throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DAEDALUS BLUE, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00832
`U.S. Patent No. 8,381,209
`Original Issue Date: February 19, 2013
`
`Title: MOVEABLE ACCESS CONTROL LIST (ACL) MECHANISMS FOR
`HYPERVISORS AND VIRTUAL MACHINES AND VIRTUAL PORT
`FIREWALLS
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF
`JARED BOBROW PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1001
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,381,209 to Reumann et al. (the “209 Patent”)
`
`File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,381,209 (the “209 FH”)
`
`Declaration of Dr. Markus Jakobsson (“Jakobsson”) re U.S. Patent
`No. 8,381,209
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Markus Jakobsson
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0079307 to Dhawan et al.
`(”Dhawan”)
`
`C. Clark et al, Live Migration of Virtual Machines, NSDI ’05: 2nd
`Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation
`(May 2-4, 2005) (“Clark”)
`
`Isolation of Shared Network Resources in XenoServers to Warfield
`et al. (“Warfield”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,107,370 to Chandika et al. (“Chandika”).
`
`Declaration of Diana Friedrich, German National Library of
`Science and Technology re: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on
`Networked Systems Design & Implementation (NSDI ’05) (May 2-
`4, 2005)
`
`Complaint for Patent Infringement, Daedalus Blue, LLC v.
`Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:20-cv-01152-ADA (Dec. 16,
`2020 W.D. Tex.)
`
`1011
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,484,208 to Nelson (“Nelson”)
`
`1012
`
`Chen et al., When Virtual Is Better Than Real, The Eighth IEEE
`Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, HotOS-VIII,
`pp.116-121 (May 20-23, 2001)
`
`1013
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 2005/0268298 to Hunt (“Hunt”)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,397,242 to Devine (“Devine”)
`
`Karger, Multi-Level Security Requirements for Hypervisors, IBM
`Search Report, RC 23624 (W0506-041), June 6, 2005 (rev. Oct. 19,
`2005), 21st Annual Computer Security Applications Conference,
`Tucson, AZ (Dec. 5-9, 2005) (“Karger”).
`
`Sailer et al., Building a MAC-Based Security Architecture for the
`Xen Open-Source Hypervisor, Proceedings of the 21st Annual
`Computer Security Applications Conference (ASCAC 2005)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,182,226 to Reid et al. (“Reid”)
`
`Eck, Access Control Lists to Protect a Network from Worm/DoS
`Attacks, SANS Institute (2004)
`
`Huang et al., A Case for High Performance Computing with Virtual
`Machines, ICS ’06 June 28-30, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
`
`Keahey et al., Virtual Workspaces in the Grid, 11th International
`Euro-Par Conferences, Lisbon, Portugal (Sept. 2005)
`
`R. Siles, Real World ARP Spoofing, SANS Institute (August 2003)
`
`V. Antoine et al, Router Security Configuration Guide, Router
`Security Guidance Activity of the System and Network Attack
`Center (SNAC) (Sept. 27, 2002)
`
`Jiang et al., VIOLIN: Virtual Internetworking on Overlay
`Infrastructure, In: Cao J., Yang L.T., Guo M., Lau F. (eds) Parallel
`and Distributed Processing and Applications (ISPA 2004), Lecture
`Notes in Computer Science, vol 3358. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
`
`Karlin, PlanetLab: A Blueprint for Introducing Disruptive
`Technology into the Internet (Nov. 20, 2003), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20031208153742/http://www.planet-
`lab.org/pubs/2003-11-20-PlanetLab-IEEE.pdf
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`Welcome to PlanetLab website (2002), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20021212060940/http:l/planet-
`lab.org/php/top.php
`
`PlanetLab – About, available at
`https://planetlab.cs.princeton.edu/about.html
`
`PlanetLab front page (2006), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20061007191534/http://www.planet-
`lab.org/
`
`Declaration of Dr. Timothy L. Harris regarding Isolation of Shared
`Network Resources in XenoServers to Warfield et al. (“Warfield”)
`
`PlanetLab Design Notes (2002), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20021212035424/http:/planet-
`lab.org:80/php/pdn.php
`
`PlanetLab Consortium (2006), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20061007234024/http://www.planet-
`lab.org/consortium/overview.php
`
`Email from Andrew Warfield submitting Isolation of Shared
`Network Resources in XenoServers to Warfield et al. (“Warfield”)
`to PlanetLab for publication (Oct. 30, 2002)
`
`PlanetLab Design Notes (PDNs) (2003), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20031002004416/http://planet-
`lab.org/php/pdn.php
`
`PlanetLab Design Note 02-2006 (2006), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20060129235541/http://www.planet-
`lab.org/PDN/PDN-02-006/
`
`Web capture from
`https://web.archive.org/web/20070715165444/http://planet-
`lab.org/files/pdn/PDN-02-006/pdn-02-006.pdf
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`PlanetLab Design Notes (2008), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20081021030221%20/http://www.plan
`et-lab.org/doc/pdn
`
`PlanetLab Design Notes (2014), available at
`https://web.archive.org/web/20140531154741/http://www.planet-
`lab.org/doc/pdn
`
`Planet Law Design Notes (2021), available at
`https://planetlab.cs.princeton.edu/doc/pdn.html
`
`Cocciarini, Meccanismi Scalabili di Accesso a Content Distribution
`Network: Uno Studio Speriomentale, Undergraduate Thesis
`submitted at the University of Bologna, Italy (2005)
`
`University of Bologna’s listing of Cocciarini, Meccanismi Scalabili
`di Accesso a Content Distribution Network: Uno Studio
`Speriomentale, Undergraduate thesis submitted to the University of
`Bologna, Italy (2005), available at
`http://www.cs.unibo.it/~ghini/tesisti/MarcoCocciarini/
`
`University of Cambridge, listing of NetOS publications (2003),
`available at web.archive.org/web/2003112410371
`O/http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/papers/
`
`University of Cambridge, listing of NetOS publications (2004),
`available at web.archive.org/web/200411230357
`40/http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/papers/
`
`University of Cambridge, listing of NetOS publications (2006),
`available at
`http://web.archive.org/web/20061008131740/http://www.cl.cam.ac.
`uk/research/srg/netos/papers/#2002
`
`University of Cambridge, listing of NetOS publications (2021),
`available at https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/papers/
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT
`NO.
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`1044
`
`University of Cambridge, listing of Xenoservers publications
`(2021), available at
`https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/projects/archive/xeno/
`publications.html
`1045 Warfield, Virtual Devices for Machines, Ph.D. dissertation
`submitted to the University of Cambridge (May 5, 2006)
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`Varian, VM and the VM Community: Past, Present, and Future,
`Office of Computing and Information Technology, Princeton
`University, Princeton, NJ, 1, 19-22 (April 1991) (“Varian”)
`
`Email from Jun Zheng dated May 4, 2021 in Daedalus Blue, LLC
`v. Microsoft Corporation, Case No. 6:20-cv-01152-ADA (W.D.
`Tex.)
`
`Declaration of Jared Bobrow in Support of Petitioner’s Motion for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10, Petitioner Microsoft Corporation
`
`(“Petitioner”) respectfully requests that the Board admit Jared Bobrow pro hac vice
`
`in this proceeding.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Board
`
`may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition
`
`that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any
`
`other conditions as the Board may impose. For example,
`
`where the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a
`
`motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel who is not a
`
`registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`the proceeding.
`
`The facts, supported by the accompanying Declaration of Jared Bobrow in
`
`Support of Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Ex. 1048, “Bobrow
`
`Declaration”), establish good cause to admit Mr. Bobrow pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`Lead counsel Don Daybell is a registered practitioner.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Jared Bobrow is an experienced litigation attorney. Mr. Bobrow has been a
`
`litigating attorney for more than 32 years. Bobrow Declaration ¶ 1. Mr. Bobrow
`
`has been litigating patent cases for over 30 of those years. Id. Mr. Bobrow is a
`
`member in good standing of the California State Bar, with no suspensions or
`
`disbarments from practice, nor any application for admission to practice denied, nor
`
`any sanctions or contempt citations, and is admitted to practice in the United States
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Ninth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit; California State
`
`Supreme Court; the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas;
`
`and the United States District Courts for the Central, Eastern, Northern and Southern
`
`Districts of California. Id. ¶¶ 1-4.
`
`Mr. Bobrow has familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding
`
`and in the related district court case Daedalus Blue, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation,
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-01152-ADA (W.D. Tex., filed Dec. 16, 2020), in which U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 8,572,612, 8,671,132, and 8,381,209 (and two other patents that are not
`
`being challenged in IPR proceedings) are asserted by the Patent Owner. Id. ¶ 9.
`
`Mr. Bobrow has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R,
`
`and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility set
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 11.19(a). Id. ¶¶ 5-6.
`
`ANALYSIS
`The facts contained in the Statement of Facts above, and contained in the
`
`Bobrow Declaration, establish that there is good cause to admit Mr. Bobrow pro hac
`
`vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, Mr. Bobrow is an experienced patent litigation attorney, and Mr.
`
`Bobrow has familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Jared Bobrow pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: August 26, 2021
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`
`
`/Don Daybell/
`By:
`Don Daybell
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`USPTO Reg. No. 50,877
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), that service
`
`was made on the Patent Owner as detailed below.
`
`Date of Service
`
`August 26, 2021
`
`Manner of Service
`
`Electronic Mail
`
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jared
`Bobrow Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10; Declaration of
`Jared Bobrow In Support of Petitioner’s Motion for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice
`Patent Owner’s Counsel of Record
`Lauren N. Robinson
`Reg. No. 74,404
`Bunsow De Mory LLP
`701 El Camino Real
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`lrobinson@bdiplaw.com
`
`Brenda Entzminger
`Reg. No. 76,896
`Bunsow De Mory LLP
`701 El Camino Real
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`bentzminger@bdiplaw.com
`
`Copy: BDIP_DaedalusMsftIPR@bdiplaw.com
`
`
`/Karen Johnson/
` Karen Johnson
`
`Documents Served
`
`Persons Served
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket