`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Inter Partes Review No.: IPR2021-00880
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,669,069 B2
`Filed: December 17, 2015
`Issued: June 6, 2017
`Inventor: George D. Yancopoulos
`
`Title: USE OF A VEGF ANTAGONIST TO TREAT
`ANGIOGENIC EYE DISORDERS
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ERIC R. HUNT
`IN SUPPORT OF MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.’S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1090
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 1
`
`
`
`I, Eric R. Hunt, declare as follows:
`
`Case IPR2021-00880
`Patent 9,669,069 B2
`Declaration of Eric R. Hunt
`
`
`1.
`
`I am an experienced litigating attorney with more than fifteen (15) years
`
`of experience.
`
`2.
`
`I have been actively litigating patent cases for more than fifteen (15)
`
`years.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Illinois and
`
`the Minnesota Bar, and am also admitted to practice in the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern
`
`District of Illinois.
`
`4.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`6.
`
`I have had no sanctions or contempt citations imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. More
`
`specifically, I am familiar with the patent at issue in this proceeding—U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,669,069 B2 (“the ’069 patent”). I am advising Mylan on patent matters
`
`relating to the subject matter claimed in the ’069 patent and have been involved in
`
`
`
`1
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1090
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00880
`Patent 9,669,069 B2
`Declaration of Eric R. Hunt
`
`the strategy and drafting of Mylan’s Petition for Inter Partes Review of the ’069
`
`patent, including all prior art raised therein.
`
`8.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in C.F.R. Part 42 – Trial
`
`Practice Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`9.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and to
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19.
`
`10.
`
`In the last three (3) years, I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in
`
`an inter partes review proceeding.
`
`11.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge
`
`are true; and further that these statements are made with the knowledge that willful
`
`false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
`
`both, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1090
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00880
`Patent 9,669,069 B2
`Declaration of Eric R. Hunt
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`
`/Eric R. Hunt /
`Eric R. Hunt
`6 West Hubbard Street
`Suite 500
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone:
`(312) 222-6314
`Facsimile:
`(312) 843-6260
`ehunt@rmmslegal.com
`
`3
`
`Dated: April 20, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mylan Exhibit 1090
`Mylan v. Regeneron, IPR2021-00880
`Page 4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
