throbber
AMERICAN ACADEMY
`OF OPHTHALMOLOGY®
`
`Prospective Study of Silicone Oil
`Microdroplets in Eyes Receiving lntravitreal
`Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
`Therapy in 3 Different Syringes
`
`John T. Thompson, MD
`
`Purpose: To compare the prevalence of intravitreal silicone oil microdroplets detected by slit- lamp
`biomicroscopy in eyes with 6 or more injections of the same anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug.
`Design: Prospective, cross-sectional case series.
`Participants: A total of 260 consecutive eyes receiving 1 of 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs for choroidal
`neovascularization, diabetic macular edema, or venous occlusive disease. The control group included 147 fellow
`eyes with no prior intravitreal injections.
`M ethods: The anterior and mid-vitreous were carefully examined using 12x to 16x magnification through
`dilated pupils with ocular saccades before an injection. Silicone oil microdroplets were graded on a scale from
`0 to 4+ based on the number and size of droplets.
`Main Outcome M easures: Presence and severity of silicone oil microdroplets in the vitreous.
`Results: Silicone oil microdroplets were observed in 78.3% of eyes receiving bevacizumab in Becton
`Dickinson (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) 0.3- ml polypropylene syringes, 14.4% of eyes receiving ranibizumab in 1.0-
`ml BD polypropylene syringes or more recently glass prefilled syringes, 48.5% of eyes receiving aflibercept in
`1.0- ml BD polycarbonate syringes, and 0% of eyes in controls. The differences among the 4 groups were
`statistically significant at P < 0.001 . The severity of silicone oil microdroplets was significantly greater in eyes
`using BD 0.3-ml polypropylene syringes than BD 1.0- ml polypropylene syringes, BD 1.0- ml polycarbonate
`syringes, or controls (P < 0.001). The severity of silicone oil microdroplets in eyes using BD 1.0-ml polycarbonate
`syringes was significantly greater than BD 1.0-ml polypropylene syringes (P = 0.012) and controls (P < 0.001).
`There was no significant difference between silicone oil microdroplet severity between BD 1.0- ml polypropylene
`syringes and controls (P = 1.0).
`Conclusions: The BD 0.3-ml polypropylene syringes with repackaged bevacizumab and the BD 1.0- ml
`polycarbonate syringes with afl ibercept cause a higher li kelihood of silicone oil microdroplets. lntravitreal in(cid:173)
`jections
`in eyes receiving multiple regular anti-VEGF injections should be supplied
`in silicone-free
`syringes. Ophthalmology Retina 2021;5:234-240 © 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
`
`The presence of intravitreal silicone oil microdroplets has
`been recogniz.ed most frequently in eyes receiving multiple
`intravitreal injections of anti vascular endothelial growth
`factor (VEGF). These anti-VEGF injections have become
`common in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization
`associated with age-related macular degeneration and other
`causes, such as myopia or histoplasmosis. Other common
`indications for treatment with anti-VEGF drugs include
`macular edema associated with venous occlusive disease
`and diabetic retinopathy. Many patients require these
`intravitreal injections every 4 to 12 weeks, and some pa(cid:173)
`tients have been receiving these injections since 2005.
`The 3 anti-VEGF drugs commonly used are bevacizumab
`(Avastin, produced by Genentech/Roche, South San Fran(cid:173)
`cisco, CA), ranibizumab (Lucentis, produced by Genentech/
`Roche), and aflibercept (Eylea, produced by Regeneron
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY). Each of the 3 drugs was
`typically used in the United States in a different syringe
`type. Minute amounts of silicone oil are typically placed in
`the barrel of most syringes to lubricate the plunger. 1 The
`presence of silicone oil microdroplets was recof nized
`more than 30 years ago with insulin syringes. The
`silicone is important to prevent the plunger from sticking
`during manufacturing and shipping. It also helps
`to
`facilitate a smoother injection by minimizing the break(cid:173)
`loose force
`to start the injection and glide force to
`complete the injections.2 The syringe type and needle used
`are important because they can have an impact on the
`amount of silicone oil that is injected into the eye with an
`intravitreal injection. Bevacizumab is repackaged from
`vials
`into syringes by a compounding pharmacy or
`outsourcing facility. The prefilled syringe has typically
`
`234
`
`© 2020 by lhe American Academy of Ophlhalmology
`Published by Elsevier Inc.
`
`htq,s://doi.org/10. 1016/j.oreL2020.07 .021
`ISSN 246$~530/20
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Thompson  Silicone Oil Microdroplet in Vitreous
`
`been shipped in the past to the ophthalmologist in a 0.3-mL
`insulin (Fig 1A) or 1.0-mL polypropylene tuberculin syringe
`(Fig 1B). It is important to recall that the bevacizumab is
`stored in the syringe for up to 3 months before use, based
`on the expiration date supplied by the repackager. These 2
`types of
`syringes are typically produced by Becton
`Dickinson (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ), a large supplier of
`syringes to the medical field. Ranibizumab was supplied
`in glass vials with a rubber stopper, and no BD syringe
`was in the kit supplied with the drug until early 2017
`when a prefilled glass syringe became available for the
`0.5-mg dose. The 0.3-mg ranibizumab glass prefilled
`syringes became available in 2018. Most ophthalmologists
`used the BD 1-mL tuberculin syringe (Fig 1B) to draw up
`and deliver ranibizumab before the introduction of the
`ranibizumab prefilled syringes. Aflibercept is supplied in a
`glass vial with a different BD 1.0-mL polycarbonate
`syringe supplied in the kit with the aflibercept (Fig 1C)
`before the introduction of glass prefilled aflibercept
`syringes in 2019. The 0.3-mL BD insulin syringe comes
`with a 31-gauge needle attached (“staked syringe”). Most
`ophthalmologists have attached the 30-gauge BD needle or
`32-gauge needle (TSK Laboratory, Tochigi-Ken, Japan)
`because BD does not sell a disposable 32-gauge needle.
`The presence of microdroplets of silicone oil
`in the
`vitreous of eyes receiving these injections was first reported
`in 2006 and was noted to be an infrequent complication after
`intravitreal injection of pegaptanib, an anti-VEGF drug in a
`prefilled syringe but rarely used today, and after triamcin-
`olone acetonide injections.3 A report 2 years later found
`silicone oil in 15 eyes of 1529 injections, but the number
`of patients is not reported, so a per patient prevalence
`cannot be calculated.4 Subsequent publications have noted
`
`treated with
`silicone oil droplets primarily in eyes
`repackaged bevacizumab.5-13 Silicone oil microdroplets
`have been reported less frequently after injection of ranibi-
`zumab5,9 and aflibercept.12 The purpose of the current study
`was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of silicone oil
`microdroplets in the vitreous of eyes that have received
`numerous intravitreal anti-VEGF injections of the same
`drug using the same syringe type for that particular drug.
`
`Methods
`
`The presence and severity of silicone oil microdroplets were
`evaluated prospectively in a consecutive series of all eyes in the
`author’s practice on the day of an intravitreal anti VEGF injection
`before the injection for choroidal neovascularization or macular
`edema due to venous occlusive disease or diabetic retinopathy. The
`data were collected on eyes examined between November 5, 2018,
`and January 31, 2019. The evaluation was performed only when
`the eye was dilated because the eye is not routinely dilated on
`every visit. Eyes had to have a minimum of 6 injections of the same
`intravitreal drug (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept) in the
`same syringe type at the time of grading. Any eye that had a
`different anti VEGF drug/syringe injected at some point during
`their prior treatment was excluded. A total of 227 eyes were
`excluded primarily because they had more than 1 different anti
`VEGF drug injected or had fewer than 6 injections. This would
`allow comparison of the prevalence of silicone oil microdroplets
`among the 3 drugs that were each delivered using 3 different BD
`syringes, respectively, in addition to the prefilled syringe intro
`duced for ranibizumab. Bevacizumab was supplied by Avella
`(Phoenix, AZ) in the BD 0.3 mL insulin syringes. Ranibizumab
`was delivered in the BD 1.0 mL tuberculin syringe until the pre
`filled syringes became available for the 0.5 mg and 0.3 mg dose in
`2017 and 2018, respectively. The ranibizumab prefilled syringes
`were used once they became available. Aflibercept was delivered in
`
`Figure 1. A, Becton Dickinson (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) 0.3-mL polypropylene insulin syringe. B, BD 1.0-mL polypropylene syringe. C, BD 1.0-mL
`polycarbonate syringe.
`
`235
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology Retina Volume 5, Number 3, March 2021
`
`Table 1. Grading Scale for Silicone Oil Microdroplets in the Vitreous
`
`Silicone Oil Severity Grade
`
`0
`0.5
`1.0
`2.0
`3.0
`4.0
`
`the BD 1.0 mL polycarbonate syringe supplied in the afli
`bercept kit, and none of the eyes in this study had aflibercept
`from the prefilled syringe that was not available at completion
`of data collection. The BD 30 gauge needle was used on all
`ranibizumab and aflibercept doses until switched to the TSK
`Laboratory 32 gauge needles
`in mid 2018. Other exclusion
`criteria were prior vitrectomy because the oil would float
`to
`the top of
`the eye and not be visible by slit lamp bio
`microscopy, poor pupillary dilation, active uveitis with vitreous
`cells, and asteroid hyalosis because the author found it diffi
`cult
`to accurately identify silicone oil microdroplets under
`these circumstances. Eyes were excluded if
`they had not
`received anti VEGF injections within the past year. All eyes
`with prior injection of other drugs such as triamcinolone or
`dexamethasone implant were excluded.
`Institutional Review
`Board approval was obtained by The Greater Baltimore
`Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The study adhered
`to the tenets of
`the Declaration of Helsinki. The data was
`collected during routine care of the patients, and the IRB did
`not require consent.
`The presence or absence of silicone oil microdroplets was
`assessed by an unmasked observer using an oblique slit beam at
`12 to 16 magnification focused into the mid vitreous. The sil
`icone oil microdroplets could be distinguished from other floaters
`or cells in the vitreous because they reflected light, causing them to
`appear like shiny bubbles. Patients were asked to saccade up and
`down, side to side several times because this improved detection of
`the silicone oil microdroplets. This examination of the vitreous
`typically took approximately 30 seconds, depending on patient
`cooperation with the saccades, and all grading was performed by
`the author. It was not possible to mask the author to the intravitreal
`anti VEGF drug received by the patient, but the goal was to find
`silicone oil microdroplets in all eyes, including controls. Silicone
`oil severity was graded using the following approximate scale
`because it was somewhat difficult to precisely count the number of
`silicone oil microdroplets
`(Table 1). The
`control group
`included fellow eyes of patients who were receiving intravitreal
`anti VEGF injections, but not necessarily those included in the
`study. They could be any fellow eye from a patient receiving
`intravitreal anti VEGF injection that was examined during the
`same time interval.
`
`Statistical Analyses
`
`The prevalence of any silicone oil was determined for each group
`and compared with one another using the chi square test with
`correction for multiple comparisons. The severity of silicone oil
`was compared among the 4 groups, including the controls using
`univariate analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for
`multiple comparisons. Linear regression analysis was used to
`compare the severity of silicone oil and the number of injections
`for each of the 3 anti VEGF drugs. All analyses were performed
`using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Subscription
`(IBM, Chicago, IL).
`
`236
`
`No droplets
`1e2 microdroplets < 0.1 mm diameter
`3e5 microdroplets < 0.1 mm diameter
`5e7 microdroplets < 0.1 mm diameter or 1 large droplet > 0.1 mm diameter
`8e10 microdroplets < 0.1 mm diameter or 2 larger droplets > 0.1 mm
`>10 microdroplets < 0.1 mm or 3 larger droplets > 0.1 mm diameter
`
`Results
`
`There were 69 eyes receiving bevacizumab in BD 0.3 mL
`polypropylene syringes, 125 eyes receiving ranibizumab in BD
`1.0 mL polypropylene syringes, and 66 eyes receiving aflibercept
`in BD 1.0 mL polycarbonate syringes. The control group consisted
`of 147 fellow eyes of patients receiving any anti VEGF injection
`with no prior intravitreal injections in that eye. The eyes receiving
`bevacizumab had a mean of 29 injections, eyes receiving ranibi
`zumab had a mean of 33 injections, and eyes receiving aflibercept
`had 26 injections. There was no significant difference in the
`number of injections among the 3 syringe types by analysis of
`variance using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons
`(Table 2). Figure 2 shows the percentage of eyes with any visible
`silicone oil droplets in the vitreous. Silicone oil microplets were
`visible in 78% of bevacizumab delivered with the BD 0.3 mL
`BD polypropylene insulin syringe and 14% of
`ranibizumab
`delivered with the 1.0 mL BD polypropylene syringe or prefilled
`syringe. Silicone oil microdroplets were not seen in any of the
`14 eyes receiving ranibizumab in the prefilled syringe only, but
`these eyes had many fewer injections because this syringe was
`more
`recently introduced. Silicone oil microdroplets were
`detected in 49% of aflibercept eyes delivered with the BD 1.0
`mL polycarbonate syringe and none of the control eyes. The
`prevalence of silicone microdroplets was significantly greater in
`BD 0.3 mL polypropylene (bevacizumab) eyes than all other
`groups as well as BD 1.0 mL polycarbonate (aflibercept)
`compared with ranibizumab and control (P < 0.001 for all
`comparisons by Pearson chi square). The prevalence of any sili
`cone oil microdroplets was significantly greater in BD 1.0 mL
`polypropylene (ranibizumab) eyes compared with control eyes
`(P < 0.001 by Pearson chi square). Figure 3 shows a graph of the
`severity of silicone oil for each of the 4 groups.
`The silicone microdroplet severity score was compared using
`univariate analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for
`multiple comparisons (Table 3). The severity grade of silicone oil
`microdroplets with bevacizumab in 0.3 mL BD insulin syringes
`was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than aflibercept
`in BD
`polycarbonate
`1.0 mL,
`ranibizumab
`in
`BD
`1.0 mL
`polypropylene,
`and controls. The
`severity of
`silicone oil
`microdroplets with aflibercept
`in 1.0 mL BD polycarbonate
`syringes was significantly greater than ranibizumab in BD 1.0
`mL polypropylene (P ¼ 0.012) and control eyes (P < 0.001).
`The severity of silicone oil microdroplets with ranibizumab in
`BD 1.0 mL polypropylene or prefilled syringes was not
`significantly different from that of controls (P ¼ 1.0). Linear
`regression analysis was performed to see if
`the severity of
`silicone oil microdroplets
`correlated with the number of
`injections. The number of injections was associated with the
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Thompson  Silicone Oil Microdroplet in Vitreous
`
`Table 2. Number of Eyes and Intravitreal Injections
`
`Anti-VEGF Drug
`
`No. of Eyes
`
`Bevacizumab
`
`Ranibizumab*
`Aflibercept
`Control (fellow eye with no prior
`intravitreal injections)
`
`69
`
`125
`66
`147
`
`Mean No. of
`Injections (Range)
`
`29 (6e121)
`
`33 (6e90)
`26 (6e69)
`0
`
`Median
`
`P Value (with Bonferroni Correction)
`
`19
`
`29
`26
`
`Bevacizumab vs. Ranibizumab
`Bevacizumab vs. Aflibercept
`Ranibizumab vs. Aflibercept
`
`0.0593
`1.00
`0.055
`
`vascular endothelial growth factor.
`VEGF
`*A total of 14 eyes had ranibizumab delivered only in prefilled syringes. Most eyes treated with ranibizumab had a combination of injections with BD
`polypropylene and later with prefilled syringes.
`
`severity of
`silicone oil
`for bevacizumab in BD 0.3 mL
`polypropylene (P ¼ 0.011) and ranibizumab in BD 1.0 mL
`polypropylene (P ¼ 0.005) but was not significant for aflibercept
`(P ¼ 0.085). The
`in BD 1.0 mL polycarbonate syringes
`correlation was weak for all 3 anti VEGF drugs with R2¼0.093
`for bevacizumab, R2¼0.064 for ranibizumab, and R2¼0.046 for
`aflibercept. The relatively low value for R2 means that less than
`10% of the silicone oil severity is explained by the mean number of
`injections. This suggests that the amount of silicone oil is not
`constant in each syringe but varies from lot to lot. Otherwise, eyes
`with a greater number of injections would be expected to have
`more silicone oil microdroplets than eyes with fewer injections.
`
`Discussion
`
`Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections have become common
`because of their potent effect on decreasing leakage from
`neovascular and damaged blood vessels in the retina and
`choroid. Frequent injections are required to maintain the
`
`leading to numerous
`beneficial response in most eyes,
`intravitreal injections over a period of many years. The BD
`syringes often used for these injections were not designed
`for delivering intravitreal drugs and contain silicone oil
`droplets to lubricate the barrel of the syringe to make the
`injection easier. The needles may also contain small
`amounts of silicone oil, but
`this appears to be a less
`important source of silicone oil microdroplets based on the
`results of studies of the BD syringes and syringes from other
`manufacturers. The same needles were used for the ranibi-
`zumab and aflibercept, so this would not explain the dif-
`ference in frequency of silicone oil between the different
`syringe types. One limitation of the current study is that the
`anti-VEGF drug and syringe type in each patient was not
`masked to the grader. It was the goal of the grader to find
`silicone oil microdroplets in all eyes, even the control eyes.
`There was also no precise quantitative way to measure the
`number and size of the silicone oil microdroplets, but all
`eyes were examined by 1 grader using the same criteria.
`
`100.0%
`
`90.0%
`
`80.0%
`
`70.0%
`
`60.0%
`
`50.0%
`
`40.0%
`
`30.0%
`
`20.0%
`
`10.0%
`
`0.0%
`
`Any Visible Silicone Oil Microdroplets
`
`Bevacizumab in BO 0.3-
`ml insulin syringe,
`78.3%
`
`Aflibercept in BO 1.0·
`ml proypropylene
`syringe, 48.5%
`
`Ranibizumab in BO 1.0
`ml TB syringe or
`prefilled syringe,
`14.4%
`
`Ill
`
`Control, 0.0%
`
`Bevacizumab
`
`Ranibizumab *
`
`Afli bercept
`
`Control
`
`* 14 eyes received only ranibizumab prefilled syringes
`and none had any visible silicone oil microdroplets
`
`Figure 2. Percentage of eyes with any silicone oil microdroplets visible in the vitreous by slit-lamp biomicroscopy for bevacizumab in BD 0.3-mL poly-
`propylene syringes, ranibizumab in BD 1.0-mL polypropylene syringes, aflibercept in BD 1.0-mL polycarbonate syringes, and controls. BD
`Becton
`Dickinson.
`
`237
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology Retina Volume 5, Number 3, March 2021
`
`Severity of Silicone Oil Microdroplets
`
`100.0%
`90.0%
`80.0%
`70.0%
`60.0%
`50.0%
`40.0%
`30.0%
`20.0%
`10.0%
`0.0%
`
`Bevacizumab in BD 0.3- Ranibizumab in BD 1.0- Aflibercept in BD 1.0-ml
`ml polypropylene
`ml polypropylene
`polycarbonate syringe
`syringe
`syringe
`
`Control
`
`■ 0 ■ 0.5 ,, 1 JC 2
`
`Ill 3 11 4
`
`Figure 3. Percentage of eyes with silicone oil visible in the vitreous for bevacizumab in BD 0.3-mL polypropylene syringes, ranibizumab in BD 1.0-mL
`polypropylene syringes, aflibercept in BD 1.0-mL polycarbonate syringes, and controls using a severity scale from 0 to 4þ. BD Becton Dickinson.
`
`Early reports of silicone oil microdroplets after intra-
`vitreal injections suggested this was an infrequent finding
`and related to particular batches of syringes with greater
`amounts of silicone oil.3,4 Several studies have noted
`increased detection of silicone oil microdroplets in the
`vitreous during one time period.10 A larger series of 6632
`bevacizumab injections found 60 of 6632 eyes (0.904%)
`with silicone oil droplets with a greater prevalence from
`injections during one
`time period in 2016 (1.7%)
`compared with a different
`time period in 2015 2016
`(0.03%).7 The variability in silicone oil detection during
`different
`time intervals was confirmed in a more recent
`study.14 The storage of the prefilled bevacizumab syringes
`also influences the likelihood of
`injecting silicone oil
`microdroplets
`into
`the
`eye. For
`example,
`if
`the
`bevacizumab is
`frozen and then thawed because of
`temperature variability during refrigeration, the amount of
`siliconle oil increases by approximately 4-fold in 0.3-mL
`insulin syringes, but not 1.0-mL tuberculin syringes.3
`Several
`studies have
`recognized that
`syringes
`from
`different manufacturers have variable amounts of silicone
`oil. The BD 0.3-mL syringes were noted to have more
`silicone oil when fluid was expressed through them
`compared with BD tuberculin syringes and HSW silicone-
`free syringes
`(Henke Sass Wolf
`[HSW], Tuttlingen,
`
`Germany).8 More oil
`the end of
`is also expressed at
`injection if the plunger is depressed all of the way to the
`end with the BD 0.3-mL insulin syringes compared with
`the beginning of the injection.6,8 Agitation of the syringes
`by flicking them to remove bubbles also appears to
`increase delivery of silicone oil.15 These 2 factors could
`also explain why the eyes treated with aflibercept had
`more silicone oil microdroplets. The volume of aflibercept
`in the glass vial supplied with the drug is 0.1-mL, so this
`means there is less drug compared with ranibizumab,
`which contained 0.23-mL in their glass vial. This means
`that it was more common to have to push the plunger of
`the syringe containing aflibercept all
`the way down to
`deliver the full 0.05-mL dose compared with ranibizumab,
`for which there was sufficient drug to start with the
`syringe at 0.1-mL and depress the plunger until it read
`0.05-mL to deliver the same dose. Aflibercept
`is also
`more viscous than ranibizumab, so there is a tendency for
`the aflibercept
`to contain bubbles when it
`is drawn up
`from the glass vial into the syringe. It is common practice
`to flick the syringe and withdraw additional air into the
`syringe to expel the air bubbles during priming, before the
`aflibercept
`is injected into the eye because patients are
`bothered by the small air bubbles for 1 or 2 days after
`their intravitreal injection.
`
`Table 3. Comparison of Silicone Oil Microdroplets Severity in Different Syringe Types by Univariate Analysis of Variance
`
`Anti-VEGF Drug/Syringe
`
`Compared to Anti-VEGF Drug/Syringe
`
`Bevacizumab in 0.3-mL BD insulin syringe
`
`Aflibercept in 1.0-mL BD polycarbonate syringe
`
`Ranibizumab in 1.0-mL BD polypropylene/prefilled
`syringe
`
`Aflibercept in 1.0-mL BD polycarbonate syringe
`Ranibizumab in 1.0-mL BD polypropylene/prefilled syringe
`Control (no injections)
`Ranibizumab in 1.0-ml BD polypropylene/prefilled syringe
`Control (no injections)
`Control
`
`P Value (with Bonferroni Correction)
`P <0.001
`P <0.001
`P <0.001
`P
`0.012
`P <0.001
`P
`1.0
`
`BD Becton Dickinson.
`
`238
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Thompson  Silicone Oil Microdroplet in Vitreous
`
`A comparison of repackaged bevacizumab in Braun sy-
`ringes (B. Braun Medical Inc, Bethlehem, PA) showed a 4-
`to 9-fold increased particle count using light obscuration and
`micro-flow imaging compared with ranibizumab in prefilled
`glass syringes.9 The use of silicone-free syringes results in
`no detectable silicone oil microdroplets in another study
`comparing syringes with silicone lubrication with silicone-
`free syringes.11 It is believed that most of the intravitreal
`silicone oil from anti-VEGF injections arises from the
`syringes, but
`the needles used to inject
`the drug are a
`potential source of silicone contamination because tiny
`amounts of silicone oil were also found in 26- and 30-gauge
`BD PrecisionGlide needles when tested without syringes.16
`Silicone oil microdroplets in the vitreous are usually
`asymptomatic with milder grades such as trace or 1þ, but
`most patients with 2þ or greater did report floaters or
`admitted seeing them when asked. Patients with very poor
`visual acuities (20/400 or less) did not seem to recognize the
`silicone oil microdroplets as often. A small percentage of
`patients with the
`silicone oil microdroplets become
`sufficiently bothered by these floaters that vitrectomy was
`performed to remove them. This may require more frequent
`anti-VEGF injections because it appears that the half-life of
`the ranibizumab and aflibercept is decreased in an animal
`eyes with vitrectomy.17 The
`model of
`silicone oil
`microdroplets in the vitreous usually does not cause any
`substantial inflammation, but there is one report of silicone
`oil droplets after aflibercept injection that was linked to
`intraocular inflammatory reactions.12 The US Food and
`Drug Administration released new guidelines affecting the
`preparation of the repackaged bevacizumab. Compounding
`pharmacies and outsourcing facilities were previously
`bound by USP 797 guidelines. In 2017, the Food and Drug
`Administration released more extensive guidelines for
`repackaged biologics, which became finalized in January
`2018 as USP 789.18 These more stringent guidelines have
`
`Footnotes and Disclosures
`
`Originally received: April 20, 2020.
`Final revision: July 3, 2020.
`Accepted: July 23, 2020.
`Available online: July 28, 2020.
`
`Manuscript no. ORET D 20 00291.
`
`Retina Specialists, Baltimore, Maryland.
`
`The results were presented in part at: the American Society of Retina
`Specialists Meeting 2019, Chicago, Illinois, July 26e30, and The Retina
`Society Meeting, September 11e15, 2019, London, United Kingdom.
`Disclosure(s):
`All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE disclosures form.
`The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s): JTT: Grant support:
`Genentech (Roche), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Opthea Consultant e
`Genentech (Roche).
`Dr. John T. Thompson serves on the editorial board of Ophthalmology
`Retina.
`HUMAN SUBJECTS: Human subjects were included in this study. The
`human ethics committees at the Greater Baltimore Medical Center approved
`the study. All research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
`
`caused most compounding pharmacies and outsourcing
`facilities to stop using the BD 0.3-mL insulin syringe to
`repackage bevacizumab. Many have shifted to the use of
`silicone-free 1-mL tuberculin syringes to allow them to
`adhere to USP 789 requirements. It is unknown if the afli-
`bercept delivered in the BD 1-mL polycarbonate syringes
`would pass the USP 789 guidelines, but Regeneron Phar-
`maceuticals introduced a prefilled glass syringe for delivery
`of aflibercept 2019, although supply issues initially slowed
`transition to all glass prefilled syringes.
`
`Conclusions
`
`This study found large differences in the presence of
`silicone oil microdroplets in the vitreous using 3 different
`syringes
`commonly
`used
`for
`intravitreal
`injections.
`Repackaged bevacizumab in BD 0.3-mL insulin syringes
`and aflibercept delivered in the supplied BD 1.0-mL
`polycarbonate syringes results in detectable silicone oil
`microdroplets in 49% of eyes treated long term with
`aflibercept delivered in BD 1.0-mL polycarbonate sy-
`ringes and 78% of eyes with repackaged bevacizumab
`delivered in BD 0.3-mL insulin syringes. In late 2019, a
`new intravitreal anti-VEGF drug became available, bro-
`lucizumab (Beovu produced by Novartis Pharmaceuticals
`Corporation, Basel, Switzerland). This drug is currently
`only available in glass vials, so silicone-free syringes
`should be preferred for intravitreal
`injection. It
`is rec-
`ommended that pharmaceutical companies load intravitreal
`anti-VEGF drugs in silicone-free syringes. It is also rec-
`ommended that compounding pharmacies and outsourcing
`facilities repackage intravitreal drugs such as bevacizumab
`in silicone-free syringes to minimize the risk of silicone
`microdroplets
`in the vitreous
`in eyes with repeated
`injections.19
`
`The data was collected during routine care of the patients, and the IRB
`exempted this study from collecting patient consent.
`No animal subjects were used in this study.
`Author Contributions:
`Conception and design: Thompson
`Data collection: Thompson
`Analysis and interpretation: Thompson
`Obtained funding: N/A
`Overall responsibility: Thompson
`Abbreviations and Acronyms:
`BD Becton Dickinson; VEGF
`Keywords:
`intra
`ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, silicone oil microdroplet,
`vitreal
`injections, Becton Dickinson syringe, anti vascular endothelial
`growth factor.
`Correspondence:
`John T. Thompson, MD, 6569 North Charles St., Suite 605, Baltimore, MD
`21204. E mail: JThompson@retinaspec.com.
`
`vascular endothelial growth factor.
`
`239
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ophthalmology Retina Volume 5, Number 3, March 2021
`
`References
`
`1. Changelau E, Berger M, Bohlken B. Silicone oil released from
`disposable insulin syringes. Diabetes Care. 1986:9672e9673.
`2. Yoshino K, Nakamura K, Yamashita A, et al. Functional eval
`uation and characterization of a newly developed silicone oil free
`prefillable syringe system. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103:1520e1528.
`3. Freund KB, Laud K, Eandi CM, Spaide RF. Silicone oil droplets
`following intravitreal injection. Retina. 2006;28:701e703.
`4. Bakri SJ, Ekdawi NS. Intravitreal silicon oil droplets after
`intravitreal drug injections. Retina. 2008;28:996e1001.
`5. Liu L, Ammar DA, Ross LA, et al. Silicone oil microdroplets and
`protein aggregates in repackage bevacizumab and ranibizumab:
`Effects of long term storage and product mishandling. Invest
`Ophthalmolol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1023e1034.
`6. Pitcher JD, Roybal CN. Silicone oil microdroplets in repack
`aged bevacizumab syringes: Identification, quantification, and
`strategies for reducing clinical impact. ARVO Annual Meeting
`Abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:434.
`7. Khurana RN, Chang LK, Porco TC. Incidence of presumed
`silicone oil droplets in the vitreous cavity after intravitreal
`bevacizumab
`injection with
`insulin
`syringes.
`JAMA
`Ophthalmol. 2017;135:800e803.
`8. Emerson GG. Silicone oil droplets are more common in fluid
`from BD insulin syringes as compared to other syringes.
`J Vitreoretin Dis. 2017;1:401e406.
`9. Shargus M, Werner BP, Geerling G, Winter G. Contamination
`of anti VEGF drugs
`for
`intravitreal
`injection: how do
`repackaging and newly developed syringes affect the amount
`of silicone oil droplets and protein aggregates? Retina.
`2018;38:2088e2095.
`10. Yu JH, Gallemore E, Kim JK, et al. Silicone oil droplets
`following intravitreal bevacizumab. Am J Ophthalmol Case
`Rep. 2017;10:142e144.
`
`11. Olea JL, Gomez Resa M, Cervera Peris MM, Aragon JA.
`Silicone oil droplets in repackaged anti vascular endothelial
`growth factors for intravitreal injection: in search of the main
`source of contamination. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30:
`774e779.
`12. Melo GB, Figueira ACM, Batista FAH, et al. Inflammatory
`reaction after aflibercept intravitreal injection associated with
`silicone oil droplets released from syringes: a case control
`study. Ophthalmic Surg Laser Imaging Retina. 2019;50:
`288e294.
`13. Melo GB, Emerson GG, Dias Jr CS, et al. Release of silicone
`oil and the off label use of syringes in ophthalmology. Br J
`Ophthalmol. 2020;104:291e296.
`14. Avery RL, Castellarin AA, Dhoot DS, et al. Large silicone
`droplets after intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin). Retin Cases
`Brief Rep. 2019;13:130e134.
`15. Melo GB, Dias Jr CS, Carvalho MR, et al. Release of
`silicone oil droplets from syringes. Int J Retina Vitreous.
`2019;5:1.
`16. Melo GB, Emerson GG, Lima Filho AAS, et al. Needles as a
`source of silicone oil during intravitreal injection. Eye (Lond).
`2019;33:1025e1027.
`17. Niwa Y, Kakinoki, Sawada T, et al. Ranibizumab and
`aflibercept: intraocular pharmacokinetics and their effects on
`aqueous VEGF level
`in vitrectomy and nonvitrectomized
`macaque
`eyes.
`Sci.
`2015;56:
`Invest Ophthalmol Vis
`6501e6505.
`18. US Pharmacopeia: USP 789. http://ftp.uspbpep.com/v29240/
`usp29nf24s0 c789.html. Accessed January 1, 2020.
`19. Sharma A, Kumar N, Bandello F, et al. Understanding
`intravitreal silicone oil droplets due to intravitreal injections.
`Retina. 2019;39:1233e1235.
`
`240
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2321.007
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket