throbber
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
`Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
`
`Designation: F 1980 – 02
`
`Standard Guide for
`Accelerated Aging of Sterile Medical Device Packages1
`
`This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1980; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
`original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
`superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
`
`1. Scope
`1.1 This guide provides information for developing accel-
`erated aging protocols to rapidly determine the effects, if any,
`due to the passage of time and environmental effects on the
`sterile integrity of packages and the physical properties of their
`component packaging materials.
`1.2 Information obtained using this guide may be used to
`support expiration date claims for medical device packages.
`1.3 The accelerated aging guideline addresses the primary
`medical package in whole and does not address the package
`and product interaction or compatibility that may be required
`for new product development. Package and product compat-
`ibility and interactions should be addressed as a material
`analysis process before package design.
`1.4 Real-time aging protocols are not addressed in this
`guide; however, it is essential that real-time aging studies be
`performed to confirm the accelerated aging test results using
`the same methods of evaluation.
`1.5 Methods used for package process validation, which
`include the machine process, the effects of the sterilization
`process, distribution, handling, and shipping events, are be-
`yond the scope of this guide.
`1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
`safety concerns,
`if any, associated with its use. It
`is the
`responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
`priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
`bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
`
`2. Referenced Documents
`2.1 ASTM Standards: 2
`D 3078 Test Method for Determination of Leaks in Flexible
`Packaging by Bubble Emission
`
`1 This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F02 on Flexible
`Barrier Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F02.50 on
`Package Design and Development.
`Current edition approved Jan. 10, 2002. Published March 2002. Originally
`published as F 1980 – 99. Last previous edition F 1980 – 99e1.
`2 For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
`contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
`Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
`the ASTM website.
`
`D 4169 Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Con-
`tainers and Systems
`D 4332 Practice for Conditioning Containers, Packages, or
`Packaging Components for Testing
`E 337 Test Method for Measuring Humidity with a Psy-
`chrometer (the Measurement of Wet- and Dry-Bulb Tem-
`peratures)
`F 88 Test Method for Seal Strength of Flexible Barrier
`Materials
`F 1140 Test Methods for Internal Pressurization Failure
`Resistance of Unrestrained Packages for Medical Applica-
`tions
`F 1327 Terminology Relating to Barrier Materials for Medi-
`cal Packaging
`F 1585 Guide for Integrity Testing of Porous Barrier Medi-
`cal Packages
`F 1608 Test Method for Microbial Ranking of Porous Pack-
`aging Materials (Exposure Chamber Method)
`F 1929 Test Method for Detecting Seal Leaks in Porous
`Medical Packaging by Dye Penetration
`2.2 AAMI Standards:
`ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607, Packaging for Terminally Steril-
`ized Medical Devices3
`AAMI TIR 17-1997, Radiation Sterilization—Material
`Qualification3
`
`3. Terminology
`3.1 Definitions—For general definitions of packaging for
`medical devices see ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607. For terminology
`related to barrier materials for medical packaging see Termi-
`nology F 1327.
`3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
`3.2.1 accelerated aging (AA), n—storage of samples at an
`elevated temperature (TAA) in order to simulate real time aging
`in a reduced amount of time.
`3.2.2 accelerated aging factor (AAF), n—an estimated or
`calculated ratio of the time to achieve the same level of
`physical property change as a package stored at real time (RT)
`conditions.
`
`3 Available from the American National Standards Institute, 25 W. 43rd St., 4th
`Floor, New York, NY 10036.
`
`Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
`
`1
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

`

`F 1980 – 02
`
`3.2.3 accelerated aging temperature (TAA), n—the elevated
`temperature at which the aging study is conducted, and it may
`be based on the estimated storage temperature, estimated usage
`temperature, or both.
`3.2.4 accelerated aging time (AAT), n—the length of time
`the accelerated aging is conducted.
`3.2.5 ambient temperature (TRT), n—storage temperature
`for real-time aging (RT) samples that represents storage con-
`ditions.
`3.2.6 package shelf life, n—the amount of real time that a
`package can be expected to remain in storage at ambient
`conditions, or under specified conditions of storage, and
`maintain its critical performance properties.
`3.2.7 real-time aging (RT), n—storage time of samples at
`ambient conditions.
`3.2.8 real-time equivalent (RTE), n—amount of real-time
`aging to which given accelerated aging conditions are esti-
`mated to be equivalent.
`3.2.9 zero time (t0), n—the beginning of an aging study.
`3.3 Symbols:
`
`Q10 = an aging factor for 10°C increase or decrease in
`temperature.
`= temperature at which a material melts.
`= glass transition temperature.
`= alpha temperature; heat distortion temperature.
`
`Tm
`Tg
`Ta
`
`4. Significance and Use
`4.1 The loss of package integrity may occur as a result of
`physical properties of the materials and adhesive or cohesive
`bonds degrading over time and by subsequent dynamic events
`during shipping and handling.
`4.2 The ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607 states that, “the manufac-
`turer shall demonstrate that, under the rigors of distribution,
`storage, handling, and aging, the integrity of the final package
`is maintained at least for the claimed shelf-life of the medical
`device under storage conditions specified by the manufacturer,
`as long as the package is undamaged or unopened.”
`4.3 Real
`time aging programs provide the best data to
`ensure that package materials and package integrity do not
`degrade over time. However, due to market conditions in
`which products become obsolete in a short time, and the need
`to get new products to market in the shortest possible time, real
`time aging studies do not meet this objective. Accelerated
`aging studies provide an alternative means. To ensure that
`accelerated aging studies do truly represent real time effects,
`real
`time aging studies must be conducted in parallel
`to
`accelerated studies. Real time studies must be carried out to the
`claimed shelf life of the product.
`4.4 Conservative accelerated aging factors (AAFs) must be
`used if little is known about
`the package material being
`evaluated. More aggressive AAFs may be used with docu-
`mented evidence to show a correlation between real time and
`accelerated aging.
`
`NOTE 1—Determining AAFs are beyond the scope of this guide.
`
`5. Apparatus
`5.1 Room (or Cabinet) of such size that sample containers
`or packages may be individually exposed to circulating air at
`the temperature and relative humidity chosen.
`5.1.1 Control Apparatus, capable of maintaining the room at
`the required atmospheric conditions within the tolerance limits.
`5.2 Hygrometer—The instrument used to indicate the rela-
`tive humidity should be accurate to 62 % relative humidity. A
`psychrometer may be used either for direct measurement of
`relative humidity or for checking the hygrometer (see Test
`Method E 337).
`5.3 Thermometer—Any temperature-measuring device may
`be used provided it can accurately indicate the temperature to
`within 0.1°C or 0.2°F. The dry-bulb thermometer of the
`psychrometer may be used either for direct measurement or for
`checking the temperature-indicating device.
`
`6. Accelerated Aging Theory
`6.1 Accelerated aging of materials refers to the accelerated
`variation of their properties over time, the properties of interest
`being those related to safety and function of the material or
`package.
`6.2 In an aging study, the material or package is subjected to
`an external stress, which is more severe, or more frequently
`applied than the normal environmental stress, for a relatively
`short period of time.
`6.3 Accelerated aging techniques are based on the assump-
`tion that the chemical reactions involved in the deterioration of
`materials follow the Arrhenius reaction rate function. This
`function states that a 10°C increase or decrease in temperature
`of a homogeneous process results in approximately, a two
`times or 1⁄2-time change in the rate of a chemical reaction
`(Q10)4.
`6.4 Determining the Q10 involves testing products at various
`temperatures and defining the differences in reaction rate for a
`10° change in temperature. Modeling the kinetics of material
`deterioration is complex and difficult and is beyond the scope
`of this guide.5
`
`7. Accelerated Aging Plan
`7.1 Characterization of Materials—AA theory and its ap-
`plication are directly related to packaging material composi-
`tion. Some areas for consideration are:
`7.1.1 Composition,
`7.1.2 Morphology (glassy, amorphous, semi-crystalline,
`highly crystalline, % crystallinity, etc.),
`7.1.3 Thermal transitions (Tm, Tg, Ta),
`7.1.4 Additives, processing agents, catalysts,
`residual solvents, and fillers.
`7.2 Accelerated Aging Plan-Design Guidelines:
`7.2.1 Temperature boundaries, based on the characterization
`of the device and package materials, must be considered in
`
`lubricants,
`
`4 Hemmerich, Karl J., “General Aging Theory and Simplified Protocol for
`Accelerated Aging of Medical Devices,” Medical Plastics and Biomaterials,
`July/August 1998, pp. 16–23.
`5 Nelson, Wayne, “Accelerated Testing Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data
`Analyses,” John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999.
`
`2
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

`

`F 1980 – 02
`
`order to ensure that initial, conservative aging factors are
`applied appropriately. The temperatures used should be based
`on the characterization of the packaging materials and the
`intended storage conditions. Material characterization and
`composition are factors in establishing the accelerated aging
`temperature boundaries. Temperature selection should be lim-
`ited to prevent any physical transition of material.
`7.2.2 Room or Ambient Temperature (TRT)—Select a tem-
`perature that represents the actual product storage and use
`conditions.
`
`NOTE 2—This temperature is typically between 20–25°C. A tempera-
`ture of 25°C is considered a conservative approach.
`7.2.3 Accelerated Aging Temperature (TAA)—Considering
`the characterization of the materials under investigation, select
`a temperature for the accelerated aging testing. The higher the
`accelerated temperature, the greater the AAF and, thus, the
`shorter the accelerated aging time. Care must be taken not to
`elevate aging temperatures solely for the shortest possible
`accelerated aging time. Excessively high temperatures may
`have an effect on the material that may never occur during real
`time or at room temperature (see Appendix X1). Guidelines for
`selecting an aging temperature are as follows:
`7.2.3.1 TAA should be below any material transitions or
`below where the package distorts. Consider the thermal tran-
`sitions of the materials under investigation, for example, the
`choice of TAA should be at least 10°C less than Tg. (For more
`information on this topic, see AAMI TIR 17-1997.)
`7.2.3.2 Keep TAA at or below 60°C unless a higher tempera-
`ture has been demonstrated to be appropriate. Temperatures
`higher than 60°C are not recommended due to the higher
`probability in many polymeric systems to experience nonlinear
`changes, such as percent crystallinity, formation of free radi-
`cals, and peroxide degradation. (For more information on this
`topic, see AAMI TIR 17-1997.)
`
`NOTE 3—If packages containing liquid or other volatile components are
`tested, lower temperatures may be required for safety reasons.
`
`7.2.3.3 When elevated temperature aging is not feasible due
`to material characteristics, then real-time aging is the only
`option.
`7.3 Accelerated Aging Factor (AAF) Determination:
`7.3.1 Using the Arrhenius equation with Q10 equal to 2 is a
`common and conservative means of calculating an aging
`factor.
`
`NOTE 4—A more aggressive reaction rate coefficient, for example,
`Q10= 2.2 to 2.5, may be used if the system under investigation is
`sufficiently well characterized in the literature. The level and nature of
`damage must be similar to that reported in the literature to ensure that the
`reaction rate coefficient and accelerated aging temperature are maintained
`within appropriate boundaries. This is the responsibility of the manufac-
`turer. For more information on this topic see AAMI TIR-17-1997.
`
`7.3.2 An accelerated aging factor (AAF) estimate is calcu-
`lated by the following equation:
`
`AAF [ Q10
`
`@~TAA – TRT!/10]
`
`(1)
`
`where:
`TAA [ accelerated aging temperature (°C), and
`TRT [ ambient temperature (°C).
`
`7.3.3 The accelerated aging time (AAT) needed to establish
`equivalence to real time aging is determined by dividing the
`desired (or required) shelf life by the AAF.
`(2)
`Accelerated Aging Time ~AAT! [ Desired ~RT!/AAF
`See Appendix X1 for a graphical representation of the time
`versus temperature.
`7.3.4 When little information is known about the package
`under investigation, the guidance above is provided for select-
`ing and verifying an appropriately conservative aging factor for
`the specific scenario. Risk to the manufacturer may be large
`since the method may predict an unduly short shelf-life;
`however, consideration must be given to maximizing patient
`safety since the necessary information to obtain a more
`accurate and aggressive shelf-life prediction is not readily
`available.
`7.4 Accelerated Aging Protocol Steps:
`7.4.1 Select the Q10 value.
`7.4.2 Define the desired shelf life of the package, such as,
`marketing needs, product needs, etc.
`7.4.3 Define aging test time intervals, including time zero.
`7.4.4 Define test conditions, room temperature (TRT), and
`accelerated aging temperature (TAA).
`7.4.5 Calculate the test duration using the Q10, TRT, and TAA.
`7.4.6 Define package material properties, seal strength and
`integrity tests, sample sizes, and acceptance criteria.
`7.4.7 Age samples at TAA. In parallel, age samples at
`real-life aging conditions (TRT).
`7.4.8 Evaluate the package performance after accelerated
`aging relative to the initial package requirements, for example,
`package seal strength, package integrity.
`7.4.9 Evaluate package, or package performance, or both,
`after real time aging relative to the initial package require-
`ments. The estimated AAF method is a simple and conserva-
`tive technique for evaluating the long-term performance of a
`package; however, like all accelerated aging techniques, it
`must be confirmed by real time aging data.
`7.5 See the example package shelf-life test plan (Appendix
`X2).
`
`8. Post-Aging Testing Guidance
`8.1 Packages and materials that have been subjected to
`aging, that is, accelerated and real time, must be evaluated for
`physical properties and integrity.
`8.2 Tests selected should challenge the material or package
`functionality that is most critical or most likely to fail due to
`the stresses resulting from aging. Guide F 1585 may be used as
`a testing guide for porous barrier medical packaging.
`8.3 Some of the physical strength properties to be consid-
`ered for selection are flexure, puncture, tensile and elongation,
`tear, impact resistance, abrasion resistance, yellowness index,
`microbial barrier (Test Method F 1608), seal strength (Test
`Method F 88), and burst strength (Test Methods F 1140).
`8.4 Packages may be subjected to whole package integrity
`testing by using validated physical, that is, trace gas detection,
`dye leak (Test Method F 1929), bubble leak (Test Method
`D 3078) or microbial methods (microbial challenge of whole
`packages). These methods must include documentation show-
`ing that the test method has been validated.
`
`3
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

`

`F 1980 – 02
`
`8.5 Acceptance criteria must be established prior to any
`package shelf-life testing. Zero time performance data may be
`used as a comparison to final package performance data at the
`end of the shelf life test.
`
`9. Documentation
`9.1 Accelerated Aging:
`9.1.1 A written test protocol specifying the accelerated
`aging conditions (test temperature, humidity, cycle, ambient
`temperature), time frame, sample sizes, package description,
`time intervals of sampling packages, and specific tests at each
`time interval must be developed prior to testing.
`9.1.2 Document the temperature of the chamber used and
`the calibrated instruments used for measuring and monitoring
`the aging conditions.
`
`9.1.3 Document the test standard references and methods
`used for package evaluation.
`9.1.4 List the equipment used for physical and microbial
`testing including the calibration dates.
`9.1.5 Document the post aging test results including, any
`statistical methods used to determine whether the package
`meets the performance specification criteria.
`
`10. Keywords
`10.1 accelerated aging; Arrhenius reaction rate; Q10;
`shelf-life
`
`APPENDIXES
`
`(Nonmandatory Information)
`
`X1. ACCELERATED AGING OF POLYMERS
`
`X1.1 Accelerated aging (Fig. X1.1) equivalent to one year
`of room-temperature aging when the package is heat-aged at a
`
`selected temperature (°C).
`
`4
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

`

`F 1980 – 02
`
`FIG. X1.1 Accelerated Aging of Polymers1
`
`X2. EXAMPLE PACKAGE SHELF-LIFE TEST PLAN
`
`X2.1 Select a conservative AAF estimate, for example, Q10
`= 2. (See Fig. X2.1.)
`
`X2.2 Define aging time points corresponding to the desired
`shelf life, for example, two points, such as 2-year and 3-year.
`
`NOTE X2.1—Trending often is helpful when characterizing the aging
`effects on material and package properties. The number of accelerated
`aged time points, minimally, is one. The one mandatory time point is at the
`time equivalent to the desired shelf-life (desired shelf-life divided by
`aging factor); however, the practice of using only one accelerated time
`point leaves the risk of failure without prior warning from an earlier
`accelerated aged time point. At
`least
`three time points should be
`considered when trending.
`
`X2.3 Build test samples in accordance with a validated
`production process.
`
`NOTE X2.2—Packages used for zero-time, sterilization, and accelerated
`aging may be produced without actual or simulated product.
`
`X2.4 Sterilize packages using validated sterilization pro-
`cess. The sterilization process may affect the stability of the
`materials or package. Materials and packages should be ex-
`posed to the maximum process conditions, or number of cycles
`intended to be used prior to the aging study, or both.
`
`X2.5 Condition the samples according to Practice D 4332,
`if required; perform distribution simulation according to Prac-
`tice D 4169, if appropriate. Packages used for this test must
`contain actual product.
`
`NOTE X2.3—Package performance testing normally is performed as a
`part of the aging protocol to determine the long-term effects of distribu-
`tion, handling, and storage. Whether performed before aging or after aging
`will depend on whether the study is to simulate storage on the hospital
`shelf or on the manufacturer’s shelf and then shipped. There may be
`instances, however, where this may not be necessary. If known package
`failure or performance limits, such as seal strength, puncture, or impact
`resistance, etc., have been documented adequately and met for the specific
`intended product, then physical testing data should be sufficient.
`
`Initiate real-time and accelerated aging. Use the
`X2.6
`defined accelerated aging temperature for the appropriate
`period of time. The time duration for samples to be placed in
`the elevated temperature oven can be calculated from Eq 1 and
`2 in 7.3.2 and 7.3.3, where AAF is the accelerated aging factor
`and AAT is the accelerated aging time.
`For example, where Q10 = 2; ambient temperature = 23°C;
`test temperature = 55°C;
`AAF = 2.0(55−23)/10;
`AAF = 2.03.2 = 9.19;
`AAT = 365 days/9.19; and
`AAT [ 39.7 days [ 12 months (real-time equivalent).
`
`NOTE X2.4—The effects of humidity may need to be considered in
`conjunction with temperature and incorporated into a test cycle of high
`and low humidity duration’s. An aging cycle may be designed to account
`for the effects of humidity.
`
`X2.7 Evaluate package performance after accelerated aging
`relative to the package requirements.
`
`5
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

`

`F 1980 – 02
`
`FIG. X2.1 Package Shelf-Life Test Plan
`
`X2.7.1 If the accelerated aging results meet the acceptance
`criteria then the product’s shelf-life conditionally is validated
`depending upon the results of the real-time aging study.
`the
`X2.7.2 If the accelerated aging results fail
`to meet
`acceptance criteria then either investigate the production pro-
`cess, redesign the failed medical device or package, attempt to
`validate a shorter shelf-life, or wait for real time aging results.
`The shelf-life is validated if real
`time aging results are
`acceptable. In this scenario, the accelerated aging program is
`more rigorous than reality.
`
`X2.8 Evaluate package performance after real-time aging
`
`relative to the package requirements.
`
`X2.8.1 If the real-time aging results meet the acceptance
`criteria, then the package’s shelf-life is validated.
`X2.8.2 If the real-time aging results fail to meet the accep-
`tance criteria, the shelf-life must be reduced to the longest shelf
`life for which real time testing has been successful. If product
`has been released to the market at risk based on the accelerated
`aging data, a careful review must be performed and docu-
`mented, and the appropriate action taken.
`
`6
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

`

`F 1980 – 02
`
`ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
`in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
`of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
`
`This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
`if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
`and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
`responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
`make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
`
`This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
`United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
`address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or
`through the ASTM website
`(www.astm.org).
`
`7
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1230.007
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`(cid:39)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:18)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:95)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:21)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket