throbber
Volume 9 Issue 7
`
`
`November/December 2006
`h'...:I
`
`�··�:a
`
`
`
`
`The Review of American Pharmaceutical Business & Technology
`
`
`Jessica Kelly, Editor
`Introduction -
`
`
`Editorial Advisory Board
`
`44 Use of Disposable Technology in Biologics
`
`
`Manufacture
`
`
`Annette Koch, Christe!ie Wittische-Larod,e,
`Raman Applications in Drug Manufacturing
`
`ElocHe De Roo and Alain Pralong
`Processes
`
`F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
`Dimuthu Jayavvkkrama, Arwa El i-iagrasy ar�d
`
`
`
`
`Sh1h .. Ying Chang
`
`
`
`
`Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Bristol Myers
`
`Squibb Co.
`
`Opportunities for Rapid Microbial Methods
`
`
`50
`
`AnthrJny M. Cundell, Ph.D.
`
`Consulting Microbiologist
`
`ear-n rare opy: Why It Is Still the
`
`
`Number One in PAT
`Emil W. Ciur
`
`Leachable Study on Solid Dosage form
`
`58
`
`
`Xueguang Fang, Nkk Cherico, Dan1on
`Barbacci, Angeia M. Harmon, Matt Piserchio
`and Molly Perpall
`Merck & Co., Inc.
`Research Laboratories
`
`s in Drug Discovery
`r
`
`
`Considerations for Successfully Replacing a
`
`
`
`Chromatography Data System (CDS) in a
`
`Regulated Environment
`From Molecules to Pharmaceutical Products -
`
`
`
`
`Anthony Pecora
`
`
`The Drug Substance/Drug Product Interface
`
`Wyeth Consumer Healthcare
`
`Martyn Tir.ehurst �nd Robert Docherty
`
`
`Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pfizer Global R&D
`
`64
`
`
`
`
`
`Delivery Strategies to Support Development of
`70
`
`Peptide Therapeutics
`
`Afeksander Swietlow, Ph.D. and
`Yves Mayeresse and R•ornain Veillon
`
`Paul Burke, Ph.D.
`GlaxoSmithKline
`
`Pharmaceutics, Amgen, Inc .
`
`• President -Nigel Russell
`
`
`'.President of Sales -Adam Young
`
`
`;/, unt Executive -Monica McArthur
`
`Russell Publishing L.L.C.
`
`
`unt Executive -Kristen Oium
`
`9200 Keystone Crossing
`
`Suite 475
`Manager -Andrea Sherrow
`. lation
`
`
`Indianapolis, IN 46240-2182
`0.Director -Allison
`USA
`Reppert
`����
`-·
`RECEIVED
`JAN ·o 2 2007
`HETERICK MEMORIAL UBR
`OHIO NORTHERN.\J.NIVER
`
`Published by
`
`
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`(ISSN -1099-8012) is published
`
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`
`
`
`seven times a year by Russell Publish·,ng LLC, 9200 Keystone Crossing, Suite
`
`
`
`
`475, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240-2i82-Subscription Rate (7 issues) 1 year
`
`
`$135.00. Periodicals postage paid at Indianapolis, IN 46206 and additional
`
`
`
`
`malling offices. POSTMASTER: Send change of addresses to Russell
`
`
`
`
`Publishing LLC, 9200 Keystone Crossing, Suite 475, Indianapolis, Indiana
`
`
`
`
`46240-2182. Publication Agreement #40739004. Return Undeliverable
`
`
`
`
`
`Canadian Addresses to: Station A, PO Box 54, Windsor ON N9A 6J5, E-mail:
`info@russpub.com
`
`Copyright rests with the publishers.
`
`
`
`
`All rights reserved ©2006
`
`Russell Publishing l.LC.
`
`Tel: 317-816-8787
`Fax: 317-816-8788
`
`"-�
`
`No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopy­
`
`
`
`
`
`ing, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the copy­
`
`
`
`
`
`right holder. While the publishers believe that all information contained in this
`E-mail: info@russpub.com
`
`
`
`
`
`publication was correct at the time of going to press, they can accept no lia­
`
`Website: www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bility for any inaccuracies that may appear or loss suffered directly or indirect­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ly by any reader as a result of any advertisement, editorial, photographs or
`
`
`
`
`other material published in American Pharmaceutical Review.
`
`
`
`Printed in the USA
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`
`REGITC00138777
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.001
`
`

`

`
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`
`
`
`
`lllffl
`
`11111
`
`DRUG DELIVERY
`
`•
`
`I I SI r ti s I
`t I t r -
`1111
`fill
`f t
`r1 s r r I
`r ts
`
`1111
`
`David E. Overcashier, Edwin K. Chan, and Chung C. Hsu
`
`
`
`
`Late Stage Pharmaceutical and Device Development
`
`Genentech, Inc.
`
`vial to a syringe for administration, prefilled syringes reduce contain­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`er overfill. For a 1 mL subcutaneous injection, the overfill can be
`re-filled syringes offer advantages in the delivery of injectable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reduced from 30% (or more) of the delivered dose to 2% (or less).
`
`
`
`
`biopharmaceutical products, including increased user-conven­
`
`
`
`For high-concentration biopharmaceutical products with high bulk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ience and decreased product wastage. Prefilled syringe manu­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`production costs, the reduced overfill can result in substantial cost
`·· .. facturing
`
`
`
`
`involves the manufacturing, preparation and sterilization of
`savings.
`
`
`
`
`
`components, followed by filling and sealing the syringe. This report
`
`
`
`
`
`The advantages provided by the prefilled syringe delivery sys­
`.. reviews typical
`
`
`processing steps and provides examples of our prod­
`
`
`
`tem have resulted in wide and increasing use of the configuration. US
`
`
`
`
`f uct/process development studies. Various syringe manufacturing
`
`
`
`sales of prefillable syringes have been reported to reach 200 million
`
`
`
`
`
`
`!\•Options are available, including the choice between "bulk" syringes
`
`
`
`units annually, with growth rates of 20% per year. World-wide annu­
`
`
`
`
`
`to fill" and "ready immediately before filling) t (washed and sterilized
`
`
`
`
`al sales (particularly Europe) exceed 1 billion units, increasing by 8-
`
`
`
`
`
`: ; / syringes ( washed and sterilized by the syringe manufacturer, then
`10% per year [l, 2].
`
`
`
`
`
`;/ delivered in sealed tubs to the filling site). Other options include
`
`
`
`Prefilled syringes, like vial dosage forms, are compnsed of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`syringe barrel size, Luer and staked needle formats, needle gauge and
`
`
`
`
`
`glass and elastomeric components; however, additional parametern
`
`
`
`
`length, the type and application method of silicone on the syringe bar­
`
`
`
`
`need to be evaluated. These include processing details such as the s1l­
`
`
`
`
`rel interior, elastomeric tip closure and plunger-stopper compounds
`
`
`
`
`iconization of components, component actuation forces and the forces
`
`
`
`
`
`.and product-contacting coatings, product filling-pump types, and
`
`
`required for solution delivery with the syringe. The effects of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`syringe closure (stoppering) methods. We compared coated and
`
`
`
`
`plunger-stopper composition and barrel siliconization on drug stabil­
`
`
`
`
`
`com­for optimal delivery. Needle-shield .uncoated plunger-stoppers
`
`
`
`
`ity require investigation, as these materials will contact the d1:1g solu­
`
`
`
`
`Syringe end-user operation. t• pounds were evaluated for convenient
`r.:
`
`
`
`
`tion continuously during the storage of the drug product. This report
`
`
`
`y force for effect on deliveri needles of various sizes were evaluated
`
`
`
`summarizes typical prefilled syringe manufacturing processes,
`
`
`
`
`• ,across a range of solution viscosities. Protein stability in prefilled
`
`
`
`
`including component preparation, filling, and stoppering (sealing).
`� •.. t, 0syringes
`was evaluated.
`Our studies concluded
`that prefilled
`syringe
`
`
`
`
`
`We also describe examples of development studies, covering both
`i .. ,,.l components and processes
`need to be selected according
`to end-user
`
`
`
`
`syringe physical properties and protein stability.
`i • requirements.
`t/
`Prefilled Syringe Manufacturing
`
`�:-l 1ntroduction
`
`
`
`
`Prefilled syringe manufacturing can be separated into four gen­
`l Prefilled
`syringes
`have become important
`options
`in the pack­
`
`
`
`
`eral steps: (1) component manufacturing, (2) component preparation,
`!! aging and distribution
`ofbiopharmaceuticals.
`Such delivery
`systems
`
`
`
`
`
`including sterilization, (3) aseptic filling and stoppering, and ( 4)
`tprovide
`several advantages.
`Drug administration
`is simplified,
`which
`
`
`
`
`labeling, plunger rod attachment, and secondary packaging. We
`radds convenience
`for healthcare
`professionals
`and patients.
`In addi­
`
`describe each of these areas below.
`(i: tion, prefilled syringes
`reduce
`risk of misidentification,
`dosage error,
`}: and contamination.
`By eliminating
`transfer
`of drug solution
`from a
`i,
`t American
`•
`
`11
`
`
`
`Pharmaceutical Review
`
`REGITC00138778
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.002
`
`

`

`DRUG DELIVERY
`
`stoppers, with fluoropolymer or other coatings on product-cont
`
`
`acting
`Preti/led Syringe Components
`
`
`
`
`
`
`surfaces to reduce extractables [6]. Such coatings have been report.:;;'_.{
`
`
`
`
`
`Prefilled syringe (PFS) components consist typically of a glass
`
`
`
`ed to be useful in reducing product degradation or adverse reactions , .. ·
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`syringe barrel, having a Luer finish or staked (glued-in) needle, an
`
`in patients [7-9].
`
`
`
`
`elastomeric tip closure, an elastomeric plunger-stopper, and a plunger
`
`
`
`
`rod (see Figure 1). The labeled syringe may also be equipped with an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`external anti-needle-stick safety device and/or packaged in a thermo­
`Preti/led Syringe Component Preparation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As performed for vials and stoppers, prefilled syringe compo�
`formed tray.
`
`
`
`
`nents require preparation before use, involving washing, siliconiza­
`
`
`
`tion and sterilization. Two general types of component processing are;:/;
`
`
`available, termed "bulk" (or "in-line") and "ready-to-fill" (or "tub").\
`
`
`
`
`"Bulk" syringe processing is similar to vial filling in that component'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preparation and sterilization are carried out at the filling site shortly
`
`
`
`
`
`before filling. "Ready-to-fill" syringes, by contrast., are washed, sil(-/;
`
`
`
`
`conized, and sterilized in sealed tubs by the syringe manufacture;,/4;:
`
`
`
`then shipped to the filling site where the drug solution is filled.
`
`Plunger-stopper
`Syringe Barrel
`
`1111
`
`A W, •
`
`� � -, ♦ C�!_ed_·•---,.-... -. �----}� ; f"
`:,1r4: :::·: :-.· .)F---.. • If&
`: ..;--���-���i-J
`
`6 12 18 24
`
`
`Storage Duration at 5°C (mo.)
`
`,
`
`CD
`u
`
`0
`
`LL ::-2 (9
`
`♦Coated
`
`!
`
`,
`
`,) /
`
`The syringe barrel is typically formed from Type I borosilicate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tubing glass, meeting USP and EP requirements. Syringe barrels are
`
`
`
`
`
`available across a wide range of sizes, typically 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.25,
`
`
`
`3.0, 5.0, and 10 mL. Syringe standard sizes and dimensions are given
`
`
`
`
`elsewhere [3]. Glass prefillable syringes are available from several
`
`
`
`
`manufacturers, with manufacturing sites in the US, France, Germany,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Switzerland, Italy, Mexico, Japan, and elsewhere. Plastic prefillable
`
`
`
`
`
`syringes are also available, providing potential advantages such as
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decreased weight, protein adsorption, dimensional variability, and
`0
`
`
`
`
`increased durability. Plastic containers must, however, be evaluated
`
`
`
`
`for suitability including water vapor transmission, oxygen transmis­
`sion and extractables.
`Syringes are available with Luer and staked needle finishes.
`
`
`
`
`�: -�---------�-�· B If;
`
`
`Common needle configurations for subcutaneous dosing are 270
`
`
`
`
`(outside diameter 0.4 mm), 1/2" long, and 250 (diameter 0.5 mm),
`10 J, .. ----.
`
`
`
`
`5/8" long; other needle sizes are available, particularly in larger diam­
`
`
`
`eters (to 21G (diameter 0.8 mm)) and lengths required for intramus­
`♦
`a ---------------rlj
`
`
`
`
`
`cular and intravenous dosing. Needle tubing standard sizes, diame­
`6 4 ■·.Unc.oated
`
`
`
`
`ters, and compositions are specified elsewhere [4].
`Syringes are typically sealed at the front end before filling by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an elastomeric rubber tip cap or needle shield. These items are man­
`
`
`
`ufactured by several manufacturers known for producing elastomer­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ic closures for vials -in various compounds. As with elastomeric vial
`2
`O _0 ___ 6 __ 1_2 __ 1_8 __ 2_4-----i3J
`i
`
`
`
`
`closures, needle shields and tip caps can be made of either dry natu­
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ral rubber or synthetic rubber. Dry natural rubber compounds have
`
`
`
`
`been linked with allergic reactions in some patients [5) and may have
`
`
`
`
`higher extractables compared with synthetic elastomers. Needle
`
`
`
`
`
`shields and tip caps may, however, present decreased surface area for
`.l
`
`
`
`potential interaction with product solution, compared with vial stop­
`for vari..'
`
`
`Bulk syringe component preparation may be eligible
`
`
`
`pers and prefi!led syringe plunger-stoppers.
`
`ous processing options. Silicone application to the barrel inner suv"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Other options in elastomeric rubber tip closures are plastic
`opera�d,?
`
`
`
`face -performed in order to attain a lubricated, easily
`
`
`
`
`
`outer shells, which may provide rigidity, dimensional control, and a
`syringe - may be carried out by different methods, such as sprayiri�>
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tamper evident overlayer.
`emul·,
`
`or wiping. The lubricant may consist of oil, or an oil-in-water
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Prefilled syringe plunger-stoppers are subject to many of the
`in so-call,e,4/
`
`
`sion. Syringes subsequently may be heated, resulting
`
`
`
`
`
`same requirements as vial stoppers (e.g., low extractables, container
`and interij-:c.t/
`
`
`''baked silicone" in an effort to reduce silicone mobility
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`closure integrity), so are typically made of similar materials (e.g.,
`
`tion with the drug product. Regardless of silicone
`
`
`
`
`
`halobutyl rubber). Plunger-stoppers are also available, as are vial
`
`
`
`
`
`Storage Duration at 5°C (mo.)
`
`type, quantity a,�i:F•
`
`
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`
`78
`
`REGITC00138779
`
`
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.003
`
`

`

`DRUG DELIVERY
`
`iw iJw,u",v� method, the stability of the drug product in the syringe
`
`
`
`rs into filled syringes. plunger-stoppeing syringes and placing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ready-to-fill syringes are typically filled in the tray, with filling and
`
`rnust be evaluated [10].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stoppering achieved using multiple filling needles (usually two to ten)
`Bulk syringe sterilization is typically performed by dry heat or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The syringe front closure (needle shield or tip cap) is mount­
`
`
`
`moving relative to the syringes in a raster pattern.
`
`
`
`on the barrel before or after sterilization, depending on the materi­
`
`
`and processing conditions employed.
`
`Prefilled Syringe Filling
`
`
`Plunger-stoppers can be washed, siliconized to facilitate
`Syringe filling machines employ the same solution dispensing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and steam-steril-or,occ:ss;1w111Ly in manufacturing and user operation,
`
`
`
`technologies as those used for vials. Rotary-piston pumps are the
`
`and rolling diaphragm
`
`
`most common, with peristaltie, time-pressure,
`
`
`
`
`Bulk syringe filling occurs in a continuous process with
`
`
`
`
`
`methods also available. Syringe filling may be conducted in a bot­
`
`
`
`
`
`and stopper­to filling conveying system syringes moved on a linear
`
`
`
`tom-up mode in order to reduce splashing and foaming.
`
`
`
`
`
`two to ten). (typically filling needles ing stations using multiple
`
`
`
`
`Syringe stoppering (the insertion of plunger-stoppers into the
`
`
`
`
`Ready-to-fill syringes, in contrast, undergo preparation by the
`
`
`
`
`filled syringes) is normally carried out by one of two methods, inser­
`
`
`
`
`
`siliconization, consisting of washing, syringe barrel manufacturer,
`
`
`
`
`tion tube or vacuum. Insertion tube stoppering consists of sliding the
`assembly
`
`
`with the tip closure, then sealing into tubs. Tubs consist of
`
`
`
`stopper into a metal tube, which compresses the stopper radially;
`
`
`
`
`
`syringes hanging vertically (tip downward) by the finger flange in a
`
`
`
`inserting the tube (with stopper) into baek of the glass syringe barrel;
`
`
`
`plastic tray with holes arranged in a rectangular anay, typically 64,
`
`
`
`
`pushing the stopper out of the tube and retracting the tube, leaving the
`
`
`
`
`100, or 160 syringes per tub (number depending on syringe size).
`
`
`
`stopper in the syringe bane!. Vacuum stoppering, by contrast,
`
`
`Sealed tubs are bagged and packed in corrugated cartons, then
`
`
`
`
`
`
`involves placing the filled syringe ( either singly or in groups of 100
`
`
`
`nrcicessf:a in an ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilizer in order to achieve
`
`
`or so) in a chamber under vacuum, then placing the plunger-stopper
`
`sterilization of the syringes.
`
`into the back of the barrel. Following this, the vacuum is released,
`
`
`
`Ready-to-use plunger-stoppers are also available. These may be
`
`
`
`and ambient pressure pushes the plunger-stopper into the low pres­
`
`
`
`
`washed, siliconized, scaled into bags and sterilized (gamma-irradia­
`
`
`
`
`
`sure region within the barrel. Depending on processing variables
`
`by the component manufacturer.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(e.g. fill tolerances, syringe dimensions, solution properties, vacuum
`
`
`
`
`Sterilized, packaged, ready-to-fill syringes and plunger-stop­
`
`
`
`levels for vacuum stoppering), the vacuum stoppering method may
`
`
`
`
`pers are then shipped to the filling site. The filling operation includes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provide smaller headspace (air bubble) sizes, compared with the
`
`
`
`
`
`transfer of syringe tubs into the aseptic filling area, followed by fill-
`
`insertion tube method.
`
`Introducing
`PharmaFocus™ Tubing
`
`• Plat;num-rnred silicone e:astoa:?r designed for thE 11eecls of the pharmac➔utical marl,etplace
`
`The Rigid Testing
`
`
`
`
`• 3ic:o:n;:iadbility Sr,2cifirntiow:
`USP Class Vl
`
`f;J'" Jr.1.31
`
`;.-:,(;A. ,?.J Cf�ct 1·17 . .2600
`
`The Risi.Id Source
`0 More th·,m :'.O years of �i!icone r,1anu,acturing ExpGrience are applied to eve,y p,ojud we make
`
`•Helix Medicc1.I Certificatio;·,s:
`
`Mamrfa:::turec; ,u::cf:Jrrling to GMFs
`1:;.o ?3485 wrtHie::J
`
`
`Jlegf.;terecf FDA M,'!•Jfr::ai Device f�cf/ity
`
`The Bltdd Tubing
`• Cost-effoctive ,ilico,1e tu,;ing delivering co1,sistent C:l'illity 2t the right lev,,1 of assur2r1ee
`
`
`
`
`•i'.<.vailable in 11 po[Jiilar size combinations
`
`
`
`• Matrrial ce,ti11c.:.tion and lol tr.:.ceabilily included
`
`M E D C A L
`
`Call today for a tree cat,;::1!og or to place an
`
`
`
`
`order i800) 266-4421 • www.heli�1.Kdical.corn
`
`79
`
`
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`
`Please circle #47
`
`
`REGITC00138780
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.004
`
`

`

`DRUG DELIVERY
`
`sol
`
`40
`
`�
`
`� 30
`
`J: 20
`
`0
`0
`
`l
`
`0Natural
`
`;J Sy nth etic-2
`Batch 1
`
`En Syn:thetic-2 Batch 2
`
`6 12 18
`30
`Time @ 5°C (Mo.)
`Storage
`
`24
`
`Prefilled
`Syringe
`Labeling
`and Packaging
`Syringes
`are typically
`labeled
`and packaged
`using automate.1j/;:'."
`equipment.
`Syringe
`labels
`may include
`dosing lines or
`graduation
`marks,
`or such information
`may be pre-printed
`rel. Plastic
`plunger
`rods can be automatically
`inserted
`into the
`syringe, by threading
`or snapping
`into the back of the pmng(:r-ston.:z:i
`per. Syringes
`may be packaged
`in thennoformed
`trays with
`Tyvek lid.
`
`••
`
`Prefilled Syringe
`Testing
`In our lab, various
`tests were performed
`to evaluate the
`propr�/''.
`ties of prefilled
`syringes
`at the time of filling,
`as well as across
`the 0
`anticipated
`product
`shelf life. Tests were aimed at evaluating
`thf f
`physical
`properties
`of the syringe
`to be encountered
`by the user (e:f(!
`removing
`the needle
`shield,
`dispensing
`the drug solution)
`as well a�Y;
`the biochemical
`properties
`of the drug solution.
`Described
`belowife.
`�
`· ·
`some examples
`of such prefilled
`syringe
`testing.
`Evaluation .. Xi;}
`Plunger-stopper
`from suppfi�rs·
`Prefilled
`syringe
`plunger-stopp
`ers are available
`in various
`elastomeric
`rubber
`compounds,
`with options
`in film co.�t:,,; .. /
`ings, as described
`above. In one study,
`we compared
`physical
`prqp-r
`erties of a typical
`uncoated
`elastomeric
`plunger-stopper
`with thosedft
`e force (aJst. f
`a film-coated
`plunger-stopper.
`Plunger-s
`topper breakloos
`termed "initial
`glide force") and glide force (also termed "dynam1&\
`glide force") testing
`measured
`the forces
`required
`to initiate
`and sus" :
`tain,
`respectively,
`the movement
`of the plunger
`to expel the contentS:.
`testing sysf,
`of the syringe.
`Testing
`was carried
`out using a material
`nt&; �
`represe
`tern with a crosshead
`speed of approximately
`4 mm/sec,
`tive of manual syringe
`delivery
`to patient.
`stopp,�rti
`Test results
`showed that syringes
`with the two plunger-
`had similar delivery
`properties.
`The breakloose
`force (some 5-7 :NX.J
`lower than that deter;
`[ 1 N=0.225
`lb] for coated
`stoppers
`was slightly
`2A). The slight diff�r.:-;�
`mined for uncoated
`stoppers,
`6-8 N (Figure
`force could be due to the effect of the coating, iis (
`ence in breakloose
`between the two plunger-stoppers teste.d >
`well as to other differences
`Glide forces for the two col11c:h.
`( e.g.,
`rubber
`compound
`and geometry).
`2B). Note that glide fore:� ?
`ponents
`were equivalent,
`at 9-10 N (Figure
`and to hydrodynarili¢>,
`is attributable
`to both stopper-barrel
`friction
`flow back-pressure
`as the drug solution
`is delivered
`through
`the
`dle; the latter
`property
`is further
`discussed
`below.
`
`80
`American
`Pharmaceutical
`Review
`
`REGITC00138781
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.005
`
`

`

`1
`
`100
`10
`Viscosity ( cP)
`
`Evaluation
`Shield
`Needle
`the force required
`force measures
`(NS) removal
`Needle shield
`we eval­
`In this study,
`to pull the NS off the front end of the syringe.
`I, Synthetic-2")
`("Synthetic-
`compounds
`rubber
`uated two synthetic
`testing
`The material
`("Natural").
`compound
`rubber
`and one natural
`speed of some 8 mm/sec,
`was
`with crosshead
`above,
`described
`· system
`of manually
`to mimic the operation
`used. The rate was expected
`the NS from the syringe.
`removing
`compound
`Needle shield
`. Synthetic-
`whereas
`forces,
`removal
`I gave high and variable
`consistent
`showed optimal,
`Natural
`and compound
`.Synthetic-2
`3. Compound Synthetic-2
`might be pre-
`see Figure
`forces;
`f removal
`allergenic)
`(potentially
`extractables
`in order to avoid the higher
`. ferred
`(data not shown).
`Natural
`with compound
`••associated
`
`·· Needle
`Evaluation
`Diameter
`we carried
`out
`properties,
`physical
`In a third study of syringe
`gauge and
`of needle
`glide force, as a function
`•,.evaluation
`of syringe
`such delivery
`to learn whether
`We were interested
`viscosity.
`_solution
`a tube
`flow through
`drop for laminar
`for pressure
`predictions
`matched
`•. (the tube being the syringe
`may be useful
`Such information
`needle).
`for which
`gauge for drug products
`needle
`the optimal
`tin determining
`than that of water.
`is greater
`the viscosity
`!Method
`with a crosshead
`as above,
`glide forces
`syringe
`{! We measured
`for a range of configurations, including
`needles
`of
`•{ speed of 3 mm/sec,
`to nominal
`gauge 30G to 23G, corresponding
`sizes (needle
`};tvarious
`to 0.34 mm [4]) and three plunger-stopper
`of 0.15
`diameters
`l)nside
`spanned
`a
`tested
`Solutions
`and one uncoated).
`(two coated
`1; types
`.range of viscosities,
`solution),
`as
`to 80 cP (sucrose
`from 1 cP (water)
`For comparison,
`wall friction).
`well as empty syringes
`(to assess
`using the Hagen-Poiseuille
`(H-P)
`were estimated
`i:extrusion
`forces
`flow in a tube [11]:
`for laminar
`liequation
`
`•0,
`
`Pharmaceutical
`Review
`American
`
`REGITC00138782
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.006
`
`

`

`)t}
`rs to pre;� ,J
`prefilled
`syringe
`and injection
`device
`drug product
`develope
`
`
`
`
`diet delivery parameters for various syringe and solution properti:es./ tJ.
`<sf
`
`Protein Stability Evaluation
`In addition to characteriz
`ing syringe
`physical parameters, we ll
`Where:
`in the pre filled syringe cont"•. ·· .f
`
`
`
`evaluated the stability of various proteins
`
`Q: Volumetric flow rate
`figuration.
`Evaluation
`methods
`included
`chromatograph
`ic analysis ot? J
`µ: Fluid viscosity
`
`
`
`
`
`protein solutions to detect physical (e.g. aggregation) and ehemic1tL' :1'
`
`L: Needle overall length
`· · · I
`
`
`(e.g. deamidation) changes.
`
`R: Radius (inner) of needle
`The degradation rates of Protein-I in prefilled
`
`
`syringes werf f
`
`
`
`P,, P,: Pressure (at inlet, outlet of needle)
`
`
`
`similar to those in glass vials, as determined by ion exchange chro-; ;;r ";;
`aphy' f
`
`matography (Figure 5A) and by size exclusion chromatogr
`
`
`The pressure drop, P,-P,, is related to the force applied to the plunger
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Figure SB). A second molecule, Protein-2, in prefilled
`
`syringes wai• ;1/f
`
`
`on the needle (the rod. We set P,=0 assuming no back pressure
`profile to ,:, ·· 1
`
`
`demonstrated in multiple studies to have a similar stability
`
`
`
`
`
`assumption is not stiictly true for injection into tissue).
`that in glass vials (Figure
`6). Other assays
`conducted on these pro�l.
`/zl
`reins indicated
`equivalent
`stability
`for prefilled
`syringe
`and vial for�;
`mats. These studies
`demonstrate
`that despite
`the exposure
`of the druf c'.•
`of materials including glass, sili�.
`
`solution to a diverse combination
`. cl
`
`cone, and one or more elastomers -prefilled syringes
`
`can provide a• J
`high producf
`convenient,
`efficient
`delivery
`system while maintaining

`quality.
`
`
`
`By rearranging, then substituting the appropriate values for parame­
`
`F= SQµLxA
`nR4
`Equation 3 enables one to estimate the extrnsion force F
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`required to dispense solution from the syringe through the needle.
`
`Note that the extrusion force is very sensitive to the tube internal
`80 t) ·�
`ll.
`
`
`
`
`
`radius (fourth-power dependence); thus small changes in needle diam­
`
`
`eter can result in large changes in force. The force thus determined
`·a;
`
`
`
`
`neglects wall friction, so that needs to be evaluated separately for each
`syringe-stopper system.
`
`
`
`Viscosity of each test solution was determined using a eonc­
`70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and-plate viscometer. Viscosity of0.7-mL samples was determined at
`0
`6 12 18
`
`
`a shear rate of 1000 sec·' and room temperature. Since the H-P equa­
`30
`24
`
`
`
`tion predicts that the extrusion force is highly dependent on the tube
`
`Storage Duration at 5°C (mo.)
`
`
`
`
`
`internal radius, we also measured, using an automated vision system,
`
`
`
`
`
`needle inside diameters (ID) to obtain the appropriate value for use in
`
`
`the calculation ("radius" (R) term).
`-�•
`
`
`
`Glide forces measured for forty-four combinations of solution,
`98
`
`
`
`
`
`plunger-stopper, and needle were detennined. Forces increased with
`97
`=-----=--=-
`==-
`
`
`
`
`increased viscosity and decreased needle diameter, as expected.
`,◊Vial =--:
`::e
`1•Pre-Hloo Syringe.·
`
`
`
`
`Differences between different plunger-stopper types were negligible
`0
`96
`
`
`
`
`(data not shown). Resutts were generally higher than the force pre­
`
`
`dicted by Equation 3.
`0
`
`
`Net glide forces were calculated in order to determine the forces
`
`
`
`
`
`required to extrude the solution through the needle. This was per­
`
`
`
`formed by subtracting, for each syringe-stopper configuration, the
`
`
`
`
`glide force detennined for empty syringes (assessing wall friction, l -
`
`3 N) from the measured glide force. The net glide forces thus deter­
`Conclusions
`high yield
`
`
`
`Prefilled syringes can provide safe, easy-to-use,
`
`
`mined are plotted in Figure 4, along with lines illustrating the extru­
`
`delivery systems for injectable bi.opharmaceuticals. A wide range:9f
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sion forces calculated by Equation 3. It can be seen that the equation
`and site, '
`
`
`
`
`
`syringe configurations, including syringe barrel material
`
`
`
`
`provides an excellent preaiction for actual net glide force, allowing
`
`(3)
`
`85
`
`A
`0\/1111
`•Pre-Filled Syringe
`
`e<:,
`
`>
`
`75
`
`•
`◊
`
`100 ~1
`-,
`,t,
`• •
`..
`•
`99
`
`-
`
`�--�
`
`I
`
`I
`
`95
`
`6 12
`18
`30
`24
`°C (mo.)
`
`Storage Duration at 5
`
`Results
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`
`82
`
`REGITC00138783
`
`
`DRUG DELIVERY
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`
`
`A = Cross sectional area of syringe barrel lumen
`
`Where:
`
`
`F = Glide force
`
`
`
`
`ters, we obtain:
`
`,>}:;
`
`; ",, �
`
`//<,:
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.007
`
`

`

`DRUG DELIVERY
`
`formats), and plunger-stopper (or Luer-tip i' needle gauge and length
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`options are avail­manufacturing ii/; composition, are available. Various
`
`
`
`
`(and and sterilization methods ll){able, such as syringe siliconization
`
`
`
`
`
`!!r•"bulk" syringe manufacturing and ready-to-fill configurations), and
`
`
`
`
`
`t'filling and stoppering (sealing) techniques. Prefilled syringe end-use
`
`
`
`
`,,tproperties, such as the forces required to remove the needle shield and
`
`
`
`and the depend on components ll!Wh:teliver the solution from the syringe,
`
`
`
`
`mr;manufacturing process. The force required to deliver the solution
`
`
`
`lle model for by the Hagen-Poiseui( through the needle can be predicted
`
`
`
`
`fqr pro­can provide stable container ilffrflow. Prefilled syringes laminar
`
`
`
`
`syringe componentsthat prefilled li/ftein drugs. Overall, it is apparent
`,,,,,
`
`
`
`
`processes need to be selected according to end-user requirements.
`
`l 99 12.i ...
`� 98
`I97
`96
`
`I ao
`•
`,,,L,, __ 7
`
`95 0
`6 12 18
`30
`24
`
`
`Storage Duration at 5°C (mo.)
`
`OnDrugDelivery, 2005: p. 9-11.
`
`
`3.ISO, Prefi.lled Syringes Part 4: Glass Barrels for Injectables.
`
`
`
`
`
`for Standardization: International
`
`1996, International Organization
`
`Standard, no. 11040-4. 1-4.
`
`
`
`
`4.ISO. Stainless steel needle tubing for the manufacture of medical
`
`
`devices. 1991, International Organization for Standardization:
`
`
`International Standard, no. 9626. 1-16.
`
`
`
`
`5.Primeau, M-N., NF. Adkinson, and R. G. Hamilton, Natural rubber
`
`
`
`
`
`pharmaceutical vial closures release latex allergens that produce skin
`
`
`
`
`
`reactions. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, 2001. 107(6): p.
`958-62.
`
`
`
`
`
`6.DeGrazio, F, Packaging in Prejilled Syringe Systems: Selection
`The Trend for Growth
`
`and Evaluation. Pre/Wed Syringes:
`
`
`Strengthens, OnDrugDelivery, 2006: p. 20-22.
`
`
`
`7.Boven, K., et al., The increased incidence of pure red cell aplasia
`
`
`
`with an Eprex formulation in uncoated rubber stopper syringes.
`
`
`Kidney Int., 2005. 67(6): p. 2346-2353.
`
`
`
`
`8.Villalobos, A.P., S.R. Gunturi, and G.A. Heavner, Interaction of
`
`
`Polysorbate 80 with Erythropoietin: A Case Study in
`
`
`
`Protein-Sw:factant Interactions. Pharm: Res., 2005. 22(7): p. 1186-
`1194
`
`
`
`9.Sharma, B., et al., Technical Investigations into the Cause of the
`
`
`
`Increased Incidence of Antibody-Mediated Pure Red Cell Aplasia
`
`
`Associated with Eprex. Eur J Hosp Pharm, 2004. 5(5): p. 86-91.
`
`
`
`10.Jones, L.S., A. Kaufmann, and C.R. Middaugh, Silicone oil
`
`
`
`
`induced aggregation of proteins. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
`
`2005. 94(4): p. 918-27.
`
`
`
`11.Whitaker, S., Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Prentice-Hall
`
`
`
`International Series in the Physical and Chemical Engineering
`
`
`
`
`ciences. 1968, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 457.
`
`David Overcashier is a Senior Engineer in the Late Stage
`
`
`
`Pharmaceutical and Device Development Department at •,*
`l'l0Acknowfedgements
`
`
`
`Genentech, where he was worked for 13 years. He has carried ii'.
`
`
`in this investiga­I\ We appreciate the support of our colleagues
`
`
`
`
`
`
`out prefilled syringe filling tests and product evaluation for pro-
`
`
`
`and by Racho Jordanov ii);Ji,on. Manufacturing assistance was provided
`
`
`
`tein product candidates. Previou.sly he worked on lyophilization
`' [
`
`
`
`
`
`Lo, by Jun Liu, Sabrina Wt1:0avid Figur. Technical support was provided
`
`
`
`
`
`process development, scale-up (mcludmg three marketed prod-1r,
`
`
`
`
`-;;;;Mary Nguyen, Al Stem, and Rita Wong. Project guidance and support
`
`
`
`
`ucts), and characterization. David received his BS degree from if
`
`
`Wwere provided by Patty Kiang and Tue Nguyen.
`
`
`the University of California, Davis, and his MS from the Ii
`
`
`University of Washington, Seattle both in Chemical '!
`1<: ' ,'
`if References
`'1
`
`
`{J. Polin, JB., The Ins and Outs of Prefilled Syringes. Pharmaceutical
`Engineering.
`
`
`Medical Packaging News, 2003. 11 (5): p. 40-43.
`
`
`
`
`Why New Prefilled Syringes: iW/!2. Schoenknect, T. and M Romacker,
`
`
`
`
`
`To correspond with the author, please contact the editor at:
`ii\[�
`',1;,pevelopments
`
`
`
`Are Important In Injectable Delivery Today Prejilled
`editoriall@russpub.com
`
`
`ii/$yringes: Innovations that Meet the Growing Demand,
`
`��
`
`$3
`
`
`
`
`
`American Pharmaceutical Review
`
`REGITC00138784
`
`
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1076.008
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket