throbber

`
`SESSION @ TREATMENT OF AMD 2005 Monday 10:30 am - 1:00 pm
`
`I2;29 pm
`Intravitreal Ranibizumab (Lucentis™) with
`Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration: Year One Results
`Jeffrey S. Heier, MD (Boston, MA)* FOCUS Study Group
`PURPOSE Lucentis™ (ranibizumab) is a humanized
`antibody fragment(Fab) that binds to and inactivates
`all active forms of VEGF. VEGF has been implicated in
`the pathogenesis of neovascular age-related macular
`degeneration (AMD).
`The primary objectives of the FOCUS study were to
`investigate the safety and tolerability of ranibizumab
`when administered as multiple intravitreal injections in
`combination with verteporfin photodynamic therapy
`(PDT), and to assess the effect of ranibizumab on visual
`loss from baseline.
`
`
`
`
`
`METHODS This was a Phase I/II, multicenter, single-
`masked, sham injection-controlled study ofintravitreally
`administered ranibizumab in subjects with primary or
`recurrent subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV)
`secondary to AMD with investigator-determined pre-
`dominantly classic lesions. From April 2003 to January
`2004, participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to
`receive either 0.5 mg of ranibizumab or a sham injection
`monthly for 2 years in combination with PDT. Subjects
`received verteporfin PDT 7 days priorto thefirst admin-
`istration of study drug (ranibizumab or sham) and every
`3 months thereafter if deemed necessary by the inves-
`tigator and in accordance with product labeling. Study
`drug was held if a PDT treatment was administered
`within 1 week prior to scheduled injection.
`
`
`
`The primary safety and tolerability outcome measures
`are the incidence and severity of adverse events and the
`incidence of positive serum antibodiesto ranibizumab.
`The primary efficacy endpointis the proportion of
`subjects who at 12 months havelost <15 letters from
`baseline in best corrected visual acuity score assessed
`using an ETDRSchart.
`RESULTS Of 162 patients randomized (106 to ranibizumab,
`56 to sham injection), 76 (46.9%) were men and 86
`(53.1%) were women; 99% were Caucasian. Mean (SD)
`age was 74.1 (7.8) years (range, 50-93 years). At the time
`of abstract submission, 1-year results were not available,
`but will be presented at this meeting.
`
`CONCLUSION Thesafety,tolerability, and efficacy of
`ranibizumab administered as monthly intravitreal
`injections for 1 year in subjects in combination with
`verteporfin PDT in predominantly classic subfoveal
`
`neovascular AMDwill be reported.
`
`94 Scientific Paper Abstracts
`
`Exhibit 2100
`
`Page 01 of 01
`
`_—
`
`oo)=|sjrE
`
`oF
`
`7 7
`
`LY
`
`EE
`
`
`
`1 f
`
`T = i
`
`r"
`{
`
`Ta
`
`r
`
`ree
`
`
`
`12:36 pm
`OCT Imaging of Neovascular
`AMDPatients Treated with Ranibizumab
`(Lucentis”): The PrONTO Study
`Anne E. Fung, MD (Miami, FL)* Philip J. Rosenfeld, MD, PhD (Miami,
`FL)* Carmen A.Puliafito, MD (Miami, FL)* Stephan Michels, MD
`(Vienna, Austria)* Anna 5. Venkatraman, MS (Miami, FL)
`
`
`
`PURPOSE Ranibizumab (Lucentis™) is an anti-VEGF
`antibody fragment that binds andinhibitsall known
`biologically active isoforms andproteolytic fragments of
`vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In PhaseI/II
`studies, monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab
`were well tolerated and associated with improvedvisual
`acuity (VA), decreased optical coherence tomography
`(OCT) central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements,
`and diminished or absentfluorescein angiographic
`leakage from choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in
`patients with age-related macular degeneration
`(AMD). PhaseIII trials with ranibizumab are currently
`underway. To determine the time-course and duration
`for the decrease in CRT and the improvement in VA
`following intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, we are
`performinga single-site, FDA-reviewed, investigator
`sponsoredtrial at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
`known as the Prospective OCT Imaging of Patients with
`
`Neovascular AMDTreated with Intra-Ocular Lucentis
`(PrONTO) Study.
`METHODS 40 AMDpatients with subfoveal CNV and OCT
`CRT measurements of at least 300 micronsare being
`enrolled in this prospective, open-label, uncontrolled
`clinical study. Each patient receives 3 consecutive
`monthly injections of ranibizumab (500 pg) in their
`study eye with subsequentinjections performed only
`if an increase in OCT CRTis observed. Duringthefirst
`2 months, OCT CRT measurements are obtained at
`baseline and on post-injection days 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, and 30.
`EDTRSvisual acuities are obtained at baseline and on
`post-injection days 14, 30, 45, 60, and 90.
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2100
`
`Mylan v. Regeneron
`IPR2021-00881
`U.S. Pat. 9,254,338
`
`* Financial interest disclosed
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2100
`Page 01 of 01
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket