`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner
`v.
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2021-00880
`Patent No. 9,669,069 B2
`_______________
`
`DECLARATION OF DANIEL L. REISNER
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 2045
`Page 01 of 04
`
`
`
`I, Daniel L. Reisner, do hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the New York Bar, to which I
`
`was admitted on May 1995.
`
`2.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`
`(“Arnold & Porter”). I began working at Kaye Scholer LLP in September 1994
`
`and at the combined firm Arnold & Porter upon the merger with Kaye Scholer LLP
`
`in 2017. I have litigated patent cases for 23 years, including numerous
`
`pharmaceutical-related patent cases, and have regularly been counsel of record in
`
`patent cases during this time. See, e.g., G.D. Searle LLC v. Lupin
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:13cv121 (E.D. Va.); Pfizer, Inc. et al. v.
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 07-1271 (Fed. Cir.); University Of Rochester
`
`v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., No. 03-1304 (Fed. Cir.).
`
`3.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied.
`
`5.
`
`I have had no sanctions or contempt citations imposed against me
`
`by any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.
`
`2
`
`Exhibit 2045
`Page 02 of 04
`
`
`
`7.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`I have applied to appear pro hac vice in the following proceedings
`
`before the USPTO: IPR2018-00156, IPR2018-00002, IPR2017-02105,
`
`IPR2017-02106, IPR2017-01987, IPR2017-01988, IPR2017-01823, and
`
`IPR2017-01824. The USPTO granted my pro hac vice application in IPR2017-
`
`02105 and IPR2017-02106.
`
`9.
`
`Deborah E. Fishman (Reg. No. 48,621) and Alice S. Ho (Lim. Rec.
`
`No. L1162) are experienced registered patent attorneys with whom I have
`
`worked closely and will continue to do so.
`
`10.
`
`I have significant familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding and have substantive knowledge of the patent at issue (U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,669,069 (the “’069 Patent”) by virtue of my preparation for this
`
`proceeding. I have been working on issues related to the ’069 Patent and Patent
`
`Owner’s commercial product, Eylea® over the last year, and was substantively
`
`involved in the preparation of the Patent Owner Preliminary Response.
`
`Therefore, I have a substantial familiarity with the subject matter of this
`
`proceeding.
`
`3
`
`Exhibit 2045
`Page 03 of 04
`
`
`
`11.
`
`I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
`
`United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that all
`
`statements made of my own knowledge are true and that all statements made on
`
`information and belief are believed to be true. I understand that willful false
`
`statements are punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. See 18 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1001.
`
`Dated: November 22, 2021
`
`/s/ Daniel L. Reisner
`Daniel L. Reisner
`
`4
`
`Exhibit 2045
`Page 04 of 04
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
