (1998).
`Lai et al. Inhibition of Corneal Neovascularization by Recombinant
`Adenovirus Mediated Antisene VEGF RNA. (2002) Experimental
`Eye Research 75:625-634.
`* cited by examiner
`Primary Examiner Christine J. Saoud
`Assistant Examiner—Jon M Lockard
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Valeta Gregg, Esq.
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Methods of preventing, reducing, or treating corneal trans
`plant rejection to improve transplant Survival in a subject in
`need thereof comprising administering an agent capable of
`blocking or inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor
`(VEGF) are provided. The methods are useful for inhibiting
`or preventing corneal transplant rejection in a human Subject
`who is the recipient of a transplanted cornea.
`
`8 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1145
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 1
`
`

`

`US 7,300,653 B2
`
`1.
`METHOD OF TREATING CORNEAL
`TRANSPLANT REUECTION
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This application claims the benefit under 35 USC S 119(e)
`of U.S. Provisionals 60/473.734 filed 28 May 2003 and
`60/492.865 filed 6 Aug. 2003, which applications are herein
`specifically incorporated by reference in their entirety.
`
`10
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`The field of the invention is related to methods of using
`VEGF antagonists to reduce, prevent, or treat corneal trans
`plant rejection, thus improving long-term transplant Sur
`vival.
`2. Description of Related Art
`It has previously been reported that topical application of
`an anti-VEGF neutralizing antibody Suppresses acute
`allograft rejection in a rat corneal transplant model (Yatoh et
`al. (1998) Transplantation 66(11):1519-24).
`
`15
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`25
`
`2
`Subject in need of the agent is topical administration to the
`eye or Subconjunctival administration. Administration may
`occur prior to or following corneal transplantation, prefer
`ably following Surgery. Administration may also include a
`Second agent, such as an immunosuppressive agent.
`The subject to be treated is preferably a human subject
`who has or will receive a corneal transplant.
`In a second aspect, the invention features a method of
`preventing corneal transplant rejection in a Subject in need
`thereof, comprising administering to the Subject an agent
`capable of blocking, inhibiting, or ameliorating vascular
`endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated activity, such
`that corneal transplant rejection is prevented.
`In a third aspect, the invention features a method of
`reducing the incidence of corneal transplant rejection in a
`Subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the
`Subject an agent capable of blocking, inhibiting, or amelio
`rating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated
`activity, Such that the incidence of corneal transplant rejec
`tion is reduced.
`In a fourth related aspect, the invention features a method
`of treating corneal transplant rejection in a subject in need
`thereof, comprising administering to the Subject an agent
`capable of blocking, inhibiting, or ameliorating vascular
`endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated activity, such
`that corneal transplant rejection is treated.
`In a fifth aspect, the invention features a pharmaceutical
`composition comprising a VEGF antagonist, for example
`the VEGF trap VEGFR1R2-FcAC1(a), in a pharmaceuti
`cally acceptable carrier. Such pharmaceutical compositions
`may be liquid, gel, ointment, salve, slow release formula
`tions or other formulations suitable for ophthalmic admin
`istration.
`Other objects and advantages will become apparent from
`a review of the ensuing detailed description.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`Before the present methods are described, it is to be
`understood that this invention is not limited to particular
`methods, and experimental conditions described, as Such
`methods and conditions may vary. It is also to be understood
`that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of
`describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended
`to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will
`be limited only by the appended claims.
`As used in this specification and the appended claims, the
`singular forms “a”, “an', and “the include plural references
`unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus for
`example, a reference to “a method’ includes one or more
`methods, and/or steps of the type described herein and/or
`which will become apparent to those persons skilled in the
`art upon reading this disclosure and so forth.
`Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific
`terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly
`understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this
`invention belongs. Although any methods and materials
`similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used
`in the practice or testing of the present invention, the
`preferred methods and materials are now described. All
`publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by
`reference in their entirety.
`General Description
`Experiments were undertaken to evaluate occurrence and
`time course of hem- and lymphangiogenesis after normal
`risk corneal transplantation and to test whether pharmaco
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`The invention is based in part on the finding that admin
`istration of an agent capable of blocking or inhibiting
`vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) prevents corneas
`transplant rejection. The experiments, described below, con
`ducted in an animal model of corneal transplantation show
`that long-term transplant survival is promoted by blocking
`VEGF-mediated activity.
`In a first aspect, the invention features a method of
`improving transplant Survival in a subject in need thereof,
`comprising administering to the Subject an agent capable of
`blocking, inhibiting, or ameliorating vascular endothelial
`growth factor (VEGF)-mediated activity, such that trans
`plant Survival is improved.
`In specific embodiments, the agent capable of blocking,
`inhibiting, or ameliorating VEGF-mediated activity is a
`VEGF antagonist. The VEGFantagonist may be a polypep
`tide, an antibody, a small molecule, or a nucleic acid. More
`specifically, the VEGF antagonist includes a VEGF trap
`selected from the group consisting of acetylated Flt-1 (1-3)-
`Fc, Flt-1 (1-3-)-Fc, Flt-1 (1-3A)-Fc, Flt-1 (2-3A)-Fc, Flt
`1(2-3)-Fc, Flt-1D2-VEGFR3D3-FcAC1(a), Flt-1D2-Flk
`1D3-FcAC1(a), and VEGFR1R2-FcAC1(a). In a specific
`and preferred embodiment, the VEGF trap is VEGFR1R2
`FcAC1(a) (also termed VEGF trap) having the nucle
`50
`otide sequence set forth in SEQID NO: 1 and the amino acid
`sequence set forth in SEQID NO: 2. The invention encom
`passes the use of a VEGF trap that is at least 90%. 95%,
`98%, or at least 99% homologous with the nucleotide
`sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 and/or the amino acid
`sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2.
`In other embodiments, the agent capable of blocking,
`inhibiting, or ameliorating vascular endothelial growth fac
`tor (VEGF)-mediated activity is a nucleic acid-based
`antagonist capable of interfering with the expression of
`VEGF. A specific example of this embodiment is one in
`which the nucleic acid-based antagonist is an aptamer, an
`siRNA, or an antisense molecule.
`Administration of the agent may be by any method known
`in the art, including Subcutaneous, intramuscular, intrader
`mal, intraperitoneal, intravenous, intranasal, oral, or topical
`routes of administration. Preferable, administration to the
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1145
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 2
`
`

`

`3
`logic strategies inhibiting both processes improve long-term
`graft Survival. As described in the experimental section
`below, normal-risk allogeneic (C57BL/6 to BALB/c) and
`syngeneic (BALB/c to BALB/c) corneal transplantations
`were performed and occurrence and time course of hem- and
`lymphangiogenesis after keratoplasty was observed using
`double immunofluorescence of corneal flatmounts (with
`CD31 as panendothelial and LYVE-1 as lymphatic vascular
`endothelial specific marker). A molecular trap designed to
`eliminate VEGF-A (“VEGF Trap; 12.5 mg/kg) was
`tested for its ability to inhibit both processes after kerato
`plasty and to promote long-term graft Survival (intraperito
`neal injections on the day of Surgery and 3, 7, and 14 days
`later). The results show that no blood or lymph vessels were
`detectable immediately after normal-risk transplantation in
`either donor or host cornea, but hem- and lymphangiogen
`esis were clearly visible at day 3 after transplantation. Both
`vessel types reached donor tissue at one week after allo- and
`similarly after Syngeneic grafting. Early postoperative trap
`ping of VEGF-A significantly reduced both hem- and lym
`phangiogenesis and significantly improved long-term graft
`survival (78% versus 40%, p<0.05). There is concurrent,
`VEGF-A-dependent hem- and lymphangiogenesis after nor
`mal-risk keratoplasty within the preoperatively avascular
`recipient bed. Inhibition of hem- and lymphangiogenesis
`(which mediate the efferent and afferent arms of an immune
`response) after normal-risk corneal transplantation improves
`long-term graft Survival, establishing that early postopera
`tive hem- and lymphangiogenesis are risk factors for graft
`rejection even in low-risk eyes.
`Definitions
`By the term “therapeutically effective dose' is meant a
`dose that produces the desired effect for which it is admin
`istered. The exact dose will depend on the purpose of the
`treatment, and will be ascertainable by one skilled in the art
`using known techniques (see, for example, Lloyd (1999)
`The Art, Science and Technology of Pharmaceutical Com
`pounding).
`40
`By the term “blocker”, “inhibitor', or “antagonist' is
`meant a Substance that retards or prevents a chemical or
`physiological reaction or response. Common blockers or
`inhibitors include but are not limited to antisense molecules,
`antibodies, antagonists and their derivatives. More specifi
`45
`cally, an example of a VEGF blocker or inhibitor is a VEGF
`receptor-based antagonist including, for example, an anti
`VEGF antibody, or a VEGF trap such as VEGFR1R2
`FcAC1(a) (SEQID NOS:1-2). For a complete description of
`VEGF-receptor based antagonists including VEGFR1R2
`50
`FcAC1(a), see PCT publication WO/00/75319, the contents
`of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
`A “small molecule' is defined herein to have a molecular
`weight below about 500 Daltons, and may include chemical
`as well as peptide molecules.
`VEGF Antagonists
`In one aspect of the invention, VEGF-mediated activity is
`blocked or inhibited by the use of VEGF receptor-based
`blockers of VEGF-mediated activity. A non-limiting
`example of a VEGF receptor-based blocker includes, but is
`not limited to, VEGFR1R2-FcAC1(a). Other suitable recep
`tor-based blockers include acetylated Flt-1(1-3)-Fc, Flt-1 (1-
`3-)-Fc, Flt-1 (1-3A)-Fc, Flt-1 (2-3A)-Fc, Flt-1 (2-3)-Fc.
`Flt-1D2-VEGFR3D3-FcAC1(a), Flt-1D2-Flk-1D3-FcAC1
`65
`(a). For a complete description of these and other VEGF
`receptor-based blockers, including pegylated receptor-based
`
`30
`
`35
`
`55
`
`60
`
`US 7,300,653 B2
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`4
`blockers, see PCT Publication No. WO/00/75319, the con
`tents of which is incorporated in its entirety herein by
`reference.
`In addition to the VEGF receptor-based blockers
`described in PCT Publication No. WO/00/75319, variants
`and derivatives of such VEGF receptor-based blockers are
`also contemplated by the invention. The sequence of the
`variants or derivatives may differ by a change which is one
`or more additions, insertions, deletions and/or Substitutions
`of one or more nucleotides of the sequence set forth in SEQ
`ID NO:1. Changes to a nucleotide sequence may result in an
`amino acid change at the protein level, or not, as determined
`by the genetic code. Thus, nucleic acid according to the
`present invention may include a sequence different from the
`sequence shown in SEQID NO:1, yet encode a polypeptide
`with the same amino acid sequence as SEQID NO:2. On the
`other hand, the encoded polypeptide may comprise an amino
`acid sequence which differs by one or more amino acid
`residues from the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID
`NO:2. Nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide which is an
`amino acid sequence variant or derivative of the sequence
`shown in SEQ ID NO:2 is further provided by the present
`invention. Nucleic acid encoding Such a polypeptide may
`show at the nucleotide sequence and/or encoded amino acid
`level greater than about 90%. 95%, 98%, or 99% homology
`with the coding sequence shown in SEQID NO:1 and/or the
`amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2. For amino
`acid “homology', this may be understood to be similarity
`(according to the established principles of amino acid simi
`larity, e.g. as determined using the algorithm GAP (Genetics
`Computer Group, Madison, Wis.)) or identity. GAP uses the
`Needleman and Wunsch algorithm to align two complete
`sequences that maximizes the number of matches and mini
`mizes the number of gaps. Generally, the default parameters
`are used, with a gap creation penalty=12 and gap extension
`penalty-4.
`Individual components of the VEGF-specific fusion pro
`teins of the invention may be constructed by molecular
`biological methods known to the art with the instructions
`provided by the instant specification. These components are
`selected from a first cellular receptor protein, such as, for
`example, VEGFR1; a second cellular receptor protein, such
`as, for example, VEGFR2; a multimerizing component. Such
`as an Fc.
`Specific embodiments of the VEGF-specific fusion pro
`teins useful in the methods of the invention comprise a
`multimerizing component which allows the fusion proteins
`to associate, e.g., as multimers, preferably dimers. Prefer
`ably, the multimerizing component comprises an immuno
`globulin derived domain. Suitable multimerizing compo
`nents are sequences encoding an immunoglobulin heavy
`chain hinge region (Takahashi et al. 1982 Cell 29:671-679);
`immunoglobulin gene sequences, and portions thereof.
`The nucleic acid constructs encoding the fusion proteins
`useful in the methods of the invention are inserted into an
`expression vector by methods known to the art, wherein the
`nucleic acid molecule is operatively linked to an expression
`control sequence. Host-vector systems for the production of
`proteins comprising an expression vector introduced into a
`host cell suitable for expression of the protein are known in
`the art. The suitable host cell may be a bacterial cell such as
`E. coli, a yeast cell. Such as Pichia pastoris, an insect cell,
`Such as Spodoptera frugiperda, or a mammalian cell. Such as
`a COS, CHO, 293, BHK or NS0 cell.
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1145
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 3
`
`

`

`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`30
`
`Antisense Nucleic Acids
`In one aspect of the invention, VEGF-mediated activity is
`blocked or inhibited by the use of VEGF antisense nucleic
`acids. The present invention provides the therapeutic or
`prophylactic use of nucleic acids comprising at least six
`nucleotides that are antisense to a gene or cDNA encoding
`VEGF or a portion thereof. As used herein, a VEGF “anti
`sense' nucleic acid refers to a nucleic acid capable of
`hybridizing by virtue of some sequence complementarity to
`a portion of an RNA (preferably mRNA) encoding VEGF.
`The antisense nucleic acid may be complementary to a
`coding and/or noncoding region of an mRNA encoding
`VEGF. Such antisense nucleic acids have utility as com
`pounds that prevent VEGF expression, and can be used in
`the treatment or prevention of corneal transplant rejection.
`The antisense nucleic acids of the invention are double
`stranded or single-stranded oligonucleotides, RNA or DNA
`or a modification or derivative thereof, and can be directly
`administered to a cell or produced intracellularly by tran
`Scription of exogenous, introduced sequences.
`The VEGF antisense nucleic acids are of at least six
`nucleotides and are preferably oligonucleotides ranging
`from 6 to about 50 oligonucleotides. In specific aspects, the
`oligonucleotide is at least 10 nucleotides, at least 15 nucle
`otides, at least 100 nucleotides, or at least 200 nucleotides.
`The oligonucleotides can be DNA or RNA or chimeric
`mixtures or derivatives or modified versions thereof and can
`be single-stranded or double-stranded. In addition, the anti
`sense molecules may be polymers that are nucleic acid
`mimics, such as PNA, morpholino oligos, and LNA. Other
`types of antisence molecules include short double-stranded
`RNAs, known as siRNAs, and short hairpin RNAs, and long
`dsRNA (>50 bp but usually 2500 bp).
`Short Interfering RNAs
`In another embodiment, VEGF-mediated activity is
`blocked by blocking VEGF expression. One method for
`inhibiting VEGF expression is the use of short interfering
`RNA (siRNA) through RNA interference (RNAi) or post
`transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) (see, for example,
`40
`Ketting et al. (2001) Genes Develop. 15:2654-2659). siRNA
`molecules can target homologous mRNA molecules for
`destruction by cleaving the mRNA molecule within the
`region spanned by the siRNA molecule. Accordingly, siR
`NAS capable of targeting and cleaving homologous VEGF
`45
`mRNA are useful for treating, reducing or preventing cor
`neal transplant rejection.
`Inhibitory Ribozymes
`In aspect of the invention, corneal transplant rejection
`may be treated or prevented in a Subject Suffering from Such
`disease by decreasing the level of VEGF activity by using
`ribozyme molecules designed to catalytically cleave gene
`mRNA transcripts encoding VEGF, preventing translation of
`target gene mRNA and, therefore, expression of the gene
`product.
`55
`Ribozymes are enzymatic RNA molecules capable of
`catalyzing the specific cleavage of RNA. The mechanism of
`ribozyme action involves sequence-specific hybridization of
`the ribozyme molecule to complementary target RNA, fol
`lowed by an endonucleolytic cleavage event. The composi
`tion of ribozyme molecules must include one or more
`sequences complementary to the target gene mRNA, and
`must include the well known catalytic sequence responsible
`for mRNA cleavage. For this sequence, see, e.g., U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,093,246. While ribozymes that cleave mRNA at
`site-specific recognition sequences can be used to destroy
`mRNAs encoding VEGF, the use of hammerhead ribozymes
`
`50
`
`60
`
`65
`
`US 7,300,653 B2
`
`5
`
`6
`is preferred. Hammerhead ribozymes cleave mRNAs at
`locations dictated by flanking regions that form complemen
`tary base pairs with the target mRNA. The sole requirement
`is that the target mRNA has the following sequence of two
`bases: 5'-UG-3'. The construction and production of ham
`merhead ribozymes is well known in the art. The ribozymes
`of the present invention also include RNA endoribonu
`cleases (hereinafter “Cech-type ribozymes') such as the one
`that occurs naturally in Tetrahymena thermophila (known as
`the IVS, or L-19 IVS RNA). The Cech-type ribozymes have
`an eight base pair active site that hybridizes to a target RNA
`sequence where after cleavage of the target RNA takes
`place. The invention encompasses those Cech-type
`ribozymes that target eight base-pair active site sequences
`that are present in the gene encoding VEGF.
`Generation of Antibodies to VEGF Proteins
`In another aspect of the invention, the invention may be
`practiced with an anti-VEGF antibody or antibody fragment
`capable of binding and blocking VEGF activity. Anti-VEGF
`antibodies are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No.
`6,121,230, herein specifically incorporated by reference.
`The term “antibody” as used herein refers to a polypeptide
`comprising a framework region from an immunoglobulin
`gene or fragments thereof that specifically binds and recog
`nizes an antigen. The recognized immunoglobulin genes
`include the kappa, lambda, alpha, gamma, delta, epsilon, and
`mu constant regions, as well as the myriad immunoglobulin
`variable region genes. Light chains are classified as either
`kappa or lambda. Heavy chains are classified as gamma, mu,
`alpha, delta, or epsilon, which in turn define the immuno
`globulin classes, IgG, IgM, IgA, Ig), and IgE, respectively.
`Within each IgG class, there are different isotypes (eg. IgG,
`IgG, etc.). Typically, the antigen-binding region of an
`antibody will be the most critical in determining specificity
`and affinity of binding.
`Antibodies exist as intact immunoglobulins, or as a num
`ber of well-characterized fragments produced by digestion
`with various peptidases. For example, pepsin digests an
`antibody below the disulfide linkages in the hinge region to
`produce F(ab)', a dimer of Fab which itself is a light chain
`joined to V-C1 by a disulfide bond. The F(ab)' may be
`reduced under mild conditions to break the disulfide linkage
`in the hinge region, thereby converting the F(ab)' dimer into
`an Fab' monomer. The Fab' monomer is essentially Fab with
`part of the hinge region. While various antibody fragments
`are defined in terms of the digestion of an intact antibody,
`one of skill will appreciate that such fragments may be
`synthesized de novo either chemically or by using recom
`binant DNA methodology. Thus, the terms antibody, as used
`herein, also includes antibody fragments either produced by
`the modification of whole antibodies, or those synthesized
`de novo using recombinant DNA methodologies (e.g., single
`chain Fv)(scFv) or those identified using phase display
`libraries (see, for example, McCafferty et al. (1990) Nature
`348:552-554).
`Methods for preparing antibodies are known to the art.
`See, for example, Kohler & Milstein (1975) Nature 256:
`495-497; Harlow & Lane (1988) Antibodies: a Laboratory
`Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Lab., Cold Spring Harbor,
`N.Y.). The genes encoding the heavy and light chains of an
`antibody of interest can be cloned from a cell, e.g., the genes
`encoding a monoclonal antibody can be cloned from a
`hybridoma and used to produce a recombinant monoclonal
`antibody. Gene libraries encoding heavy and light chains of
`monoclonal antibodies can also be made from hybridoma or
`plasma cells. Random combinations of the heavy and light
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1145
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 4
`
`

`

`US 7,300,653 B2
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`7
`chain gene products generate a large pool of antibodies with
`different antigenic specificity. Techniques for the production
`of single chain antibodies or recombinant antibodies (U.S.
`Pat. No. 4,946,778; U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567) can be adapted
`to produce antibodies used in the fusion proteins and meth
`ods of the instant invention. Also, transgenic mice, or other
`organisms such as other mammals, may be used to express
`human or humanized antibodies. Alternatively, phage dis
`play technology can be used to identify antibodies and
`heteromeric Fab fragments that specifically bind to selected
`antigens.
`Antibody Screening and Selection
`Screening and selection of preferred antibodies can be
`conducted by a variety of methods known to the art. Initial
`screening for the presence of monoclonal antibodies specific
`to a target antigen may be conducted through the use of
`ELISA-based methods, for example. A secondary screen is
`preferably conducted to identify and select a desired mono
`clonal antibody for use in construction of the multi-specific
`fusion proteins of the invention. Secondary screening may
`be conducted with any suitable method known to the art.
`One preferred method, termed “Biosensor Modification
`Assisted Profiling” (“BiaMAP) is described in co-pending
`U.S. Ser. No. 60/423,017 filed 1 Nov. 2002, herein specifi
`25
`cally incorporated by reference in its entirety. BiaMAP
`allows rapid identification of hybridoma clones producing
`monoclonal antibodies with desired characteristics. More
`specifically, monoclonal antibodies are sorted into distinct
`epitope-related groups based on evaluation of antibody:
`antigen interactions.
`Treatment Population
`A suitable subject for treatment by the method of the
`invention is a human who has received or will receive a
`corneal transplant. Corneal transplantation is the oldest,
`most successful and most commonly performed tissue trans
`plantation, with nearly 40,000 transplantations a year alone
`in the US. When corneal grafts are placed into an avascular
`recipient bed (so-called normal-risk keratoplasty), 2-year
`graft survival rates approach 90% under cover of topical
`steroids, even without HLA-matching. This very successful
`outcome is attributed to corneal immune privilege, i.e. the
`phenomenon of Suppressed corneal inflammation induced
`by an array of endogenous mechanisms downregulating
`alloimmune and inflammatory responses in the cornea and
`its bed. These mechanisms include the lack of both afferent
`lymphatic and efferent blood vessels in the normal-risk
`recipient cornea, lack of MHC II antigen presenting cells
`(APCs), FASL-expression on corneal epithelium and endot
`helium, and the anterior chamber associated immune privi
`lege (ACAID) directed at graft antigens etc. (Streilein et al.
`(1999) Transplant Proc. 31:1472-1475).
`In contrast, Survival rates of cornea grafts placed into
`vascularized, not immune-privileged recipient beds (so
`called high-risk keratoplasty) drop significantly to below
`50% (even with local and systemic immune Suppression).
`Pre-existing corneal stromal blood vessels have been iden
`tified as strong risk factors for immune rejection after
`corneal transplantation, both in the clinical setting as well as
`in the well-defined mouse model of corneal transplantation
`(Sano et al. (1995) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36:2176
`85). Recently, in addition to blood vessels, biomicroscopi
`cally undetectable lymphatic vessels have been found in
`association with blood vessels in vascularized high-risk
`human corneas (Cursiefen et al. (2003) Cornea. 22:273-81)
`and it is likely that corneal lymphatic vessels enable effec
`tive access of donor and host APCs and antigenic material to
`
`35
`
`8
`regional lymph nodes where accelerated sensitisation to
`graft antigens occurs (Liu et al. (2002) J. Exp. Med. 195:
`259-68) even in the normal-risk setting (with a preopera
`tively avascular recipient bed), where mild corneal heman
`giogenesis develops after keratoplasty. Outgrowth of new
`blood vessels from the limbal arcade towards the graft can
`be observed within the first postoperative year in about 50%
`of patients undergoing normal-risk keratoplasty, and in 10%
`of patients these new blood vessels even reach the interface
`or invade donor tissue (Cursiefen et al. (2001) Graefes Arch.
`clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 39:514-21) at corneal suture sites,
`and then proceed centrally.
`Methods of Administration
`The invention provides methods of treatment comprising
`administering to a subject an effective amount of an agent of
`the invention. In a preferred aspect, the agent is substantially
`purified (e.g., Substantially free from Substances that limit its
`effect or produce undesired side-effects). The subject is
`preferably an animal, e.g., Such as cows, pigs, horses,
`chickens, cats, dogs, etc., and is preferably a mammal, and
`most preferably human.
`Various delivery systems are known and can be used to
`administer an active agent of the invention, e.g., delivery
`systems Suitable for topical administration, preferably topi
`cal administration directly to the eye, or Subconjunctival
`administration, as well as other delivery systems such as
`those that utilize encapsulation in liposomes, microparticles,
`microcapsules, recombinant cells capable of expressing the
`compound, receptor-mediated endocytosis (see, e.g., Wu
`and Wu, 1987, J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432), construction
`of a nucleic acid as part of a retroviral or other vector, etc.
`Methods of introduction are preferably topical or subcon
`junctival, but may be enteral or parenteral including but are
`not limited to intradermal, intramuscular, intraperitoneal,
`intravenous, Subcutaneous, intranasal, and oral routes. The
`active agents may be administered by any convenient route,
`for example by absorption through epithelial (e.g. topical
`administration to the eye) or mucocutaneous linings (e.g.,
`oral mucosa, intestinal mucosa, etc.) or infusion or bolus
`injection, and may be administered together with other
`biologically active agents. Administration can be systemic
`or local. Administration can be acute or chronic (e.g. daily,
`weekly, monthly, etc.) or in combination or alteration with
`other agents. Pulmonary administration can also be
`employed, e.g., by use of an inhaler or nebulizer, and
`formulation with an aerosolizing agent.
`In another embodiment, the active agent can be delivered
`in a vesicle, in particular a liposome (see Langer (1990)
`Science 249:1527-1533). In yet another embodiment, the
`active agent can be delivered in a controlled release system.
`In one embodiment, a pump may be used (see Langer (1990)
`Supra). In another embodiment, polymeric materials can be
`used (see Howard et al. (1989) J. Neurosurg. 71:105). In
`another embodiment where the active agent of the invention
`is a nucleic acid encoding a protein, the nucleic acid can be
`administered in vivo to promote expression of its encoded
`protein, by constructing it as part of an appropriate nucleic
`acid expression vector and administering it so that it
`becomes intracellular, e.g., by use of a retroviral vector (see,
`for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,980.286), or by direct injection,
`or by use of microparticle bombardment (e.g., a gene gun;
`Biolistic, Dupont), or coating with lipids or cell-surface
`receptors or transfecting agents, or by administering it in
`linkage to a homeobox-like peptide which is known to enter
`the nucleus (see e.g., Joliot et al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. USA 88:1864-1868), etc. Alternatively, a nucleic acid
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1145
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 5
`
`

`

`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`can be introduced intracellularly and incorporated within
`host cell DNA for expression, by homologous recombina
`tion.
`In a specific embodiment, it may be desirable to admin
`ister the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention
`locally to the area in need of treatment; this may be
`achieved, for example, and not by way of limitation, by
`topical administration, Subconjunctival administration, local
`infusion during Surgery, e.g., by injection, by means of a
`catheter, or by means of an implant, said implant being of a
`10
`porous, non-porous, or gelatinous material, includin

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket