throbber
Plant, Cell and Environment (2007) 30, 1269–1283
`
`doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01701.x
`
`Increase in respiratory cost at high growth temperature is
`attributed to high protein turnover cost in
`Petunia ¥ hybrida petals
`
`TAKUSHI HACHIYA1,2, ICHIRO TERASHIMA2 & KO NOGUCHI2
`
`1Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka,
`Osaka, 560-0043 and 2Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo,
`Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`It is widely believed that turnover of nitrogenous (N) com-
`pounds (especially proteins) incurs a high respiratory cost.
`Thus, if protein turnover costs change with temperature, this
`would influence the dependence of respiration rate on
`growth temperature. Here, we examined the extent to which
`protein turnover cost explained differences in N-utilization
`costs (nitrate uptake/reduction, ammonium assimilation,
`amino acid and protein syntheses, protein turnover and
`amino acid export) and in respiration rate with changes in
`growth temperature. By measurements and literature data,
`we evaluated each N-utilization cost in Petunia ¥ hybrida
`petals grown at 20, 25 or 35 °C throughout their whole
`lifespans. Protein turnover cost accounted for 73% of the
`integrated N-utilization cost on a whole-petal basis at 35 °C.
`The difference in this cost on a dry weight basis between
`25 and 35 °C accounted for 75% of the difference in
`N-utilization cost and 45% of the difference in respiratory
`cost. The cost of nitrate uptake/reduction was high at low
`growth temperatures. We concluded that respiratory cost in
`petals was strongly influenced by protein turnover and
`nitrate uptake/reduction, and on the shoot basis, C invest-
`ment in biomass was highest at 25 °C.
`
`Key-words: nitrate reduction.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`including nitrate/
`Nitrogen (N) utilization processes,
`ammonium uptake, nitrate reduction, ammonium assimila-
`tion, amino acid synthesis, protein synthesis, protein
`turnover and amino acid export, incur large respiratory
`costs in plants (Penning de Vries, Brunsting & van Laar
`1974; Zerihun, McKenzie & Morton 1998). Among these
`processes, nitrate reduction and ammonium assimilation
`are thought to consume high respiratory costs. In fact, the
`form of N source (e.g. nitrate or ammonium) greatly influ-
`ences estimates of construction respiration (McDermitt &
`Loomis 1981; Williams et al. 1987). On the other hand,
`
`Correspondence: T. Hachiya. Fax: +81-3-5841-4465;
`takushi@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
`
`e-mail:
`
`© 2007 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`maintenance respiration rates are often correlated with
`protein content, suggesting that protein turnover cost domi-
`nates maintenance respiration (Penning de Vries 1975;
`Amthor 1989; Lambers, Chapin & Pons 1998). The cost of
`amino acid export during senescence is also claimed to be
`substantial (Dangl, Dietrich & Thomas 2000). Because
`these processes consume large respiratory costs, these pro-
`cesses would influence plant growth and production.Thus, it
`is important
`to assess the costs of
`these respective
`N-utilization processes and their responses to environmen-
`tal factors, including growth temperature.
`On the basis of data from the literature, Zerihun et al.
`(1998) calculated the total respiratory cost of N-utilization
`processes (N-utilization cost) in bean leaves.They suggested
`that protein turnover cost dominates the N-utilization cost.
`However, their calculation was based on data on protein
`turnover rates in several plant species grown under different
`conditions. Moreover, these plant materials were at various
`developmental stages, and protein turnover rate is known to
`differ markedly depending on the developmental stage
`(Mae, Makino & Ohira 1983; Barneix et al. 1988; Bouma
`et al. 1994). Therefore, their calculation would have been
`inaccurate, although the approach was valid.
`Growth temperature greatly influences plant respiration.
`This is because growth temperature changes substrate avail-
`ability and/or demand for ATP (Bunce 2004; Atkin, Scheur-
`water & Pons 2006). Generally, the specific maintenance
`respiration rate increases with increasing growth tempera-
`ture, whereas specific construction respiration is affected
`little (Amthor 1989; Marcelis & Baan Hofman-Eijer 1995;
`Van Iersel 2003,2006).Interestingly,the half-life of protein in
`wheat roots decreases with increasing temperature because
`of activity of the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway (Ferguson,
`Guikema & Paulsen 1990). This indicates that the protein
`turnover rate increases with temperature.
`All of these studies indicate that protein turnover cost is
`a major component of the N-utilization cost and is likely to
`increase with growth temperature. Our aims here were to
`estimate the costs of the respective N-utilization processes –
`especially that of protein turnover – and to examine the
`effects of growth temperature on these costs. The quantita-
`tive understanding of these components of respiratory costs
`
`1269
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2016
`Page 01 of 15
`
`

`

`1270 T. Hachiya et al.
`
`will provide us the information to improve plant growth
`and productivity.
`Growth temperature generally changes not only the spe-
`cific maintenance respiration rate, but the lifespans of plant
`organs (Kikuzawa 1995; Forbes, Black & Hooker 1997).
`Therefore, it is difficult to estimate the protein turnover cost
`from data on one developmental stage of an organ, and
`analyses that cover the whole lifespan of the organ are
`preferable. We estimated each of the N-utilization costs in
`petals of Petunia ¥ hybrida grown at one of three tempera-
`tures throughout their lifespans. Petals are useful materials,
`because they have shorter lifespans than leaves and it is
`easy to determine their developmental stages. Moreover,
`most petals are non-photosynthetic, and therefore ATP and
`reducing equivalents are supplied mainly from the respira-
`tory pathway.
`To calculate the costs of nitrate/ammonium uptake,
`nitrate reduction, ammonium assimilation, amino acid and
`protein syntheses, and amino acid transport, we used the
`specific costs of these respective processes in the literature
`(De Visser, Spitters & Bouma 1992; Boorer & Fischer 1997;
`Zerihun et al. 1998; Amthor 2000; Dangl et al. 2000), and
`multiplied these specific costs by actual changes in the
`amounts of amino acids and proteins. The cost of protein
`turnover was estimated by using cycloheximide (CHI), an
`inhibitor of cytosolic protein synthesis, according to Bouma
`et al. (1994). On the basis of the data obtained, we discuss
`the contribution of protein turnover cost to N-utilization
`cost and respiration rate. We also evaluated the effects of
`different N sources on estimates of N-utilization cost. Fur-
`thermore, we calculated the biomass C, N-utilization cost
`and respiratory cost to the petals on one shoot over 90 d,
`and we discuss the changes in N-utilization cost and in C
`investment in petal biomass with growth temperature. Our
`precise estimations clarified that
`the costs of nitrate
`reduction/uptake and protein turnover were large, and that
`the growth temperature intensively influenced these costs.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Plant materials and growth conditions
`
`We used Petunia ¥ hybrida cv. Surfinia ‘White Vein’ (Suntry
`flowers, Tokyo, Japan). We purchased seedlings and
`removed the shoots other than the main one. We then cul-
`tivated the seedlings in vermiculite in pots (diameter,
`10.5 cm; depth, 17.5 cm; one seedling per pot). We placed
`the pots in a growth chamber (Biotron, Nippon Medical &
`Chemical Instruments Co., Osaka, Japan). Light was sup-
`plied by a bank of cool-white fluorescent tubes. The photo-
`synthetically active photon flux density (PPFD) was ca.
`450 mmol m-2 s-1. The air temperature was 20, 25 or 35 °C,
`relative humidity was 55%, and day length was 16 h (from
`1000 to 0200 h). Twice a week, the plants received 200 mL
`per pot of a nutrient solution containing 2 mM KNO3,
`2 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.75 mM MgSO4, 0.665 mM KH2PO4,
`25 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-Fe, 5 mM
`MnSO4, 0.5 mM ZnSO4, 0.5 mM CuSO4, 25 mM H3BO3,
`
`0.25 mM Na2MoO4, 50 mM NaCl and 0.1 mM CoSO4. We
`cultivated the plants for approximately 1 month. For mea-
`surements, we used the new petals on shoots newly devel-
`oped in the growth chamber at 20, 25 or 35 °C.We measured
`and sampled the petals between 1400 and 0000 h.
`
`Respiration rate
`
`Respiratory O2 uptake rates of detached petals were mea-
`sured polarographically with a gas-phase oxygen electrode
`system (LD2; Hansatech Instruments Ltd, Kings Lynn,
`Norfolk, UK). The respiratory quotient (RQ) was assumed
`to be 1.
`
`Protein and amino acid contents
`
`Proteins were extracted from samples frozen in liquid N2
`and powdered using a mortar and pestle with a buffer con-
`taining 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% sodium dodecyl sul-
`phate [w/v], 7.5% glycerol [v/v], 0.01% bromophenol blue
`[w/v], 50 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol, and 1 tablet/50 mL Com-
`plete proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics
`GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The ratio of the sample dry
`weight (DW) to the sample buffer was 10 to 40 mg/mL.
`Extracts were incubated at 100 °C for 5 min and centrifuged
`at 12 000 g. The supernatants were used for protein quanti-
`fication by the modified Lowry method (Peterson 1977).
`Amino acids were extracted from the powdered samples
`with 80% ethanol by the method of Ono, Terashima &
`Watanabe (1996). Amino acids in the supernatant were
`quantified by the modified ninhydrin method (Rosen 1957).
`
`Inhibition of protein synthesis with CHI
`
`To estimate the protein turnover cost, we incubated the
`petals in 40 mM Hepes-KOH buffer (pH 7.2) in the pre-
`sence or absence of 500 mM CHI for 20 min in the dark at
`the growth temperature, and then measured the O2 uptake
`rates.
`
`Definition of petal age and lifespan
`
`Day 0 denoted the day when the petal started to unfold.
`Negative days were those on which the petals were still
`folded. We measured the folded petal
`lengths of
`P. ¥ hybrida everyday at each temperature (n ⱖ 30 on each
`day at each growth temperature) and plotted length against
`the day number. The age of the folded petal (in days) was
`estimated from the folded petal
`length by polynomial
`approximation (R2 ⱖ 0.99). We defined the petal lifespan as
`the number of days for which the size and respiratory activ-
`ity of a single detached petal were sufficient for us to
`measure the respiration rate (see Fig. 1).
`
`Definition of respiratory cost
`
`Respiratory cost was taken to include not only C in the CO2
`emitted by the respiratory pathway to supply ATP and
`
`© 2007 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 1269–1283
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2016
`Page 02 of 15
`
`

`

`Respiratory cost to petals at high temperature 1271
`
`(b)
`
`1
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`(g water g FW–1)
`Water content
`
`(a)
`
`20˚C
`25˚C
`
`35˚C
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`(mg DW)
`Dry weight
`
`Figure 1. Changes in dry weight (DW)
`(a), water content on a fresh weight (FW)
`basis (b), respiration rate on a DW basis
`(c) and respiration rate on whole-petal
`basis (d) during development of
`Petunia ¥ hybrida petals at each growth
`temperature (20 °C, circles; 25 °C,
`squares; 35 °C, triangles). Day 0 was the
`first day on which the petal began to
`unfold. Vertical bars represent standard
`error of the mean (SEM) (n ⱖ 4).
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`(d)
`
`300
`
`250
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`(mol O2 petal–1 day–1)
`
`Respiration rate on a whole petal basis
`
`(c)
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`(mol O2 g DW–1 day–1)
`
`Respiration rate on a DW basis
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5
`Day
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5
`Day
`
`reducing equivalents, but also the C in CO2 emitted in other
`biosynthetic pathways (see Amthor 2000).
`
`2000). The 1 in the denominator is the number of protons
`co-transported with phosphate into the matrix to compen-
`sate for the deficit in phosphate.
`
`Efficiency of respiratory ATP production
`
`Respiratory costs of nitrate/ammonium uptake,
`nitrate reduction, ammonium assimilation,
`amino acid synthesis and protein synthesis
`
`Nitrate and ammonium ions are taken up from the xylem
`into the symplast across the plasma membrane, with
`+, respectively
`stoichiometries of 2H+/NO3
`- and H+/NH4
`(Cannell & Thornley 2000; Kronzucker et al. 2001). We
`assumed that the number of membranes to be crossed was
`one (Kurimoto et al. 2004). The uptake of nitrate and
`ammonium as N sources requires additional specific res-
`piratory costs of proton motive force formation, at 1.24
`and 0.62 mol C mol-1 amino acid residue, respectively
`(Table 1). The processes of unloading of sucrose and
`amide into the petal are assumed to occur only via the
`symplastic pathway and thus require no respiratory costs
`(Cannell & Thornley 2000).
`The respiratory costs of nitrate reduction, ammonium
`assimilation [glutamine (Gln) synthesis], and synthesis of
`amino acids other than Gln were calculated from Zerihun
`et al. (1998) and the AraCyc metabolic map (Zhang et al.
`2005). The elemental composition of amino acid residues
`was considered to be the average of the 20 amino acids, with
`a molecular weight of 118.9 g mol-1 (C5.35H7.95O1.45N1.45S0.10).
`Carbon skeletons and reducing equivalents for amino acid
`synthesis were assumed to be supplied by Gln and sucrose.
`The pathway for each amino acid synthesis (see Appendix)
`was based on the AraCyc metabolic pathway database for
`
`FADH
`
`2
`
`
`
`]) +
`
`(1)
`
`cyt
`
`mit
`
`+N
`
`ATP
`
`ATP production efficiencies from sucrose and reducing
`equivalents were estimated according to Amthor (1994).
`He assumed that oxidation of 1 mol of sucrose via pyruvate
`produces 58 mol of ATP, and that all sucrose is degraded by
`invertase (for details, see Amthor 1994). The number of
`ATP produced via mitochondrial oxidation of reducing
`equivalents (PATP; mol ATP) was estimated as
`[
`] × [
`] +[
`] + [
`(
`NADPH
`]] × [
`]
`ADH
`+[
`]
`)
`H
`
`cyt
`
`I,III,IV
`1
`
`(
`
`+
`
`H
`
`III,IV
`
`P
`ATP
`
`=
`
`NADH
`[
`+
`H
`
`where [H+III,IV] and [H+
`
`I,III,IV] are the numbers of protons
`pumped into the inter-membrane space when a pair of
`electrons flows through Complex III/IV and Complex
`I/III/IV, respectively. We adopted 6 for [H+
`III,IV] and 10 for
`[H+
`(Amthor
`2000).
`I,III,IV]
`[NADHcyt],
`[NADPHcyt],
`[FADH2] and [NADHmit] are the concentrations of the
`corresponding reductants, and the subscripts ‘cyt’ and ‘mit’
`indicate the cytosol and mitochondrial matrix, respec-
`tively, and indicate the compartments where these reduc-
`tants are produced. In the respiratory oxidation of sucrose
`[NADHcyt],
`[NADPHcyt],
`[FADH2] and
`via pyruvate,
`[NADHmit] are given the values 4, 0, 4 and 16, respectively
`(Amthor 2000). [H+
`ATP] is the number of protons moving
`through H+-ATPase per ADP that undergoes phosphory-
`lation; a value of 3 was used for the calculation (Amthor
`
`© 2007 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 1269–1283
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2016
`Page 03 of 15
`
`

`

`1272 T. Hachiya et al.
`
`Table 1. Specific respiratory costs of nitrate reduction, ammonium assimilation, other amino acid synthesis and nitrate/ammonium
`uptake
`
`Process basis
`
`(1) Nitrate reduction
`
`(2) Ammonium
`assimilation
`
`(3) Other amino
`acid synthesis
`
`(4) NO3
`(5) NH4
`
`- uptake
`+ uptake
`
`Equation
`- + NADHcyt + 3NADPHcyt → NH3 + OH- + H2Oa
`NO3
`(a) 0.05Sucrose → 0.6CO2 + NADHcyt + 0.2FADH2cyt + 0.4ATP
`(b) 0.125Sucrose + 0.25ATP → 1.5CO2 + 3NADPHcyt
`2NH3 + 0.5Sucrose + ATP → L-glutamine + CO2 + NADHcyt + 2NADHmit
`(c) a-ketoglutarate + 2NH3 + 2ATP + NADHcyt → L-glutamine
`(d) 0.5Sucrose → a-ketoglutarate + 2NADHmit + 2NADHcyt + ATP + CO2
`14.5L-glutamine + 9.95Sucrose + 2SO4
`2– + 8NADPHcyt + 19ATPc
`→ 20C5.35H7.95O1.45N1.45S0.10 + D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
`+ 10.5a-ketoglutarate + Succinate + 2Fumarate + 2Acetate + 12.21CO2
`+ 25.5NADHcyt + 7NADHmit
`
`b
`
`Specific cost on amino acid residues
`[mol C mol-1 amino acid residues]
`
`3.05
`
`0.73
`
`0.81
`
`1.24
`0.62
`
`Each specific cost is estimated on the basis of the equations shown.
`aEquations (a) and (b) denote pathways from which NADH and NADPH are supplied, respectively. NADH and NADPH are produced via
`the glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathway, respectively.
`bEquation (c) denotes L-Gln synthesis via glutamine synthetase and glutamine: 2-oxoglutarate amidotransferase reactions. a-ketoglutarate is
`produced from pathway (d). ATP is produced via the oxidation of additional NADHcyt or NADHmit in mitochondrial electron transport.
`cAverage amino acid (C5.35H7.95O1.45N1.45S0.10) is assumed to be the average of 20 amino acids. Pathways for 20 amino acids are summarized in
`the Appendix. NADPH is supplied from the pentose phosphate pathway, as shown in Eqn (b).ATP is produced via the oxidation of additional
`NADHcyt or NADHmit in mitochondrial electron transport.
`
`where DP is the rate of increase in amount of amino acid
`residues in the proteins on a DW basis (mol amino
`acid residues g DW-1 d-1), ES is the specific respiratory
`(mol C mol-1 amino acid
`cost of protein synthesis
`residue) in Table 2 (we used the mean value in Table 2
`for the calculation), and Forg is the amount of protein syn-
`thesis or turnover in the organelles (e.g. mitochondria and
`plastids) as a ratio of that in the whole cell. Forg was
`assumed to be 0%, because (1) fewer than 10% of all
`mitochondrial proteins are encoded by mitochondrial
`DNA and synthesized in the mitochondria and (2) the
`petals of P. ¥ hybrida do not have green tissues and
`include
`little
`ribulose
`1·5-bisphosphate
`carboxylase/
`oxygenase (Rubisco), which accounts for a large pro-
`portion of the proteins synthesized in the leaf chloroplasts.
`Pn is the amount of protein on a whole-petal basis on day
`n (g petal-1). Tn is the sampling time (on day n). DWn–1 is
`the dry weight on day n–1, and 118.9 (g mol-1) is the
`average molecular weight of the amino acid residues as
`noted.
`
`Respiratory cost of protein turnover
`
`From the information provided by De Visser et al. (1992),
`Bouma et al. (1994), Zerihun et al. (1998) and Noguchi et al.
`(2001), we assumed that the total specific respiratory cost of
`protein turnover included the costs of protein biodegrada-
`tion and protein biosynthesis (see Table 2). The expected
`effects of CHI on protein turnover and the specific respira-
`tory costs of these processes are also shown in Table 2.
`The respiratory cost of protein turnover (Rmpro: mol C g
`DW-1 d-1) was as follows:
`
`where An is the amount of amino acid residues in amino
`acids and proteins on a whole-petal basis on day n (mol
`amino acid residues petal-1), Tn is the sampling time (day n),
`and DWn–1 is the dry weight on day n–1.
`The specific respiratory costs of protein synthesis pro-
`cesses are listed in Table 2. The respiratory cost of protein
`synthesis (Rcpro; mol C g DW-1 d-1) was calculated according
`to the following equations:
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`R
`cpro
`
`=
`


`P E
`S
`

`
`1
`F
`org
`
`)
`
`−(
`1
`
`and
`

`
`1
`DW
`n
`
`−
`
`1
`

`
`1
`118 9.
`
`)
`)
`
`(
`−
`P P
`n
`n
`(
`−
`T T
`n
`n
`
`1 1
`− −
`
`ΔP
`
`=
`
`© 2007 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 1269–1283
`
`plant research (Zhang et al. 2005). The specific respiratory
`costs of nitrate reduction, ammonium assimilation and
`other amino acid synthesis are listed in Table 1. The respi-
`ratory cost of pH regulation was neglected, because little
`information was available (Zerihun et al. 1998). To estimate
`the respiratory costs of nitrate/ammonium uptake, nitrate
`reduction, ammonium assimilation and other amino acid
`synthesis, we multiplied the rate of increase in amino acid
`residues on a DW basis (DA; mol amino acid residue g
`DW-1 d-1) by the specific respiratory costs in Table 1. The
`rate of increase in amino acid residues was estimated as
`follows:
`(
`−
`A A
`n
`n
`(
`−
`T T
`n
`n
`
`1
`DW
`n
`
`−
`
`1
`
`(2)
`
`ΔA
`
`=
`
`)
`×−
`1
`)
`−
`1
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2016
`Page 04 of 15
`
`

`

`Respiratory cost to petals at high temperature 1273
`
`Table 2. Specific respiratory costs for each process of protein synthesis, protein turnover and amino acid export on the basis of amino
`acid residues
`
`Specific cost on an amino acid residues basis [mol C mol-1 amino acid residues]
`
`Process
`
`Protein biodegradation
`(1) Protein biodegradation (Edeg) (a)
`Protein biosynthesis
`(2) Amino acid activation (b)
`(3) Editing for misaminoacylation of tRNA (c)
`(4) Peptide bond formation and translocation (a)
`(5) Signal sequences (c)
`Tool maintenance
`(6) Amino acid turnovera (a,b)
`(7) mRNA turnover (c)
`Amino acid export
`(8) Gln synthesis (Esyn)b (d)
`(9) Membrane transport (Etra) (e)
`Protein synthesis [ES: (2) + (3) + (4) + (5) + (6)]
`Protein turnover [ESP: ES + (7) + (8)]
`Expected CHI effect (ECHI = ES)
`
`Min
`
`0.21
`
`0.41
`0.00
`0.41
`0.04
`
`0.36
`0.03
`
`0.21
`0.21
`0.86
`1.46
`0.86
`
`Max
`
`Mean
`
`CHI effect
`
`0.21
`
`0.41
`0.03
`0.41
`0.21
`
`0.50
`0.07
`
`0.21
`0.21
`1.06
`1.84
`1.06
`
`0.21
`
`0.41
`0.02
`0.41
`0.13
`
`0.43
`0.05
`
`0.21
`0.21
`0.96
`1.65
`0.96
`
`-
`
`+
`+
`+
`+
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`‘CHI effect’ denotes the expected effect of cycloheximide (CHI) on the process. It was assumed that oxidation of 1 mol sucrose produced
`58 mol ATP. Letters denote references for estimation of the specific cost of each process (a: Zerihun et al. 1998, b: De Visser et al. 1992, c:
`Amthor 2000, d: Dangl et al. 2000, e: Boorer & Fischer 1997).
`aSpecific respiratory cost of amino acid turnover was estimated on the assumption that 30 to 50% of amino acids are recycled.
`bGln was assumed to be transported across one membrane for its export.
`
`deamination of amino acids, 2 mol of amino acids will be
`required for 1 mol of Gln synthesis. We assumed that Gln is
`exported from the petal via the apoplastic pathway. The
`export of 1 mol of protons is coupled to that of the equiva-
`lent mole of amino acid, in accordance with the stoichiom-
`etry of the Arabidopsis thaliana amino acid transporters
`AAP1 and AAP5 (Boorer & Fischer 1997; Table 2).
`The minimum and maximum respiratory costs (Ramino,min
`and Ramino,max; mol C g DW-1 d-1) of amino acid export from
`the petal were calculated using Eqns 6 and 7. To calculate
`+ was
`the minimum cost, we assumed that half the NH4
`derived from the pool in the same cell and half was derived
`from the deamination of amino acids. To calculate the
`+ was derived from
`maximum cost, we assumed that all NH4
`that pool:
`
`(6)
`
`(7)
`
`and
`
`R
`aminomax
`
`=
`

`
`12
`58
`E
`tra
`
`(

`

`
`E
`deg
`
`+
`NPDR E
`syn
`)
`
`NAER
`max
`

`
`NPDR
`
`+
`
`where Edeg, Esyn and Etra denote the specific respiratory costs
`of protein degradation, Gln synthesis and membrane trans-
`port, respectively (Table 2). NPDR (mol amino acid resi-
`dues g DW-1 d-1) and NAER (mol amino acids g DW-1 d-1)
`
`(
`

`

`
`E
`deg
`

`
`E
`syn
`

`
`NPDR
`
`+
`
`1 2
`
`+
`
`NPDR
`)
`

`
`NAER
`min
`
`R
`amino
`
`min
`
`=
`
`12
`58
`E
`tra
`

`
`1
`F
`org
`
`)
`
`−(
`1
`
`(5)
`
`E E
`
`SP
`
`CHI
`
`R
`mpro
`
`=
`
`(
`
`R
`CHI
`
`−
`
`R
`cpro
`
`) ×
`
`rate
`respiration
`in
`decrease
`the
`is
`where RCHI
`(mol C g DW -1 d-1) in response to CHI application, ESP is
`the specific respiratory cost of protein turnover (mol C-
`mol-1 amino acid residue) and ECHI is the specific respira-
`tory cost of the processes blocked by CHI (mol C mol-1
`amino acid residue). We used the mean value in Table 2 for
`the estimation.
`
`Respiratory cost of amino acid export from
`the petal
`
`We defined amino acid export as a series of processes from
`the biodegradation of proteins into amino acids to the
`loading of amino acids into the phloem. We assumed that
`amino acids were transported in the form of Gln. ATP-
`requiring processes were assumed to be protein biodegra-
`dation, Gln synthesis and transport across the plasma
`membrane.
`In protein biodegradation, amino acids are assumed to be
`converted to Glu by specific transaminases (Dangl et al.
`2000). The specific cost of Gln synthesis from Glu by Gln
`synthetase is 1 mol of ATP per mol Gln produced (Table 2).
`A certain fraction of amino acids from the protein degra-
`+ and a-keto
`dation is considered to be degraded into NH4
`acids by deaminase or Glu dehydrogenase (Dangl et al.
`+ for Gln synthesis is derived from the
`2000). If NH4
`
`© 2007 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 1269–1283
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2016
`Page 05 of 15
`
`

`

`expanded. The maximum DW of the petal at 35 °C was half
`that of the petal at 20 °C. At any growth temperature, the
`water content (WC) of the petal on a fresh weight (FW)
`basis gradually increased from about 0.85 to above 0.90 and
`then steeply decreased (Fig. 1b). By the time the petals had
`attained their maximum WC, visible senescence or wilting
`had already occurred. Respiration rates on a DW basis
`consistently declined with time (Fig. 1c). In contrast, respi-
`ration rates on a whole-petal basis increased as the petals
`developed, peaked and then decreased (Fig. 1d).
`
`Changes in the amounts, synthesis, and
`degradation of proteins and amino acids
`
`The amounts of protein on a DW basis decreased with time
`(Fig. 2a) and did not differ markedly among growth tem-
`peratures. At 20 and 25 °C, the amino acid amounts on a
`DW basis also decreased with time (Fig. 2b) and were
`strongly correlated with the protein amounts (at 20 °C,
`r = 0.875, P < 0.0001; at 25 °C, r = 0.941, P < 0.0001). On the
`other hand, at 35 °C, the amount of amino acid started to
`increase just before full petal expansion (Fig. 2b) and by
`day 2 had reached 30% of the amount of protein. The
`amounts of proteins and amino acids are expressed on a
`whole-petal basis in Fig. 2c,d. At 35 °C, the amount of
`amino acid on a whole-petal basis peaked on day 2; this
`peak amount was much higher than the amounts at lower
`temperatures (Fig. 2d).
`The rates of increase in the amounts of protein and
`amino acids in Fig. 3 were calculated from the changes in
`protein and amino acid amounts in Fig. 2c,d (see Materials
`and Methods). Negative values denote decreases in the
`amounts of protein or amino acids. The minimum
`
`1274 T. Hachiya et al.
`
`are the net protein decrease rate and net amino acid export
`rate, respectively. NAER was calculated according to the
`following equations:
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`

`
`+
`NPDR NADR
`
`1 2
`
`min =
`NAER
`
`and
`
`max =
`NAER
`
`+
`NPDR NADR
`
`where NADR (mol amino acid g DW-1 d-1) is the net amino
`acid decrease rate. We assumed that the amino acids from
`the protein degradation were immediately used for Gln
`synthesis. NPDR and NADR correspond to negative values
`of the rates of increase of proteins and amino acids, respec-
`tively (see Results).
`
`Statistical analyses
`
`All statistical analyses were conducted with STATVIEW
`(ver. 5.0 J; SAS, Cary, NC, USA). The difference between
`respiration rates in the absence and presence of CHI was
`determined using Student’s t-test. For the other empirical
`data, we conducted two-way analysis of variance; the inter-
`action between factors (petal age and growth temperature)
`was statistically significant in all analyses (P < 0.01).
`
`RESULTS
`Effects of growth temperature on growth and
`respiration rate in P. ¥ hybrida petals
`The DW of the P. ¥ hybrida petal increased as the flower
`developed (Fig. 1a). At peak petal DW, the petal was fully
`
`(b)
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`(mol g DW–1)
`
`Figure 2. Changes in amounts of
`protein (a) and amino acids (b) on a dry
`weight (DW) basis, and in amounts of
`protein (c) and amino acids (d) on a
`whole-petal basis during development of
`Petunia ¥ hybrida petals at each growth
`temperature (20 °C, circles; 25 °C,
`squares; 35 °C, triangles). Vertical bars
`represent standard error of the mean
`(SEM) [n ⱖ 3 except on day –3 at 20 °C
`and days 6 and 7 at 35 °C (n = 2)].
`Amounts of protein and amino acids on a
`whole-petal basis were calculated by
`multiplying the amounts of protein and
`amino acids on a DW basis by average
`values of DW.
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`(d)
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`(mmol amino acid residue petal–1)
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5
`Day
`
`Amino acid amount on a DW basis
`
`Amino acid amount on a whole-petal basis
`
`20˚C
`25˚C
`
`35˚C
`
`(a)
`
`3
`
`2.5
`
`2
`
`1.5
`
`1
`
`0.5
`
`(mmol amino acid residue g DW–1)
`Protein amount on a DW basis
`
`0
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`Day
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`(c)
`
`35
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`–10
`
`(mol amino acid residue-petal–1)
`
`Protein amount on a whole-petal basis
`
`© 2007 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 1269–1283
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2016
`Page 06 of 15
`
`

`

`Respiratory cost to petals at high temperature 1275
`
`Figure 3. Changes in protein increase
`rate (a) and amino acid increase rate (b)
`on a whole-petal basis during
`development of Petunia ¥ hybrida petals
`at each growth temperature (20 °C,
`circles; 25 °C, squares; 35 °C, triangles).
`
`(b)
`
`0123
`
`–1
`
`–2
`
`–3
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5
`
`Day
`
`(mmol amino acid petal–1 day–1)
`
`Amino acid increase rate on a whole-petal basis
`
`20˚C
`25˚C
`35˚C
`
`10
`
`(a)
`
`5
`
`0
`
`–5
`
`(mmol amino acid residue petal–1 day–1)
`
`Protein increase rate on a whole-petal basis
`
`–10
`
`–5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`5
`
`Day
`
`(NAERmin) and maximum (NAERmax) net amino acid
`export rates were calculated using these negative values
`(Fig. 3a,b; see Materials and Methods).
`
`Effects of CHI on respiration rates and
`respiratory costs of protein turnover
`
`We measured the effects of CHI on respiration rates
`(Fig. 4). Only FW-based results are shown, because the
`buffer incubation interfered with the measurement of DW.
`At 20 °C, the effects of CHI on respiration rate were greater
`during the initial developmental stages. At 20 °C, the
`decrease in respiration rate in response to CHI ranged from
`9.4% (day 0) to 35.5% (day –3) (Fig. 4a). At 25 °C, the
`decrease in response to CHI treatment ranged from 7.8%
`(day –1) to 32.8% (day –4) (Fig. 4b). In contrast, at 35 °C,
`marked CHI effects were also observed after petal unfold-
`ing (Fig. 4c). For example, CHI treatment decreased the
`respiration rate by 33.3% on day 2 (Fig. 4c).
`The respiratory costs of protein turnover on a DW basis
`were calculated from the data in Fig. 4 and the theoretical
`values in Table 2. Maximum values were observed on day
`–3 at 20 °C and on day –4 at 25 and 35 °C (Fig. 5). At 35 °C,
`there was another peak on day 2. It is noteworthy that the
`cost at 35 °C was approximately twice those at the lower
`temperatures at most times during development.
`
`N-utilization costs and respiratory costs during
`petal development
`
`We summarized the changes in N-utilization costs during
`petal development on a DW basis (Fig. 6a–c) and on a
`whole-petal basis (Fig. 6d–f). The negative values in Fig. 5
`were regarded as zero for the calculation of protein turn-
`over costs. To calculate the costs in Fig. 6, the N source
`was assumed to be solely nitrate. Respiratory costs on a
`DW basis were used for comparisons among growth tem-
`peratures, because in this way petal size did not affect
`the cost estimations. In contrast, costs on a whole-petal
`basis were used to evaluate the contribution of each
`N-utilization cost to the respiratory cost at each growth
`temperature.
`
`+),
`--NH4
`The costs of nitrate uptake/reduction (NO3
`+Gln), other amino acid syn-
`ammonium assimilation (NH4
`thesis (Gln-Amino), protein synthesis (Amino-Protein) and
`protein turnover were large before petal unfolding at all
`temperatures. The contribution of nitrate uptake/reduction
`+) was largest. At 35 °C, the cost of protein turn-
`--NH4
`(NO3
`over accounted for a large part of the cost after petal
`unfolding (Fig. 6c,f).The costs of amino acid export (Amino
`export) arose mainly after petal unfolding and accounted
`for a minimal fraction of the N-utilization cost.
`By using the data in Fig. 6, we integrated the N-utilization
`costs on a DW basis (Fig. 7a) and on a whole-petal basis
`(Fig. 7b) throughout the petal’s whole lifespan. The inte-
`grated N-utilization cost on a DW basis was greatest at
`35 °C, and those at 20 and 25 °C were similar to each other
`(Fig. 7a). The integrated protein turnover cost on a DW
`basis at 35 °C was more than four times that at 25 °C
`(Fig. 7a). The integrated protein turnover cost on a whole-
`petal basis at 35 °C was the largest component of the
`N-utilization cost, followed by the nitrate uptake/reduction
`cost (Fig. 7b). The integrated cost of nitrate uptake/
`reduction was similar to the sum of costs of the subsequent
`three processes from ammonium to protein synthesis at all
`temperatures.
`We calculated the integrated respiratory cost, including
`various processes other than N-utilization processes, by
`integrating the respiration rates throughout the petal’s
`lifespan (Fig. 1c,d).The integrated respiratory cost on a DW
`basis at 35 °C was higher than those at lower temperatures
`(Fig. 7c), but, on a whole-petal basis, the integrated respira-
`tory cost at 35 °C was lowest (Fig. 7d).
`
`Costs of net amino acid export
`
`We assumed that net amino acid export started on the day
`when the value of NAER became positive. The integrated
`costs of amino acid export on a whole-petal basis during
`petal development are shown in Fig. 7b and Table 3. These
`costs accounted for the smallest fraction of the N-u

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket