throbber
For Public & Patients I Eye Hea!Jh A-Z
`
`j Select Language
`
`v j
`
`Comparison of Anti-VEGF Treatments for Wet
`AMD
`
`Leer en Espanol : Com11araci6n de tratamientos de anti-VEGF 11ara DMRE humeda
`
`By Reena Mukamal
`Edited By Anni Delfaro
`Feb. 03, 2020
`
`Anti-VEGF drugs can prevent vision loss in patients with ~ge-related macular degeneration
`.(AMO)., a leading cause of blindness among older Americans. Here's a guide to the similarities and
`differences between four anti-VEGF drugs commonly used to treat wet AMO.
`
`Groundbreaking treatments for wet AMD
`In the United States, an estimated 11 million Americans have some form of AMO. This disease
`erodes central vision, complicating day-to-day activities such as reading, driving and identifying faces.
`AMO has two forms - wet and dry. While dry AMO leads to a gradual loss of vision, wet AMO leads to
`faster vision loss and is the most advanced form of the disease. It is responsible for 90 percent of all
`AMO-related blindness.
`
`A decade ago, wet AMO was considered untreatable and two-thirds of those affected could expect to
`be legally blind within two years of developing the disease. Today there is a very different story about
`wet AMO thanks to the introduction of injectable anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF).
`drug§. The usage of anti-VEGF drugs has nearly halved the incidence of AMO-related blindness in
`some countries, and ophthalmologists are now able to help wet AMO patients maintain - and in some
`cases restore - vision.
`
`"This class of drugs represents a huge leap in treatment for macular degeneration, and doctors have
`been blown away by the results," said Rahul Khurana, MD, a clinical spokesperson for the American
`Academy of Ophthalmology and retina specialist. "Ten years ago, wet AMO was a one-way ticket to
`blindness, but now I have patients with the condition who are able to read and drive; and some even
`maintain 20/20 vision."
`
`Multiple anti-VEGF drugs are available to treat AMO, but four are commonly used for the condition.
`Three of these, ranibizumab (brand name Lucentis®), aflibercept (brand name Eylea®) and
`brolucizumab (brand name Beovu®), were designed specifically for the treatment of AMO. A fourth
`drug, bevacizumab (brand name Avastin®), was originally developed to treat various types of cancer,
`but is commonly used "off-label" in patients with AMO.
`
`As doctors and the media debate the relative merits and disadvantages of these drugs, the growing
`collective experience of ophthalmologists indicates that all four are safe and effective treatments for
`wetAMD.
`
`How do they work?
`Wet AMO occurs when abnormal blood vessels begin to grow underneath the retina and leak blood or
`fluid that blurs central vision. A chemical called vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF, causes
`this abnormal growth. Anti-VEGF treatments seek out harmful VEGF molecules and block them. This
`reduces abnormal growth and leakage, which helps to stabilize vision loss and, in some cases, can
`improve sight.
`
`Patients can receive treatment in their doctor's office. The ophthalmologist will place anesthetic and
`antiseptic drops on the eye to numb it, then administer the anti-VEGF drug by injection.
`
`
`https://www.aao.org/eye-health/diseases/avastin-eylea-lucentis-difference
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2260.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`"An eye injection may sound scary, but the needle is very small and the injection is very quick - a
`fraction of a second: said Raj Maturi, MD. "Many of my patients are nervous about this the first time,
`but by the second treatment, they are much more confident in the process and its effectiveness."
`
`The recommended frequency of these injections varies from every few weeks to every few months,
`and duration of treatment varies by case. Patients will likely require multiple doses over the course of
`many months, and repeat treatments are often needed for continued benefit.
`
`How are they different?
`Lucentis, Eyles and Avastin offer similar visual benefits, according to many ophthalmologists, But
`Beovu is the first anti-VEGF drug to provide similar benefits with a single eye injection only four times
`a year,
`
`Here are some other differences that your ophthalmologist may explain to you as you discuss
`treatment options.
`
`FDA approval
`Lucentis, Eylea and Beovu have been FDA-approved for use in the eye. But Genentech, the
`company that manufactures Avastin and Lucentis, has not sought FDA approval for Avastin to be
`used as treatment of wet AMO.
`
`However, Avastin was FDA-approved as a treatment for colon cancer in February 2004, and since
`then has been used by ophthalmologists to treat wet AMO "off-label" with great resylts In fact, halt
`of ophthalmologists prescribe Avastin as a first-line treatment for wet AMO.
`
`Cost
`Avastin, at approximately $50 per average treatment, is significantly less expensive for the patient
`than the alternatives (-$1,800 to $2,000 for Eylea, Lucentis or Beovu).
`
`Eylea's and Lucentis' significantly higher price tags reflect the costly process of FDA approval for
`their intended use. Although Avastin carries a similarly high price tag when used for colon cancer,
`it is much less expensive as an eye treatment because only 1140th of the drug is being used for
`each dose.
`
`Price is often a deciding factor for patients. Drug manufacturers do offer some patient assistance
`programs to help subsidize costs. But for many individuals, the nearly $2,000 difference between
`these drugs and Avastin can add up to thousands of dollars or more in out-of-pocket costs over
`the course of treatment. This cumulative price differential has been the main focus of media
`stories about the drugs.
`
`Also related to the issue of cost is insurance coverage. All three drugs are covered by Medicare,
`but the terms of coverage can be complex. Not all injections may be covered by each insurance
`carrier.
`
`Risks
`Numerous studies have concluded that there are minimal differences in risk between the three
`drugs. A concern is that there is a greater possibility of infection with Avastin due to potential
`contamination when the drug is being repackaged into smaller doses for the eye, When
`appropriate guidelines are followed for preparing such medicines, this risk is minimized,
`Additionally, "in the vast majority of cases of eye infection, the source is the surface of the patient's
`own eye, rather than contaminated medication or anything else," said Abdish Bhavsar, M.D.,
`Academy clinical spokesperson and retina specialist,
`
`Packaging and accesslblllty
`Since Lucentis, Eylea and Beovu are FDA approved for use in the eye, they are manufactured and
`delivered to ophthalmologists as eye injectables, usually stored in the ophthal mologist's office and
`available for use whenever they are needed.
`
`Avastin, in contrast, is a repackaged drug. It is shipped from the manufacturer to a special
`pharmacy that repackages it into smaller doses for the eye and then delivers it to doctors' offices.
`If you and your ophthalmologist decide that Avastin is right for you, you may have to come back
`for a second appointment to receive the treatment. In most cases your doctor will be able to pre(cid:173)
`order your prescription each month and have it ready for your subsequent appointments,
`minimizing this issue after the initial treatment.
`
`Which treatment is right for you?
`Multiple studies have compared these anti-VEGF drugs and found that all help patients retain their
`abil ity to see. So the American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends that ophthalmologists
`counsel patients about the availabil ity of these treatments.
`
`Patients may differ in how their eyes respond to one treatment versus another, Additionally, there may
`be cause at some point during a patient's course of treatment for the ophthalmologist to switch
`patients from one drug to another, Your ophthalmologist will help you pick a therapy after reviewing
`your unique condition and the relative tradeoffs of these treatments,
`https://www.aao.org/ eye-health/diseases/avastin-eylea-lucentis-difference
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2260.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`I earn more about these doigs as treatment for diabe!ic macular edema
`
`Related Ask an Ophthalmologist Answers
`
`Is MS associated with AMO or uveitis?
`AUG 10, 2021
`
`How long can vou use ornscriotion eve droos after opening them?
`JUL 15, 2021
`
`After retjna surgecy can I take sildenaflp
`JUL 07, 2021
`
`can treatment stgp hanucjnatjgns tram CBS?
`JUN 15, 2021
`
`!&yaµ haye wet AMP fgr life?
`APR25, 2021
`
`Search
`
`Q.
`
`Find an Ophthalmologist
`
`Enter ZIP Code
`
`Advaocad Saarnb
`
`Ask an Ophthalmologist
`
`Search questions
`
`Bmwsa Answars
`
`Free Newsletter
`
`Get ophthalmologist-reviewed tips and Information about eye health and preserving your vision.
`
`I Email Address
`Sign up
`
`Privacy Policy
`
`Interested in a no-cost
`eye exam from the
`Academy's
`EyeCare
`America®
`program?
`
`Ull'lm Mote
`
`https://www.aao.org/ eye-health/diseases/avastin-eylea-lucentis-difference
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2260.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Contact Us
`
`Terms of Service
`
`About the Academy
`
`l::lfilR
`
`for Advertisers
`
`Jobs at the AcademY.
`
`For Media
`
`Financial RelationshiP-S
`with lndust[Y.
`
`Q12hthalmologY. Job
`Center
`
`Medical Disclaimer
`
`Erivfil;Y. PolicY.
`
`OUR SITES
`
`FOLLOW THE ACADEMY
`
`loternatiooal Socie!Y. of
`Refractive Surg~r),'.
`
`Medical Professionals
`
`Public & Patients
`
`00®0
`
`Museum of the Eye
`
`© American Academy of Ophthalmology 2021
`
`ALSO OF INTEREST
`
`~
`Yegf
`
`What Is Ey.Lel!1
`
`
`https://www.aao.org/eye-health/diseases/avastin-eylea-lucentis-difference
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2260.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket