throbber
(19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0160233 A1
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Jun. 24, 2010
`BSSERY et al.
`
`US 2010016O233A1
`
`(54) ANTITUMOUR COMBINATIONS
`CONTAINING AVEGF INHIBITINGAGENT
`AND RINOTECAN
`
`(75) Inventors:
`
`Marie-Christine BISSERY,
`Charenton le Pont (FR); Marielle
`CHIRON-BLONDEL, Paris (FR);
`Pascale LEJEUNE, Vitry (FR):
`Patricia VRIGNAUD, Combs la
`Ville (FR)
`
`Correspondence Address:
`ANDREA Q. RYAN
`SANOF-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
`104.1 ROUTE 202-206, MAIL CODE: D303A
`BRIDGEWATER, NJ 08807 (US)
`
`(73) Assignee:
`
`Aventis Pharma S.A., Antony (FR)
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`12/631,767
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Jan. 4, 2010
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(63) Continuation of application No. PCT/FR2008/
`000943, filed on Jul. 2, 2008.
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`
`(30)
`
`Jul. 5, 2007 (FR) ....................................... O704868
`Publication Classification
`
`(51) Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`A638/16
`(2006.01)
`A63L/4375
`(52) U.S. Cl. ........................................... 514/12: 514/283
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`Disclosed are antitumor combinations of VEGF inhibitors
`with Irinotecan and the use thereof in the treatment of neo
`plastic diseases.
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2015
`Page 01 of 05
`
`

`

`US 2010/01 60233 A1
`
`Jun. 24, 2010
`
`ANTITUMIOUR COMBINATIONS
`CONTAINING AVEGF INHIBITINGAGENT
`AND RINOTECAN
`
`0001. The present invention relates to the combinations of
`a VEGF inhibitor and of a chemotoxic agent of the topoi
`Somerase inhibitor class, useful in the treatment of neoplastic
`diseases.
`0002 VEGF inhibitors, which are inhibitors of vascular
`endothelial growth factor, are in the majority of cases biologi
`cal products selected from Soluble receptors, antisenses,
`RNAaptamers and antibodies. The topoisomerase inhibitors
`of use in the treatment of known neoplastic diseases are
`selected from camptothecins, including CPT 11, topotecan
`and pyridobenzoindole. The present combination is in par
`ticular directed toward the treatment of colon cancer or of
`stomach cancer.
`0003. The description and the preparation of the VEGF
`inhibitor preferably used in the invention, which is a VEGF
`Trap chimeric protein, is described in patent application WO
`00/75319. There are several embodiments of the chimeric
`protein.
`0004. The embodiment corresponding to VEGF Trap is
`the one described in FIG.24 (sequence) of WO00/75319. The
`VEGF Trap used in the invention is a fusion protein compris
`ing the signal sequence of VEGFR1 fused to the D2 Ig domain
`of the VEGFR1 receptor, itself fused to the D3 Ig domain of
`the VEGFR2 receptor, in turnfused to the Fc domain of IgG1,
`also known as VEGFR1R2-FcAC1 or Flt1D2. Flk1D3.
`FCAC1.
`0005. In general, the doses of VEGF Trap used in humans,
`which depend on factors specific to the individual to be
`treated, are between 1 and 10 milligrams per kilo when the
`administration is carried out Subcutaneously or intravenously.
`0006 Among the topoisomerase inhibitors, irinotecan,
`also known under the nonproprietary name CPT-11, is pref
`erably used.
`0007 Irinotecan is generally used intravenously at a dose
`of between 100 mg/m and 500 mg/m depending on the
`administration scheme. A dose of 150 mg/m is, for example,
`used for a weekly scheme and a dose of between 200 and 400
`mg/m is, for example, used for a scheme every three weeks.
`0008. An article by H Hurwitz, L. Fehrenbacher, W
`Novotny, T Cartwright, J Hainsworth, W Heim, J Berlin, A
`Baron, S Griffing, E Holmgren, NFerrara, G Fyfe, B Rogers,
`R Ross, F Kabbinavar, published in “The New England Jour
`nal of Medicine” has described a clinical trial proving a better
`survival rate when the combination of bevacizumab with
`irinotecan, 5FU and leucovorin is used, compared with the
`same combination not containing bevacizumab. In this clini
`cal trial, there is nothing to prove that the improvement in the
`survival rate comes from the combination of irinotecan with
`bevacizumab, it may just as easily come from the combina
`tion of 5FU or of leucovorin with bevacizumab, or may come
`from the quadruple combination. Now, since it is known that
`each of the anticancer agents brings toxic side effects, along
`with its therapeutic effect, it appears to be advisable to limit
`their presence as much as possible, especially when the same
`effect can be obtained in the absence of at least one of them.
`Furthermore, this article does not provide evidence of any
`synergistic effect within the meaning of Corbett, i.e. an effect
`which cannot be obtained with each of the elements of the
`combination used alone at its maximum tolerated dose.
`
`0009 VEGF Trap is a soluble receptor created by fusion of
`the second Ig domain of VEGFR-1 with the third Ig domain of
`VEGFR-2, which is subsequently fused to the Fc part of a
`human IgG1. Like the VEGFR-1 receptor, aflibercept (VEGF
`Trap) has a very high affinity for VEGF-A, with a Kd of 0.5
`picoM. The high-affinity binding of VEGF Trap with
`VEGF-A results in the formation of a complex which pre
`vents VEGF from binding to and activating its receptors at the
`surface of cells.
`0010. In comparison with Avastin (or bevacizumab),
`VEGF Trap is a soluble receptor, whereas Avastin is an anti
`body directed against VEGF-A. VEGF Trap has a much
`higher affinity for VEGF-A than that of Avastin, and a differ
`ent selectivity profile since VEGF Trap also binds to the other
`ligands of VEGFR1-2 receptors, i.e. to PIGF (placental
`growth factor) and to VEGF-B. Furthermore, VEGF Trap has
`a molecular weight which is substantially less than that of
`Avastin (115 kDa for aflibercept versus 160 kDa for Avastin),
`more favorable to penetration in solid tumors.
`0011. It has now been found, and it is this which is the
`subject of the present invention, that the effectiveness of
`VEGF inhibitors can be considerably improved when they are
`administered in combination with at least one Substance of
`therapeutic use in anticancer treatments which has a mecha
`nism of action different than that of VEGF inhibitors.
`0012 Moreover, since the activity of the products depends
`on the doses used, it is possible to use higher doses and to
`increase the activity by reducing the toxicity phenomena or
`by delaying their appearance, through the combining with the
`VEGF inhibitors or with their analogs of other therapeutically
`active Substances of growth factors of hematopoietic type,
`such as G-CSF or GM-CSF, or certain interleukins.
`0013 More particularly, the invention relates to the com
`binations of VEGF Trap with irinotecan.
`0014. The improved effectiveness of a combination
`according to the invention can be demonstrated by determin
`ing the therapeutic synergism.
`0015. A combination shows atherapeutic synergism if it is
`therapeutically superior to both the constituents used at the
`optimum dose thereof.
`0016. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of a com
`bination, it may be necessary to compare the maximum tol
`erated dose of the combination with the maximum tolerated
`dose of each of the isolated constituents in the study under
`consideration. This effectiveness can be quantified, for
`example, by the logo cell kill, which is determined according
`to the following equation:
`logo cell kill-T-C(days), 3.32XT
`in which T-C represents the delay in growth of the cells, which
`is the average time, in days, for the tumors of the treated group
`(T) and the tumors of the control group (C) to have reached a
`predetermined value (1 g for example), and T represents the
`time, in days, necessary for the volume of the tumor to double
`in the control animals T. H. Corbett et al., Cancer, 40, 2660.
`2680 (1977); F. M. Schabelet al., Cancer Drug Development,
`Part B. Methods in Cancer Research, 17, 3-51, New York,
`Academic Press Inc. (1979). A product is considered to be
`active if logo cell kill is greater than or equal to 0.7. A product
`is considered to be very active if logo cell kill is greater than
`2.8.
`0017. The combination, used at its own maximum toler
`ated dose, in which each of the constituents is presentata dose
`generally less than or equal to its maximum tolerated dose,
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2015
`Page 02 of 05
`
`

`

`US 2010/01 60233 A1
`
`Jun. 24, 2010
`
`will show therapeutic synergy when the logo cell kill is
`greater than the value of the logo cell kill of the best con
`stituent when it is administered alone, and in particular has a
`Superiority of at least one log cell kill.
`0.018. The effectiveness of the combinations on solid
`tumors can be determined experimentally in the following
`way:
`0019. The animals subjected to the experiment, generally
`mice, are grafted bilaterally, subcutaneously, with 30 to 60
`mg of an HCT116 human tumor fragment (Brattain, M. G.,
`Fine, W. D., Khaled, F. M., Thompson, J. and Brattain, D. E.,
`Heterogeneity of malignant cells from a human colonic car
`cinoma. Cancer Res., 1981, 41, 1751-1756) on day 0. The
`animals bearing the tumors are randomized before being Sub
`jected to the various treatments and controls. In the case of
`treatment of tumors of the present invention, the tumors were
`allowed to develop to a size of between 48 and 294 mg, which
`made it possible to have a median tumor per group of between
`129 and 162 mg. The animals which underwent the treatment
`with VEGF Trap alone had a weight of between 17.1 and 22.7
`g, the animals having undergone the treatment withirinotecan
`alone had a weight of between 17.5 and 22.3 g, and those
`which received the combination had a weight of between 17.5
`and 23.6 g. Animals bearing tumors were also subjected to the
`same treatments with the excipient alone in order to be able to
`dissociate the toxic effect of the excipient from the actual
`effect of the chemotherapy on the tumor. The chemotherapy
`was begun on day 12 after the tumor graft. The VEGF Trap
`injections were given subcutaneously simultaneously with
`the irinotecan injections, which themselves were given intra
`venously, according to a daily double injection. These injec
`tions were carried out on days 12, 15 and 18 after implantation
`of the tumor. The various groups of animals are weighed three
`to four times per week until the maximum weight loss is
`reached, and then the groups are weighed at least once a week
`until the end of the trial.
`0020. The tumors are measured two or three times a week
`until the tumor reaches approximately 2 g or until the death of
`the animal if the latter occurs before the tumor reaches 2 g.
`The animals are autopsied at the time of sacrifice.
`0021. The antitumor activity is determined according to
`the various parameters recorded.
`0022. By way of examples, the following tables give the
`results obtained with combinations of VEGF Trap and of
`irinotecan used at their optimum dose.
`0023 The present invention also relates to the kits of phar
`maceutical compositions containing the products used in the
`combinations according to the invention.
`0024. The products which constitute the combination may
`be administered simultaneously, separately or sequentially in
`Such a way as to obtain the maximum effectiveness of the
`combination; it being possible for each administration to have
`a variable duration ranging from a rapid total administration
`to a continuous infusion.
`0025. As a result of this, for the purpose of the present
`invention, the combinations are not only limited to those
`which are obtained by physical association of the constitu
`ents, but also to those which allow a separate administration
`that can be simultaneous or sequential.
`0026. The compositions according to the invention are
`preferably compositions that can be administered parenter
`ally.
`0027 Compositions for parenteral administration are gen
`erally pharmaceutically acceptable sterile solutions or Sus
`
`pensions which may optionally be prepared extemporane
`ously at the time of use. For the preparation of nonaqueous
`Solutions or Suspensions, natural plant oils such as olive oil,
`sesame oil or liquid paraffin, or injectable organic esters such
`as ethyl oleate, may be used. Aqueous sterile Solutions may be
`constituted of a solution of the product in water. Aqueous
`Solutions are suitable for intravenous administration insofar
`as the pH is Suitably adjusted and the isotonicity is produced,
`for example, by means of a Sufficient amount of sodium
`chloride or of glucose. The sterilization can be carried out by
`heating or by any other means which does not detrimentally
`alter the composition. The combinations may also be in the
`form of liposomes or in the form of an association with
`Supports such as cyclodextrins or polyethylene glycols.
`0028. In the combinations according to the invention, the
`application of the constituents of which may be simultaneous,
`separate or sequential, it is particularly advantageous for the
`amount of VEGF Trap derivative to represent from 10% to
`80% by weight of the combination, it being possible for this
`content to vary according to the nature of the associated
`substance, to the desired effectiveness and to the nature of the
`cancer to be treated.
`0029. The combinations according to the invention are of
`particular use in the treatment of colon cancer and/or stomach
`cancer. In particular, they can have the advantage of being
`able to use the constituents at doses which are much lower
`than those at which they are used alone.
`0030 The following example illustrates a combination
`according to the invention.
`
`EXAMPLE
`0031. Vials of 1 cm containing 25 mg of VEGF Trap
`which are diluted in a buffer of 5 mM phosphate, 5 mM
`sodium citrate, 100 mM sodium chloride, polysorbate 20 and
`20% sucrose are prepared according to the usual technique,
`for Subcutaneous administration. The administration Volume
`per mouse is 0.1 ml. The VEGF Trap is administered once a
`day, on days 12, 15 and 18 after implantation of the tumor.
`0032 0.3 ml per mouse is prepared, according to the usual
`technique, for intravenous administration, from a commer
`cially available solution at 20 mg/ml of irinotecan to be
`diluted with 5% dextrose in water.
`0033. These solutions are administered simultaneously,
`after a suitable dilution.
`0034. The treatment with irinotecan is repeated twice a
`day, with a 4-hour interval, on days 12, 15 and 18 after
`implantation of the tumor.
`0035. The results of the trial are attached in the appended
`table.
`0036 Tumor doubling time=3.2 days.
`0037 Abbreviations used: (T-C) delay in growth of the
`tumor, Icklog cell kill.
`0038 Toxicity was observed for irinotecan alone at the
`doses of 52.4, 32.5 and 20.2 mg/kg/injection owing to a death
`at the dosage of 52.4 and a weight loss of greater than 20% for
`the two lower dosages. Thus, the maximum tolerated dose for
`irinotecan was 12.5 mg/kg/inj (total injected dose of 75.0
`mg/kg). The dose of 12.5 mg/kg/injection was found to be
`active with an Ick of 1.8.
`0039. For the VEGF Trap, the product was well-tolerated
`at all the dosages tested and was found to be active with an Ick
`of 1.7 at 40 mg/kg/administration and 25 mg/kg/administra
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2015
`Page 03 of 05
`
`

`

`US 2010/01 60233 A1
`
`3
`
`Jun. 24, 2010
`
`tion. The lower dose of 10 mg/kg/administration is also
`active, with an Ick of 1.3. The dose of 2.5 mg/kg/administra-
`tion is inactive.
`0040. For the combination ofirinotecan at 32.5 mg/kg/inj,
`whatever the dose of VEGF Trap, the combination was found
`to be toxic with a weight loss of 18% close to toxicity. The
`lower dose of 20.2 mg/kg/inj ofirinotecan with 40 mg/kg of
`VEGF Trap was considered to be the maximum tolerated
`dose. This dose had an Ick of 3.0, judged to be very active. The
`same level of activity was found with the lower doses of
`VEGF Trap, such as 25, 10, 2.5 mg/kg/administration (Ick of
`2.9, 3.0 and 2.9, respectively).
`0041
`Irinotecan at 12.5 mg/kg/inj combined with VEGF
`Trap at 40 mg/kg/administration is active with an Ick of 2.7.
`
`This antitumor activity is maintained with 25 and 10 mg/kg of
`VEGF Trap (Ick of 2.9 and 2.7, respectively). The combina
`tion with 2.5 mg/kg/administration of VEGF Trap has an
`activity of 2.0 Ick.
`0042. In conclusion, the activity of the combination of
`VEGF Trap with irinotecan shows a synergistic effect with a
`log cell kill of 3.0, at the maximum tolerated dose of the
`combination, which corresponds to more than 1 log cell kill
`compared with the activity of each of the compounds used
`alone, which exhibits a log cell kill of 1.8 and 1.7 (for irino
`tecan at 12.5 mg/kg/injection and VEGF Trap at 40 mg/kg/
`administration, respectively). An antitumor activity is main
`tained at several levels of doses below the maximum tolerated
`dose of the combination.
`
`Route of
`adminis-
`tration
`
`i.v.
`0.3 ml
`
`Agent
`Group (alone)
`
`CPT-11
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`2 VEGF
`Trap
`
`S.C.
`0.1 ml
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Dosage
`in mg/kg
`Scheme
`per
`injection in days
`
`Death due
`to the
`product,
`with day
`of death
`
`Average
`Weight
`time for the
`loss of
`tumor to
`the mouse
`reach 750
`(date of
`low-point) mg in days
`
`Total
`dose in
`mg/kg
`
`Survivors
`without
`tumor at
`day 144 Comments
`
`Log
`cell
`kill
`
`T-C in
`days
`
`52.4
`
`12, 15, 18
`
`314.4
`
`1/8 (23)
`
`32.5
`
`(2x/d)
`
`195.0
`
`O7
`
`20.2
`
`(4h apart)
`
`121.2
`
`12.5
`
`75.0
`
`40.0
`
`12, 15, 18
`
`120.0
`
`2S.O
`
`1O.O
`
`2.5
`
`75.0
`
`3O.O
`
`7.5
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`— Toxic
`
`— Toxic
`
`— Toxic
`
`Of8
`
`Of8
`
`0.8
`
`HNTD
`active
`HDT
`active
`active
`
`19.1
`
`1.8
`
`18.3
`
`1.7
`
`18.3
`
`1.7
`
`13.S
`
`1.3
`
`1.8
`
`active
`
`37.6
`
`36.8
`
`36.8
`
`32.O
`
`2O2
`
`1.7
`
`O2
`
`O8 inactive
`
`— Toxic
`
`-27.0
`(21)
`-23.1
`(19)
`-21.9
`(19)
`-15.9
`(21)
`-3.1
`(13)
`-2.2
`(13)
`-50
`(19)
`-8.3
`(19)
`-16.2
`(21)
`
`-18.6
`(21)
`-18.2
`(19)
`-18.4
`(19)
`-13.0
`(21)
`-11.9
`(19)
`-13.0
`(19)
`-12.5
`(19)
`-11.0
`(19)
`-11.9
`(19)
`-10.0
`(21)
`-14.3
`(21)
`-9.6
`(25)
`
`— Toxic
`
`— Toxic
`
`— Toxic
`
`SO.9
`
`49.6
`
`50.7
`
`49.7
`
`46.8
`
`49.8
`
`47.0
`
`40.O
`
`18.5
`
`32.4
`
`3.0
`
`31.1
`
`2.9
`
`Of8
`
`HNTD
`highly active
`08 high active
`
`32.2
`
`3.0
`
`08 high active
`
`31.2
`
`2.9
`
`08 high active
`
`28.3
`
`2.7
`
`0.8
`
`active
`
`31.3
`
`2.9
`
`08 high active
`
`28S
`
`2.7
`
`0.8
`
`active
`
`21.5
`
`2.0
`
`0.8
`
`active
`
`Of 10
`
`CPT-11
`
`i.v.
`0.3 ml
`VEGF Trap s.c.
`0.1 ml
`
`O
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`2O
`
`21
`
`1
`
`Vehicle
`
`S.C.
`0.1 ml
`i.v.
`0.3 ml
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`O.8
`
`95.0
`
`2O.O
`
`95.0
`75.0
`95.0
`3O.O
`95.0
`7.5
`21.2
`2O.O
`21.2
`75.0
`21.2
`3O.O
`21.2
`7.5
`75.0
`2O.O
`75.0
`75.0
`75.0
`3O.O
`75.0
`7.5
`
`32.5
`
`40.0
`
`12, 15, 18
`(2xid)
`12, 15, 18
`
`32.5
`2S.O
`32.5
`1O.O
`32.5
`2.5
`2O2
`40.O
`2O2
`2S.O
`2O2
`1O.O
`2O2
`2.5
`12.5
`40.O
`12.5
`2S.O
`12.5
`1O.O
`12.5
`2.5
`— 12, 15, 18
`
`— 12, 15, 18
`(2xid) (4h
`later)
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2015
`Page 04 of 05
`
`

`

`US 2010/01 60233 A1
`
`Jun. 24, 2010
`
`What is claimed is:
`1. A method of treating a neoplastic disease comprising
`administering to a patient in need thereof a combination of a
`VEGF inhibitor with irinotecan.
`2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the VEGF
`inhibitor is a VEGF Trap.
`3. The combination according to claim 2, wherein the
`amount of VEGF Trap represents from 10% to 80% by weight
`of the combination.
`4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said method
`does not include any other chemotoxic derivative having a
`therapeutically synergistic effect in the treatment of neoplas
`tic diseases.
`5. A product comprising a VEGF inhibitor and irinotecan,
`as a combined preparation for simultaneous, separate or
`sequential use in anticancer therapy.
`
`6. The product according to claim 5, wherein the VEGF
`inhibitor is a VEGF Trap.
`7. The product according to claim 6, wherein the amount of
`VEGF Trap represents from 10% to 80% by weight of the
`combined weight of VEGF Trap and irinotecan.
`8. The product according to claim 5 which does not include
`any other chemotoxic derivative having atherapeutically Syn
`ergistic effect in the treatment of neoplastic diseases.
`9. A combination containing a VEGF inhibitor with irino
`tecan.
`10. The combination according to claim 9, containing a
`VEGF Trap with irinotecan.
`11. The combination according to claim 10, containing
`from 10% to 80% by weight of VEGF Trap.
`
`c
`
`c
`
`c
`
`c
`
`c
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2015
`Page 05 of 05
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket