throbber
SYRINGE SILICONISATION:
`TRENDS, METHODS, ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
`
`In this paper, Bruno Reuter, Director of Product Development, and Claudia Petersen, Director,
`Business Development, both of Gerresheimer Bünde, provide a detailed description of silicone
`oil and its applications in syringe siliconisation, highlighting the advantages and challenges
`siliconisation brings to the drug formulation and recent developments in the field.
`
`Ready-to-fill, i.e. sterile, prefillable glass syring-
`es, are washed, siliconised, sterilised and pack-
`aged by the primary packaging manufacturer.
`They can then be filled by pharmaceutical com-
`panies without any further processing. These
`days the majority of prefillable syringes are made
`of glass and the trend looks set to continue. The
`siliconisation of the syringe barrel is an extreme-
`ly important aspect of the production of sterile,
`prefillable glass syringes because the functional
`interaction of the glass barrel siliconisation and
`the plunger stopper siliconisation is crucial to the
`efficiency of the entire system. Both inadequate
`and excessive siliconisation can cause problems
`in this connection. The use of modern technology
`can achieve an extremely uniform distribution
`of silicone oil in glass syringes with reduced
`quantities of silicone oil. Another option for
`minimising the amount of free silicone oil in a
`syringe is the thermal fixation of the silicone oil
`on the glass surface in a process called baked-on
`siliconisation. Plastic-based silicone oil-free, and
`low-silicone oil, prefillable syringe systems are
`relatively new developments. Silicone oil-free
`lubricant coatings for syringes are also currently
`in the development phase.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Primary packaging for injectables almost
`exclusively comprises a glass container (car-
`tridge, syringe, vial) and an elastomer closure.
`Ampoules are an exception. Elastomers are by
`nature slightly sticky, so all elastomer closures
`(plunger stoppers for syringes and cartridges,
`serum or lyophilisation stoppers) are siliconised.
`Siliconisation prevents the rubber closures
`from sticking together and simplifies processing
`of the articles on the filling lines. For example,
`it minimises mechanical forces when the stop-
`
`pers are inserted. Siliconisation is therefore
`essential to process capability.
`Although syringes and cartridges are always
`siliconised, this applies to a lesser extent to vials
`and ampoules. On the container the siliconisation
`provides a barrier coating between the glass and
`drug formulation. It also prevents the adsorption
`of formulation components on the glass surface.
`The hydrophobic deactivation of the surface also
`improves the containers’ drainability. In prefill-
`able syringes and cartridges, siliconisation also
`performs another function. It lubricates the syringe
`barrel or cartridge body enabling the plunger to
`glide through it. Siliconisation of the plunger stop-
`per alone would not provide adequate lubrication.
`Silicone oils are ideal as lubricants because
`they are largely inert, hydrophobic and visco-
`elastic. Chemical and physical requirements
`for lubricants are set out in the relevant mono-
`graphs of the US Pharmacopeia (USP) and the
`European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur).1,2 Section
`3.1.8 of the Ph Eur also defines a kinematic vis-
`cosity of 1,000-30,000 mm2/s for silicone oils
`used as lubricants.3 In contrast, the monograph
`for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) in the USP 2
`permits the use of silicone oils with a viscosity
`of 20-30,000 centistokes (cSt).
`However, increasingly stringent quality
`requirements and new bioengineered drugs are
`now taking siliconisation technology to its lim-
`its. Non-homogenous siliconisation, which can
`occur when simple coating techniques are used
`on longer syringe barrels, can in some cases
`lead to mechanical problems. These include
`the incomplete drainage of the syringe in an
`auto-injector or high gliding forces. Silicone oil
`droplets are always observed in filled syringes.
`The number of silicone oil droplets increases
`in line with the quantity of silicone oil used.
`Droplets which are visible to the naked eye
`
`Claudia Petersen
`Global Director,
`Marketing & Development
`T: +49 5223 164 242
`E: c.petersen@gerresheimer.com
`
`Gerresheimer Bünde GmbH
`Erich-Martens-Strasse 26-32
`32257 Bünde
`Germany
`
`www.gerresheimer.com
`
`16
`
`
`
`www.ondrugdelivery.com
`
`Copyright © 2013 Frederick Furness Publishing Ltd
`
`
`
`1024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 161024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 16
`
`
`
`02/07/2013 08:0202/07/2013 08:02
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2021.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Figure 1: Polydimethylsiloxane.
`
`could be viewed as a cosmetic defect. At sub-
`visual level, the issue of whether silicone oil
`particles could induce protein aggregation is
`currently under discussion.4
`In light of this development, there is an
`obvious trend towards optimised or alternative
`coating techniques. Attempts are being made to
`achieve the most uniform possible coating with
`a reduced quantity of silicone oil and to mini-
`mise the amount of free silicone oil by way of
`baked-on siliconisation. In this context, reliable
`analysis technologies that can be used to make
`qualitative and quantitative checks on the coat-
`ing are absolutely essential. Alternative coating
`techniques are also being developed.
`
`SILICONE OILS & THEIR PROPERTIES
`
`Silicone oils have been used for half a cen-
`tury in numerous pharmaceutical applications.
`For example, they are used as lubricants in
`pharmaceutics production and as inert pharma-
`ceutical base materials (e.g. soft capsule walls).5
`Trimethylsiloxy end-blocked polydimethylsilox-
`ane (PDMS, dimethicone) in various viscosities
`is generally used for siliconisation (see Figure 1).
`The most frequently used silicone oil for
`the siliconisation of primary packaging compo-
`nents is DOW CORNING® 360 Medical Fluid.
`PDMS is produced by reducing quartz sand to
`elemental silicon. In the next step, the silicon
`reacts directly with methyl chloride in a pro-
`cess called Müller-Rochow synthesis to create
`methyl chlorosilanes. In this process, a mixture
`of different silanes is produced, the majority of
`which (75%–90%) are dimethyldichlorosilane
`(CH3)2SiCl2. After distillative separation, the di-
`methyldichlorosilane is converted by hydrolysis
`or methanolysis into silanols which condense
`into low-molecular-weight chains and cycles.
`In an acidic (cationic) or alkaline (anionic)
`catalysed polymerisation, polydimethylsilox-
`anes with hydroxyl functions are generated.
`After the addition of trimethylchlorosilane they
`are furnished with trimethylsiloxy end groups.
`The short-chain molecules are removed from
`the resulting polydisperse polymers by way of
`vaporisation, leaving deployable PDMS.
`The characteristic aspect of the PDMS mol-
`ecule is the Si-O bond. With a bond energy of
`
`108 kcal/mol, it is considerably more stable than
`the C-O bond (83 kcal/mol) or the C-C bond (85
`kcal/mol). PDMS is accordingly less sensitive to
`thermal loads, UV radiation or oxidation agents.
`Reactions such as oxidation, polymerisation or
`depolymerisation do not occur until temperatures
`exceeding 130°C. The molecule also typically has
`a flat bond angle (ӨSi-O-Si = 151° ±12°) which
`has low rotation energy and is especially flexible
`(Figure 2). A high bond length (1.63 Å Si-O as
`
`Figure 2: 3D-structure of
`polydimethylsiloxane.
`
`compared with 1.43 Å for C-O) makes the mol-
`ecule comparatively gas-permeable.6
`The spiral shaped (and therefore easily com-
`pressible) molecule is surrounded by CH3 groups
`which are responsible for the chemical and
`mechanical properties of PDMS. The molecule’s
`methyl groups only interact to a very limited
`extent. This ensures low viscosity, even with
`high molecular weights, which simplifies the
`distribution of PDMS on surfaces and makes it
`a very effective lubricant. PDMS is also largely
`inert and reactions with glass, metals, plastics
`or human tissues are minimal. The CH3 groups
`make PDMS extremely hydrophobic. It is insolu-
`ble in water, but soluble in non-polar solvents.6
`
`SILICONISED SYRINGES
`
`As already explained the syringe system
`only works if the glass barrel and plunger
`stopper siliconisation are homogenous and opti-
`mally harmonised. For needle syringes, siliconi-
`sation of the needle is also essential to prevent
`it sticking to the skin, thereby minimising injec-
`tion pain. For the so-called oily siliconisation
`of the syringe glass barrel DOW CORNING®
`360 with a viscosity of 1,000 cSt is used. The
`DOW CORNING® 365 siliconisation emulsion
`
`is often used in the baked-on siliconisation pro-
`cess (describe later). The needle is siliconised
`using a wipe technique during ready-to-fill
`processing. DOW CORNING® 360 with a vis-
`cosity of 12,500 cSt is used. Another option is
`the thermal fixation of silicon oil on the needle
`during the needle mounting process.
`The goal of syringe barrel siliconisation is to
`obtain the most even anti-friction coating possi-
`ble along the entire length of the syringe in order
`to minimise break loose and gliding forces when
`the plunger stopper is deployed (Figure 3).
`Inadequate siliconisation of the syringe
`barrel, particularly the existence of unsilicon-
`ised areas, can cause slip-stick effects that
`impair the syringe’s function. The forces in
`the injection process can then be too high or
`the entire system can fail. Since inadequate
`siliconisation and gaps in the coating are often
`found on the lower end of the syringe (luer
`tip/needle end), it is possible that the syringe
`will not be completely emptied. Such defects
`can remain undiscovered, particularly in auto-
`injectors since these are closed systems. The
`result could be that an inadequate dosage of the
`medication is administered.
`The obvious solution is to increase the
`amount of silicone oil used to achieve a homog-
`enous coating. However, as already mentioned,
`increasing the amount of silicone oil used is
`also associated with higher quantities of silicone
`particles in the solution.
`With protein-based drugs in particular, unde-
`sirable interactions with silicone oil particles
`cannot be ruled out. Sub-visual silicone oil par-
`ticles are thought to promote protein aggrega-
`tion which can increase the severity of immune
`responses and reduce the drug’s tolerability.
`However, the underlying mechanism is not yet
`fully understood. There is a discussion as to
`whether protein aggregation is influenced by
`additional motion, e.g. shaking the syringe.7
`Experiments have also shown that when
`silicone oil in excess of 1 mg/syringe is used the
`additional silicone oil does not further reduce
`gliding forces.
`The interior siliconisation of glass syringe
`barrels has another advantage. It prevents the
`drug solution from interacting with the glass
`surface and minimises related problems such as
`the loss of active ingredients through adsorption
`or pH value changes due to alkali leaching.
`Prefillable glass syringes are only manu-
`factured from high-quality type 1 borosilicate
`glass. However, sodium ions can still leach out
`of the glass surface if the syringe contains an
`aqueous solution and is stored for a long period
`of time. This leads to higher pH values which
`could be problematic in unbuffered systems.
`Acidic environments foster this process:
`
`Copyright © 2013 Frederick Furness Publishing Ltd
`
`www.ondrugdelivery.com
`
`17
`
`
`
`1024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 171024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 17
`
`
`
`02/07/2013 08:0202/07/2013 08:02
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2021.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`OPTIMISED SILICONISATION
`
`For the abovementioned reasons, the main
`objective in siliconisation is to achieve the most
`homogenous possible coating with the mini-
`mum possible quantity of silicone oil. Initially it
`is necessary to establish the minimum quantity
`of silicone oil which will reliably satisfy the
`quality requirements of the application. In the
`production of ready-to-fill syringes, siliconisa-
`tion generally takes place after washing and
`drying. Fixed nozzles positioned at finger flange
`level under the syringe barrel spray the silicone
`oil onto the inside surface. In long syringes, the
`silicone oil is sometimes unevenly distributed
`and the concentration of the silicone oil is lower
`at one end of the syringe (luer tip/needle end).
`The use of diving nozzles can considerably
`improve the evenness of the coating across the
`entire length of the syringe body. In this pro-
`cess, the nozzles are inserted into the syringe
`to apply the silicone oil (finely atomised) in
`motion. The result is practically linear as is
`shown by the closely bundled gliding forces in
`the force path diagram (Figure 4).
`Studies on 1 ml long syringes have revealed
`considerable potential for reducing the amount
`of silicone oil required. In one experiment, the
`quantity of silicone oil per syringe could be
`reduced by 40% without any impairment of the
`system’s functional properties (see Figure 5). In
`practice the calculation of the optimum quan-
`tity of silicone oil has to take syringe volume,
`plunger stopper type (coated/ uncoated), plung-
`er stopper placement method (seating tube/vac-
`uum) and application requirements (injection
`systems) into account. Plunger stoppers from
`different suppliers not only differ in terms of
`the type of rubber used and their design, they are
`also coated with silicone oils of different vis-
`cosities. The siliconisation methods also differ
`considerably. These variables can have a bigger
`impact on the syringe system’s functional prop-
`erties than the syringe siliconisation of different
`suppliers, as shown by Eu et al.8
`
`BAKED-ON SILICONISATION
`
`Another key advancement in siliconisation
`technology is the baked-on siliconisation tech-
`nology. It involves the application of silicone
`oil as an emulsion which is then baked on to
`the glass surface in a special kiln at a specific
`temperature and for a specific length of time.
`In the baked-on process, both hydrogen
`and covalent bonds form between the glass
`surface and the poly-dimethylsiloxane chains.
`The bonds are so strong that part of the silicone
`oil cannot be removed with solvent and a per-
`manent hydrophobic layer is created (Figure 6).
`
`Figure 3: Extrusion force profile of a prefillable syringe.
`
`Fixed Nozzle
`– Fav break loose force = 2.1 N
`– Faw gliding force = 2.4 N
`
`Diving Nozzle
`– Fav break loose force = 1.7 N
`– Faw gliding force = 0.5 N
`
`Distance (mm)
`
`Distance (mm)
`
`Force (N)
`
`Force (N)
`
`m = 0.8 mg, v = 300 mm/min, empty 1 ml long LC Syringes
`
`Figure 4: Comparison of extrusion force profiles – fixed nozzle (top) versus diving
`nozzle (bottom).
`
`Standard 1ml long syringe*
`Fixed Nozzle
`m = 0.8 mg
`V = 100 mm/min
`BFmean = 2.5 N
`EFmean = 1.7 N
`
`Optimised siliconisation
`
`Standard 1ml long syringe*
`Diving Nozzle
`m = 0.5 mg
`V = 100 mm/min
`BFmean = 1.7 N
`EFmean = 0.5 N
`* Empty syringes
`
`Distance (mm)
`
`Distance (mm)
`
`Force (N)
`
`Force (N)
`
`Figure 5: Baked-on siliconisation.
`
`Si-O-Na + H20
`
` SiOH + NaOH
`
`In alkaline environments, on the other hand, an
`etching process is observed:
`
` Na2SiO3 + H2O
`2NaOH + (SiO2)X
`Aqueous solutions with a high pH value
`
`cannot therefore be stored for long periods in
`unsiliconised borosilicate glass containers. They
`have to be lyophilised and reconstituted before
`use. In extreme cases, the etching of the glass
`surface can cause delamination. Hydrophobic
`deactivation of the container by siliconisation
`effectively protects the glass surface.
`
`18
`
`
`
`www.ondrugdelivery.com
`
`Copyright © 2013 Frederick Furness Publishing Ltd
`
`
`
`1024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 181024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 18
`
`
`
`02/07/2013 08:0202/07/2013 08:02
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2021.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`In addition the average molecule weight
`increases as a result of polymerisation and the
`vaporisation of short chain polymers. The result-
`ing extremely thin layer of silicone, in conjunc-
`tion with the low quantity of silicone oil used
`in the emulsion, minimises free silicone in the
`syringe and ensures that the required quality of
`finish is achieved. The layer thickness measures
`15-50 nm. By comparison, the average layer
`thickness with oily siliconisation is 500-1,000 nm.
`Baked-on siliconisation reduces the measur-
`able quantity of free silicone oil to approximate-
`ly 10 % of the normal value. As a result, there
`are fewer sub-visual and visual silicone oil par-
`ticles in the solution. This siliconisation process
`is therefore recommended for use with sensitive
`protein formulations. It is also advantageous
`for ophthalmological preparations which are
`associated with very stringent requirements as
`regards particle contamination.
`Another benefit is the stability of the mechan-
`ical properties of the filled syringe throughout
`its shelf life. The ribs of a plunger stopper press
`into the silicone layer when a syringe with oily
`siliconisation is stored for long periods of time
`and the glass comes into direct contact with the
`rubber. Since elastomers are always slightly
`sticky, the break-loose forces increase over the
`storage period.
`With baked-on siliconisation, however, this
`phenomenon is not observed to the same extent
`(Figure 7). The break-loose force remains prac-
`tically constant over the entire storage period.
`
`OUTLOOK
`
`There is a trend towards reduced-silicone
`systems or baked-on siliconisation in glass
`syringe finishing. Improved analysis techniques
`and a better understanding of the phenomena
`involved support optimised use of silicone oil.
`New issues are arising as a result of the use
`of innovative materials or coatings. In light of
`the increasing complexity of devices and the
`more widespread incidence of biopharmaceuti-
`cals with specific requirements, new alternative
`materials for primary packaging products are
`becoming increasingly interesting. For example,
`the inside surfaces of vials and syringes can be
`coated with pure SiO2 in a plasma process to
`minimise their interaction with drugs. Plastic
`systems based on cyclic olefins (COP/COC)
`are also gaining in significance for prefilled
`syringes and vials. COP syringes such as the
`ClearJect™ TasPack™ by from Kako Co Ltd
`(Osaka, Japan) have glass-like transparency.
`Additionally, they have a higher break resist-
`ance, their pH stability range is larger and there
`is no metal ion leaching.
`Excellent dosage precision is also very
`
`Figure 6: Extrusion force profile after optimised siliconisation.
`
`Oily siliconised syringe
`
`Baked-on siliconised syringe
`
`Storage
`
`Storage
`
`Direct rubber/glass contact leads to higher
`break-loose forces over the storage period
`
`The baked-on siliconisation provides
`a permanent coating
` Smaller increase in break-loose
`
`forces over the storage period
`
`Figure 7: Comparison of syringes with oily and baked-on siliconisation.
`
`important in packaging for bio-pharmaceuticals.
`In most cases siliconisation is also essential in
`COP syringes. Silicone oil-free systems are a
`brand new approach. The gliding properties of
`the fluoropolymer coating on specially devel-
`oped plunger stoppers eliminate the need to
`siliconise plastic syringes. There are as many
`innovative ideas for the development of pri-
`mary packaging products as there are innovative
`drugs and syringe systems.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. US Pharmacopeia 35 NF 30. Dimethicone,
`The United States Pharmacopeial
`Convention Inc (Rockville, MD, US), 2011
`2. Pharmacopoea Europaea. 7. Ausgabe.
`Dimeticon, Deutscher Apotheker Verlag,
`Stuttgart, Deutschland, 2011, s. 2788.
`3. Pharmacopoea Europaea. 7. Ausgabe. 3.1.8
`Siliconöl zur Verwendung als Gleitmittel,
`Deutscher Apotheker Verlag, Stuttgart,
`
`Deutschland, 2011, s. 486.
`4. Jones L, Kaufmann A, Middaugh C,
`“Silicone oil-induced aggregation of pro-
`teins”. J Pharm Sci 2005, Vol 94(4), pp
`918-927.
`5. Colas A, Siang J, Ulman K, “Silicone
`in Pharmaceutical Applications Part
`2: Silicone Excipients”. Dow Corning
`Corporation (Midland, MI, US), 2001.
`6. Colas A, “Silicone in Pharmaceutical
`Applications”. Dow Corning Corporation
`(Midland, MI, US), 2001.
`7. Thirumangalathu R, Krishnan S, Speed
`Ricci M, Brems D, Randolph T, Carpenter J,
`“Silione oil- and agitation-induced aggrega-
`tion of a monoclonal antibody in aqueous
`suspension”. J Pharm Sci, 2009, Vol 98(9),
`pp 3167-3181.
`8. N, Pranay P, Eu B, “Variability in syringe
`components and its impact on functionality
`of delivery systems”. PDA J Pharm Sci &
`Tech, 2011, Vol 65, pp 468-480.
`
`Copyright © 2013 Frederick Furness Publishing Ltd
`
`www.ondrugdelivery.com
`
`19
`
`
`
`1024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 191024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 19
`
`
`
`02/07/2013 08:0202/07/2013 08:02
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2021.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Our comprehensive offering:
`RTF® syringe systems
`| High-quality ready-to-fill syringes
`| Innovative accessories
`| Proprietary baked-on siliconization
`
`www.gerresheimer.com
`
`
`
`1024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 201024_GF_ONdrugDeilvery_June Inj Formulations.indd 20
`
`
`
`02/07/2013 08:0202/07/2013 08:02
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2021.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket