throbber
0013-7227/02/$15.00/0
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Endocrinology 143(7):2797–2807
`Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`Prevention of Thecal Angiogenesis, Antral Follicular
`Growth, and Ovulation in the Primate by Treatment
`with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap R1R2
`
`CHRISTINE WULFF, HELEN WILSON, STANLEY J. WIEGAND, JOHN S. RUDGE, AND
`HAMISH M. FRASER
`Medical Research Council (C.W., H.W., H.M.F.) Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Edinburgh, United Kingdom EH3 9ET;
`Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm (C.W.), 89075 Ulm, Germany; and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,
`Inc. (S.J.W., J.S.R.), Tarrytown, New York 10591
`
`This study was designed to investigate the effects of inhibition
`of thecal angiogenesis on follicular development in the mar-
`moset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). To inhibit vascular endo-
`thelial growth factor (VEGF), a soluble combined truncated
`form of the fms-like tyrosine kinase (Flt) and kinase insert
`domain-containing receptor (KDR) receptor fused to IgG
`(VEGF Trap R1R2) was administered for 10 d during the fol-
`licular phase of the cycle. Changes in angiogenesis and fol-
`licular cell proliferation were quantified using immunocyto-
`chemistry for bromodeoxyuridine to obtain a proliferation
`index, CD31 to visualize endothelial cell area, and dual stain-
`ing to distinguish thecal endothelial cell proliferation. The
`effects of the treatment on follicular development were as-
`sessed by morphometric analyses by measuring follicle diam-
`eter, thecal thickness, and a proliferation index for granulosa
`cells. Follicular atresia was detected and quantified using the
`terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-UTP nick end labeling
`
`method. Effects on gene expression of VEGF and its receptors,
`Flt and KDR, were studied by in situ hybridization. VEGF
`Trap R1R2 treatment resulted in a significant decrease in
`thecal proliferation and endothelial cell area, demonstrating
`the suppression of thecal angiogenesis. The absence of a nor-
`mal thecal vasculature was associated with a significantly
`reduced thecal thickness. Antral follicular development was
`severely compromised, as indicated by decreased granulosa
`cell proliferation, decreased follicular diameter, and lack of
`development of ovulatory follicles. Furthermore, the rate of
`atresia was significantly increased. VEGF expression in gran-
`ulosa and thecal cells increased after treatment, whereas Flt
`and KDR expressions in thecal endothelial cells were mark-
`edly decreased. These results show that VEGF Trap treatment
`is associated with the suppression of follicular angiogenesis,
`which results in the inhibition of antral follicular develop-
`ment and ovulation. (Endocrinology 143: 2797–2807, 2002)
`
`THE OVARY IS distinctive in being a site of active an-
`
`giogenesis in the adult. Angiogenesis takes place in the
`developing follicle before ovulation and in the corpus luteum
`formed postovulation (1– 4). It is now well established that
`active cyclical angiogenesis plays a key role in normal luteal
`function (1, 4). However, its contribution to normal follicular
`growth and function has not been addressed experimentally.
`Thus, little is known about the direct relevance of the thecal
`vasculature for follicular growth, development, and atresia.
`Although small preantral follicles are avascular, angiogen-
`esis is initiated during early follicular development and con-
`tinues throughout follicular growth. The vascular sheath that
`develops during follicular maturation in the thecal compart-
`ment expands with ongoing folliculogenesis (3). The thecal
`capillaries do not penetrate the membrana propria, so the
`granulosa compartment remains avascular until breakdown
`of the basement membrane at ovulation.
`The vasculature of the follicle is thought to be necessary for
`the delivery of hormones, hormone precursors, oxygen, and
`nutrients. It has been suggested that the preferential delivery
`of gonadotropins via a more highly developed vascular sys-
`
`Abbreviations: BrdU, Bromodeoxyuridine; Flt, fms-like tyrosine ki-
`nase; KDR, kinase insert domain-containing receptor; NBT, nitro blue
`tetrazolium; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucle-
`otidyltransferase-UTP nick end labeling; VEGF, vascular endothelial
`growth factor.
`
`tem in individual follicles plays an instrumental role in the
`selection and growth of the dominant follicle (5). The rela-
`tionship between changes in angiogenesis and onset of atre-
`sia is uncertain due to difficulties in determining the tem-
`poral relationship between these processes, but decreased
`vascularity in atretic follicles has been reported in a number
`of species (5–7), including the marmoset (3).
`With regard to the molecular mechanisms controlling follic-
`ular angiogenesis, the presence of the vascular endothelial
`growth factor (VEGF), a principal angiogenic factor, has been
`described in the ovarian follicle (8, 9). More recently, we have
`demonstrated by direct inhibition of VEGF in vivo in the primate
`that VEGF is a major regulator of follicular angiogenesis (3).
`Inhibition of VEGF was followed by a severe restriction of thecal
`angiogenesis in the developing follicle. To investigate the im-
`portance of the thecal vasculature for follicular maturation, the
`approach of suppressing thecal angiogenesis by in vivo inhibi-
`tion of VEGF was used in the current study. A new compound,
`VEGF Trap R1R2, comprising the extracellular domain of the
`two VEGF receptors, VEGF-R1 (Flt) (fms-like tyrosine kinase)
`and VEGF-R2 (KDR) (kinase insert domain-containing recep-
`tor), was administered to marmoset monkeys throughout the
`follicular phase. The efficacy of VEGF Trap R1R2 to suppress
`thecal angiogenesis was tested using bromodeoxyuridine
`(BrdU) immunocytochemistry as a proliferation marker, CD31
`as a specific endothelial cell marker and dual staining to dis-
`
`2797
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 1
`
`

`

`2798 Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807
`
`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`FIG. 1. Structure of VEGF receptors and the VEGF Trap. VEGF-R1
`(A) and VEGF-R2 (B) both contain seven extracellular domains, which
`differ between the two receptors. These extracellular domains are
`responsible for VEGF binding. The soluble VEGF Trap R1R2 (C) was
`created by fusion of domain 2 of VEGF-R1 and domain 3 of VEGF-R2
`with the FC portion of IgG.
`
`jected to immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization, and TUNEL. Tis-
`sue sections were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in descending con-
`centrations of ethanol, washed in distilled water, and stained with
`hematoxylin (Richard-Allan, Richland, MI) for 5 min, followed by a
`wash in water and acetic alcohol before staining with eosin (Richard-
`Allan) for 20 sec. After dehydrating in ascending concentrations of
`ethanol and xylene, sections were mounted.
`
`Immunocytochemistry
`
`The effects of the treatment on the establishment of the thecal vascular
`network were studied by 1) quantifying the number of proliferating cells
`stained for BrdU, 2) identifying endothelial cells using CD31 staining,
`and 3) distinguishing proliferating endothelial from nonendothelial cells
`by colocalization of BrdU and CD31.
`For BrdU and CD31 immunostaining, antigen retrieval was per-
`formed by pressure cooking (Tefal Clypso pressure cooker, Tefal, Essex,
`UK) sections in 0.01 m citrate buffer, pH 6, for 6 min at high pressure
`setting 2. Slides were then left for 20 min in hot buffer and washed in
`TBS (0.05 mol/liter Tris and 9 g/liter NaCl). To reduce nonspecific
`binding sections were blocked in normal rabbit serum (1:5 diluted in TBS
`containing 5% BSA) for 30 min. Primary antibodies CD31 (mouse an-
`tihuman CD31, DAKO Corp., Copenhagen, Denmark) or BrdU (mouse
`anti-BrdU, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) were diluted 1:20 or 1:30 in
`TBS, respectively. Incubation was carried out overnight at 4 C. Slides
`were washed three times in TBS. Incubation with the secondary anti-
`body, rabbit antimouse Ig (1:60 diluted in NRS:TBS; DAKO Corp.), was
`performed for 40 min at room temperature, followed after two washes
`in TBS by incubation of the alcaline phosphatase-antialcaline phospho-
`lase (APAAP) complex (1:100 dilution in TBS, DAKO Corp.) for 40 min
`at room temperature. Visualization was performed using 500 ␮l/slide
`nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) solution containing 45 ␮l NBT substrate
`(Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 10 ml NBT buffer, 35 ␮l 5-bromo-3-
`chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate, and 10 ␮l levamisole. Sections for BrdU
`
`tinguish between proliferating endothelial and nonendothelial
`cells. The influence on follicular development was assessed by
`morphological and morphometric image analyses as well as
`quantification of granulosa cell proliferation. As granulosa
`cells of the follicle die of apoptosis during the process of
`atresia (10), the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-UTP
`nick end labeling (TUNEL) method was used to detect apo-
`ptotic granulosa cells for definite classification and quantifica-
`tion of atretic follicles. The effects of inhibition of VEGF on the
`expression of VEGF and its receptors Flt and KDR was inves-
`tigated using in situ hybridization.
`
`Materials and Methods
`VEGF Trap R1R2
`
`The VEGF Trap R1R2 used in these experiments is a recombinant
`chimeric protein comprising portions of the extracellular, ligand binding
`domains of the human VEGF receptors Flt-1 (VEGF-R1, Ig domain 2) and
`KDR (VEGF-R2, Ig domain 3) expressed in sequence with the Fc portion
`of human IgG (Fig. 1). The presence of the Fc domain results in ho-
`modimerization of the recombinant protein, thereby creating a high
`affinity (KD1–5pM) VEGF Trap.1 The VEGF trap was expressed in CHO
`cells and was purified by protein A affinity chromatography followed
`by size-exclusion chromatography. The specificity of VEGF binding and
`the affinity to VEGF of VEGF Trap R1R2 were determined by Biacore
`(Uppsala, Sweden).
`
`Animals
`
`Adult female common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) with a
`body weight of approximately 350 g and regular ovulatory cycles (28-d
`cycle length) with ovulation on d 8 were housed together with a younger
`sister or prepubertal female as described previously (11). Blood samples
`were collected three times per week by femoral venipuncture without
`anesthesia, and plasma was subjected to progesterone assay as described
`previously (4).
`
`Treatment
`
`Experiments were carried out in accordance with the Animals (Sci-
`entific Procedures) Act, 1986, and were approved by the local ethical
`review process committee. To synchronize timing of ovulation during
`the pretreatment cycle, marmosets were given PGF2␣ in the mid to late
`luteal phase to induce luteolysis. In the late luteal phase of the subse-
`quent cycle, four marmosets were treated with VEGF trap at a dose of
`25 mg/kg, injected sc on d 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 of the follicular phase. Ovaries
`were collected 2 d later on d 10 of the cycle. Eleven control marmosets
`were studied (four on d 1–2, three on d 7– 8, and four at d 11 of the cycle).
`Control animals were treated with vehicle containing 5 mm phosphate,
`5 mm citrate, 100 mm sodium chloride, 0.1% (wt/vol) Tween 20, and 20%
`(wt/vol) sucrose. All animals were injected iv with 20 mg BrdU (Roche
`Molecular Biochemicals, Essex, UK) in saline 1 h before being sedated
`using 100 ␮l ketamine hydrochloride (Parke-Davis Veterinary, Ponty-
`pool, UK) and killed with an iv injection of 400 ␮l Euthetal (sodium
`pentobarbitone, Rhone Merieux, Harlow, UK). After cardiac exsangui-
`nation via a heparinized syringe, ovaries were removed immediately
`and fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin. After 24 h, the ovaries were
`put into 70% ethanol, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin according
`to standard procedures.
`
`Hematoxylin-eosin staining
`
`The embedded ovaries were serially sectioned, and tissue sections (5
`␮m) were placed onto BDH SuperFrost slides (BDH, Merck & Co., Inc.,
`Poole, UK). For morphological and morphometric analyses every 20 of
`a total of 200 sections/ovary were used. Sections in between were sub-
`
`1 The detailed molecular structure and how it was created are de-
`scribed in the patent REG 710-A-PCT, VEGF Trap Application published
`December 2000, Publication WO 00/75319 A1.
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807 2799
`
`were counterstained with hematoxylin, whereas sections for CD31 were
`not counterstained, so that quantitative image analysis could be per-
`formed. For dual labeling, slides were incubated first with CD31 and
`visualization with Fast Red [Sigma, Poole, UK; 1 mg Fast Red in 1 ml Fast
`Red buffer (20 mg naphtol AS-MX phosphate, 2 ml dimethyl formamide,
`and 98 ml 0.1 m Tris, pH 8.2)]. After staining for CD31, incubation with
`BrdU was performed. BrdU-stained cells were visualized with NBT as
`described above.
`
`In situ hybridization
`
`In situ hybridization was performed as described previously (4, 12).
`As the marmoset shows 97–98% homology of the known gene sequence
`with human genome, cRNA probes for human VEGF, Flt, and KDR were
`used. Sense and antisense probes were prepared using an RNA tran-
`scription kit (Ambion, Inc. Austin, TX) and were labeled with [35S]-
`uridine 5[prime]-triphosphate (NEN Life Science Products, Boston,
`MA). Deparaffinized sections were treated with 0.1 n HCl and then
`digested in proteinase K (5 ␮g/ml; Sigma) for 30 min at 37 C. After
`prehybridization for 2 h at 55 Csubsequent hybridization was per-
`formed in a moist chamber overnight. High stringency posthybridiza-
`tion washings and ribonuclease treatment were used to remove excess
`probe. Slides were then dehydrated, dried, and dipped in Ilford G5
`liquid emulsion (H. A. West, Edinburgh, UK). Exposure times for VEGF,
`Flt, and KDR were 4, 7, and 7 wk, respectively. Slides were subsequently
`developed (D19 developer, Kodak, Rochester, NY) and fixed (GBS,
`Kodak). All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (Richard-
`Allan, Richland, MI), dehydrated, and mounted.
`
`In situ TUNEL
`
`It is known that during atresia granulosa cells undergo programmed
`cell death, apoptosis. Hence, the TUNEL method for detection of apo-
`ptotic cells was used to identify atretic follicles. Dewaxed and rehy-
`drated slides were incubated for 6 min in 20 ␮g/ml proteinase K (Sigma)
`at room temperature and blocked with normal sheep serum (1:5 dilu-
`tion). Slides were washed three times in TBS. For 3⬘-end labeling the TdT
`Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used. 3⬘-OH ends of DNA
`fragments were labeled with 1 nm digoxigenin-11-deoxy-UTP (Roche
`Molecular Biochemicals) for 1.5 h at 37 C by 1 IU/␮l TdT (Roche Mo-
`lecular Biochemicals) in 50 ␮l buffer [30 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 140 mm
`sodium cacodylate, and 1.5 mm CoCl2; Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
`Negative control slides had the TdT replaced by the equivalent amount
`of buffer. Three rinses of the slides with TBS were followed by incubation
`with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep anti-digoxigenin antibod-
`ies (1:100 dilution; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in TBS for 90 min at
`room temperature. The labeling was visualized with NBT as described
`above. After air-drying, slides were put into xylene and mounted.
`
`Analysis of data
`
`Quantitative analysis was performed using an image analysis system
`linked to an Olympus Corp. camera, and the data were processed using
`Image-Pro Plus version 3.0 for Windows (Microsoft Corp.).
`
`Morphological characterization of ovarian follicles
`
`Stages of follicular development were defined as follows: primary
`follicles (containing only one granulosa cell layer), early secondary fol-
`licles (two to four granulosa cell layers, no antrum), late secondary
`follicles (more than four granulosa cell layers, no antrum), tertiary fol-
`licles (follicles containing an antrum), and ovulatory follicles (large
`antral follicles, ⬎2 mm). Follicles were classified as healthy if they
`contained a normal-shaped oocyte surrounded by granulosa cells that
`were regularly apposed on an intact basement membrane with normal
`appearance of granulosa cell nuclei without signs of pycnosis. Follicles
`not fulfilling these criteria were classified as unsuitable for analyses.
`Only follicles with a visible oocyte containing a nucleus were considered
`to ensure proper follicular classification.
`
`Morphometric analyses
`
`Serial sections of both ovaries of each animal stained for hematoxylin-
`eosin were subjected to morphometric analyses (10 sections at a distance
`
`of 100 ␮m/ovary from each other). A total of 31 primary, 523 secondary,
`and 181 tertiary follicles were analyzed in controls, and 29 primary, 327
`secondary, and 77 tertiary follicles were analyzed in treated animals. The
`image analysis system was set up to measure two diameters of the
`follicles in a right angle. From these diameters the mean follicular di-
`ameter was calculated. Furthermore, the thecal compartment was out-
`lined, and the mean thecal thickness was measured.
`
`Quantification of immunocytochemistry, in situ
`hybridization, and 3⬘-end labeling
`
`From our previous study (3) it was known that angiogenesis is ini-
`tiated in follicles containing more than four granulosa cell layers. Thus,
`in this study only follicles with four or more granulosa cell layers were
`analyzed. In all follicles the whole cross-sections were analyzed. Cap-
`tured images were thresholded, and the thecal and granulosa cell com-
`partments were outlined and analyzed separately.
`
`BrdU labeling
`Four sections per ovary were analyzed under ⫻200 magnification.
`The image analysis system was set up to measure the number of dark-
`stained nuclei (BrdU positive), and the number of dark- and light-
`stained nuclei (total number of cells) in the outlined compartment of
`interest. A proliferation index (i.e. BrdU-positive cells expressed as a
`percentage of the total number of cells) was calculated in the thecal and
`granulosa compartments for each follicle. The proliferation index was
`expressed as a mean value for the number of follicles assessed within
`each follicular stage and per animal.
`The automated image analysis of BrdU in the granulosa of secondary
`follicles failed to reliably distinguish between single cells because gran-
`ulosa cells have only a small cytoplasmic volume, so that the nuclei of
`different cells are in close vicinity. Thus, the granulosa cell proliferation
`index in these follicles was obtained by manual counting using an
`eyepiece with a grid.
`
`CD31 labeling
`
`The endothelial cell area (i.e. CD31-positive cells) was measured at
`⫻200 magnification in four sections of each ovary. The captured gray
`scale image was thresholded and converted to a binary image. The whole
`area of the thecal compartment and the CD31-positive area within the
`compartment was measured. The CD31-positive area was then calcu-
`lated per unit area of the thecal compartment and expressed as a mean
`value for the number of follicles assessed within each follicular stage and
`per animal.
`
`3⬘-End labeling
`
`Four sections per animal were analyzed. Follicles were classified as
`atretic if more than approximately 20% of the granulosa cells were
`apoptotic. The number of atretic and healthy late secondary and antral
`follicles were counted manually, and an index for atresia (atretic follicles
`expressed as a percentage of total number of follicles) was calculated.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`Data obtained for different cycle and follicular stages were tested for
`significant differences using ANOVA, followed by Duncan’s multiple
`range test. Effects of the treatment compared with late follicular controls
`were determined using a two-tailed, unpaired t test. Differences were
`considered to be significant at P ⬍ 0.05. The tests were performed using
`SPSS version 6.1 for Macintosh (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). All values are
`given as the mean ⫾ sem.
`
`Results
`Efficacy of the treatment to suppress thecal angiogenesis
`Dual staining for BrdU and CD31 (Fig. 2A) showed the
`established microvasulature in controls. Besides numerous
`single-stained cells for BrdU, some BrdU-positive cells were
`also associated with CD31 staining, indicating proliferating
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`2800 Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807
`
`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`FIG. 2. Dual staining for CD31 (red
`staining) and BrdU (black nuclei) in a
`follicle of a control (A) and an R1R2-
`treated animal (B). Note the reduction
`of proliferating cells (single and dual
`stained) and endothelial staining in the
`theca (Th) after treatment. Quantifica-
`tion of thecal proliferation (C) revealed
`a significant decrease in late secondary
`(LS) and tertiary (T) follicles. In these
`follicle stages the endothelial cell area
`(D) was also significantly reduced, dem-
`onstrating the suppression of thecal an-
`giogenesis after treatment. Different
`letters indicate significant differences.
`f, controls; u, R1R2 treated. ES, Early
`secondary follicle. Bar, 100 ␮m.
`
`endothelial cells. After R1R2 treatment (Fig. 2B), very few
`proliferating cells were visible, and thecal CD31 staining was
`markedly reduced. These observations were confirmed by
`quantitative analyses (Fig. 2, C and D). The thecal prolifer-
`ation index in late secondary follicles was 13.6 ⫾ 2.8% in early
`follicular controls, 13.2 ⫾ 1.8% in late follicular controls, and
`13.4 ⫾ 1.4% in early luteal controls. After treatment, a 79%
`reduction (P ⬍ 0.05) of thecal proliferation was found in late
`secondary follicles (3.4 ⫾ 0.6%). The thecal proliferation in-
`dex of tertiary follicles was 10.6 ⫾ 0.4% in early follicular
`controls, 15.1 ⫾ 2.1% in late follicular controls, and 16.2 ⫾
`2.0% in early luteal controls. After R1R2 treatment, a major
`92% reduction (P ⬍ 0.001) in thecal proliferation in tertiary
`follicles (1.1 ⫾ 0.2%) was observed.
`The endothelial cell areas measured in secondary or ter-
`tiary follicles of control animals were comparable (in sec-
`ondary follicles, 0.09 ⫾ 0.01 ␮m2/unit area during the early
`follicular phase, 0.09 ⫾ 0.008 ␮m2/unit area during the late
`follicular phase, and 0.09 ⫾ 0.008 ␮m2/unit area during the
`early luteal phase; in tertiary follicles, 0.2 ⫾ 0.01 ␮m2/unit
`area during the early follicular phase, 0.2 ⫾ 0.03 ␮m2/unit
`area during the late follicular phase, and 0.18 ⫾ 0.02 ␮m2/
`unit area during the early luteal phase). After R1R2 treatment
`a significant reduction of the endothelial cell area of 72% was
`found in secondary follicles (0.025 ⫾ 0.005 ␮m2/unit area)
`and 80% in tertiary follicles (0.04 ⫾ 0.007 ␮m2/unit area). In
`summary, it was evident that the treatment efficiently sup-
`pressed thecal angiogenesis in secondary and tertiary
`follicles.
`
`Effects of R1R2 treatment on thecal development
`Thecal development is initiated during early follicular
`growth when a follicle contains more than two granulosa cell
`layers. The fully differentiated theca is shown in Fig. 3A.
`Thecal cells have an elongated flat appearance surrounding
`the granulosa compartment in several layers. Fibrocytes are
`dispersed within these layers as the microvasculature is es-
`tablished. After R1R2 treatment (Fig. 3B), thecal cells ap-
`peared swollen, contained enlarged nuclei, and had lost their
`elongate shape. Furthermore, the theca lacks a microvascu-
`lature. In contrast, the occurrence of fibrocytes appeared
`unaffected.
`By measuring thecal thickness and plotting against the
`follicular diameter (Fig. 3C), a significant linear correlation
`was found for secondary follicles in controls (r ⫽ 0.9; P ⬍
`0.001) and treated animals (r ⫽ 0.86; P ⬍ 0.001). However,
`after R1R2 treatment the slope of the curve was reduced,
`indicating that at a given follicle diameter the theca is thinner
`than that in controls. Comparison of the mean thecal thick-
`ness in these follicles confirmed a significant reduction (P ⬍
`0.05) in thecal thickness after treatment. No correlation be-
`tween thecal thickness and follicle diameter was observed in
`tertiary follicles.
`
`Effects of R1R2 treatment on the expression of VEGF and
`its receptors KDR and Flt
`In controls, VEGF mRNA was expressed in the granu-
`losa and to a lesser extent in the thecal compartment in
`secondary and tertiary follicles (Fig. 4A). An increase in
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807 2801
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`FIG. 3. Effects of the inhibition of thecal angiogenesis on thecal development. A, A hematoxylin- and eosin-stained section of the theca (Th)
`of a control. Thecal cells have an elongated, flattened shape. Capillaries pass through the thecal compartment. B, Thecal cells after R1R2
`treatment appear swollen with enlarged nuclei. Note the lack of the thecal capillaries (bar, 100 ␮m). Measuring the thecal thickness and plotting
`it against the follicle diameter (C), a significant linear correlation for both in controls and after R1R2 treatment was found. However, the curve
`for the R1R2 treatment exhibited a lower slope, indicating that the theca after treatment is thinner. This was confirmed by comparison of the
`mean thecal diameters (D). Different letters indicate significant differences. LF, Late follicular control.
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 5
`
`

`

`2802 Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807
`
`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`FIG. 4. Effects of the treatment on the gene expression of VEGF (A and B), KDR (C and D), and Flt (E and F). After treatment, VEGF was
`expressed in increasing amounts in the thecal and granulosa cell compartments of secondary and tertiary follicles. KDR (B) and Flt (E) mRNA
`was localized in thecal endothelial cells, and after treatment a complete down-regulation was notable (D and F). Bar, 50 ␮m.
`
`VEGF expression in the granulosa was observed in the
`preovulatory follicles. After R1R2 treatment (Fig. 4B)
`VEGF mRNA expression was markedly increased in the
`granulosa of secondary and tertiary follicles. Expression in
`the theca was also increased, especially in secondary fol-
`licles, such that the expression in the theca appeared to be
`higher than that in the granulosa. The KDR receptor
`mRNA (Fig. 4C) and Flt receptor mRNA (Fig. 4E) are both
`expressed in the endothelium of the thecal vasculature of
`both secondary and tertiary follicles. A complete down-
`
`regulation of both receptors (Fig. 4, D and F) was found
`after R1R2 treatment. This decrease was attributable not
`only to the dearth of thecal endothelial cells after treat-
`ment, but also to a reduction in expression in the remain-
`ing cells.
`
`Secondary effects of the treatment on follicular development
`
`By gross inspection, it appeared that after R1R2 treatment
`ovaries were smaller than controls. No signs of an ovulatory
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807 2803
`
`follicle or an ovulation stigma were found, which were ob-
`served in late follicular or early luteal controls. A significant
`decrease in ovarian weight (37 ⫾ 6.9 mg) after treatment was
`measured compared with early follicular (113 ⫾ 12 mg), late
`follicular (70 ⫾ 13 mg), and early luteal (127 ⫾ 35 mg) controls.
`In a cross-section through a typical control ovary of the
`early follicular phase (d 1–2; Fig. 5A) the regressing luteal
`tissue of the previous cycle was visible, occupying the ma-
`jority of the organ. Numerous healthy and atretic small and
`medium sized antral follicles were also present. In the late
`follicular phase ovary (d 7– 8; Fig. 5B) the predominant fea-
`ture was the developed preovulatory follicles (two or three
`per animal). Besides these, a number of smaller antral folli-
`cles are located within the cortex. After ovulation (d 10 –11;
`Fig. 5C), the early corpus luteum dominates, occupying two
`thirds of the ovary. Medium and large antral follicles, a
`number of them either luteinized or atretic, are present
`within the cortex. After R1R2 treatment, the most striking
`observation is the absence of medium and large antral fol-
`licles (Fig. 5D). A small proportion of regressed luteal tissue
`from the previous cycle was visible, but fresh, healthy cor-
`pora lutea were absent.
`Depending on the stage of follicular development, gran-
`ulosa cell proliferation was also effected by the treatment. In
`secondary follicles of controls (Fig. 6A) numerous granulosa
`cells were BrdU positive, indicating active cell proliferation.
`After R1R2 treatment no differences were apparent (Fig. 6B).
`In tertiary follicles of controls (Fig. 6C) a large number of
`
`granulosa cells are also proliferating, whereas after treatment
`(Fig. 6D) the number of proliferating granulosa cells mark-
`edly decreased. Quantification (Fig. 6E) confirmed these ob-
`servations, showing a nonsignificant decrease in secondary
`follicles and a significant reduction in the proliferation index
`after R1R2 treatment in tertiary follicles.
`The results of granulosa cell proliferation are consistent
`with morphometric analysis of follicular diameter. There
`was no difference in follicle diameter of early follicular
`stages (primary and early secondary follicles). Also no
`differences were observed for late secondary follicles be-
`tween early follicular phase (167 ⫾ 9.1 ␮m), late follicular
`phase (174 ⫾ 8.1 ␮m), early luteal phase (161 ⫾ 5.2 ␮m),
`and after R1R2 treatment (171 ⫾ 5 ␮m). However, major
`differences were detectable in tertiary follicles. Frequency
`measurements revealed that in controls, the peak fre-
`quency of tertiary follicles was 950 ␮m (Fig. 7A). A smaller
`number of large antral follicles (⬎1300 ␮m) and ovulatory
`follicles (⬃2500 ␮m) were also present. In comparison, in
`R1R2-treated animals (Fig. 7B) the peak frequency was
`reduced (750 ␮m). Most striking was the absence of fol-
`licles over 1000 ␮m. Comparison of the mean follicular
`diameter of tertiary follicles (Fig. 7C) showed a signifi-
`cantly decreased diameter in follicles after R1R2 treatment
`(722 ⫾ 13 ␮m) compared with controls (973 ⫾ 31 ␮m).
`The TUNEL method to detect apoptosis in follicles to clas-
`sify them definitely as atretic (i.e. the percentage of apoptotic
`follicles of the total number of follicles) showed that atresia
`
`FIG. 5. Effects of the inhibition of thecal angiogenesis on follicular development. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections of the early follicular
`phase (A), late follicular phase (B), and early luteal phase (C) and after R1R2 treatment (D) are shown. Note the lack of large antral follicles
`after treatment compared with all other stages. Bar, 200 ␮m.
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1129
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 7
`
`

`

`2804 Endocrinology, July 2002, 143(7):2797–2807
`
`Wulff et al. (cid:127) Inhibition of Follicular Development
`
`Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/143/7/2797/2989719 by guest on 26 May 2022
`
`FIG. 6. Effects of the treatment on granulosa cell
`proliferation as indicated by BrdU immunocyto-
`chemistry. A, A late secondary follicle (LS) of a
`control ovary; B, a comparable follicle after treat-
`ment. No obvious differences in BrdU staining
`(black nuclei) are visible. C and D, A tertiary
`follicle of a control and R1R2-treated ovary is
`shown, respectively. Note the decline in granu-
`losa cell proliferation after the treatment (bar,
`100 ␮m). Quantitative analyses (E) confirmed the
`observation of decreased granulosa cell prolifer-
`ation in antral follicles after treatment (u) com-
`pared with controls (f).
`
`was rarely detectable in follicles up to the late secondary
`stage, and no quantitative difference in atresia was found
`between controls and R1R2-treated animals. In tertiary fol-
`licles, atresia did not vary between the normal cycle phases,
`being 37 ⫾ 1.6% during the early follicular phase, 35 ⫾ 6.8%
`during the late follicular phase, and 41 ⫾ 4.3% during the
`early luteal phase. However, after R1R2 treatment, a signif-
`icant doubling (78 ⫾ 4%) in the atretic rate was found com-
`pared with all controls (Fig. 7D).
`
`Discussion
`This study has established the importance of the thecal
`vasculature for follicular develop

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket