throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DAEDALUS BLUE, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No.: IPR2021-00831
`U.S. Patent No. 8,671,132
`Original Issue Date: March 11, 2014
`
`Title: SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR POLICY-BASED DATA
`MANAGEMENT
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`4130-7033-8617.1
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order dated
`
`November 1, 2021 (Paper No. 18), Petitioner Microsoft Corporation (“Petitioner”)
`
`requests Oral Argument on issues related to the patentability of claims 15-25 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,671,132.
`
`Petitioner requests to present arguments on the following issues:
`
` All grounds on which trial was instituted, including all issues raised
`
`by the parties’ papers;
`
` Any issue raised by either party in a motion to exclude (if any),
`
`objections to demonstrative exhibits (if any), or any other motion or
`
`paper filed by either party before oral argument;
`
` Rebuttal to any issue raised by either party in its presentation at the
`
`oral argument; and
`
` Any additional issue on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`In the Scheduling Order, the Board scheduled Oral Argument for
`
`July 28, 2022. Petitioner respectfully proposes that each side be provided 45
`
`minutes of argument time, inclusive of any rebuttal time reserved at the hearing.
`
`Petitioner also respectfully requests the ability to use audio-visual equipment
`
`to display demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, a projector,
`
`an overhead projector (“Elmo”), and a screen.
`
`1
`
`

`

`To the extent the Oral Argument is conducted remotely by video or telephone,
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests permission to file its demonstratives with the Board
`
`and to refer to its demonstratives during argument.
`
`Dated: June 10, 2022
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`
`
`By: /Don Daybell/
`Don Daybell
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Reg. No. 50,877
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`T: (949) 567-6700
`F: (949) 567-6710
`Email: D2DPTABDocket@orrick.com
`
`Jared Bobrow
`Pro Hac Vice granted
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`T: (650) 614-7400
`F: (650) 614-7401
`Email: PTABDocketJ3B3@orrick.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Microsoft Corporation
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on June 10, 2022, a copy of PETITIONER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served in its entirety by filing through
`
`the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End System, as well as via electronic
`
`mail, upon the following attorneys of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Kevin K. McNish
`MCNISH PLLC
`254 Commercial Street, Suite 245
`Portland, ME 04101
`
`Lauren N. Robinson
`Brenda Entzminger
`BUNSOW DE MORY LLP
`701 El Camino Real
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`
`kmcnish@mcnishpllc.com
`
`lrobinson@bdiplaw.com
`bentzminger@bdiplaw.com
`BDIP_DaedalusMsftIPR@bdiplaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Daedalus Blue, LLC
`
`/Karen Johnson/
` Karen Johnson
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket