throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00881
`Patent 9,254,338 B2
`
`
`PETITIONER’S IDENTIFICATION OF STATEMENTS SUPPORTED BY
`OBJECTED TO REFERENCES IN PATENT OWNER RESPONSES
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2021-00881
`
`In accordance with the Board’s order during the teleconference held on
`
`February 23, 2022, Petitioner hereby submits this chart to identify statements in
`
`Patent Owner’s Responses supported by references that Petitioner objects to for non-
`
`compliance with 37 CFR § 42.6(a)(3) and/or 37 CFR § 42.24(b)(2). (Ex. 1100,
`
`Transcript of Teleconference Proceedings held on February 23, 2022, at 16:22-19:1).
`
`Statement Location
`
`IPR2021-00881
`Patent No. 9,254,338:
`• Paper 40, Patent
`Owner Response, filed
`February 11, 2022
`(“POR”).
`• Section VIII.B. (Paper
`40 at 58-62, entitled
`“Objective Evidence
`Confirms the Non-
`Obviousness of the
`Claimed Dosing
`Regimen”).
`
`IPR2021-00881
`Patent No. 9,254,338:
`• Paper 40, POR.
`• Section I. (Paper 40
`at 1-3, entitled
`“Introduction”).
`
`Objected to References
`(37 CFR § 42.6(a)(3))
`
`Word Count of Objected
`to References
`(37 CFR § 42.24(b)(2))
`
`Ex.2051, Do Declaration
`¶¶98-133, 135-170
`
`
`Ex.2051, ¶¶98-133 and
`135-170 account for 6071
`additional words.
`
`Ex.2052, Manning
`Declaration ¶¶29-42
`
`
`Ex.2052, ¶¶29-42
`account for 2436
`additional words;
`Ex.2052, ¶¶29-42 further
`cite 12 pages of
`appendices and 385
`pages of exhibits.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Statement Location
`
`Objected to References
`(37 CFR § 42.6(a)(3))
`
`Ex.2052, Manning
`Declaration ¶¶48-117
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00881
`
`Word Count of Objected
`to References
`(37 CFR § 42.24(b)(2))
`
`Ex.2052, ¶¶48-117
`account for 12,500
`additional words
`Ex.2052, ¶¶48-117
`further cite 138 pages of
`appendices and 27,861
`pages of exhibits.
`
`IPR2021-00881
`Patent No. 9,254,338:
`• Paper 40, POR
`• Section VIII.B. (Paper
`40 at 58-62, entitled
`“Objective Evidence
`Confirms the Non-
`Obviousness of the
`Claimed Dosing
`Regimen”).
`
`IPR2021-00881
`Patent No. 9,254,338:
`• Paper 40, POR, filed
`February 11, 2022.
`• Section VIII.B. (Paper
`40 at 58-62, entitled
`“Objective Evidence
`Confirms the Non-
`Obviousness of the
`Claimed Dosing
`Regimen”).
`
`Ex.2050, Brown
`Declaration ¶¶150-181
`
`
`
`Ex.2050, ¶¶150-181
`account for 2,757
`additional words.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2021-00881
`
`Word Count of Objected
`to References
`(37 CFR § 42.24(b)(2))
`
`Patent Owner’s Claim
`Construction arguments
`for IPR2021-00881 are
`found on pages 7-24
`(Section IV) of its POR.
`(IPR2021-00881, Paper
`40 at 7-24).
`PO’s objected to
`reference accounts for
`4222 additional words.
`
`Statement Location
`
`Objected to References
`(37 CFR § 42.6(a)(3))
`
`IPR2021-00880
`Patent No. 9,669,069:
`• Paper 39, POR.
`• Section IV. (Paper 39
`at 7-9, entitled “Claim
`Construction”).
`
`CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION
`Patent Owner states that
`it “does not advance
`claim construction
`positions” in this matter,
`IPR2021-00880.
`(IPR2021-00880, Paper
`39 at 8).
`In footnote, Patent
`Owner states that “if the
`Board decides to construe
`‘method of treating’ or
`‘tertiary dose’ in this
`IPR,” then the Board
`should do so consistent
`with Patent Owner’s
`arguments set forth in its
`POR for IPR2021-
`00881. (IPR2021-00880,
`Paper 39 at 8, fn. 5).
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Dated: February 28, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00881
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`
`/Paul J. Molino/
`Paul J. Molino
`Registration No. 45,350
`6 West Hubbard Street
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone:
`(312) 222-6300
`Facsimile:
`(312) 843-6260
`paul@rmmslegal.com
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2021-00881
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`Petitioner’s Identification Of Statements Supported By Objected To References In
`
`Patent Owner Responses was served on February 28, 2022, via electronic mail by
`
`agreement of the parties, to the following counsel for record of Patent Owners:
`
`Deborah E. Fishman (Reg. No. 48,621)
`David A. Caine (Reg. No. 52,683)
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`Five Palo Alto Square, Suite 500
`Palo Alto, California 94306-3807
`Telephone: 650.319.4519
`Telephone: 650.319.4710
`Facsimile: 650.319.4573
`Deborah.Fishman@arnoldporter.com
`David.Caine@arnoldporter.com
`RegeneronEyleaIPRs@arnoldporter.com
`
`Daniel Reisner
`Matthew M. Wilk
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`250 West 55th Street
`New York, New York 10019-9710
`Telephone: 212.836.8000
`Fax: 212.836.8689
`Daniel.Reisner@arnoldporter.com
`Matthew.Wilk@arnoldporter.com
`
`Dated: February 28, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`Alice S. Ho (Lim. Rec. No. L1162)
`Victoria Reines
`Jeremy Cobb
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`601 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
`Washington D.C. 20001
`Tel: 202.942.5000
`Fax: 202.942.5999
`Alice.Ho@arnoldporter.com
`Victoria.Reines@arnoldporter.com
`Jeremy.Cobb@arnoldporter.com
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`
`/Paul J. Molino/
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket