throbber
12/22/2021
`
`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`
`Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the
`modernization effort.
`
`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With
`Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRAVO) (BRAVO)
`
`The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor
`and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S.
`Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
`
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00486018
`
`Recruitment Status  : Completed
`First Posted  : June 13, 2007
`Results First Posted  : February 25, 2011
`Last Update Posted  : May 10, 2017
`
`Sponsor:
`Genentech, Inc.
`
`Information provided by (Responsible Party):
`Genentech, Inc.
`
`Study Details
`
`Tabular View
`
`Study Results
`
`Disclaimer
`
`How to Read a Study Record
`
`Study Description
`
`Go to
`
`Brief Summary:
`This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection-controlled study of the efficacy and
`safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with sham injections in patients with macular edema secondary to branch
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`1/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 01 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`retinal vein occlusion (BRVO); 397 patients with BRVO were enrolled at 93 investigational sites in the United States.
`The study included a treatment period (6 months) and an observation period (6 months).
`
`Condition or disease 
`
`Intervention/treatment 
`
`Macular Edema
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
`
`Retinal Vein Occlusion
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
`
`Phase 
`
`Phase 3
`
`Drug: Sham injection
`
`Study Design
`
`Go to
`
`Study Type  :
`Interventional (Clinical Trial)
`Actual Enrollment  :
`397 participants
`Allocation:
`Randomized
`Intervention Model:
`Parallel Assignment
`Masking:
`Double (Participant, Investigator)
`Primary Purpose:
`Treatment
`Official Title:
`A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Sham Injection-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of
`Ranibizumab Injection Compared With Sham in Subjects With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal
`Vein Occlusion
`Study Start Date  :
`July 2007
`Actual Primary Completion Date  :
`May 2009
`Actual Study Completion Date  :
`November 2009
`
`Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine
`
`MedlinePlus related topics: Edema
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`2/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 02 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`Drug Information available for: Ranibizumab
`
`U.S. FDA Resources
`
`Arms and Interventions
`
`Go to
`
`Arm 
`
`Intervention/treatment 
`
`Sham Comparator: Sham injection
`
`Experimental: Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
`
`Experimental: Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
`
`Drug: Sham injection
`Sham injection in a single-dose regimen given
`every month (Day 0 through the Month 5 visit), for
`a total of six sham injections.
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
`Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg in a single-dose
`regimen given every month (Day 0 through the
`Month 5 visit), for a total of six injections.
`Other Name: Lucentis
`
`Drug: Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
`Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg in a single-dose
`regimen given every month (Day 0 through the
`Month 5 visit), for a total of six injections.
`Other Name: Lucentis
`
`Outcome Measures
`
`Go to
`
`Primary Outcome Measures  :
`1. Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at 6 Months
`[ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]
`
`BCVA score in the study eye was based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
`visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters.
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures  :
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`3/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 03 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`1. Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥ 15 Letters in BCVA Score at Month 6 Compared With
`Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]
`
`BCVA score based on the ETDRS visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a
`starting distance of 4 meters.
`
`2. Percentage of Participants Who Lost < 15 Letters in BCVA Score at Month 6 Compared With
`Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]
`
`BCVA score based on the ETDRS visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a
`starting distance of 4 meters. The percentage of subjects who lost <15 letters will be greater than
`the percentage of subjects who "gained >=15 letters" as "losing <15 letters" includes both those who
`gained >=15 letters and those who were "stable" (i.e. lost between 1 and 14 letters, had no change,
`or gained between 1 and 14 letters).
`
`3. Percentage of Participants With a Central Foveal Thickness of ≤ 250 μm at Month 6 [ Time Frame: 6
`months ]
`
`A central reading center assessed all optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Central foveal
`thickness was defined as the center point thickness.
`
`4. Mean Absolute Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Month 6
`[ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]
`
`A central reading center assessed all OCT images. Central foveal thickness was defined as the
`center point thickness.
`
`5. Mean Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI
`VFQ-25) Near Activities Subscale Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]
`
`The NEI VFQ-25 (v. 2000; Interviewer Format) consisted of the base set of 25 questions, plus the
`optional additional questions (where questions A3, A4, and A5 pertained to the Near Activities
`Subscale). Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score represented better functioning.
`
`6. Mean Change From Baseline in the NEI VFQ-25 Distance Activities Subscale Score at Month 6
`[ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]
`
`The NEI VFQ-25 (v. 2000; Interviewer Format) consisted of the base set of 25 questions, plus the
`optional additional questions (where questions A6, A7, and A8 pertained to the Distance Activities
`Subscale). Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score represented better functioning.
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`4/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 04 of 09
`
`

`

`12/22/2021
`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`Eligibility Criteria
`Go to
`
`Information from the National Library of Medicine
`
`Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family
`members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may
`contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About
`Clinical Studies.
`
`Ages Eligible for Study:
`18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
`Sexes Eligible for Study:
`All
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
`No
`
`Criteria
`Inclusion Criteria:
`
`Willingness to provide signed Informed Consent Form
`Age ≥ 18 years
`For sexually active women of childbearing potential, use of an appropriate form of contraception (or
`abstinence) for the duration of the study
`Ability and willingness to return for all scheduled visits and assessments
`
`Ocular Inclusion Criterion (Study Eye):
`
`Foveal center-involved macular edema secondary to BRVO
`BCVA using ETDRS charts of 20/40 to 20/400 (Snellen equivalent)
`Mean central subfield thickness ≥ 250 μm on two optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements (at
`screening [confirmed by the central reading center] and Day 0 [confirmed by the evaluating physician])
`Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and participant cooperation sufficient to obtain adequate fundus
`photographs
`
`Exclusion Criteria:
`
`History of cerebral vascular accident or myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to Day 0
`History of any anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in fellow eye within 3 months prior
`to Day 0
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`5/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 05 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`History of any systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 6 months prior to Day 0
`History of allergy to fluorescein
`History of allergy to ranibizumab injection or related molecule
`Relevant systemic disease that may be associated with increased systemic VEGF levels (namely, all active
`malignancies); history of successfully treated malignancies is not an exclusion criterion
`Uncontrolled blood pressure
`Pregnancy or lactation
`Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., chronic
`alcoholism or drug abuse, personality disorder or use of major tranquilizers, indicated difficulty in long-term
`follow-up, and likelihood of survival of less than 1 year)
`Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days prior to Day 0 that involved treatment with any drug
`(excluding vitamins and minerals) or device that has not received regulatory approval at time of study entry
`
`Ocular Exclusion Criteria (Study Eye):
`
`Prior episode of retinal vein occlusion (RVO)
`Brisk afferent pupillary defect
`History of radial optic neurotomy or sheathotomy
`History or presence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD; dry or wet form)
`History of any anti-VEGF treatment in the study eye within 3 months prior to Day 0
`History of laser photocoagulation for macular edema within 4 months prior to Day 0
`History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation or sector laser photocoagulation within 3 months prior to
`randomization or anticipated within the next 4 months following randomization
`History of intraocular corticosteroid use within 3 months prior to Day 0
`History of pars plana vitrectomy
`History of intraocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, etc.) within 2 months prior to
`Day 0 or anticipated within the next 7 months following Day 0
`History of yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to Day 0
`Previous filtration surgery in the study eye
`History of herpetic ocular infection
`History of ocular toxoplasmosis
`History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
`History of idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy
`Evidence upon examination of vitreoretinal interface disease (e.g., vitreomacular traction, epiretinal
`membrane), either on clinical examination or OCT, thought to be contributing to macular edema
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`6/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 06 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`An eye that, in the investigator's opinion, would not benefit from resolution of macular edema, such as eyes
`with foveal atrophy, dense pigmentary changes, or dense subfoveal hard exudates
`Presence of an ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter
`visual acuity during the study (e.g., uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma,
`Irvine-Gass syndrome, or prior macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment)
`Visually significant hemorrhage obscuring the fovea and felt to be a major contributor to reduced visual
`acuity
`Presence of a substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual
`acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., a 20/40 cataract)
`Aphakia
`Relevant ocular disease that may be associated with increased intraocular VEGF levels (namely, uveitis,
`neovascular glaucoma, neovascular AMD, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic maculopathy, or ocular ischemic
`syndrome)
`Improvement of > 10 letters on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between screening and Day 0
`
`Contacts and Locations
`
`Go to
`
`Information from the National Library of Medicine
`
`To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact
`information provided by the sponsor.
`
`Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00486018
`
`Sponsors and Collaborators
`Genentech, Inc.
`
`Investigators
`Study Director: Roman Rubio, M.D. Genentech, Inc.
`
`More Information
`
`Go to
`
`Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
`
`Suñer IJ, Bressler NM, Varma R, Lee P, Dolan CM, Ward J, Colman S, Rubio RG. Reading speed
`improvements in retinal vein occlusion after ranibizumab treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;131(7):851-6.
`doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.114.
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`7/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 07 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`Bhisitkul RB, Campochiaro PA, Shapiro H, Rubio RG. Predictive value in retinal vein occlusions of early versus
`late or incomplete ranibizumab response defined by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013
`May;120(5):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
`
`Responsible Party:
`Genentech, Inc.
`ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
`NCT00486018 History of Changes
`Other Study ID Numbers:
`FVF4165g
`First Posted:
`June 13, 2007 Key Record Dates
`Results First Posted:
`February 25, 2011
`Last Update Posted:
`May 10, 2017
`Last Verified:
`April 2017
`
`Keywords provided by Genentech, Inc.:
`Lucentis
`RVO
`BRVO
`Edema
`
`Additional relevant MeSH terms:
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`8/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 08 of 09
`
`

`

`A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusi…
`12/22/2021
`Macular Edema
`Retinal Vein Occlusion
`Edema
`Macular Degeneration
`Retinal Degeneration
`Retinal Diseases
`Eye Diseases
`Venous Thrombosis
`Thrombosis
`Embolism and Thrombosis
`Vascular Diseases
`Cardiovascular Diseases
`Ranibizumab
`Angiogenesis Inhibitors
`Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
`Growth Substances
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`Growth Inhibitors
`Antineoplastic Agents
`
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00486018
`
`9/9
`
`Exhibit 2124
`Page 09 of 09
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket