throbber

`
`Transcript of James Agalloco
`
`Date: May 4, 2022
`Case: Regeneron -v- Novartis (PTAB)
`
`Planet Depos
`Phone: 888.433.3767
`Email: transcripts@planetdepos.com
`www.planetdepos.com
`
`WORLDWIDE COURT REPORTING & LITIGATION TECHNOLOGY
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`
`1 (1 to 4)
`
`3
`
`4
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS,
`
`INC.:
`
` Natalie Kennedy, Esquire
` Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
` 767 Fifth Avenue
` New York, New York 10153-0119
` PHONE: +1 (212) 310-8730
` E-MAIL: Natalie.Kennedy@weil.com
` -and-
`
` Andrew Peter Gesior, Esquire
` Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
` 767 Fifth Avenue
` New York, New York 10153-0119
` PHONE: +1 (212) 310-8244
` E-MAIL:andrew.gesior@weil.com
` -and-
`
` Christopher Pepe, Esquire
` Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
` 2001 M Street, NW
` Washington, D.C. 20036
` PHONE: +1 (202) 682 7153
` E-MAIL: Christopher.pepe@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`1
`
`2
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` ___________________________
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` __________________________
`
`
` REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
` Petitioner
`
` v.
`
` NOVARTIS PHARMA AG,
` NOVARTIS TECHNOLOGY LLC,
` NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
` Patent Owners
` ____________________________
`
`0
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
` Case IPR2021-00816
`
`12
`
`13
`
` Patent No. 9,220,631
` ___________________________
`
`
`14
`
` Remote Zoom Deposition of
`
`15
`
` JAMES AGALLOCO, taken on
`
`16
`
` May 4, 2022 at 10:02 a.m.
`
`17
`
` ____________________________
`
`18
`
`
`
`19
`
`Job No. 447979
`
`20
`
`Pages 1-139
`
`21
`
`Reported by: Lisa M. Barrett, RPR, CRR, CRC, CSR
`
`22
`
`
`
` REMOTE DEPOSITION OF JAMES AGALLOCO held
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S (CONT'D)
`
`(Via Zoom Videoconferencing):
`
`ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS,
`
`INC.:
`
` Petra Scamborova, PhD, JD
` Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
` 777 Old Saw Mill River Road
` Tarrytown, New York 10591
` PHONE: +1 (914) 847-7611
` E-MAIL: Petra.scamborova@regeneron.com
`
`
`ON BEHALF OF THE PATENT OWNERS:
`
` Elizabeth J. Holland, Esquire
` Allen & Overy LLP
` 1221 Avenue of the Americas
` New York, New York 10020
` PHONE: +1 (212) 610 6365
` E-MAIL: Elizabeth.Holland@allenovery.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`Also present: Matt Weedon, PD Remote Technician
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`virtually via Zoom Videoconferencing,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
` Before Lisa M Barrett, Certified Relatime
`
`20
`
`Court Reporter Reporter, and Notary Public of the State of
`
`21
`
`Maryland.
`
`22
`
`
`
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`
`2 (5 to 8)
`
`5
`
`7
`
` "Sterilization of health
`
` care products-Requirements
`
` and for selecting a
`
` sterility - assurance level
`
` (SAL) for products labeled
`
` "sterile" Novartis.
`
`Exhibit 2206 Document entitled, "Dr. Sigg's 79
`
` declaration."
`
`Exhibit 2115
`
`0
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`15
`
`Exhibit 2104 Document reflecting 105
`
` C O N T E N T S
`
`EXAMINATION OF JAMES AGALLOCO PAGE
`
`By Ms. Holland 9
`
` E X H I B I T S
` PAGE
` (Presented pre-marked exhibits)
`
` (Attached to the Transcript)
`
`Exhibit 1016 Excerpt from a book 9
`
` called "Pharmaceutical Dosage
`
` Forms," edited by Nema and
`
`0
`
` Ludwig
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`11
`
`Exhibit 1100 Expert Declaration by James 16
`
`12
`
` Agalloco
`
`13
`
`Exhibit 2330 Transcript of James Agalloco 19
`
`14
`
` dated February 16, 2021
`
`15
`
` Case: Certain Pre-Filled
`
`16
`
` Syringes for Intravitreal
`
`16
`
` communications between
`
`17
`
` Injection (337-TA-1207)
`
`17
`
`
`
`18
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 1029 Patent Application, Xanthe 115
`
`19
`
` Lam
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`8
`
` Wednesday, May 4, 2022
`--- Commencing at 10:02 a.m.
` REMOTE TECHNICIAN: Before we
`administer the oath, I just have a brief read on
`script to do for Planet Depos. One second, let me
`pull that up. Thank you to everyone for attending
`this proceeding remotely, which we anticipate will
`run smoothly. Please remember to speak slowly and
`do your best not to talk over one another.
` Please be aware we are recording this
`0
`proceeding for backup purposes. Any
`11
`off-the-record discussions should be had away from
`12
`the computer. Please remember to mute your mic
`13
`for those conversations.
`14
` Please have your video enabled to help
`15
`the reporter identify who is speaking. If you are
`16
`unable to connect with video and are connecting
`17
`via phone, please identify yourself each time
`18
`before speaking.
`19
` I apologize in advance for any
`20
`technical-related interruptions. Thank you.
`21
` (Court reporter read oath stipulation.
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1234567891
`
` E X H I B I T S
` PAGE
` (Presented pre-marked exhibits)
`
` (Attached to the Transcript)
`
`Exhibit 2328 Article co-authored by James 20
`
` Agalloco with Dr. Aikers,
`
` published in 2013.
`
`Exhibit 1007 Document entitled "Sigg 36
`
` Publication."
`
`Exhibit 1005 Document from IPR 317. 39
`
`Exhibit 2148 Technical memorandum from 41
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
`
`0
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`11
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2329 Document entitled, 53
`
` "Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
`
` Handbook: Production and
`
`17
`
` Processes."
`
`18
`
`
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
` E X H I B I T S (Continued)
` PAGE
` (Presented pre-marked exhibits)
`
` (Attached to the Transcript)
`
`Exhibit 2187 Document entitled: 67
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`9
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` Counsel agreed.)
` JAMES AGALLOCO, having been duly
` sworn testified as follows,
` EXAMINATION
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Good morning, Mr. Agalloco, nice to see
`you again.
` A Good morning.
` Q I'd like to start by looking at exhibit
`1016.
` (Whereupon, Exhibit 1016 was
`identified.)
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q So Matt, can you put that up on the
`screen please. Can you -- thank you.
` Mr. Agalloco, this is an excerpt from a
`book called "Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms," edited
`by Nema and Ludwig.
` You are familiar with this reference,
`correct?
` A Yes, I am.
` Q And you wrote one of the chapters in
`
`3 (9 to 12)
`
`11
`
`it"?
` A It can be written differently, but I
`agree with it in principle.
` Q And then I want to look at the next
`paragraph, the first sentence, which says that:
` "Requirements for the validation and routine
`operation of sterilization methods are given in a
`series of ISO and AAMI standards and guidelines."
`[As read.]
` Do you see that?
` A Yes, I do.
` Q And do you agree with that as well?
` A That is only correct within the medical
`device industry.
` The ISO standard are, you know, widely
`accepted in that industry, which is the one that
`AAMI represents.
` The drug industry tends to follow the
`standards of the Food and Drug Administration.
` They look at these, but they do not
`follow them exactly.
` Q Do you -- let me withdraw that.
`
`10
`
` Are you familiar with the AAMI
`here, right?
` A That's correct.
`standards?
` A Only to the extent that I work with a
` Q Can we go to page 1016.210. Thank you.
`device, but when I'm working with drugs, I look
` Mr. Agalloco, this is a chapter in the
`more closely at Food and Drug Administration
`Exhibit 1016, the Nema book, called:
`expectations.
` "Industrial Sterilization Techniques:
` Q Okay, is a syringe a device?
`Principles and Overview" by Anne Booth.
` A When it is presented with a drug inside
` Have you seen this before?
`of it, it is a drug.
` A Only in passing. I have not read it in
`depth.
` Q Let me turn now to page 1016.256.
`0
` There is a chapter in the NEMA book
` Q Well, I want to point your -- direct
`11
`called:
`your attention to six lines down. There is a
`12
` "Gas Vapor and Liquid Chemical
`sentence that says:
`13
`Sterilization."
` "Also, the sterilization treatment must not
`14
` Is that a chapter that you wrote,
`render the medical product, materials or functions
`15
`Mr. Agalloco?
`unacceptable." [As read.]
`16
` A Yes, I did.
` Do you see that?
`17
` A Yes, I do.
` Q All right, I'd like to turn to page --
`18
`that has .259 on the bottom.
` Q Is that something you agree with?
`19
` A I think it is one way of stating it.
` There is a section in the middle of
`20
`Yes, I do agree with it.
`that page that says:
`21
` "Gas, Vapor, and Liquid Sterilization
` Q What do you mean by "one way of stating
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`1234567891
`
`12
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`13
`
`Fundamentals: Material Effects." Do you see
`that?
` A Yes.
` Q And the first sentence says:
` "Sterilization processes are designed to
`kill microorganisms and as such they utilize
`conditions that may be destructive of essential
`material properties." [As read.]
` Is that a sentence you agree with?
` A I wrote it, so yes, I agree with it.
` Q And the sterilization processes that
`are being referred to in that sentence, would that
`include the use of ethylene oxide and vaporized
`hydrogen peroxide?
` A Yes, it would.
` Q You agree, Mr. Agalloco, that a
`terminal sterilization process, in addition to
`achieving the appropriate level of sterilization,
`has to also avoid degradation of the drug product?
` A Yes, I do.
` Q Do you also agree that a sterilization
`process, in addition to achieving an appropriate
`
`4 (13 to 16)
`
`15
`
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q If the hydrogen peroxide or ethylene
`oxide is absorbed onto the rubber stopper, can it
`then leach into the drug product over time?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: Potentially. That's a
`possibility.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Is it correct that if a sterilizing gas
`like hydrogen peroxide or ethylene oxide gets into
`a drug product, it can be impossible to remove it
`from the drug product?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: I'd say it would be
`extremely difficult to remove it. I can't say
`it's impossible. There may be methods.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q In your declaration, you talk about the
`claimed construction of terminal sterilization; do
`you recall that?
` A Yes, I do.
` Q Why don't we put that up on the screen?
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`14
`
`level of sterilization, also has to avoid leaving
`traces of toxic substances that could make the
`drug product unsafe?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Is it also true, Mr. Agalloco, that
`sterilizing gases can absorb onto syringe
`components during sterilization?
` A That's a possibility with some
`materials and some gases.
` Q Which gases?
` A There are many gases, and there are
`many materials. It is infinity combinations. I
`can't list them all.
` Q All right. Is it -- I appreciate that.
`Let me try again then.
` Is it correct that ethylene oxide and
`vaporized hydrogen peroxide can absorb onto a
`rubber stopper that's part of a prefilled syringe?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: It's possible, yes.
`
` It is exhibit 1100, at paragraph 20.
` (Whereupon, Exhibit 1100 was
`identified.)
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q All right. At the bottom of page 8,
`it's in paragraph 20, you say:
` "I understand that, as used in the '631
`Patent, the parties have agreed that 'terminally
`sterilized' refers to a process whereby the
`outside of a prefilled syringe is sterilized,
`0
`while contact between the sterilizing agent and
`11
`the drug product within the syringe is minimized."
`12
`[As read.]
`13
` Do you see that?
`14
` A Yes, I do.
`15
` Q And is it correct that the reason for
`16
`minimizing the contact is to avoid chemical action
`17
`of the sterilizing agent on the contents of the
`18
`syringe, including the active ingredient?
`19
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
`20
` THE WITNESS: Yes, that would be the
`21
`reason for minimization.
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`16
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`17
`
`5 (17 to 20)
`
`19
`
` (Whereupon, Exhibit 2330 was
`identified.)
` MS. KENNEDY: I'm going to object to
`the exhibit as outside the scope and to the extent
`that there is no authorization to file new
`exhibits in the surreply.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q All right. I'd like to go to page 74.
` It is not 74 of the exhibit, sorry. It
`is 74 of the transcript.
` Let's see if I can -- sorry, just one
`second. It's page 20. On the bottom it should
`have a 2330.0020.
` I want to look at page 74, and at line
`2, I asked you:
` "Question: So to figure out whether
`something is terminally sterilized, meaning had
`minimized contact, you would at least have to wait
`until stability is over because terminal
`sterilization could be a factor that affects
`degradation of the active." [As read.]
` I said, "Is that fair?"
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Do you agree that in order to determine
`whether or not contact has been minimized, you
`would need to test the syringe, both
`post-sterility testing as well as post-stability
`testing?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: Can you repeat that for
`me, please?
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Yes, I can. You said in your last
`answer you agreed that minimizing contact is done
`so that you can avoid the chemical action of the
`sterilizing agent on the contents of the syringe,
`including the active.
` So now my question is: To determine
`whether or not that contact has actually been
`minimized, is it correct that you would need to
`test the active, both post-sterility testing, as
`well as after stability testing?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: If I understand your
`
`1234567891
`
`18
`question correctly, the answer would be yes, you
`would test immediately after sterilization, and
`test again at the end of the stability program.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Okay, and you wouldn't know for sure
`whether or not you have successfully terminally
`sterilized until the end of stability testing; is
`that right?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
`Objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: That's actually not
`entirely true because you don't always have the
`full stability at the time of approval.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q All right. Are you -- let me ask this
`again. Let me do this differently. Sorry about
`that.
` I want to look at your deposition
`transcript from the ITC case. Let's see if we
`have that here.
` Can you put Exhibit 2330 on the screen,
`please.
`
` You answered:
` "Answer: You would make an immediate
`determination at the beginning, and you could only
`get definitive proof at the end of stability." [As
`read.]
` Do you still agree with that testimony?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, because exactly what
`I said just a few minutes ago when you asked a
`0
`very similar question.
`11
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
`12
` Q Okay. You can take that exhibit down.
`13
`Thank you. I want to go now to an exhibit that I
`14
`pre-marked as 2328.
`15
` (Whereupon, Exhibit 2328 was
`16
`identified.)
`17
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection to the exhibit,
`18
`outside the scope and to the extent that there's
`19
`not authorization to file new exhibits in the
`20
`surreply.
`21
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`20
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`21
`
`6 (21 to 24)
`
`23
`
`processes and their subsequent validation?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: The thrust of this
`article is primarily to the treatment of isolators
`in which there is sterilization decontamination.
` It is somewhat different from the
`sterilization of objects in an autoclave, which is
`the subject of the '631 Patent.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Let me try my question again.
` Do you agree with the sentence you
`wrote in September 2013, that persistent problems
`regarding the development of H²O² processes and
`their subsequent validation have been reported?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: I will repeat what I just
`said.
` This was directed at the treatment of
`isolators, in which you are dealing with an
`environment, a chamber, not the sterilization of
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` Q Mr. Agalloco, is this an article that
`you wrote?
` A Yes, I co-authored it with a good
`friend of mine, Dr. Aikers.
` Q And it was published in 2013; is that
`right?
` A I believe so.
` Q And in this article -- well, let me
`withdraw that.
` The article is called "Overcoming
`Limitations of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide"; is
`that right?
` A Yes.
` Q All right. I want to look at the
`fourth line, the last sentence.
` You say:
` "Some difficulties have been associated
`with the implementation of H²O² processes in the
`healthcare field." [As read.]
` Do you see that?
` A Not clearly. It is very small.
` Q Can we -- is there anyway to -- thank
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`22
`
`objects like prefilled syringes in an autoclave.
`you.
` Quite a different process, quite a
` Can you see the sentence now?
` A Yes, I can.
`different level of sophistication in those. So,
`you are characterizing it too broadly.
` Q Is it correct that as of September 2013
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
`there were difficulties associated with the
` Q The article seems to apply broadly to
`implementation of vaporized hydrogen peroxide in
`vaporized hydrogen peroxide.
`the healthcare field?
` Is there something in the article that
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`you say is limiting in some way?
`objection, scope.
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`0
` THE WITNESS: At the time the article
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
`11
`was published back in 2013, there was almost no
` Q And then if you go two lines down, it
`12
`discussion or even awareness of sterilization in
`says at the end of the line:
`13
`an autoclave using vapor-phased hydrogen peroxide.
` "Specifically, persistent problems
`14
` What was widely known was its use in
`regarding the development of H²O² processes and
`15
`environments, as I've outlined, and that's what
`their subsequent validation have been reported."
`16
`this article speaks towards.
`[As read.]
`17
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Do you see that?
`18
` A Yes.
` Q What do you mean when you say it was
`19
`almost unknown to use vaporized hydrogen peroxide
` Q Okay, so is it correct that as of
`20
`in autoclave?
`September 2013, there were reports of persistent
`21
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`problems regarding the development of VHP
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`24
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.007
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`25
`
`7 (25 to 28)
`
`27
`
`directed towards.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q All right. Which the article was
`directed towards, but doesn't actually say.
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: It mentions isolators in
`several locations, and again I will tell you the
`use of it in an autoclave type setting was not
`widely known in 2013.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q What do you mean by "was not widely
`known"?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: I work in sterilization
`all the time. I can tell you in 2013 there was
`almost no knowledge of the deep vacuum hydrogen
`peroxide process.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Did you say "deep vacuum"?
` A Yes.
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: That's a sterilization
`process that's under the subject of the '631
`Patent and these Sigg and Lam references.
` That's a process in which you have a
`chamber, and you put objects in to sterilize;
`that's the only purpose of that chamber.
` This article was addressed towards
`environments, rooms, enclosures, if you would, in
`which a process occurs. Lots of different types
`of equipment and quite a different situation from
`that use for single, very common, uniform types of
`devices as in the '631 Patent.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q All right. I'm asking you a different
`question though.
` I asked you whether there's something
`in this article that says that.
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: At that time, it does
`not. I have since written other articles which
`
`1234567891
`
`26
`
`make that distinction.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Can we go to page .006 of the article,
`which is in Exhibit 2328. I want to look at that
`paragraph that says, "Biological Indicator
`Issues." Thank you.
` The first sentence says:
` "Difficulties encountered in the
`destruction of biological indicators have been
`commonly reported and are so well-known that there
`are some who doubt the efficacy of H²O² as a
`sterilant." [As read.]
` Do you see that?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, I do.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Was that sentence correct as of 2013?
` A As it related to --
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: As it related to the
`types of systems and as -- again, I repeat --
`isolators, primarily, which the article was
`
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q I just want to explore what you said
`about deep vacuum and make sure I understand it.
` Is vaporized hydrogen peroxide, as in
`the Sigg reference, for example, is that performed
`under vacuum?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: If you can open the
`0
`portion of it, let's take a look at that. Let's
`11
`open the Sigg reference and see what they say
`12
`about it, please.
`13
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
`14
` Q I'm going do that in a second, but let
`15
`me ask it more broadly first: Is it correct that
`16
`in general as of 2012, that vaporized hydrogen
`17
`peroxide was performed under vacuum?
`18
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
`19
` THE WITNESS: It is performed in a
`20
`variety of ways, some with vacuum and some
`21
`without.
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`28
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.008
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`29
`
`8 (29 to 32)
`
`31
`
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Repeat that again,
`please.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Let me take you back to 2012, okay.
` Would a person of skill in the art in
`2012 have known about performing VHP sterilization
`in an autoclave?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: They would have known
`about the ASP with Johnson & Johnson, ASP product.
` They may have been aware of any deep
`vacuum type process that, you know, is really
`central to the '631 Patent.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Do you know whether ASP used a vacuum
`or not?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: My understanding is that
`they do use a vacuum.
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Was that true as of 2012?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: As I'm now aware of, yes,
`it was true in 2012.
` Q What do you mean, as you are now aware
`of?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
` THE WITNESS: When you look into the
`depths of the '631 Patent and the processes
`involved, it is clear there is a deep vacuum
`technology. That was not widely disclosed and,
`you know, when this article was written, it was
`not considered.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Let me ask my question the little
`differently. I'm sorry, Mr. Agalloco. I think
`maybe I didn't phrase it properly.
` If you were going to use that autoclave
`method of VHP sterilization as of 2012, would you
`have done it under vacuum?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
`
`1234567891
`
`30
` THE WITNESS: In 2012, as I mentioned
`previously, I was unaware of the deep vacuum
`system. It was not widely discussed, so I would
`not have.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Were you -- as of 2012, is it correct
`that you would apply a post-treatment vacuum
`procedure after a treatment with sterilizing
`gases?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: One would have to do that
`carefully. It was done with ethylene oxide.
` In my experience with the ambient
`pressure hydrogen peroxide, that would not have
`been necessary and would not have been used.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q I want to make sure I understand your
`testimony. Are you saying that you were aware of
`ambient pressure hydrogen peroxide sterilization
`in an autoclave as of 2012?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Okay, so I'm going to ask the question
`again: As of 2012, would a person of ordinary
`skill in the art have understood that with a
`vaporized hydrogen peroxide process in an
`autoclave, you would perform it under vacuum?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Within the ASP, yes, they
`would not know of any other types of processes or
`0
`may not know of them.
`11
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
`12
` Q Okay, so is it your testimony that the
`13
`only process that they would have known about --
`14
`well, let me withdraw that.
`15
` Is it your testimony that as of 2012,
`16
`the only vaporized hydrogen peroxide process that
`17
`a person of ordinary skill in the art would have
`18
`known about would have been the ASP process?
`19
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`20
`objection, scope.
`21
` THE WITNESS: That's -- I have come to
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`32
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.009
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Transcript of James Agalloco
`Conducted on May 4, 2022
`33
`
`9 (33 to 36)
`
`35
`
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: One of the common
`representations of isolators is that they are very
`small rooms.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q So the sterilization is done not in an
`autoclave but in a small room; is that what you're
`saying?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, that's what I'm
`saying.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q And that's different than what ASP was
`doing?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, that is different.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Let's now go to the Sigg publication.
`It's Exhibit 1007.
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`learn that that's not the case, but my own
`personal knowledge at that time, I was unaware of
`it.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Were you aware of ASP or unaware of it
`in 2012?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: I am aware of ASP, yes,
`then and at that time as well.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q And were you aware at that time that
`ASP process was done under vacuum?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Were you aware of any processes that
`were not -- withdraw.
` Were you aware of any VHP processes
`that were not performed under vacuum?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: Yes, that's the subject
`
`1234567891
`
`34
`
`of this article.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q And that would be a -- well, let me
`withdraw that.
` What did you say that the subject of
`the article was?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
` THE WITNESS: This is basically
`discussing ambient pressure, so just applied some
`pressure in a room.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Just so everyone is clear, what you are
`saying is that this is an article about doing the
`whole process under vaporized hydrogen peroxide,
`right?
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form,
`objection, scope.
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Let me withdraw that.
` What did you mean by doing it in a
`room?
`
` (Whereupon, Exhibit 1007 was
`identified.)
`BY MS. HOLLAND:
` Q Let's look at example 1, which is on
`page .021. Okay, and you see in the first
`sentence it says:
` "In the following experiment, prefilled
`syringes were treated with a vaporized hydrogen
`peroxide sterilization treatment in a chamber."
`[As read.]
`0
` Do you see that?
`11
` A Yes, I do.
`12
` Q Okay, but can you tell from that
`13
`sentence what type of VHP use this is?
`14
` A No.
`15
` Q Let me ask you this: You don't recall
`16
`from your review of the Sigg article -- I'm sorry,
`17
`the Sigg application -- whether this was a
`18
`treatment that was performed under vacuum or not?
`19
` MS. KENNEDY: Objection, form.
`20
` THE WITNESS: What you see here in this
`21
`sentence makes no mention of vacuum.
`22
`PLANET DEPOS
`888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM
`
`36
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1234567891
`
`0
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2339.010
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`REDACTED VERSION
`
`

`

`Tran

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket