throbber
T H E CLEARANCE OF INTRAVITREAL GENTAMICIN
`
`L. M I C H A E L C O B O , M.D., AND R I C H A R D K. F O R S T E R , M.D.
`Miami, Florida
`
`Intravitreal gentamicin cleared significantly more rapidly from the
`uninflamed aphakic rabbit eye than the phakic control, with a half-life
`of 12 hours in the former and 32 hours in the latter. A similar difference
`was noted in aphakic and phakic eyes with an experimental Staphylo-
`coccus aureus endophthalmitis, but without the same level of signifi­
`cance. Human data from nine aphakic infected eyes undergoing
`reinjection or vitrectomy indicated that therapeutic levels of gentamicin
`are not consistently found 48 hours or more after the initial intravitreal
`injection.
`
`group of patients who underwent repeat
`intravitreal
`injections of antibiotics, a
`procedure that has been used with suc­
`cess in selected cases.1 These data allow a
`critical evaluation of the duration of ther­
`apeutic gentamicin levels and a consider­
`ation of the optimal time for repeating
`intravitreal injections
`in those patients
`who require additional intravitreal antibi­
`otic therapy.
`
`59
`
`Although intravitreal injection of gen­
`tamicin has been used for almost a decade
`in the treatment of postoperative endoph­
`thalmitis in humans, 1 our understanding
`of the dynamics of intravitreal gentami­
`cin, as well as other antibiotics, has been
`based on data derived from studies in
`phakic, uninflamed rabbit eyes. 2 3 Such
`data may be misleading because the es­
`tablishment of a communication between
`the vitreous and the anterior chamber
`might cause more rapid clearance of the
`antibiotic from the vitreous into the aque­
`ous circulation.
`We studied the clearance of gentamicin
`in phakic and aphakic rabbit eyes, both in
`the presence and absence of infection, to
`more closely approximate the most com­
`mon setting for endophthalmitis in the
`postoperative aphakic patient. Addition­
`ally, gentamicin levels were obtained in a
`
`From the Department of Ophthalmology, Univer­
`sity of Miami, School of Medicine, Bascom Palmer
`Eye Institute/Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital,
`Miami, Florida. This study was supported in part by
`grant G-598 from the Fight for Sight Foundation, and
`grants from the Flournory and Mae Knight Clark
`Research Fund and the Miami Retreat (Dr. Forster).
`Reprint requests to L. M. Cobo, M.D., Duke
`University Medical Center, Box 3802, Durham, NC
`27710.
`
`M A T E R I A L AND M E T H O D S
`Thirty-one albino New Zealand rabbits
`(weighing 2 to 3 kg each) underwent lens
`aspiration in one eye; the unoperated eye
`served as the phakic control. Right and
`left eyes were done alternately, after the
`rabbits were under general anesthesia
`with intravenously administered pento-
`barbitol. A beveled 60-degree corneal
`incision was made, a sector
`iridectomy
`was performed, and
`the anterior
`lens
`capsule incised. A lens fragmenter was
`inserted and all visible lenticular material
`was irrigated from the anterior chamber.
`The posterior capsule was not intention­
`ally incised. The wound was closed with
`resorbable sutures. The rabbits then re­
`ceived a subtenon's injection of 8 mg of
`triamcinalone acetonide and 4 mg of
`gentamicin subconjunctivally. The ani-
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 92:59-62, 1981
`
`Exhibit 2065
`Page 01 of 04
`
`

`

`60
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY, 1981
`
`mais were then observed for two to three
`months with regular slit-lamp examina­
`tions until the eyes were quiet. In the
`first part of the study, 13 of the monocu-
`larly aphakic animals received
`intravit-
`real injections of gentamicin into both
`eyes. A solution of 100 μg/0.1 ml was
`prepared by serial dilutions of stock solu­
`tion of gentamicin. Proparacaine was ap­
`plied topically to both eyes and a 30-
`gauge needle, mounted on a tuberculin
`syringe containing diluted gentamicin so­
`lution, was inserted 2 mm posterior to the
`temporal corneoscleral limbus,
`through
`the pars plana, with the bevel directed
`anteriorly. Before injection of the antibi­
`otic, an anterior chamber paracentesis
`was performed to relieve any increase in
`intraocular pressure. Peyman and associ­
`ates2 demonstrated
`that gentamicin
`is
`cleared exponentially from the rabbit vit­
`reous. By collecting data at fewer points
`(for example, three), more reliable fig­
`ures could be obtained with a given num­
`ber of animals. An exponential decay
`model allowed data to be plotted semilog-
`arithmically to obtain a regression line.
`Rabbits were killed two, 24, or 48 hours
`after
`injection. We isolated the entire
`vitreous body for assay, using a modifica­
`tion of the technique described by Abel
`and Boyle.4 The eyes were promptly enu­
`cleated,
`tagged with an
`identification
`label, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Each
`globe was dissected, and vitreous was
`isolated and then placed in a graduated
`tube. The concentration of gentamicin
`was subsequently determined by radio-
`immunoassay technique and the concen­
`trations per eye were calculated using the
`known volume of vitreous removed from
`the eye.
`The second group of 18 rabbits was
`subsequently used
`to study antibiotic
`clearance in infected eyes. An endoph-
`thalmitis was consistently created in both
`eyes of each animal, using
`intravitreal
`inoculation of approximately 60 organ­
`
`aureus} Thirty-
`isms of Staphylococcus
`two hours after infection, at which time
`clinical endophthalmitis was apparent,
`the eyes received 100 μg of gentamicin
`intravitreally. The rabbits were killed
`and studied in the same manner as the
`first, noninfected group.
`
`R E S U L T S
`the
`in
`The gentamicin concentration
`rabbit vitreous, measured in micrograms
`per eye, was plotted on a logarithmic
`scale against the hours after injection of
`antibiotic into the vitreous body. Using
`an exponential decay model, a
`least
`squares
`regression
`line was obtained
`from the data. The data for the aphakic
`and the phakic eyes were compared in
`the first group of noninfected
`rabbits
`(Fig. 1), and in the second group of ani­
`mals with experimental endophthalmitis
`(Fig. 2).
`The clearance of gentamicin from the
`rabbit vitreous is equivalent to the slope
`of the
`line derived from plotting
`the
`
`STERILE EYES:
`
`Fig. 1 (Cobo and Forster). The clearance of 100 μg
`of gentamicin injected into the midvitreous cavity of
`uninfected rabbit eyes.
`
`Exhibit 2065
`Page 02 of 04
`
`

`

`VOL. 92, NO. 1
`
`INTRAVITREAL GENTAMICIN CLEARANCE
`
`61
`
`uu
`
`A
`
`INFECTED EYES:
`
`\
`
`*
`
`T
`
`%* Z
`\
`* '
`\
`: \ H
`*
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`*
`\
`'
`s
`\ ·
`\
`\
`\
`
`50
`
`25
`
`10
`
`* *
`\
`v
`^
`. *
`*
`\
`\
`s
`*
`\
`%
`*
`
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`\
`V \
`\
`\
`•\
`\
`
`5,

`
`24
`
`*
`\
`*
`*
`X
`
`72
`
`48
`HOURS
`Fig. 2 (Cobo and Forster). The clearance of 100 μg
`of gentamicin injected into the midvitreous cavity of
`rabbit eyes infected experimentally with Staphylo-
`coccus aureus.
`
`aphakic model compared to 32 hours in
`the control phakic eye (P < .05).
`In the second group of animals infected
`with S. aureus,
`the difference in rate of
`clearance was less distinct. The half-life
`of gentamicin in the infected aphakic eye
`was 14 hours compared to 19 hours in the
`infected phakic eye (.10 > P > .05).
`Gentamicin levels in vitreous fluid ob­
`tained from human eyes at the time of
`reinjection are listed in the Table, includ­
`ing the time that had elapsed from the
`initial intravitreal injection and the isolat­
`ed organism. All eyes had aphakic en-
`dophthalmitis. Vitreous samples were ob­
`tained either by pars plana
`syringe
`aspiration or at the time of vitrectomy.
`The gentamicin level was determined by
`radioimmunoassay technique.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Experimental clearance data provide
`an estimate of the duration of therapeu­
`tic levels for a given, nontoxic dose of
`an intravitreally administered antibiotic.
`Additionally, clearance data are a guide
`in selected cases where
`the physician
`may wish to intervene with either vitrec­
`tomy or reinjection of antibiotic. Such
`data have generally been derived from
`
`concentration of gentamicin per eye on
`the
`logarithmic scale against
`the
`time
`after injection (hours). In the noninfected
`model, gentamicin was cleared more rap­
`idly from the aphakic eye than the phakic
`eye, with a half-life of 12 hours in the
`
`VITREOUS GENTAMICIN CONCENTRATIONS IN INFECTED HUMAN PATIENTS
`
`TABLE
`
`Patient
`No.
`
`1
`2
`
`3*
`4
`5*
`6*
`7*
`8*
`9
`
`Time
`After Injection
`(hrs)
`
`Vitreous
`Gentamicin
`Concentration
`^g/ml)
`
`20
`31
`
`36
`37
`44
`48
`48
`48
`52
`
`0.90
`>20.00
`
`8.00
`5.00
`6.75
`3.50
`0.25
`10.00
`3.50
`
`"These samples were obtained at the time of subsequent vitrectomy.
`
`Organism
`
`Citrobacter diversus
`Aspergillus flavus,
`Staphylococcus epidermidis
`S. aureus
`S. epidermidis
`Enterococcus Group D
`S. epidermidis
`Klehsietta pneumoniae
`Streptococcus viridans
`S. aureus
`
`Exhibit 2065
`Page 03 of 04
`
`

`

`62
`
`AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
`
`JULY, 1981
`
`uninflamed phakic animal models. This
`study indicates that gentamicin is cleared
`more rapidly in the aphakic rabbit eyes.
`Presumably, removal of the lens allows
`intravitreally administered antibiotic to
`diffuse more readily
`into
`the anterior
`chamber where such drugs may be more
`rapidly cleared through the aqueous cir­
`culation. Although studies in the infected
`model again demonstrated more
`rapid
`clearance in the aphakic eyes, the values
`for drug half-life were much closer in the
`phakic and aphakic eyes and the differ­
`ence was not statistically significant as it
`was in the uninfected eyes.
`If all other factors are equal, experi­
`mental clearance data for the intravitreal
`injection of 100 μg of gentamicin may be
`extrapolated from the 1.5-ml rabbit vitre­
`ous body to the 4-ml human vitreous
`body. Using half-life figures from the un­
`inflamed eyes, where a significant differ­
`ence was demonstrated between phakic
`and aphakic clearance rates, we estimat­
`ed that the gentamicin level would reach
`the minimum therapeutic level of 4 μg/ml
`after 32 hours in the aphakic eye com­
`pared
`to 87 hours
`in the phakic eye.
`Comparison with data obtained from hu­
`mans at first glance demonstrated
`the
`variability expected in the clinical setting
`and the problems of strict reliance on
`animal data. However, we then divided
`the group into those with values obtained
`less than 48 hours and those with values
`obtained more than 48 hours after
`the
`initial injection. Only one of four samples
`obtained after 48 hours contained a mini­
`
`mum inhibitory concentration of genta­
`micin, compared to four of five samples
`obtained before 48 hours. We cannot
`account for the unexpectedly low value in
`Patient 1 or the high level in Patient 2
`other than sampling error or a technical
`error in the determination of antibiotic
`levels.
`These data from experimental animals
`and humans indicate that therapeutic lev­
`els of antibiotic are maintained for 24 to
`48 hours after the initial intravitreal in­
`jection of antibiotic in aphakic eyes. An
`optimal time for reinjection of antibiotic
`in a selected aphakic case may be be­
`tween 36 and 48 hours. Although we have
`no human data on the clearance of genta­
`micin in phakic eyes, experimental ani­
`mal data indicate that the drug may be
`cleared more slowly in these eyes. It may
`be reasonable to postpone reinjection in
`the phakic eye to 72 to 96 hours after
`initial injection to avoid potentially toxic
`intravitreal levels.
`REFERENCES
`1. Forster, R. K., Abbott, R. L., and Gelender,
`H.: Management of infectious endophthalmitis. Oph­
`thalmology 87:313, 1980.
`2. Peyman, G. A., May, D. R., Ericson, E. S.,
`and Apple, D.: Intraocular injection of gentamicin.
`Toxic effects and clearance. Arch. Ophthalmol.
`92:42, 1974.
`3. Zachary, I. G., and Forster, R. K.: Experimen­
`tal intravitreal gentamicin. Am. J. Ophthalmol.
`82:604, 1976.
`4. Abel, R., and Boyle, G. L. : Dissecting ocular
`tissue for intraocular drug studies. Invest. Ophthal­
`mol. 15:216, 1976.
`5. Cottingham, A. J., and Forster, R. K.: Vitrec-
`tomy
`in endophthalmitis. Arch. Ophthalmol.
`94:2078, 1976.
`
`Exhibit 2065
`Page 04 of 04
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket