throbber
' NCT00637377 on 2008_03_17: ClinicalTrials.gov Archive
`
`Seite 1 von 4
`
`Clinicaf Trials.gov archive,
`
`A seMCe of the U. $. National l11$titutes of He,illh
`j Current version of this study
`- History of this study
`View of NCT00637377 on 2008_03_ 17
`
`ClinicalTrials Identifier: NCT00637377
`2008_03_ 17
`Updated:
`
`Descriptive Information
`Brief title
`
`Official title
`
`VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet
`AMO (VIEW2).
`A Randomized, Double Masked, Active Controlled, Phase 3
`Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated
`Doses of lntravitreal VEGF Trap in Subjects With
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMO).
`
`Brief summary
`This study is a phase Ill, double-masked, randomized, study of the efficacy and
`safety of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with neovascular age-related macular
`degeneration. Approximately 1200 patients will be randomized in Europe, Asia,
`Japan, Australia and South America.
`Detailed description
`Phase
`Study type
`Study design
`Study design
`Study design
`
`Phase 3
`lnterventional
`Treatment
`Randomized
`Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes
`Assessor)
`Active Control
`Parallel Assignment
`Safety/Efficacy Study
`Measure: The proportion of subjects who maintain vision at
`Week 52, where a subject is classified as maintaining vision
`if the subject has lost fewer than 15 letters on the ETDRS
`chart compared to baseline (ie, prevention of moderate
`vision loss)
`Time Frame: week 52
`Safety Issue? Yes
`Measure: Mean change from baseline in BCVA as measured
`by ETDRS letter score at Week 52
`Time Frame: week 52
`Safety Issue? Yes
`Measure: The proportion of subjects who gain at least 15
`letters of vision at Week 52
`Time Frame: week 52
`Safety Issue? No
`Measure: Mean change from baseline in total NEI VFQ-25
`score at Week 52
`
`Study design
`Study design
`Study design
`Primary outcome
`
`Secondary outcome
`
`Secondary outcome
`
`Secondary outcome
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT0063 73 77 /2008 _ 03 _ 17
`
`02.09.2016
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2008
`Page 01 of 04
`
`

`

`· NCT00637377 on 2008_03_17: ClinicalTrials.gov Archive
`
`Seite 2 von 4
`
`Time Frame: week 52
`Safety Issue? No
`Secondary outcome Measure: Mean change from baseline in CNV area at Week
`52
`Time Frame: week 52
`Safety Issue? Yes
`1200 (Anticipated)
`Macular Degeneration
`Arm Label: Arm 3
`
`Enrollment
`Condition
`Arm/Group
`
`Experimental
`
`Arm/Group
`
`Arm/Group
`
`Arm/Group
`
`Intervention
`
`Intervention
`
`Intervention
`
`Intervention
`
`URL
`URL
`URL
`See also
`
`See also
`
`See also
`
`n/a
`Arm Label: Arm 1
`
`n/a
`Arm Label: Arm 2
`
`n/a
`Arm Label: Arm 4
`
`Experimental
`
`Experimental
`
`Active Comparator
`
`n/a
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`
`Arm Label: Arm 1
`
`0.5 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during
`the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as
`frequently as every 4 weeks, but no less frequently than
`every 12 weeks.
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`
`Arm Label: Arm 2
`
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 4 weeks during
`the first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as
`frequently as every 4 weeks, but no less frequently than
`every 12 weeks.
`Drug: VEGF Trap-Eye
`
`Arm Label: Arm 3
`
`2.0 mg VEGF Trap-Eye administered every 8 weeks
`(including one additional 2,0 mg dose at Week 4) during the
`first year. Thereafter a dose may be administered as
`frequently as every 4 weeks, but no less frequently than
`every 12 weeks.
`Drug: Ranibizumab
`
`Arm Label: Arm 4
`
`0.5 mg administered every 4 weeks during the first year.
`Thereafter a dose may be administered as frequently as
`every 4 weeks, but no less frequently than every 12 weeks.
`http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/DrugSafety/Druglndex.htm
`http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety. htm
`http://www.clinicalstudyresults.org
`Click here and search for drug information provided by the
`FDA
`Click here and search for information on any recalls, market
`or product safety alerts by the FDA which might have
`occurred with this product
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT00637377/2008_03_17
`
`02.09.2016
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2008
`Page 02 of 04
`
`

`

`· NCT00637377 on 2008_03_17: ClinicalTrials.gov Archive
`
`Seite 3 von 4
`
`Click here to find results for studies related to marketed
`products
`
`Not yet recruiting
`2008-03
`2011-09 (Anticipated)
`
`Recruitment Information
`Status
`Start date
`Last follow-up date
`Criteria
`Inclusion Criteria:
`1. Signed informed consent.
`2. Men and women 2:: 50 years of age.
`3. Active primary or recurrent subfoveal CNV lesions secondary to AMO,
`including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the
`study eye.
`4. ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity of: 20/40 to 20/320 (letter score of 73 to
`25) in the study eye at 4 meters.
`5. Willing, committed, and able to return for ALL clinic visits and complete all
`study-related procedures.
`6. Able to read, (or, if unable to read due to visual impairment, be read to
`verbatim by the person administering the informed consent or a family member)
`understand and willing to sign the informed consent form.
`Exclusion Criteria:
`1. Any prior ocular (in the study eye) or systemic treatment or surgery for
`neovascular AMO, except dietary supplements or vitamins.
`2. Any prior or concomitant therapy with another investigational agent to treat
`neovascular AMO in the study eye.
`3. Any prior treatment with anti-VEGF agents in the study eye.
`, including blood, scars and
`4. Total lesion size >12 disc areas (30.5 mm 2
`neovascularization) as assessed by FA in the study eye.
`5. Subretinal hemorrhages that is either 50% or more of the total lesion area, or
`if the blood is under the fovea and is 1 or more disc areas in size in the study
`eye (if the blood is under the fovea, then the fovea must be surrounded by 270
`degrees by visible CNV).
`6. Scar or fibrosis making up >50% of the total lesion in the study eye.
`7. Scar, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye.
`8. Presence of retinal pigment epithelial tears or rips involving the macula in the
`study eye.
`9. History of any vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 in the study
`eye.
`10. Presence of other causes of CNV in the study eye.
`11. Prior vitrectomy in the study eye.
`12. History of retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment
`in the study eye.
`13. Any ·history of macular hole of stage 2 and above in the study eye.
`14. Any intraocular or periocular surgery within 3 months of Day 1 on the study
`eye, except lid surgery, which may not have taken place within 1 month of Day
`1, as long as it is unlikely to interfere with the injection.
`15. History or clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema
`or any retinal vascular disease other than AMO in either eye.
`Both
`Gender
`Minimum age
`50 Years
`Healthy volunteers
`No
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT0063 73 77 /2008 _ 03 _ l 7
`
`02.09.2016
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2008
`Page 03 of 04
`
`

`

`· NCT00637377 on 2008_03_17: ClinicalTrials.gov Archive
`
`Seite 4 von 4
`
`Administrative Data
`Organization name
`Organization study ID
`Secondary ID
`Secondary ID
`Secondary ID
`Sponsor
`Collaborator
`Health Authority
`
`Bayer
`91689
`EurdaCT No.: 2007-000583-25
`311523
`VIEW2
`Bayer
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
`Switzerland: Ethikkommision
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/archive/NCT006373 77 /2008 _ 03 _17
`
`02.09.2016
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 2008
`Page 04 of 04
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket