throbber
Counsel Washington, D.C.
`
`+1 202 682 7024
`
`
`
`robert.vlasis@weil.com
`
`Practice Areas
`
`Patent Litigation
`
`Admissions
`
`District of Columbia
`Eastern District Texas
`US Ct App Federal Circuit
`Northern District Texas
`State of Texas
`US Supreme Court
`
`Education
`
`Baylor University (B.B.A., 2000)
`University of Houston Law Center (J.D., 2006)
`
`Robert T. Vlasis III is counsel in Weil’s Patent Litigation group and is
`an expert in Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International
`Trade Commission. He has 15 years of experience representing
`innovator companies such as Regeneron, Johnson & Johnson,
`General Electric, Microsoft, Illumina, and Under Armour before all of
`the major patent law venues in high-stakes IP disputes involving an
`array of technologies.
`Robert has counseled clients in more than two dozen ITC investigations, has taken or
`defended over 100 depositions, and has second-chaired a dozen bench and jury trials. He
`consistently plays a lead role in all phases of complex, multi‑party, multi-jurisdictional patent
`litigations, from pre-suit investigation, to case management and strategy, witness
`presentation and cross-examination at trial, oral argument, mediation and settlement, and
`briefing on appeal. He has experience with a wide variety of complex technologies relating to
`life sciences, pharmaceuticals, cellular and wireless communications, smartphones and
`tablets, medical devices, and wearable devices and fitness.
`
`Some of Robert’s representative ITC experience includes:
`
`Certain Pre-Filled Syringes for Intravitreal Injection and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1207
`represented respondent Regeneron and developed an extensive record on the statutory public
`interest factors
`Novartis withdrew its complaint and terminated the investigation following the rare finding by the
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) that the public interest record supported no relief even
`if a Section 337 violation were found
`Certain Laparoscopic Surgical Staplers, Reload Cartridges, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-
`TA-1167
`represented complainant Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary)
`obtained Commission finding of a violation of Section 337 by Intuitive Surgical
`Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbine Generators and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1218
`represented complainant General Electric
`obtained final initial determination of a Section 337 violation by Siemens
`Certain IoT Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1094
`obtained termination of investigation on an early motion to dismiss
`Certain RF Capable Integrated Circuits and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-982
`complainant withdrew its complaint following favorable motion in limine ruling
`Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers
`and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-745
`obtained no violation finding on all six asserted patents
`Certain Electronic Devices with Multi-Touch Enabled Touchpads and Touchscreens, Inv. No. 337-TA-
`714
`obtained no violation finding on single asserted patent
`Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras, and
`Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-703
`obtained no violation finding on single asserted patent
`Certain Semiconductor Chips with Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Containing Same, Inv.
`No. 337-TA-649
`represented respondents ASE and STATS ChipPAC against complainant Tessera
`complainant withdrew complaint following exchange of expert reports
`Recent district court wins include:
`
`Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv-05501-SI (N.D. Cal.)
`obtained $27 million jury verdict and dismissal of $100 million counterclaims on patents directed to
`prenatal testing for the early diagnosis of fetal abnormalities such as Down’s Syndrome
`affirmed by the Federal Circuit
`Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics Inc., Case No. 1:15-cv-00152-RGA (D. Del.)
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1099.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`Robert T. Vlasis
`Printed: January 21, 2022
`

`

`obtained $24 million jury verdict and permanent injunction on patents directed to foundational
`technology that allows thousands of microscopic “droplets” to serve as test tubes for chemical
`reactions with genetic material
`affirmed by the Federal Circuit
`Robert also contributes extensively to Weil’s diversity efforts and with recruiting, training, and
`mentoring. He is also dedicated to pro bono matters and defending the rights of LGBTQ+
`people and people with HIV. He co-authored an amicus brief in Obergefell v. Hodges, the
`landmark Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage, and another Supreme
`Court amicus brief concerning discriminatory transgender bathroom laws. His representation
`of immigrant clients fighting deportation as a result of the now-repealed HIV travel and
`immigration ban was featured in multiple, international media outlets including the Los
`Angeles Times and the BBC, among others. Robert has been recognized for his pro bono
`work, which earned Weil the HIV Law Project’s Distinguished Pro Bono Legal Service
`Award.
`
`Robert is a member of the ITC Trial Lawyers Association and the ITC section of the
`American Bar Association. His civic affiliations include service as past Chair of the
`Campaign Board’s Eastern Caucus for the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund, and on the Levine
`School of Music Virtuoso Society Steering Committee. He is a member of the Human Rights
`Campaign Federal Club, a past member of the Lambda Legal Liberty Circle, and a past
`chairman of the Milby High School Leadership 2000 Mentoring Program.
`
`Firm News & Announcements
`
`Weil Delivers Dual Federal Circuit Wins for Bio-Rad and Illumina Protecting DNA Sequencing and Analysis
`Litigation Win — August 05, 2020
`
`Weil Wins Federal Circuit Victory Upholding $27M Patent Infringement Jury Verdict
`Litigation Win — April 24, 2020
`
`Copyright © 2022 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, All Rights Reserved. The contents of this website may contain attorney advertising under the laws of
`various states. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is headquartered in New York and has office locations in
`Beijing, Boston, Dallas, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Miami, Munich, New York, Paris, Princeton, Shanghai, Silicon Valley and Washington,
`D.C.
`
`Regeneron Exhibit 1099.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis
`IPR2021-00816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket