`571.272.7822
`
`
` Paper 38
`Date: May 20, 2022
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ALCON INC., ALCON VISION, LLC, ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.,
`and ALCON RESEARCH, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AMO DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2021-00843 (Patent 9,233,023 B2)
`IPR2021-00845 (Patent 9,233,024 B2)
`IPR2021-00846 (Patent 10,376,356 B2)
` IPR2021-00849 (Patent 10,709,548 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`RYAN H. FLAX, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SNEDDEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues common to each of these proceedings and we
`use this caption for efficiency. The parties may not use this style heading in
`any subsequent papers without authorization.
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00843 (Patent 9,233,023 B2)
`IPR2021-00845 (Patent 9,233,024 B2)
`IPR2021-00846 (Patent 10,376,356 B2)
`IPR2021-00849 (Patent 10,709,548 B2)
`
`
`In each of the above-captioned proceedings, Alcon Inc., Alcon Vision,
`LLC, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., and Alcon Research, LLC (collectively
`“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for inter partes review, challenging claims of
`respective patents (noted above) owned by AMO Development, LLC
`(“Patent Owner”). See e.g., IPR2021-00843, Paper 1 (the record in each
`proceeding is similar and we cite herein to the first proceeding as exemplary
`unless otherwise noted). The Board instituted trial in each proceeding.
`Paper 15. In each proceeding, a Scheduling Order was entered setting a final
`hearing date (DUE DATE 8) of August 12, 2022. Paper 16.
`A scheduling conflict requires the Panel to revise these proceedings’
`schedules to change DUE DATE 8 to August 30, 2022. The oral argument
`(if requested by either party) shall be held then. No other change to the
`respective schedules is made and approximately one month prior to the oral
`argument, the Board will issue an order setting the start time of the hearing
`and the procedures that will govern the parties’ arguments.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the schedule in each of the above-captioned inter
`partes review proceedings is revised to change DUE DATE 8, for hearing
`oral argument, to August 30, 2022; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that no other modification to the respective
`schedules is made.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00843 (Patent 9,233,023 B2)
`IPR2021-00845 (Patent 9,233,024 B2)
`IPR2021-00846 (Patent 10,376,356 B2)
`IPR2021-00849 (Patent 10,709,548 B2)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Gregg F. LoCascio
`W. Todd Baker
`Noah Frank
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`gregg.locascio@kirkland.com
`todd.baker@kirkland.com
`noah.frank@kirkland.com
`Alcon_IPR@kirkland.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael A. Morin
`Jonathan M. Strang
`S. Giri Pathmanaban
`Inge Osman
`Allison Harms
`Susan Y. Tull
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`michael.morin@lw.com
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`giri.pathmanaban@lw.com
`inge.osman@lw.com
`Allison.harms@lw.com
`susan.tull@lw.com
`
`
`3
`
`