throbber
Accelerating the world's research.
`
`The 1.7 Å crystal structure of BPI: a
`study of how two dissimilar amino
`acid sequences can adopt the same
`fold
`
`Parag Mallick
`
`Journal of Molecular Biology
`
`Cite this paper
`
`Downloaded from Academia.edu 
`
`Get the citation in MLA, APA, or Chicago styles
`
`Related papers
`
`Download a PDF Pack of the best related papers 
`
`PFIT and PFRIT: Bioinformatic algorithms for detecting glycosidase function from structure …
`Parag Mallick
`
`Sequence and structural analysis of cellular retinoic acid-binding proteins reveals a network of conse…
`Lila Gierasch, Kannan Gunasekaran
`
`3DSIG 2010: The 6th Structural Bioinformatics and Computational Biophysics Meeting
`Mihir Solanki
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 01 of 17
`
`

`

`The 1.7 AÊ Crystal Structure of BPI: A Study of How
`Two Dissimilar Amino Acid Sequences can Adopt the
`Same Fold
`
`Gary Kleiger1, Lesa J. Beamer2, Robert Grothe1, Parag Mallick1
`and David Eisenberg1*
`
`1UCLA-DOE Laboratory of
`Structural Biology and
`Molecular Medicine, Molecular
`Biology Institute, UCLA
`BOX 951570, Los Angeles
`CA 90095-1570, USA
`2Biochemistry Department
`University of Missouri-
`Columbia, Columbia
`MO 65211, USA
`
`We have extended the resolution of the crystal structure of human bac-
`to 1.7 AÊ . BPI has two
`tericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI)
`domains with the same fold, but with little sequence similarity. To under-
`stand the similarity in structure of the two domains, we compare the
`corresponding residue positions in the two domains by the method of
`3D-1D pro®les. A 3D-1D pro®le is a string formed by assigning each pos-
`ition in the 3D structure to one of 18 environment classes. The environ-
`ment classes are de®ned by the local secondary structure, the area of the
`residue which is buried from solvent, and the fraction of the area buried
`by polar atoms. A structural alignment between the two BPI domains
`was used to compare the 3D-1D environments of structurally equivalent
`positions. Greater than 31 % of the aligned positions have conserved 3D-
`1D environments, but only 13 % have conserved residue identities. Anal-
`ysis of the 3D-1D environmentally conserved positions helps to identify
`pairs of residues likely to be important in conserving the fold, regardless
`of the residue similarity. We ®nd examples of 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved positions with dissimilar residues which nevertheless play
`similar structural roles. To generalize our ®ndings, we analyzed four
`other proteins with similar structures yet dissimilar sequences. Together,
`these examples show that aligned pairs of dissimilar residues often share
`similar structural roles, stabilizing dissimilar sequences in the same fold.
`# 2000 Academic Press
`
`*Corresponding author
`
`Keywords: BPI; X-ray crystallography; 3D-1D environment; domain; fold
`
`Introduction
`
`Proteins with sequence similarity also display
`structural similarity. However, many proteins with
`no apparent sequence similarity display the same
`folds. For example, the mitochondrial enzyme rho-
`danese contains two domains of similar structure,
`but little sequence similarity (Hol et al., 1983). This
`phenomenon is not rare. In fact, the database of
`distant aligned protein structures (DAPS) has over
`1000 examples of structurally similar proteins with
`less than 25 % sequence identity (Rice & Eisenberg,
`1997). Examples of both intra and inter-molecular
`
`fold similarity in the absence of amino acid simi-
`larity is given in Table 1.
`To study how dissimilar protein sequences
`adopt similar folds, we analyze the structure of the
`bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI).
`BPI has two domains with the same fold but with
`dissimilar
`sequences. Both BPI domains
`are
`twisted, anti-parallel b-sheet barrels capped by two
`a-helices. The domain main-chain atoms can be
`superimposed without
`signi®cant deformation
`(3.0 AÊ rmsd over 173 residues). The BPI domain is
`to date a unique fold. We take advantage of the
`apparent domain duplication in BPI to ®nd struc-
`turally conserved positions for the BPI domain.
`BPI is a mammalian protein located in polymor-
`phonuclear neutrophils, a cell of
`the
`innate
`immune response that protects the host during
`microbial
`infection (Elsbach & Weiss, 1995). BPI
`speci®cally binds lipopolysaccharides in the outer-
`membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Although
`
`

`

`1020
`
`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`Table 1. Examples of domains with similar folds but dissimilar amino acid sequences
`
`Protein 1
`
`Protein 2
`
`rmsd (AÊ )
`
`% Seq. ID
`
`Reference
`
`Hexokinase domain I
`Rhodanese domain I
`Rhizopuspepsin domain I
`Phosphoglycerate kinase
`dom. I
`Arabinose-binding protein
`dom. I
`Bovine F1-ATPase
`Bromoperoxidase A2
`b-amylase
`Cellobiohydrolase I
`Neuroglian
`
`Hexokinase domain II
`Rhodanese domain II
`Rhizopuspepsin domain II
`PGK domain II
`
`Arabinose domain II
`
`Rec A protein
`Triacylglycerol hydrolase
`Concanavalin B
`Serum amyloid component
`T cell antigen receptor
`
`2.8
`1.8
`3.0
`4.5
`
`3.2
`
`3.2
`2.7
`4.1
`3.4
`3.3
`
`11
`13
`13
`8
`
`7
`
`9
`14
`10
`10
`11
`
`Steitz et al. (1976)
`Ploegman et al. (1978)
`Subramanian et al. (1977)
`Banks et al. (1979)
`
`Quiocho et al. (1977)
`
`Abrahams et al. (1994); Story et al. (1992)
`Hecht et al. (1994); Uppenberg et al. (1994)
`Hennig et al. (1995); Mikami et al. (1994)
`Divne et al. (1994); Emsley et al. (1994)
`Bentley et al. (1995); Huber et al. (1994)
`
`The ®rst ®ve examples are similar folds where each domain is from the same protein (rms deviations are for superimposed
`main-chain atoms); the last ®ve examples are similar folds where each domain is from a different protein (rmsd are for superim-
`posed Ca atoms). This table has been adapted and expanded from Richardson (1981).
`
`BPI has two domains, a single BPI domain can
`adopt a stable fold: an N-terminal fragment has
`been expressed and retains the in vitro activity of
`wild-type BPI (Horwitz et al., 1996). The BPI X-ray
`structure was determined in our laboratory to
`2.4 AÊ resolution at room temperature (Beamer et al.,
`1997), and here is extended to 1.7 AÊ using cryo-
`crystallography diffraction data.
`Here, we use 3D-1D environment classes to
`identify the structurally equivalent positions in the
`two domains that have similar atomic environ-
`ments. 3D-1D environment classes have been used
`successfully for tasks such as protein sequence fold
`assignment, and assessing the quality of protein
`structures derived from NMR or X-ray crystallo-
`graphy experiments (Bowie et al., 1991; Luthy et al.,
`1992). The 3D-1D environment classes describe the
`protein structure, where each environment
`is
`de®ned by the local secondary structure, the sol-
`vent accessibility, and the fraction of local atoms
`that are polar for each residue. Our hypothesis is
`that structurally equivalent positions with identical
`environments are important
`for conserving the
`fold. While one might expect to ®nd positions with
`conserved structural environments in the core of
`each BPI domain, we show here that structurally
`equivalent surface positions with dissimilar residue
`types can conserve structural
`roles. With the
`environment classes determined from our 1.7 AÊ
`model, we compare structurally equivalent pos-
`itions between the two domains of BPI and exam-
`ine the physical-chemical properties that determine
`the unusual BPI structure.
`
`Results
`
`Extension of the resolution and refinement of
`the 1.7 AÊ structure of BPI
`
`Using cryo-crystallography as described in
`Materials and Methods, the resolution of the BPI
`structure was extended to 1.7 AÊ and re®ned to an
`R-factor of 0.198 with an Rfree of 0.249. Comparison
`
`of the high-resolution model of BPI with the room-
`temperature model reveals little structural change,
`with the exception of residues 42 to 48. In the new
`structure, several side-chains on one side of the
`loop now pack against the protein, whereas these
`side-chains in the previous model were mostly
`exposed to solvent. The loop rearrangement may
`be due to conditioning the crystals with 45 % PEG
`6000 for cryo-protection, freezing, or a combination
`of the two. Equivalent main-chain atoms for the
`two models superimpose with an rmsd of 0.9 AÊ .
`The ribbon diagram is shown in Figure 1(a).
`
`Comparison of the N-terminal and C-terminal
`domains of BPI using 3D-1D environments
`
`The structural alignment of the N-terminal and
`C-terminal BPI domains was used to generate a
`sequence alignment between the two domains
`(Figure 2). Conservation between the two domains
`was ®rst examined at the residue level. A total of
`21 pairs of residues are identical out of 164 aligned
`positions between the two domains, corresponding
`to a sequence identity of 13 %. This level of
`sequence identity is
`signi®cantly higher
`than
`would be expected for two independently gener-
`this length (Z-score
`ated random sequences of
`equals 3.6, see Materials and Methods). Even so,
`the sequence identity is too low to allow sequence
`alignment methods to predict an alignment, and in
`fact the structural identity of the two domains was
`unsuspected prior to the 2.4 AÊ resolution structure.
`To understand the fold identity of the two BPI
`domains in the absence of strong sequence simi-
`larity, positional similarities were examined using
`3D-1D environment classes. The environments for
`each position in the two domains are shown on the
`structure-derived sequence alignment of the two
`domains (Figure 2). We reasoned that structurally
`equivalent positions with similar environments
`might also have similar structural roles in each BPI
`domain. Of the 164 structurally aligned positions,
`51 have identical 3D-1D environments, correspond-
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 03 of 17
`
`

`

`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`1021
`
`Figure 1. (a) Ribbon representation of the 1.7 AÊ crystal structure of human BPI. The N-terminal domain is blue.
`The C-terminal domain is red. Residues 10 to 193 fold into a structural element called the N-terminal barrel. The bar-
`rel is composed of ®ve anti-parallel b-strands which twist about the barrel axis. Two a-helices complete the barrel by
`closing a gap in the b-sheet. Residues 260 to 430 fold into a similar structure called the C-terminal barrel. Amino acid
`residues 201 to 229, as well as 431 to 456, fold into the central b-sheet of six strands, located in the center of the mol-
`ecule, which interacts with both the N-terminal and C-terminal barrels. A linker of residues 230 to 250 (olive) con-
`nects the N-terminal and C-terminal domains. (b) Superposition of the N-terminal domain (blue) on the C-terminal
`domain (red). Residues 1-229 were structurally aligned to residues 251-456 using the algorithm ALIGN V2 (Cohen,
`1986). The two domains align with 3.0 AÊ root mean square deviation over the main-chain atoms of the 173 structu-
`rally corresponding residues. (c) Schematic of BPI showing its elongated shape and two-domain structure. The two
`domains are related by a pseudodyad perpendicular to the page. Secondary structure units are represented by arrows
`(b-strands) and rectangles (helices). The N-terminal domain (residues 1-229) is gray; the C-terminal domain (residues
`251 to 456) is black. Secondary structure units have been numbered, with the primes denoting the units in the
`C-terminal domain. Residue positions for the start and end of each secondary structure unit are shown. The three
`subdomains (N-terminal barrel, C-terminal barrel, and central sheet) are shown.
`
`ing to 31 % of the structurally equivalent positions
`in the BPI domain alignment. This level of conser-
`vation is highly signi®cant relative to an alignment
`of two independently generated random pro®les of
`this length (Z-score ˆ 12.9. A fuller statistical anal-
`ysis of
`the BPI domain alignment
`is given in
`Materials and Methods).
`
`Analysis of environmentally conserved
`positions in the BPI alignment as a function of
`environment class
`
`We then asked if certain environment classes are
`more conserved than others in the BPI alignment.
`We use a p-value which is the probability that at
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 04 of 17
`
`

`

`1022
`
`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`Figure 2. Structure-based alignment of the amino acid sequences of the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of BPI.
`Both the sequence and corresponding 3D-1D environments are shown. The N-terminal domain (residues 1 to 229) is
`the top sequence; the C-terminal domain (residues 251 to 456) is the bottom of each dual line. If the 3D-1D environ-
`ments are identical for a given pair in the alignment, the two positions are considered structurally conserved and
`colored black. Consecutive stretches of 3D-1D-conserved residues are labeled blocks I-V. The nine positions that were
`removed from the initial alignment have stars located above the corresponding N-terminal position.
`
`least M out of N pairs of environments from the
`BPI domain alignment would be the same if the
`environments were paired at
`random. Small
`p-values indicate correlation between the environ-
`ments of structurally aligned positions; p-values
`for each environment class are shown in Table 2.
`Notice that residues important for stabilizing the
`cores of proteins tend to be hydrophobic and bur-
`ied in apolar environments,
`that
`is,
`in the B1
`
`environment class (see Materials and Methods and
`Table 5 for the de®nition of each environment
`class). We would then expect to observe a low
`p-value for B1-B1 pairs because the structural role
`of residues that pack in the protein core tend to be
`conserved. The p-values for the H:B1 and E:B1
`environment classes are 3  106 and 8  106,
`respectively. Therefore, one would expect
`to
`observe at least as many H:B1 matches for the BPI
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 05 of 17
`
`

`

`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`1023
`
`Table 2. Log-odds and fractional weighted log-odds (FWLO) values for 3D-1D environment classes (Env. Class) for
`the alignment of the N and C-terminal domains of BPI and for all alignments from the DAPS database
`
`BPI
`Env. Class
`
`H:E
`H:P2
`H:P1
`H:B3
`H:B2
`H:B1
`E:E
`E:P2
`E:P1
`E:B3
`E:B2
`E:B1
`C:E
`C:P2
`C:P1
`C:B3
`C:B2
`C:B1
`
`P-value
`
`5  102
`2  108
`NO
`NO
`NO
`3  106
`2  102
`1  105
`1  101
`NO
`NO
`8  106
`1  101
`2  101
`NO
`NO
`NO
`NO
`
`Log-odds
`
`FWLO
`
`DAPS database
`Log-odds
`
`FWLO
`
`1.7
`2.0
`NO
`NO
`NO
`3.1
`1.4
`1.0
`0.9
`NO
`NO
`1.3
`1.1
`0.9
`NO
`NO
`NO
`NO
`
`0.05
`0.24
`NO
`NO
`NO
`0.17
`0.06
`0.20
`0.04
`NO
`NO
`0.19
`0.03
`0.02
`NO
`NO
`NO
`NO
`
`1.4
`1.2
`1.0
`1.0
`1.0
`1.5
`2.1
`1.9
`1.3
`1.5
`1.3
`1.7
`1.4
`0.9
`0.9
`1.0
`1.1
`1.3
`
`0.03
`0.11
`0.06
`0.02
`0.02
`0.16
`0.01
`0.05
`0.04
`0.03
`0.03
`0.23
`0.07
`0.06
`0.03
`0.02
`0.01
`0.02
`
`The log-odds gives the log of the ratio of the observed to expected probability for the pairing of two identical environmental
`classes. It is a measure of the likelihood that any instance of an environment class is conserved in the alignment. The FWLO is the
`log-odds weighted by the observed probability for the pairing of two identical environment classes in fractional form. A given pair
`may have a positive log-odds value, but if it occurs rarely in the structural alignment, the FWLO value will be low. Notice that the
`FWLO values for the BPI alignment and the DAPS alignments follow similar trends; the H:B1, E:B1, and H:P2 have high FWLO
`values. See Table 5 for de®nitions of the environment classes. NO, no observations.
`
`domains in a random alignment only three out of
`one million times. Thus, positions that belong to
`the H:B1 or E:B1 classes are observed more often
`than expected at random, suggesting these pos-
`itions have conserved structural roles (a more
`thorough discussion of Table 3 is given in
`Materials and Methods.)
`The same argument can be applied to the surface
`of the protein. Positions which belong to the P2
`environment class tend to be solvent exposed at
`the protein's surface. If the environment at the sur-
`face is conserved, we would expect to observe low
`p-values for the P2 class. The p-values for the H:P2
`and E:P2 environment classes are 2  108 and
`1  105, respectively, which are as low as the
`values shown above for the H:B1 and E:B1 classes.
`While the structural conservation of residues in the
`protein core is well documented, the conservation
`of residues on the surface of proteins is not as well
`described. We next characterize the structural roles
`of residues in these positions, especially pairs from
`the BPI domain alignment which do not conserve
`residue type.
`
`The structural roles of 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved positions with dissimilar residues
`in the BPI domain alignment
`
`Thirty-one of the 51 3D-1D environmentally con-
`served pairs from the BPI domain alignment have
`similar or identical residues, de®ned by a positive
`substitution score from the GONNET matrix
`(Benner et al., 1994). However, 20 structurally
`equivalent
`positions with
`conserved
`3D-1D
`environments have dissimilar residues. We next
`
`wished to characterize the structural roles for resi-
`dues at these 20 positions and determine if any
`could be important for stabilizing the BPI fold.
`The structural roles for 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved positions with dissimilar residues were
`compared by analyzing the tertiary interactions
`they form with other residues. We analyzed favor-
`able contacts,
`including hydrogen bonds,
`salt
`bridges, disul®de bonds, van der Waals inter-
`actions, or aromatic ring stacking. We then deter-
`mined for each pair in the alignment whether the
`structural roles are similar.
`We ®nd that the structural roles for these pairs
`fall into three major categories: (i) conserved struc-
`tural roles; (ii) auxiliary structural roles; and (iii)
`different structural roles.
`
`Conserved structural roles
`
`The structural roles for a pair of dissimilar resi-
`dues are de®ned as conserved when a residue at
`position i in the N-terminal domain of BPI forms a
`tertiary interaction with residue j in the N-terminal
`domain, and residue i0 in the C-terminal domain
`forms a tertiary interaction with residue j0. Both
`residues i and i0 and j and j0 must be at structurally
`equivalent positions in the alignment for the struc-
`tural roles to be de®ned as conserved. The type of
`tertiary interaction does not have to be the same
`(Figure 3(a)).
`
`Auxiliary structural roles
`
`Residue i forms a tertiary interaction with resi-
`due j in the N-terminal domain, and residue i0 in
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 06 of 17
`
`

`

`1024
`
`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`Table 3. Classi®cation of the structural roles for equivalent positions with conserved 3D-1D environment classes and
`dissimilar residue types. Comparison of structural roles for the N-terminal (n) and C-terminal (c) domains of BPI.
`
`Residue (n)
`
`Atom
`
`Structural role
`
`Residue (c)
`
`Atom
`
`Structural role
`
`N-terminal domain
`
`C-terminal domain
`
`Ser112
`
`OG
`
`A. Conserved structural roles
`Ser79
`OG
`H bond to Ser69 OG through
`a water molecule
`H bond to bb carbonyl group
`of His138 through a water
`molecule
`H bond to Ser134 OG
`H bond to Thr216 OG1
`
`Asp116
`Thr219
`
`OD2
`OG1
`
`Tyr336
`
`His361
`
`Ser365
`Phe446
`
`OH
`
`CE1
`
`OG
`-
`
`H bond to Ser327 OG
`
`VdW with Leu385 CB and
`CD1
`
`H bond to Lys380 NZ
`Ring stacking with His443
`
`H bond to bb carbonyl group
`of Phe262
`VdW with Glu272 CD and
`CG
`H bond to bb amide group of
`Met 312
`H bond to Gln329 NE2
`VdW with Met360 CB
`
`VdW with Arg416 CZ and
`Leu414 CB
`Salt bridge to Arg416 NH2
`Solvent exposed
`VdW with Val453 CG1
`VdW with Leu440 CB and
`CD1 and Val368 CG1
`VdW with Tyr436 CE1
`
`H bond with Arg252 NH1
`and Tyr255 OH
`VdW w/Pro241 CG,CD
`H bond to bb carbonyl group
`of Ala370
`VdW with His361 CE1
`VdW with Leu447 CD1
`
`B. Auxiliary structural roles
`Tyr16
`OH
`H bond to Gln20 NH2
`
`Thr265
`
`OG1
`
`Glu19
`
`Asp36
`
`Lys77
`Ala83
`
`Asn180
`
`Ser184
`Pro188
`Asn206
`Val222
`
`Glu227
`
`NE2
`
`H bond to Gln20 OE1
`
`Leu268
`
`CG,CD1
`
`OD1
`
`H bond to bb amide of Ser55
`
`Thr294
`
`NZ
`CB
`
`ND2
`
`OG
`-
`CG
`CG1
`
`OE1
`
`Salt bridge to Asp116 OD1
`VdW with Leu63 CD2 and Ile
`80 CG2
`H bond to Ser184 OG
`
`H bond to Asn 180 ND2
`Solvent exposed;
`VdW with Lys225 CB and CG
`VdW with Leu209 CG and
`CD1
`Salt bridge to Lys225 NZ
`
`Thr334
`Val339
`
`Pro415
`
`Glu419
`Lys423
`Val433
`Phe449
`
`Val454
`
`OG1
`
`OG1
`CG1
`
`CB,CD
`
`OE2
`-
`CG1, CG2
`CD1,CE1,CE2
`
`CB
`
`C. Different Structural Roles
`Val1
`-
`Solvent exposed
`
`Asp251
`
`OD1
`
`Lys12
`Gly120
`
`His138
`Thr215
`
`NZ
`-
`
`-
`OG
`
`Salt bridge with Asp452 OD1
`Solvent exposed;
`
`Solvent exposed
`H bond to ordered water
`
`Tyr261
`Ser369
`
`Leu385
`Pro442
`
`CG,CD1,CD2,CE2,CZ
`OG
`
`CB,CD1
`CB,CG
`
`H bond, Hydrogen-bond interaction; VdW, a van der Waals interaction; backbone, bb.
`
`the C-terminal domain forms a tertiary interaction
`with residue k0. Residues i and i0 must occupy
`structurally equivalent positions, but residues j and
`k0 do not have to be aligned (Figure 3(b)).
`
`Different structural roles
`
`Residues i and i0 belong to the same environ-
`ment class but one or both of the residues have no
`corresponding structural role, or one or both resi-
`dues are involved in stabilizing the interface
`between the domains in the BPI structure rather
`than the domain itself (Figure 3(c)). A summary of
`the structural roles for the 20 pairs of dissimilar
`residues is given in Table 3.
`Four pairs of 3D-1D environmentally conserved
`positions with dissimilar residue types fall into the
`conserved structural roles category. For example,
`Ser79 and Tyr336 both belong to the E:P2 environ-
`ment class, however the substitution of serine for
`tyrosine in the GONNET matrix (Benner et al.,
`1994) is not favorable. The conserved structural
`roles of both Ser79 and Tyr336 are to stabilize the
`domain by connecting adjacent b-strands. These
`residues are located on b-strands 4 and 40 respect-
`
`ively (see Figures 1(c) and 4(a)). Ser79 (N-terminal
`domain) forms a 2.7 AÊ hydrogen bond to a water
`molecule which is hydrogen bonded to Ser69,
`located on b-strand 3. The crystallographic tem-
`perature factor for this water molecule is 27 AÊ 2
`suggesting that it is well ordered. In the C-terminal
`domain, Tyr336 forms a 2.8 AÊ hydrogen bond to
`Ser327, which lies on b-strand 30. Ser69 and Ser327
`are also paired in the BPI domain alignment.
`Therefore, Ser79 and Tyr336 interact with structu-
`rally equivalent
`residues
`in their
`respective
`domains, conserving the structural role for these
`dissimilar residues.
`A similar example involves Asp116 and Ser365,
`and 50,
`respectively
`located on b-strands
`5
`(Figure 4(b)). The conserved structural roles of
`Asp116 and Ser365 connect adjacent b-strands in
`their respective domains. Asp116 forms a 2.9 AÊ
`hydrogen bond to Ser134 on b-strand 6. Ser365
`forms a 3.1 AÊ hydrogen bond to Lys380 on
`b-strand 60. Ser134 and Lys380 are paired in the
`BPI domain alignment.
`Conserved structural roles do not necessarily
`involve identical tertiary interactions. For example,
`Thr219 and Phe446 are structurally equivalent resi-
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 07 of 17
`
`

`

`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`1025
`
`Figure 3. Pairs of 3D-1D environmentally conserved
`positions with dissimilar residues fall into three major
`categories. Each category describes the similarity of the
`structural role for each residue in the pair. (a) Con-
`served structural roles: residue i from the N-terminal
`domain interacts with residue j, and residue i0
`in the
`C-terminal domain interacts with residue j0. Both resi-
`dues i and i0 and j and j0 must be at structurally equival-
`ent positions in the alignment. (b) Auxiliary structural
`roles: residue i from the N-terminal domain interacts
`with residue j, and residue i0 in the C-terminal domain
`interacts with residue k0. Residue i and i0 must occupy
`structurally equivalent positions. (c) Different structural
`roles: either residue i or i0 is solvent exposed, or residue
`i from the N-terminal domain interacts with residue l0
`from the C-terminal domain.
`
`dues with identical environment classes (E:P2).
`Thr219 forms a 2.7 AÊ hydrogen bond with Thr216
`which stabilizes a tight turn from b-strand 8 to
`b-strand 9 (Figure 4(c)). In the C-terminal domain,
`the aromatic ring of Phe446 is approximately 4 AÊ
`from the ring of His443. Ring stacking of phenyl-
`alanine and histidine residues has been shown to
`be an energetically favorable interaction (Mitchell
`et al., 1994). Therefore, the interaction of Phe446
`with His443 stabilizes a tight turn from b-strand 70
`to b-strand 80, similar to the interaction found in
`the N-terminal domain.
`Eleven 3D-1D environmentally conserved pos-
`itions with dissimilar residue types have auxiliary
`structural roles in the BPI domains. The structural
`roles of these residue pairs are auxiliary because
`they help stabilize the fold, even though the struc-
`tural roles are not strictly conserved. An example
`is Lys77 and Thr334, located in b-strand 4 and 40
`respectively (Figure 1(c)). Lys77 forms a salt bridge
`
`Figure 4. Examples of pairs of 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved residues with dissimilar residues yet con-
`served structural roles from the BPI domain alignment.
`Residues and secondary structure elements from the
`N-terminal domain are blue; residues and secondary
`structure elements from the C-terminal are red. The
`relationship of the secondary structure elements to the
`entire BPI molecule is shown in Figure 1(c). Hydrogen
`bonds are shown as broken lines between the hydrogen
`bond donor and acceptor atoms.
`
`with Asp116 located on b-strand 5. Thr334 forms a
`hydrogen bond to Gln329 located on b-strand 30.
`These interactions still support the fold of each BPI
`domain by connecting adjacent b-strands.
`Five of the 3D-1D environmentally conserved
`positions with dissimilar residue types have differ-
`ent structural roles in the two domains. Some of
`these positions, such as His138, are completely
`exposed to bulk solvent and make no contacts
`with any ordered atoms in the BPI structure,
`whereas the structurally equivalent residue from
`the C-terminal domain, Leu385, makes van der
`Waals contacts with His361.
`Another example of a pair of residues with
`different structural roles is Lys12 and Tyr261.
`Lys12 forms a salt bridge with Asp452, connecting
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 08 of 17
`
`

`

`1026
`
`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`the N-terminal domain of BPI with the C-terminal
`domain. Tyr261 forms van der Waals contacts with
`Pro241, located in the domain linker. The structural
`roles for these two residues are different because
`Lys12 stabilizes the interface between the two
`domains and Tyr261 interacts with the domain
`linker.
`
`Examples of conserved structural roles in
`proteins other than BPI with similar folds yet
`dissimilar sequences
`
`The database of distant aligned protein struc-
`tures (DAPS) has over 1000 pairs of structurally
`similar proteins with less than 25 % sequence iden-
`tity. To determine if other proteins of similar struc-
`ture and dissimilar sequence also share residues
`with conserved structural roles, ®ve examples were
`chosen from DAPS and compared in the same
`manner as the domains of BPI. These examples are
`shown as the last ®ve entries in Table 1.
`The ®rst example aligns
`the a subunit of
`the bovine mitochondrial F1-ATPase with the
`Escherichia coli Rec A protein. These proteins share
`only 9 % sequence identity over the aligned resi-
`dues, yet 26 % of the positions are 3D-1D environ-
`mentally conserved. Like the domains of BPI, we
`®nd pairs of 3D-1D environmentally conserved
`positions with dissimilar residues which share con-
`served structural roles. For example, Tyr300 of
`F1-ATPase forms a 3.5 AÊ hydrogen bond to
`Arg304 (Figure 5(a)). These residues are located on
`an a-helix. Tyr300 and Arg304 are separated by
`four residues corresponding to approximately one
`turn of the helix. This serves to align the two resi-
`dues so that they can form a hydrogen bond stabi-
`lizing
`the
`helix. Likewise,
`the
`structurally
`equivalent residues in Rec A, Arg169 and Gln173,
`also form a 3.5 AÊ hydrogen bond. Tyr300 and
`Arg169 are paired in the structure-based sequence
`alignment and are not favored to substitute for one
`another according to the GONNET matrix (Benner
`et al., 1994). Arg304 and Gln173 are also paired in
`the alignment, demonstrating that the structural
`roles in both proteins are conserved.
`The second example aligns bromoperoxidase A2
`with triacylglycerol hydrolase. The sequence iden-
`tity is 14 % over the aligned positions while 25 % of
`the aligned positions are 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved. Gln42 in bromoperoxidase forms a
`2.7 AÊ hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group oxy-
`gen atom of Leu260 (Figure 5(b)). The structurally
`equivalent
`residue in triacylglycerol hydrolase,
`Trp52, forms a 3.1 AÊ hydrogen bond with the car-
`bonyl group oxygen atom of Leu228. Leu260 and
`Leu228 are paired in the alignment of these two
`proteins. The structural role of both Gln42 and
`Trp52 is a long-range tertiary interaction serving to
`connect two helices. It is noteworthy that this inter-
`action is between two residues
`separated by
`approximately 200 residues.
`A third example compares T cell antigen recep-
`tor with neuroglian. The sequence identity is 11 %
`
`over the aligned positions. Of the aligned pos-
`itions, 16 % have 3D-1D environmentally con-
`served positions. Trp162 of the antigen receptor is
`structurally aligned to Gln650 of neuroglian.
`Trp162 forms a 3.4 AÊ hydrogen bond to Gln213,
`which also forms a 2.7 AÊ hydrogen bond to
`Arg211. Gln650 forms a 2.8 AÊ hydrogen bond to
`Arg687, which is paired with Arg211 in the align-
`ment of neuroglian and T cell antigen receptor.
`This example demonstrates how hydrogen bonds
`through
`intermediate
`residues
`can
`promote
`conserved structural roles in proteins of similar
`structure.
`In our fourth example, we align b-amylase with
`concanavalin B. These proteins
`share
`10 %
`sequence identity. Of the aligned positions, 22 %
`are 3D-1D environmentally conserved. Leu78 of
`b-amylase is structurally aligned to Gln68 of conca-
`navalin B. Unlike the above examples, these resi-
`dues are buried in the core of each protein and
`belong to the H:B2 environment. Leu78 forms van
`der Waals contacts with other hydrophobic resi-
`dues in the core, while Gln68 forms both van der
`Waals contacts with other residues as well as two
`hydrogen bonds to water molecules near the sur-
`face of the protein. The hydrogen bonding poten-
`tial of
`the amide group hydrogen and oxygen
`atoms are thus satis®ed, even though Gln68 is bur-
`ied in the core. While this example does not satisfy
`the de®nition for
`conserved structural
`roles
`because each residue forms many non-speci®c con-
`tacts, it shows how dissimilar residues can stabilize
`the core of proteins.
`
`Clustering of 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved positions in both the BPI fold
`and the lipid-binding pockets
`
`Positions with conserved 3D-1D environments
`tend to cluster in the BPI fold. The location of the
`51 3D-1D environmentally conserved pairs are
`highlighted in Figure 6(a). These positions tend to
`cluster around the core of each domain and the
`phospholipid binding pockets, while the two tips
`of the molecule contain very few 3D-1D environ-
`mentally conserved residues. Clustered positions
`predominantly belong to classes with mostly bur-
`ied and apolar environments (H:B1 or E:B1) or
`mostly solvent accessible environments (H:P2, or
`E:P2).
`The degree of clustering was assessed by calcu-
`lating Ca-Ca distances for all 3D-1D environmen-
`tally conserved positions in each domain. For this
`analysis, a position is considered a tertiary neigh-
`bor of another position if its Ca atom is less than
`7 AÊ away but is not within two residues on the
`peptide chain. We ®nd 3D-1D environmentally
`conserved positions have at
`least one other
`conserved tertiary neighbor 41 and 44 % of the
`time for the N-terminal and C-terminal domains,
`respectively. In contrast, positions that were not
`3D-1D environmentally conserved has ``tertiary
`neighbors'' that were conserved only 24 and 28 %,
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 09 of 17
`
`

`

`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`1027
`
`Figure 5. Four examples of pairs of 3D-1D environmentally conserved residues with dissimilar residues yet con-
`served structural roles. Each example is based on an alignment chosen at random from the DAPS database. (a) Rec A
`protein and F1-ATPase. (b) Bromoperoxidase A2 and triacylglycerol hydrolase. (c) Neruoglian and T-cell antigen
`receptor. (d) b-amylase and concanavalin B.
`
`con®rming that 3D-1D environmentally conserved
`positions tend to cluster.
`3D-1D environmentally conserved positions in
`the lipid-binding pockets of each domain also
`cluster. The program CAST (Liang et al., 1998) was
`
`used to identify all positions in contact with at
`least one lipid atom. Fifty-one positions contribute
`to the N-terminal lipid-binding pocket and 43 pos-
`itions contribute to the C-terminal pocket. A total
`of 11 of these positions from the N-terminal pocket
`
`Exhibit 2069
`Page 10 of 17
`
`

`

`1028
`
`How Dissimilar Sequences Adopt the Same Fold
`
`Figure 6 (legend opposite)
`
`are 3D-1D environmentally conserved; 15 positions
`from the C-terminal pocket are 3D-1D environmen-
`tally conserved. While the number of 3D-1D envir-
`onmentally conserved positions between the
`domains of BPI must be equal, the number of con-
`served positions in the lipid-binding pocke

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket