throbber
US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718202
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y,l_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )-
`
`Y,l_YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY ,l_ YY ,l_ Y ,l_ YY
`Y,l_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y ,l_ YY-'-YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY ,l_ YY ,l_ Y ,l_ YY
`Y-'-YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy ;._ yy ;._ y ;._ yy
`YJ..YYJ..YYYY)(cid:173)
`yy;._yy;._y;._yy
`Y J.. YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy )._ yy )._ y )._ yy
`y )._ yy )._ yyyy )_
`yy )._ yy )._ y )._ yy
`y )._ yy )._ yyyy )_
`YYJ..YY,l_YJ..YY
`y;._yy;._yyyy,1-
`yy).. YY).. Y J.. YY
`y;._yy;._yyyy,1-
`yy )._ yy )._ y )._ yy
`y )._ yy )._ yyyy )_
`YYJ..YYJ..YJ..YY
`Y J.. YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy )._ yy )._ y )._ yy
`Y J.. YY-'-YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY-'-YY).. Y J.. YY
`YJ..YYJ..YYYY)(cid:173)
`yy;._yy;._y;._yy
`
`Oliver, Catherine , Amit,
`Source Text Box to eve
`
`RTH Situation Assessment
`
`Christine Wong
`Amit Kumar Goyal
`Oliver Bock
`Catherine Becker
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718203
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Executive Summary
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718204
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Wet AMD is 57% of total aVEGF sales ($6 B),
`but is growing more slowly than total aVEGF
`market growth rate
`
`Sales Split by Indication for Branded
`aVEGF Sales (2018)
`
`Total wetAMD aVEGF Sales($ M)
`
`• Eylea •
`
`Lucentis
`
`____ ...,@-_______ ,.
`
`2,965
`
`3,033
`
`3,032
`
`3,299
`
`13% annual growth rate
`from 2014-2018
`
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`%of
`aVEGF 76%
`sales:
`
`70%
`
`64%
`
`59%
`
`57%
`
`Source EvaluatePharma
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718205
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Avastin leads the market: 46% total treatment share
`A vastin maintains dominance in naive patient share, though
`Eylea continues to grow
`
`wAMD Treatment Share
`
`Eylea
`-
`- Avastin
`-
`Lucentis - Others
`
`---------------------....:::.46%
`
`38%
`
`70%
`60%
`50%
`40%
`30%
`20%
`10%
`0%
`
`100%
`90%
`80%
`70%
`60%
`50%
`
`Continuing Patient Share
`
`15%
`
`44%
`
`~ ---
`
`~
`
`----
`
`-=:-.._:::-
`
`;%
`
`·------.111- %
`
`Naive Patient Sha.,_re~ - - - -~
`Avastin leads naive
`00%
`patient share
`90%
`80%
`70%
`60%
`50%
`40%
`30%
`20%
`10%
`
`67%
`
`US Ophthalmology Time penod of data Jan' 10 to Jul'17
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718206
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`43 practices account for 30°/o of all
`branded aVEGF procedures
`
`Account Concentration Curve
`
`100%
`
`90%
`
`0
`
`"O
`
`80%
`"'
`~ 70%
`~ 60%
`ct
`50%
`u_
`(.')
`w 40%
`>
`"' 0 30%
`#-
`20%
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Branded aVEGFs
`
`AllaVEGFs
`
`-------- , -----.- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`10%
`
`0%
`
`Number of Practices
`
`Time period of data Jan-Dec 2016
`Data Source IQVIA claims data + CMS Data CareSet Affiliations
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718207
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`HCPs treating nAMD are highly concentrated
`with 35% treating 80% of all patients
`
`100%
`
`HCP Concentration Curve
`
`80'¾
`
`Q)
`
`f
`~ 60%
`Q_
`0
`2
`1
`#-
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`0%
`0%
`
`10%
`
`20%
`
`30%
`
`40%
`
`50%
`
`60%
`
`70%
`
`80%
`
`90%
`
`100%
`
`% HCPs
`322 Retinal Specialists (15%) drive 50% of nAMD treatments
`759 Retinal Specialists (35%) drive 80%
`
`Time period of data Aug'16 to Jul'17
`Data Source IQVIA claims data HCP (# AMD patients> 10) N = 2145
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718208
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.007
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Retina Landscape - Near Term Highlights
`
`o ... - .. ~,_.,..,,Q-. o._,,,..,..,., ◊­
`
`•-• • .. ..., ...... --•-•.,.. •~· •"""'·
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`Last Update: Feb19
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718209
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.008
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Retina Biosimilar Landscape
`(Advanced stage products only)
`
`Last Update: Jan19
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`Notes:
`
`*ONS501 O: The first clinical study for ONS-501 O is being conducted outside
`of the U.S. and is designed to serve as the first of two adequate and well
`controlled studies for wet AMO. The U.S. portion of the second study is
`scheduled to begin in early 2019 upon the submission of an IND application.
`Oncobiologics' wet AMO clinical program was reviewed at a successful end of
`Phase II meeting held with the U.S. FDA conducted earlier in 2018. If the
`program is successful , it will support the Company's plans to submit for
`regulatory approval in multiple markets in 2020. The Company is developing
`ONS-5010 as an innovative therapy and not using the biosimilar drug
`development pathway. Previously, ONS-5010 met the primary and secondary
`endpoints in a 3-arm single-dose PK Phase I clinical trial. All of the PK
`endpoints met the bio equivalency criteria of the geometric mean ratios within
`90% confidence interval of 80-125% when compared to both U.S. and EU
`sourced Avastin reference products (https://oncobiologics.com/programs/novel(cid:173)
`therapeutics/)
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718210
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.009
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Annually, 200 K new nAMD patients, at
`high diagnosed and treated rate: 86%
`
`Naive Patients on Treatment
`
`Continuing Patients on Treatment
`
`TOTAL Patients
`TOTAL Eyes·
`
`2019
`
`182K
`
`316K
`498K
`610K
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718211
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0010
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`. ~ . .
`
`t
`
`.
`
`I
`
`•
`
`..
`. . .
`
`Patient's first contact with
`the PCP, OD, or GO
`
`••
`• . .
`
`Lack of
`clarity
`
`8.
`
`•
`
`I
`
`Trea
`1s1mt1at
`
`•
`
`• •
`. .
`
`Treatment
`
`RS makes diagnosis and
`explains the condition/treatment
`
`The PCP, OD, or GO
`refers patientto the RS
`
`•
`
`a Undersranding A Fear
`
`u
`J l
`
`~ Boththe
`prognosis a~d
`t~eatm~ntp an
`( mtrav1treal
`injections) terrify
`the patient.
`
`Loss of ■
`Gaps
`independence
`Increase need for a
`caregiver
`
`Between
`reality and
`expectations.
`
`Inability to drive
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`What is
`happening?
`
`What is
`nAMD?
`
`What are its
`implications?
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718212
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0011
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Majority of patients are diagnosed with nAMD in
`both eyes but are only treated early enough to
`save one eye
`
`Monocular, Binocular Diagnosed Patients
`
`Treatment Adherence (mean)
`
`100%
`
`"' Cl)
`>, w ... 0
`
`-;J.
`
`0%
`
`48%
`
`Monocular nAMD, Di agnosed
`and treated ea~y
`
`22%
`
`Binocular nAM D, Diagnosed
`and treated ea~y
`
`11 %
`
`-----------}
`
`Monocular nAMD, Diagnosed too
`late to treat/save vis ion
`Binocular nAMD, Diagnosed too
`late to treat/save vision
`Binocular , Only a ble to treat
`early enough to save vision in one eye
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`US Opht halmology
`
`30% too late
`75% of
`patients wrrh
`binocular
`nAMD are
`diagnosed in
`both eyes on
`the same day
`Yet, <50%
`wrrh binocular
`wAMD are
`treated in both
`eyes
`
`•
`
`Adherent to treat ment D Not adherent
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718213
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0012
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`US Ophthalmology
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)0071821 4
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0013
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Each physician segment type impacts the in
`treatment prescription drivers and their proc
`preferences
`
`Font size too small. W
`the so-what of this pa
`Keep only the primary
`on the page
`
`SCICNCCSAM
`'ln-.16<1-'•W~
`
`More tenured intelectualy
`curiOus retila exi,erts who
`pride themselves on
`Jldividuaized patient treatment
`-they thrive on making
`treatment decisions based on
`a patient's pathology combll'led
`with thel"ex1ensive knowledge
`and experience
`
`Price is the least mportant
`treatment choice motrvator for
`this group, instead tis B
`pathology driven decision
`pnortizing patient outcomes,
`visual acuiy and branded
`optJons for safety
`
`-US Ophthalmology
`
`% of
`physicia ns in
`each segnent
`
`. ,_ . ..,.
`
`SINCLC BRAND BLAKC
`
`• They are less tenured non-~
`partnered retll'la experts who
`are focused on treatment '
`efficacyand efficiencyoftheir
`practice. The cost of stocking
`in.tectable drugs is a concern ,
`t>ecause ofthel' high volume
`• They are early adopters of new
`treatments. They are sightly
`less colaborat1Ve with their
`patients alld focus on treating
`the disease rather than the i
`patient. ,
`No productsareoffwrvt for
`many and they are motivated to
`try the newest even if outcomes '
`for a new treatment therapy
`aren't completely dear. 92% of
`this segment agreed that cost 1
`effectiveness is fartess :···_ · _,
`important than efficacy, which
`
`ranks high with thlS group -
`
`.,.,._.,.._ .. ,,,_ ....
`
`PRAGMATIC PAT
`
`Less tenured reMa experts
`who pride themselves on
`curilg patients defintively(cid:173)
`they aclively engage
`patients in the treatment
`decision favorilg unlicensed
`bevacizumab as a
`financially practical and
`efficacious first me therapy
`but they switch rapidly to
`Eylea if a patient responds
`poorly to early injections of
`un~cense-d bevacizumab
`Patient convenience is
`centralto influencing
`treatment choice
`Safetyandtolerability are
`strong treatment choice
`motivators forth is group,
`wanting to ultimately
`maximize comfortto
`patients in the treatment
`
`expenence -
`
`STAac.Hm SP[NCEA
`'7.dltbofl\'111111,-...,,,,..,..,,, •
`
`More tenured retl\a experts
`who Like to feel they are
`helping others, they are
`driven to cure patients and
`engage in the most pro bono
`work. Toey often operate in
`smaaer practices where cost
`effectiveness is as important
`as efficacy, making
`unlicensed bevacizumabthe
`preferred treatment therapy
`TIiey are slower to adopt
`new technology and are
`most skeptical of
`pharmaceutical companies
`Ease and amount of
`reUT1bursemenl are strong
`treatment choice motivators
`for this group making
`unlicensed bevacizumabthe
`
`clear fav orite -fu NOVARTIS
`
`$0\/Kle : !UH LllfnellfJ.p.ntrA ~ - lkKlnHy&cornp.iy
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718215
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0014
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`"Extremely Important".
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718216
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0015
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Eylea is considered to outperform others on majority of
`attributes, OOP costs and reimbursement confidence drive
`highest Avastin levels
`Comparative Product Performance- T2B (rated 81-100)- Total Level
`
`■11ihiiit■---
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`
`ltmpor- Attribute
`ance
`
`1111 rmproving visual acuity - mean change in BCVA
`1111 Helps achieve regression of neovascularization
`1111 ls a product I can trust
`1111 Longer duration of efficacy
`1111 Confidence in product quality
`1111 Flattens/thins central subfield thickness
`
`67% Positive experience with the product
`
`67% Reimbursement confidence
`
`64% Resolves IRF/SRF fastest
`
`64% Out of pocket cots patient
`
`63% Maximizes treat and extend dosing interval
`
`62%
`Injection frequency
`ti~~ t l -~WPW~ Anti-VEGF therapies for
`s~
`3~ M0v,w~~/tJ'vlOJ,1arW~sst~~ing to again show y
`2sW0~"1iUk,-<VQ1iteWr ay,t!Mate how well ( or how poor
`13% Patient/caregiver support services & education
`Using the scale below, p1Era1S~ate each An~ ~therapy for the treatment of
`us~~il~~ AMO (Wet AMO) anywhere from Does Not Pertd&n .VAffll[R>
`Performs Extremely Well for the statement shown. To do so, click on each
`treatment and drag it to the rating you would like to give for that Anti-VEGF
`therapy for the treatment of Neovascular AMO (Wet AMO).
`
`i&
`ai
`>
`0
`Cl
`C
`"ii
`Ill
`a,
`ti

`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718217
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0016
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Physician-perceived strengths and weaknesses of
`current nAMD treatments are clear, across all
`segment types
`
`AVASTIN
`
`Low cost / well
`reimbursed
`
`[±l Similar efficacy to
`
`Lucentis
`Lower economic risk to
`practice
`
`G
`LUCENTIS
`
`RANIBIZUMAB INJECTION
`
`Longer market experience
`Pre-filled Syringe
`Preferred for patients with
`recent cardiovascular
`disease
`She~ life
`Gives rebates to big users
`
`ro•s
`1
`
`Off label use
`Preparation requires
`compounding pharmacy
`Dosing frequency
`Short she~ life
`
`Reimbursement for
`patients with suboptimal
`insurance
`Lower perceptions of
`efficacy vs Eylea
`Dosing frequency
`
`Barring financial /
`insurance concerns,
`physicians prefer Eylea
`Perceived longer duration
`of action
`Reducing side effects
`Dosing advantage
`She~ life
`
`Reimbursement for
`patients with suboptimal
`insurance
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718218
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0017
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`In the past 12 months 7% patients had their
`treatment switched; During Eylea launch year
`the switch rate had increased to 17%
`
`PatientMixin nAMD
`
`Product Share of Switching nAMD Patients
`
`100%
`
`80%
`
`60%
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`0%
`
`■ Off-label
`beva
`■ Lucentis
`
`■ Eylea
`
`■ Naive
`
`■ Switch ■ Continuing
`
`Time period of data Aug'16 toJu1'17
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`Products Switched To (from
`Eylea , Lucentis, Off-label beva)
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718219
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0018
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Is this slide % of
`AMIT:
`patients or% of eyes? itching happens early in treatment
`when MDs are assessing patients' response
`
`Switching - Eye Level
`(n=22k)
`
`29%
`
`13%
`
`11 %
`
`8%
`
`5%
`
`5%
`
`---- - ◄€- ----
`
`25%
`
`30%
`
`"'
`C:
`Q) 'i
`a.
`0
`#-
`
`20%
`
`10%
`
`0%
`
`-
`
`4
`1- - - - 2 - - - - 3 - -
`No of Treatments
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7+
`
`■ A-> L ■ A-> E ■ L-> E ■ L->A ■ E-> A ■ E -> L Total
`
`Time period of data Aug'16 to Ju1'17
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718220
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0019
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Lack of efficacy is primary reason for switch, although cost
`plays a role when switching from Eylea and Lucentis
`
`Reasons for Treatm ent Switch
`% selected
`
`Lack of efficacy
`Cost
`Side effects
`Patient request
`
`z
`~ <(
`$
`<i w
`Lack of efficacy
`Cost
`..J >-w
`S1deeffects
`~ Patient request
`'-~ z
`Lack of efficacy
`Cost
`b
`Side effects
`Patient request
`J
`
`t:f~hthatmologyo1-e,•rior, ot ecst _c•hersegrr-er:•so• qC9ficor'1derce eve
`St:iel'•o·e:uect '-' vrQ1,,e5 v
`..,tll'dini.;
`
`l.!, NOVART IS
`
`Q9. Again, please think of your wet AMO patients that you have initiated on
`each of the following agents, and then switched to a different anti-VEGF agent.
`On average, what % patients are switched for each of the following reasons?
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718221
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0020
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`May swap w/ patient adherence report slide
`Approx. 3 in 4 physicians acknow Highlight important stats
`be sufficient, and that the treatment is burdensome to patients
`
`Treatment Needs Addressed by CurrentAnti-VEGF-T2B
`
`Total
`
`Single Brand Blalee
`or Science Sam
`
`Pragmatic Pat
`
`Stretched Spencer
`
`C ,ascuta, AMD (Wet AMO) is a chronic, complex disease
`I ;;;,;~ by multiple pathogenic mechanisms beyond VEGF
`
`Treatment with intrtl'itreal injections of Anti-VEGF c.in be
`burdensome 10 Neovascular AMO ,:,Mel AMO) pa11en1s
`
`Despite optimal Anti.VEGF therapy vision or Ne-ovascular AMO
`Ci/./et AMO) patients maydecli.ne 1n the long-term.
`
`Despite optimal AntiNEGF therapy. vision of Neovascular AMO
`(Wet AMO) patients does not often retum to normal.
`
`Patients response toAntt-VEGf therapy 1s vanable in terms of
`initial gain and maintenance of gain
`
`Optimal outcomes with current Anti-VEGF therapies may not be
`achieved due to requirement for frequent treatmenVmonitoring
`
`Under current Anti-VEGF therapies, only a mmonty of patients
`regain normal '4$ion
`
`Current AntiNEGF the,apies do not modify disease
`progression
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`Q26.We would now like to present you with a series of statements, can you
`please indicate your level of agreement with each of them, using a scale from
`1 to 7, where 1 = 'Strongly Disagree' and 7 = 'Strongly Agree'? Single code per
`row.
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718222
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0021
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Patients and physicians agree that they need
`Innovative formulations with Prolonged
`duration and a Home-based monitoring
`
`Lessmvasrve
`Preference for topical
`Lower nsk of10fed10n
`
`Higher durat10nthat re<1uces
`the frequencyof111Ject10ns
`
`Offers an endpoint
`Reduce nsk of side effects
`Patient friendly
`
`Higher durnt100 of ad.on
`Less fre,quentdos1ng
`
`[LO
`
`Economic
`Considerations
`
`EYen11i+sen rernbursemertcs
`successluf.~ptOC@SSlJ"90fd.u'r.s
`Gburden!.om,eandthe
`w,prafJCUbil1ty~iestre
`f~jHCU0eS
`
`TOOIS&.Jitalowed pat,erts
`... ~ti."ddi:seas.e ar-:3
`t"Ul~I
`Patoie'llSS..pp0(1:IP'OU~
`
`Education and
`Support
`
`Too,s&.,..at@rial:slOl'l"l.tt!
`st:rseo'tl-,edl¥,lno5tS
`.. ~derstar,d ~.gof prog;r.oslS
`trUl!'l"'i!"t!lr-dexpectabOl"Ji
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718223
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0022
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`2 out of 3 physicians believe there is a need for a
`new nAMD therapy
`Need for New Therapy to Treat nAMD
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`SiKJlitf~ntdif!erences.@ ) l.!, NOV ART I $
`
`Q24. To what extent do you believe there is a need for a new therapy to treat
`Neovascular AMO (Wet AMO)? Please use a scale of 1 to 7 where 1 means "no
`need" and 7 means "major need".
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718224
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0023
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Q36. And how you would describe your knowledge of these products?
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718225
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0024
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Dosing and efficacy are identified as key advantages;
`While cost is the main disadvantage, over 1 in 10 do
`not see any disadvantages
`
`Advantages or disadvantages perception for RTH
`
`What comes to mind-when--yotJ think of R:EH258/Brol1?i~~~? What ar
`~
`the a'ct'\Pcffi~~ ~gbr disadvantages you perceive for RTH? (P as
`~Vdfic
`.
`.
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718226
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0025
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Need Images
`What Retinal Specialists expect with RTH
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718227
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0026
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718228
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0027
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Q3-8-:-Based on what you know I the-information-yot1--have b~n shown how(cid:173)
`Ii kelf ai'@~'01't'~tJse RTH 258 / Brolucizumab as a treatmen\1o~~¥M\ t 1 1ar
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718229
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0028
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`US Ophthalmology
`
`Q42. Should RJH258/Brolucjzumab become available in the market, assuming
`positive clinical results and assuming that there will be no access challenges,
`how likely would you be to use this product to each type of Wet AMO patients?
`Please select all that apply.
`043. And should RJH258/Brolucjzumab become available in the market,
`assuming positive clinical results and assuming that there will be no additional
`access challenges when compared to other branded, on-label anti-VEGFs, what
`proportion of each of your Neovascular AMO (Wet AMO) patients would you
`treat with this product? Please specify your answer per each of the following
`types of Wet AMO patients.
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)0071 8230
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0029
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718231
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0030
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718232
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0031
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`While physicians see many drivers for RTH
`use, a few key risks to RTH share are present
`
`US Ophthalmology
`1:
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718233
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0032
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Key Insights
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718234
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0033
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Outstanding Questions to Explore
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718235
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0034
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y,l_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY ,l_ YY ,l_ Y,l_ YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy ,l_ yy ;_ y ;_ yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`Y,t_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy,l_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy,l_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`
`Thank you
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718236
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0035
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y,l_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY ,l_ YY ,l_ Y,l_ YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy ,l_ yy ;_ y ;_ yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`Y,t_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy,l_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy,l_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`
`Supporting Material
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718237
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0036
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y,l_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY ,l_ YY ,l_ Y,l_ YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy ,l_ yy ;_ y ;_ yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`Y,t_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy,l_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy,l_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`
`Market Overview
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718238
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0037
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Wet AMD comprises majority (57%) of total
`aVEGF sales, but is growing less rapidly than
`total aVEGF market
`
`Sales Split by Indication for Branded
`aVEGF's (2018)
`
`Total aVEGF Sales in wet AMO in USA ($mn)
`
`• Eylea •
`
`Lucentis
`
`____ ...,@-_______ ,.
`
`2,965
`
`3,033
`
`3,032
`
`3,299
`
`13% annual growth rate
`from 2014-2018
`
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`%of
`aVEGF 76%
`sales:
`
`70%
`
`64%
`
`59%
`
`57%
`
`Source EvaluatePharma
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718239
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0038
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`US nAMD patient population is highly
`penetrated
`86% is diagnosed & tre ated; annually, 200K new patients
`
`AMO lnc1denco Rato
`
`01agnos1s & Treatment
`Rates
`
`Naive Pc:ithrnts on
`Treatment
`
`Continuing Patients on
`Traatnutnt
`
`TOTAL Patients
`TOTAL Eyes'
`
`!l
`
`C ! :.
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)0071 8240
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0039
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Avastin leads the market with 46%
`share while Eylea continues to grow
`
`wAMD Treatment Share
`
`----------------46%
`
`38%
`
`15%
`
`70%
`
`60%
`
`50%
`
`40%
`
`30%
`
`20%
`
`10%
`
`0%
`
`#~~~~~~~~~~~~~##~~~~~~~~####~~
`O'~o~~o~\::Y~O'~o~~o'~if~O'~o~~O"~if~O'~o~~o~~.J'~O'~o~~o~~cf'~O'~c§~o~~.J'~O'~o~~o~~.J'~O'~CY?
`
`-
`
`Avastin
`
`-
`
`Eylea
`
`-
`
`Lucentis -Others
`
`Time penod of data Jan'10 to Jul'17
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718241
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0040
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Patient share mix differs with naive market
`leader off-label beva at 67% but 44% for
`continuing
`
`Naive Patient Share
`
`Continuing Patient Share
`
`100%
`
`90%
`
`80%
`
`70%
`
`60%
`
`50%
`
`100%
`
`90%
`
`80%
`
`70%
`
`67%
`
`-
`
`Eylea
`
`-
`
`Lucentis
`
`-
`
`Avastin
`
`-
`
`Eylea
`
`-
`
`Lucentis - Avastin
`
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718242
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0041
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Avastin is prescribed as an initial
`treatment by a majority
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`S11 . In what order do you typically prescribe / escalate therapy in wet AMO
`patients (1 for first-line, up to 4 for 4th line)?
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718243
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0042
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`In the past 12 months 7% patients had their
`treatment switched; During Eylea launch year
`the switch rate had increased to 17%
`
`PatientMixin nAMD
`
`Product Share of Switching nAMD Patients
`
`100%
`
`80%
`
`60%
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`0%
`
`■ Off-label
`beva
`■ Lucentis
`
`■ Eylea
`
`■ Naive
`
`■ Switch ■ Continuing
`
`Time period of data Aug'16 toJu1'17
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`Products Switched To (from
`Eylea , Lucentis, Off-label beva)
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718244
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0043
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`Q7. Now please think about your wet AMO patients that you have initiated on
`initiated on ________ and then switched to a different anti-VEGF
`agent. For those patients, what percent were switched to the following
`medications on average?
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718245
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0044
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`While initially Eylea took more share from
`Lucentis, at end of Y1 it had taken more share
`from Beva
`
`002)
`-1".~
`<l)"'
`20.7%
`_J _J _JIIODIL
`
`0 >,
`:::, 0
`
`34.6%
`
`21.3'11,
`
`(-9.3% )
`
`Pre-Launch
`
`Aug-Oct '11
`(Pre-Launch)
`
`Time penod of data Aug'11 to Oct'12
`Data Source IQVIA claims data
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`■ Lucentis ■ Av astin ■ Eylea
`
`Aug-Oct '12
`(12 mths)
`
`Aug-Oct '12
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`Lucentis share >60% - Lucentis Loyalist
`Avastin share> 60% -Avastin Loyalist
`Others - Splitters
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718246
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0045
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Retina Biosimilar Landscape
`(Advanced stage products only)
`
`Last Update. Jan19
`
`US Ophthalmology
`
`l.!, NOVARTI S
`
`Notes:
`
`*ONS501 O: The first clinical study for ONS-501 O is being conducted outside
`of the U.S. and is designed to serve as the first of two adequate and well
`controlled studies for wet AMO. The U.S. portion of the second study is
`scheduled to begin in early 2019 upon the submission of an IND application.
`Oncobiologics' wet AMO clinical program was reviewed at a successful end of
`Phase II meeting held with the U.S. FDA conducted earlier in 2018. If the
`program is successful , it will support the Company's plans to submit for
`regulatory approval in multiple markets in 2020. The Company is developing
`ONS-5010 as an innovative therapy and not using the biosimilar drug
`development pathway. Previously, ONS-5010 met the primary and secondary
`endpoints in a 3-arm single-dose PK Phase I clinical trial. All of the PK
`endpoints met the bio equivalency criteria of the geometric mean ratios within
`90% confidence interval of 80-125% when compared to both U.S. and EU
`sourced Avastin reference products (https://oncobiologics.com/programs/novel(cid:173)
`therapeutics/)
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)0071824 7
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0046
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Retina Biosimilar Landscape - Key Highlights
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718248
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0047
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y,l_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY-'-Y-'-YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`YY ,l_ YY ,l_ Y,l_ YY
`Y-'-YY-'-YYYY)(cid:173)
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`Y ,l_ YY ,l_ YYYY )(cid:173)
`yy ,l_ yy ;_ y ;_ yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`YY,l_YY,l_Y,l_YY
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`Y,t_YY,l_YYYY)(cid:173)
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy,l_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy)_
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy,l_yyyy,1-
`yy,l_yy;_y;_yy
`y;_yy;_yyyy,1-
`yy;_yy;_y;_yy
`
`Patient Journey
`
`fu NOVARTIS
`
`CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`NOVITC(US)00718249
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2172.0048
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`. ~ . .
`
`t
`
`.
`
`I
`
`•
`
`..
`. . .
`
`Patient's first contact with
`the PCP, OD, or GO
`
`••
`• . .
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket