throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 54
`Entered: May 11, 2022
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., CELLTRION, INC., and
`APOTEX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2021-00880 (Patent 9,669,069 B2)1
`IPR2021-00881 (Patent 9,254,338 B2)2
`____________
`
`Before ERICA A. FRANKLIN, JOHN G. NEW, and
`SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`ORDER3
`Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice of Eric R. Hunt
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 IPR2022-00257 and IPR2022-00301 have been joined with this
`proceeding.
`2 IPR2022-00258 and IPR2022-00298 have been joined with this
`proceeding.
`3 The combined caption is for administrative convenience only and does not
`indicate that IPR2021-00880 and IPR2021-00881 have been joined. The
`parties are not authorized to use this caption without express permission of
`the Board.
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00880 (Patent 9,669,069 B2)
`IPR2021-00881 (Patent 9,254,338 B2)
`
`
`On April 20, 2022, Petitioner filed motions for admission pro hac vice
`of Eric R. Hunt in each of the above-identified proceedings (collectively
`“Motions”). Paper 49.4 Petitioner also filed declarations of Mr. Hunt in
`support of the Motions (collectively “Declarations”). Ex. 1090.5 Petitioner
`attests that Patent Owner does not oppose the Motions. Paper 49, 1. For the
`reasons provided below, Petitioner’s Motions are granted.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. In its notice
`authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission, the Board requires a
`statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize
`counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear in this proceeding. See Paper 3, 2 (citing Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013)
`(representative “Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission”)).
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motions and the accompanying
`Declarations, we conclude that Mr. Hunt has sufficient legal and technical
`qualifications to represent Petitioner in these proceedings, that Mr. Hunt has
`demonstrated sufficient familiarity with the subject matter of these
`proceedings, and that Mr. Hunt meets all other requirements for admission
`pro hac vice. Accordingly, Petitioner has established good cause for pro hac
`
`
`4 For purposes of expediency, we cite to Papers filed in IPR2021-00880.
`Petitioner filed a similar Motion in IPR2021-00881 (Paper 52).
`5 We cite to Exhibits filed in IPR2021-00880. Petitioner filed a similar
`Declaration in IPR2021-00881 (Ex. 1101).
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00880 (Patent 9,669,069 B2)
`IPR2021-00881 (Patent 9,254,338 B2)
`
`vice admission of Mr. Hunt. Mr. Hunt will be permitted to serve as back-up
`counsel only. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`We note that Petitioner has filed a Power of Attorney including Mr.
`Hunt in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b). IPR2021-00880, Paper 50;
`and IPR2021-00881, Paper 54. Petitioner has also filed Mandatory Notices
`identifying Mr. Hunt as back-up counsel in accordance with
`37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3). IPR2021-00880, Paper 52; and IPR2021-00881,
`Paper 55.
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Eric R. Hunt are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the above-identified
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hunt is authorized to represent
`Petitioner as back-up counsel only in the above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hunt is to comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide6 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title
`37, Code of Federal Regulations;7 and
`
`
`6 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`7 In the Declaration, Mr. Hunt indicates compliance with the Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth
`in C.F.R. Part 42, as opposed to part 42 of 37 C.F.R. See Ex. 1090 ¶ 8.
`We deem this harmless error.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00880 (Patent 9,669,069 B2)
`IPR2021-00881 (Patent 9,254,338 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hunt shall be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00880 (Patent 9,669,069 B2)
`IPR2021-00881 (Patent 9,254,338 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Paul Molino
`Willaim Rakoczy
`Nwil McLaughlin
`Heinz Salmen
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`paul@rmmslegal.com
`wrakoczy@rmmslegal.com
`nmclaughlin@rmmslegal.com
`hsalmen@rmmslegal.com
`
`Teresa Rea
`Deborah Yellin
`Shannon Lentz
`trea@crowell.com
`dyellin@crowell.com
`slentz@crowell.com
`
`Lora Green
`Yahn-Lin Chu
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`lgreen@wsgr.com
`ychu@wsgr.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Deborah Fishman
`Amanda Antons
`Alice Sin Yu Ho
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`deborah.fishman@kayescholer.com
`amanda.antons@arnoldporter.com
`alice.ho@arnoldporter.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket