throbber
4/7/22, 12:13 PM
`
`ASRS Fights Novitas Decision to Interpret Eylea Usage More Frequently than qS as Off Label - The American Society of Retina Specialists
`
`Contact Us THOMAS ALBINI Sign Out
`
`AS RS American Society of
`
`Retina Specialists
`
`El V
`
`You
`ühe
`
`Clinical Updates - Clinical Updates
`
`ASRS Fights Novitas Decision to Interpret Eylea Usage
`More Frequently than q8 as "Off Label"
`
`ASRS is fighting a recent decision by Novitas Solutions, a Medicare Administrator Contractor, to
`interpret the Aflibercept (Eylea) FDA label as to not cover Eylea use more frequently than 8 weeks
`after the initial load. This interpretation came to our attention as a result of a Medicare utilization
`audit in which Novitas indicated that it is seeking recoupment of reimbursement for Eylea doses that
`it deems as "off label" under this definition.
`
`The current FDA label states the following:
`
`"The recommended dose for EYLEA is 2 mg (0.05 mL) administered by intravitreal injection every 4
`weeks (monthly) for the first 3 months, followed by 2 m (0.05 mL) via intravitreal injection once
`every 8 weeks (2 months). Although EYLEA may be dosed as frequently as 2 mg every 4 weeks
`(monthly), additional efficacy was not demonstrated when EYLEA was dosed every 4 weeks
`compared to every 8 weeks."
`
`ASRS Board member, David Brown, discussed this issue with Wiley Chambers, Deputy Director for
`the Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology at the FDA, and was assured that it was not the
`intention of the FDA label to restrict Eylea use to every 8 weeks, and the label was specifically
`designed to permit monthly dosing in patients. ASRS is trying to coordinate a meeting between the
`FDA and CMS to resolve the misinterpretation.
`
`In the meantime, Regeneron is aware of the situation and has submitted a revised label to the FDA
`for clarification. A response is expected shortly.
`
`Please contact the ASRS if you are being audited for "off label" use of Eylea.
`
`(Posted May 24,2016)
`
`EXHIBIT
`
`10
`BROWN
`April 26, 2022
`
`1/2
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1139
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 1
`
`

`

`4/7/22,12:13 PM
`
`ASRS Fights Novitas Decision to Interpret Eylea Usage More Frequently than qS as Off Label - The American Society of Retina Specialists
`
`Home Clinical Education Publications Annual Meeting Practice Advocacy Sections
`Patients Member Services
`
`FIND A RETINA SPECIALIST RETINA CAREER CENTER ABOUT ASRS FOUNDATION CORPORATE JOIN
`THEASRS SIGNIN
`
`AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RETINA SPECIALISTS
`
`20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 2030, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 578-8760 phone info@asrs.org
`
`c 2022 T American Soo v n ieunn Spnc.iaUsts A/ nThrs re .?rvecL Privacy statement. Terms of use
`
`2/2
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1139
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00881
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket