throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________________
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS PHARMA AG,
`NOVARTIS TECHNOLOGY LLC,
`NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`______________________
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00816
`U.S. Patent No. 9,220,631
`
`______________________
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. KENNETH S. GRAHAM
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.001
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1
`
`EXHIBITS ....................................................................................................... 2
`
`III. DEVELOPMENT OF EYLEA PFS ................................................................ 2
`
`A.
`
`B.
`C.
`D.
`
`June 2010 Commercial Validation Batches of Terminally Sterilized
`EYLEA PFS .......................................................................................... 4
`Filing and Modification of BLA No. 125387 ..................................... 12
`EYLEA Approval in Australia and Europe ........................................ 14
`Clinical Studies, New Supply Chain, and Supplemental BLA for
`EYLEA PFS ........................................................................................ 15
`
`IV. DECLARATION ........................................................................................... 18
`
` i
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.002
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`. 1155 REGITC00110725 — Regeneron Confidential Emails Filed Under Seal
`. 1156 REGITC00117031 — Regeneron Confidential FDA Correspondence
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Ex. 1019 U.S. Pharmacopeia, USP 789, Particulate Matter in Ophthalmic
`. 1019 U.S. Pharmacopeia, USP 789, Particulate Matter in Ophthalmic
`Solutions, USP 34 NF 29 (2011)
`Solutions, USP 34 NF 29 (2011)
`Ex. 1066 Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing, Australian
`. 1066 Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing, Australian
`Public Assessment Report for Aflibercept, (July 2012)
`Public Assessment Report for Aflibercept, July 2012)
`Ex. 1137 REGITC00114439 – Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1137 REGITC00114439 — Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`Ex. 1138 REGITC00042686 – Vetter Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`REGITC00042686 — Vetter Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1138
`Ex. 1139 REGITC00264748 – Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`REGITC00264748 — Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1139
`Ex. 1140 REGITC00149282 – Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1140 REGITC00149282 — Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`Ex. 1141 STERIS_00000489 – Steris Report Filed Under Seal
`STERIS_00000489 — Steris Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1141
`Ex. 1142 REGITC00122265 – Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1142 REGITC00122265 — Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`Ex. 1143 REGITC00116953 – Vetter Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1143 REGITC001 16953 — Vetter Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`Ex. 1144 REGITC01008782 – Vetter Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`REGITC01008782 — Vetter Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1144
`Ex. 1145 REGITC00381349 – Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`REGITC00381349 — Regeneron Confidential Report Filed Under Seal
`. 1145
`Ex. 1146 REGITC00255816 – Bayer Correspondence with EMEA Filed Under
`. 1146 REGITC00255816 — Bayer Correspondence with EMEAFiled Under
`Seal
`Seal
`Ex. 1147 REGITC00883958 – Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`. 1147 REGITC00883958 — Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`Under Seal
`Under Seal
`Ex. 1148 REGITC00264472 – Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`. 1148 REGITC00264472 — Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`Under Seal
`UnderSeal
`Ex. 1149 REGITC01066319 – Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`REGITC01066319 — Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`. 1149
`Under Seal
`UnderSeal
`Ex. 1150 REGITC00149657 – EMA Assessment Report Filed Under Seal
`REGITC00149657 — EMA Assessment Report Filed Under Seal
`1150
`Ex.
`Ex. 1151 REGITC00381924 – Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`Ex. 1151 REGITC00381924 — Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`Under Seal
`Under Seal
`Ex. 1152 REGITC00041726 – Regeneron Confidential Presentation Filed Under
`Ex. 1152 REGITC00041726 — Regeneron Confidential Presentation Filed Under
`Seal
`Seal
`Ex. 1153 REG_SDNY_02214433 – EMA Correspondence Filed Under Seal
`REG_SDNY_02214433 — EMA Correspondence Filed Under Seal
`. 1153
`Ex. 1154 REGITC00160863 – Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`REGITC00160863 — Regeneron Confidential Memorandum Filed
`. 1154
`Under Seal
`UnderSeal
`Ex. 1155 REGITC00110725 – Regeneron Confidential Emails Filed Under Seal
`Ex. 1156 REGITC00117031 – Regeneron Confidential FDA Correspondence
`Filed Under Seal
`Filed UnderSeal
`
`ii
`ii
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`
`I, Kenneth S. Graham, declare as follows:
`I.
`Introduction
`1.
`I am Senior Director at Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”)
`
`and I have been employed at Regeneron since January 21, 2002.
`
`2.
`
`I earned a B.S. in Animal Bioscience from Penn State University in
`
`1983 and an M.S. in Veterinary Science from Penn State University in 1986. I then
`
`earned a Ph.D in Bioorganic Chemistry from the California Institute of Technology
`
`in 1992.
`
`3.
`
`I have worked on Regeneron’s biologic drug EYLEA® (aflibercept)
`
`(“EYLEA”) since 2003. My initial involvement was developing fit for purpose
`
`analytical methods that were used to characterize the protein and ensure its quality.
`
`While working in the Regeneron pilot manufacturing facility at Tarrytown, New
`
`York, I helped to produce and ensure the release of the first clinical batches that were
`
`used during development of the drug. In 2005, I transferred pilot manufacturing into
`
`pre-clinical development and joined the Formulation Development Group (“FDG”).
`
`4.
`
`In 2005, I became the FDG Program Lead of EYLEA and was
`
`responsible for the development of EYLEA in both vial and pre-filled syringe
`
`presentations. My role in the development of EYLEA pre-filled syringe included
`
`defining quality attributes, studying the stability of the product, evaluating syringe
`
`offerings and specifications from Vetter, evaluating particulate matter and
`
`
`
`1
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.004
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`siliconization, and evaluating and developing methods of terminally sterilizing the
`
`pre-filled syringes.
`
`5.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below.
`
`II. Exhibits
`6.
`Exs. 1137, 1138, 1139, 1140, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1144, 1145, 1146,
`
`1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152, and 1153 are true and correct copies of records
`
`that were either created or received by an employee of Regeneron as part of that
`
`employee’s job duties relating to the development of EYLEA and regulatory
`
`submissions for EYLEA. The records were maintained by Regeneron in the
`
`ordinary course of business.
`
`7.
`
`Exs. 1154 and 1155 are true and correct copies of records of email or
`
`letter correspondence sent by an employee of Regeneron as part of that employee’s
`
`job duties relating to the development of EYLEA and regulatory submissions for
`
`EYLEA. The records were maintained by Regeneron in the ordinary course of
`
`business.
`
`III. Development of EYLEA PFS
`8.
`EYLEA is a biotherapeutic product developed for intravitreal injection
`
`that is designed to treat diseases of the eye, such as Wet Age-related Macular
`
`Degeneration (“wAMD”).
`
`
`
`2
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.005
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`9.
`
`In 2004, Regeneron began its clinical development of Eylea® for use
`
`in treating eye disease. Regeneron began developing the pre-filled syringe
`
`presentation of EYLEA (“EYLEA PFS”) in 2005 in collaboration with Vetter
`
`Pharma-Fertigung GmbH & Co. KG (“Vetter”).
`
`10. On December 1, 2005, Regeneron and Vetter entered into a
`
`development agreement to develop an EYLEA PFS.
`
`11. At the time, Vetter offered both sprayed and baked-on options for
`
`siliconization of a 1 ml syringe barrel. Ex. 1152 (3/16/2006 presentation identifying
`
`syringes examined as being prepared with “sprayed silicone” or “baked emulsion
`
`silicon treatment”). Regeneron ultimately selected the baked-on siliconization
`
`option.
`
`12. By October 2007, Regeneron and Vetter had manufactured batches of
`
`1 ml EYLEA PFS for clinical use. Ex. 1137 is a batch status form confirming the
`
`manufacture of 5,629 prefilled 1 ml syringes containing EYLEA on October 24,
`
`2007. Ex. 1138 shows that the syringe barrels were siliconized using a baked-on
`
`silicone process on Vetter’s CR01 production line that involved application of
`
`DC365 emulsion diluted to 1.75% silicone oil (also referred to as a 1:20 emulsion).
`
`In paragraphs 22-30 below, I provide more detail regarding the amount of silicone
`
`oil applied using this baked-on process.
`
`
`
`3
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.006
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`13. With respect to sterilization, the FDA informed Regeneron in 2008 that
`
`terminally sterilizing the outside of the prefilled syringe would be a requirement for
`
`launching a prefilled syringe containing EYLEA. Ex. 1155 is November 2008 email
`
`from
`
`, who was regulatory lead at Regeneron on EYLEA at the
`
`time, relaying the FDA’s requirement for sterilization of the outside of the prefilled
`
`syringe within the blister pack. Based on this requirement specified by FDA,
`
`Regeneron proceeded to develop a commercial terminal sterilization process for the
`
`EYLEA PFS.
`
`A.
`
`14.
`
`June 2010 Commercial Validation Batches of Terminally
`Sterilized EYLEA PFS
`In June 2010, three consecutive validation batches of terminally
`
`sterilized EYLEA PFS were manufactured. The syringes were filled at Vetter in
`
`March and April 2010, and then terminally sterilized at Steris in Syracuse, NY in
`
`June 2010 using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (“VHP”). The table below is an
`
`excerpt from Ex. 1139, which is a portion of the Biologics Licensing Application
`
`(“BLA”) No. 125387 submitted to FDA in February 2011. The commercial scale
`
`validation batch numbers are C08011M640N11, C08012M640N11, and
`
`C08014M640N11.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.007
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`Ex. 1139.019
`
`15. The table below is an excerpt from Ex. 1140, which is another portion
`
`of BLA No. 125387, showing that the number of syringes manufactured in these
`
`commercial scale validation batches was roughly 25,000 syringes each.
`
`Ex. 1140.005
`
`16. These commercial scale validation batches were sterilized in a VHP
`
`
`
`chamber developed with Steris as shown in exemplary pictures below from Ex.
`
`1141.010, .012, .01, which is a Cycle Development Report dated 12/7/2010
`
`
`
`5
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.008
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`regarding VHP sterilization of the EYLEA PFS. As depicted below, each tray
`
`contains 54 blister packs, with each blister pack containing a prefilled syringe. The
`
`trays are loaded onto skids, and the skids are then placed into the sterilization
`
`chamber. The cycle report explains that a
`
` Id. at .020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.009
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`17. Ex. 1142 contains excerpts from the official batch record for
`
`commercial validation batch no. C08012M640N11. The Quality Assurance Batch
`
`Status Form identifies the product as “VEGF Trap ITV Drug Product, 40 mg/mL
`
`(50 µL/1 mL syringe)” and confirms the batch size of 25,063 prefilled syringes. Ex.
`
`1142.001.
`
`18. Page .005 of Ex. 1142 is titled “Summary of Analysis” and includes an
`
`assessment as to whether commercial validation batch no. C08012M640N11 met
`
`certain acceptance criteria. Ex. 1142.005.
`
`
`
`. The “Summary of Analysis” describes that the syringes
`
`manufactured in the batch were “pre-filled syringes” that included an “aqueous
`
`solution of VEGF Trap recombinant protein for injection [at] 40 mg/mL.” Id. The
`
`pre-filled syringes were also “subjected to the Vaporized Hydrogen (VHP)
`
`sterilization process.” Id.
`
`19. The Summary of Analysis confirms that commercial validation batch
`
`no. C08012M640N11 met the requirement of no more than 50 particles greater than
`
`10 µm in diameter per mL, no more than 5 particles greater than 25 µm in diameter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.010
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`per mL, and no more than 2 particles greater than 50 µm in diameter per mL. Ex.
`
`1142.005. These criteria are a requirement of USP789 for ophthalmic solutions
`
`using the microscopic method. Ex. 1019.005-.006.
`
`20. The Summary of Analysis confirms that commercial validation batch
`
`no. C08012M640N11 also met the requirements for break out force (also known as
`
`break loose force) and sustaining force (also known as glide force or slide force). A
`
`break out force of
`
` and a sustaining force of
`
` were reported for syringes
`
`from the batch. Ex. 1142.005.
`
`21. The Summary of Analysis confirms that commercial validation batch
`
`no. C08012M640N11 met the sterility requirement.
`
`. Ex. 1142.005.
`
` Ex. 1151.002 (
`
`”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22. As detailed below, the commercial validation batches included syringe
`
`barrels that were siliconized at Vetter using a baked-on process with a 1.75% diluted
`
`DC365 emulsion that results in the application of between
`
` and
`
` µg of silicone
`
`oil to the glass barrel.
`
`
`
`8
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.011
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`23. Ex. 1140.004
`
`24. Ex. 1143 is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25. Page .011 of Ex. 1143 confirms that a DC365 emulsion diluted to
`
`1.75% (i.e., 1:20 emulsion) is used to siliconize the syringe barrel, which is the same
`
`diluted emulsion used for the October 2007 batches.
`
`26.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.012
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`27.
`
`NN20N
`
`28.
`
`29.
`Ny s©
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`— So
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.013
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.013
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`30.
`bo S
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`11
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.014
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.014
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`B.
`Filing and Modification of BLA No. 125387
`31. On February 11, 2011, Regeneron filed BLA No. 125387 with FDA
`
`seeking approval of EYLEA. The BLA included four vial presentations and two
`
`pre-filled syringe presentations for EYLEA shown in the table below.
`
`Presentation
`Vial
`Vial
`Vial
`Vial
`PFS (VHP)
`PFS (EtO)
`
`32.
`
`
`
`Dose Concentration
`10 mg/ml
`40 mg/ml
`10 mg/ml
`40 mg/ml
`40 mg/ml
`40 mg/ml
`
`Manufacturer
`Vetter
`Vetter
`JHP
`JHP
`Vetter
`Vetter
`
`
`
`
`
`However, when it became apparent that FDA would not be able to timely complete
`
`review of the BLA given the large number of presentations, Regeneron made a
`
`decision to formally withdraw three vial presentations and both prefilled syringe
`
`presentations, thereby leaving one vial presentation in the BLA. The decision to
`
`withdraw the prefilled syringe presentations was based on facilitating FDA’s review
`
`and approval of EYLEA, and not because of any safety concerns regarding the
`
`prefilled syringe presentation.
`
`33. Ex. 1156 is an August 10, 2011 letter from
`
` at Regeneron to
`
` at FDA regarding BLA No. 125387. This letter informs FDA
`
`of Regeneron’s “intention to withdraw all dosage forms except the 40 mg/mL Vetter
`
`
`
`12
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.015
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`vials from consideration in the initial BLA” in order “[t]o streamline completion of
`
`the BLA review.” Ex. 1156.001 (emphasis in original).
`
`34. Ex. 1146 is a document that Bayer2 submitted to the European
`
`Medicines Evaluation Agency (“EMA”) as part of its regulatory filing for EYLEA.
`
`Bayer’s submission to the EMA retained the pre-filled syringe presentation. Ex.
`
`1146 explains that “[t]he reason for the withdrawal of the PFS presentation [from
`
`the U.S. FDA regulatory application] was to facilitate completion of the BLA
`
`review. The withdrawal of the PFS was not related to safety concerns.” Ex.
`
`1146.001. The document also notes that “[i]t was discussed with the FDA that to
`
`facilitate completion of review, it would make sense to focus on a single presentation
`
`for initial approval and request approval of the additional configurations in
`
`supplemental applications. The vial presentation was deemed to be the most straight-
`
`forward in terms of data available at the time in the six month priority review cycle.
`
`FDA concurred with this determination.” Id.
`
`35. FDA approved EYLEA in the vial presentation in November 2011, and
`
`it achieved greater success than anticipated. Regeneron was anticipating EYLEA
`
`would have sales
`
`product.
`
`, but within a year it was a billion dollar
`
`
`2 Bayer partnered with Regeneron to commercialize EYLEA outside the United
`States.
`
`
`
`13
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.016
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`C. EYLEA Approval in Australia and Europe
`36. The terminally sterilized EYLEA prefilled syringe was approved in
`
`Australia and Europe in March 2012 and November 2012, respectively. Ex. 1149 is
`
`a document detailing Regeneron’s EYLEA “AMD Program Global Development
`
`Plan” and confirms that approval in Australia was granted in March 2012. Ex. 1150
`
`is the EMA’s Assessment Report of Bayer’s EYLEA registration filing, dated
`
`September 20, 2012, and states that “in the light of the overall data submitted and
`
`the scientific discussion within the Committee, issued a positive opinion for granting
`
`a Marketing Authorisation to Eylea.” Ex. 1150.007; see also Ex. 1153.005
`
`(“Aflibercept was officially approved for use in the European Union (EU) by the
`
`European Commission (EC) on November 22, 2012”).
`
`37. The Therapeutic Goods Authority (“TGA”) of Australia issued an
`
`Australian Public Assessment Report for Aflibercept that published on July 30,
`
`2012. Ex. 1066. The report identifies the product as “Eylea” and with both “Pre-
`
`filled syringe and vial” containers. Id. at .005. The report further describes that
`
`“[t]he syringe presentation is supplied in glass 1 mL syringes…One blister package
`
`contains one syringe…[and] [b]listers containing the syringe are either hydrogen
`
`peroxide (H2O2)-sterilised or ethylene oxide (ETO)-sterilised.” Id. at .007.
`
`38. The EMA Assessment report on September 20, 2012 identifies the
`
`product as Aflibercept, and identifies both a vial presentation and “a pre-filled
`
`
`
`14
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.017
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`syringe that is terminally sterilised.” Ex. 1150.010; Id. at .012 (“The [drug product]
`
`appears in two presentations differing in terms of primary container type: 2 ml type
`
`I glass vials and 1ml pre-filled syringes.”). The report further explains that “[i]n
`
`2007, a pre-filled syringe has been developed [and] [i]n 2009, an external
`
`sterilization step was added to the proposed pre-filled syringe manufacturing process
`
`after secondary packaging to render the external surface of the syringe and the
`
`internal surface of the blister as sterile.” Id. at .012.
`
`D. Clinical Studies, New Supply Chain, and Supplemental BLA for
`EYLEA PFS
`39. After EYLEA was approved in a vial presentation in November 2011,
`
`Regeneron continued to use and pursue commercialization of the pre-filled syringe
`
`presentation.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.018
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
`|
`
`42.
`
`
`
`43.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`16
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.019
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.019
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`
` Regeneron ultimately filed a supplemental BLA seeking approval of the
`
`EYLEA prefilled syringe in June 2018, and it was approved in August 2019.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.020
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`IV. Declaration
`
`44.
`
`I declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledgeare true
`
`and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Dated:
`
`// Apr: / ZOZZ
`
`By:
`
`18
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.021
`Regeneron Exhibit 1102.021
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`Regeneron v. Norvatis
`IPR2021-00816
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket