throbber
Ophthalmology·
`Retina
`
`Volume 2, Number 7, July 2018
`www.ophthalmologyrctina.org
`
`Real-world Outcomes of Anti Vascular
`Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration in the United States
`Thonws A. Ciulla, MD, MBA, Forbes Huang, Keith Westby, MBA,
`DavidF. Williams, MD, MBA, Sandi Zave1i , RPh, SamirC. Patel, MD
`
`Purpose: Real-world visual outcomes of aoti-vascular eodo(cid:173)
`thelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for neovascular age(cid:173)
`related macular degeneration (oAMD) have been reported in
`cohorts outside of the Uoited States. This study sought to assess the
`relationship between presenting visual acuity (VA) and visual
`outcomes, as well as the potential impact of loss to follow-up, in
`real-world anti-VEGF-treated nAMD patients from the United
`States.
`Design: Retrospective study of aggregated, longitudinal elec(cid:173)
`tronic medical records obtained from a geographically diverse
`sample of US retina specialists and included in the Vestmm Health
`Retina Database.
`Participants: Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of nAMD, no
`previous treatment, and _2:3 monthly anti-VEGF injections in the
`first 4 months from diagnosis in patients diagnosed between
`January 2011 and July 2013.
`Methods: To model loss to follow-up, mun1ally exclusive co(cid:173)
`horts of oAMD patients with loss to follow-up after specific time
`points of 6 and 12 mooths (i.e., oo follow-up beyood) were
`compared with a separate cohort of patieots who completed 24
`months of follow-up endiog prior to July 2015 (n = 2213).
`Main Outcome Measure: VA outcomes were assessed on each
`cohort as a whole, with additional stratification by baseline VA.
`Results: The 6-, 12-, and 24- month cohorts received means of
`5.4, 7.3, and 12.l injections and showed no change, no change,
`and a meao change of + 3.1 letters from baseline (95% confidence
`interval l.8-4.4 letters, P < 0.01), respectively. When stratified
`by baseline VA, nearly all groups lose VA at their respective
`follow-up periods, except for those with baseline VA of 20/200
`or worse.
`Conclusions: Real-world nAMD patients in the United States
`receive fewer anti-VEGF injections and experience worse visual
`outcomes compared with patients in randomized clinical trials,
`consisteot with ooo-US studies. Patients with better VA at pre(cid:173)
`seotatioo tend to be particularly vuloen1ble to visioo
`loss.
`Compared with other patients, those ultimately lost to follow-up
`have worse visual outcomes at, or prior to, their final visit,
`suggesting that loss to follow-up may lead to overestimation of
`visual outcomes in clinical studies of nAMD.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:645-653.
`
`1130
`
`Timing of Povidone Iodine Application to
`Reduce the Risk of Endophthalmitis after
`lntravitreal Injections
`Joshua D. Levimon, MD, Richard A. Garfinkel, MD, Daniel M.
`Berinstein, MD, Mic/1ael Flory, CRA, COT, Frank A Spellman , MD
`
`Purpose: To analyze comparatively the effect of different
`intravitreal injection (TV{) protocols oa the incidence of endopb(cid:173)
`thalmitis occurring after injection.
`Design: Retrospective case-control series.
`Participants: Twenty-seven retina specialists in a large vitre(cid:173)
`oretinal practice performed 37 646 fVIs.
`Methods: Multivariate analysis was used to ideatify risk factors
`for development of endopbthalmitis occurring after injectioa. Before
`all injections, a technician applied 5% povidoae-iodine (Pl) to the
`eyelids and conjunctiva. There were 4 distinct aseptic protocols with
`,regard to reapplication of PI by physicians: physicians who did not
`reapply Pl, reapplicatioo of Pl without the use of a lid speculum,
`reapplication of Pl before speculum placement, and reapplication of
`PI after speculum placemeot. Other analyzed variables included the
`use of gloves, a caliper to mark the injection site, and the class of
`medicatioo (steroid vs. anti-vascular endothelial growth factor).
`Main Outcome Measures: Cases of presumed infectious
`eadophthalmitis.
`Results: Thirty-three cases of presumed infectious endoph(cid:173)
`thalmitis occurred after 37 646 injectioas (0.088%). The method of
`PI application was fouad to be a statistically signilicaat predictor of
`the incidence of endophthalmitis (P = 0.031). When compared
`with the incidence of eodopbthalmitis for pbysiciaos who did not
`reapply PI (0.124% [20/16 155]), there w,.~ no statistical. difference
`for reapplicatioo of PI without the use of a speculum (0.110% [6/
`5472); P = 0.584) or reapplication before speculum insertion
`(0.122% [5/4067); P = 0.863). However, reapplication of PI after
`insertion of the lid speculum wa~ associated with a significantly
`decreased incidence of endophthalmitis (0.017% [2/11 952); P =
`0.004; odds ratio, 0.113). Use of gloves (P = 0.119) or a caliper to
`mark the injection site (P = 0.496) aad the cla~s of medication
`(P = 0.740) were not found to be statistically sigaificaat risk
`factors for endophthalmitis developmeat.
`Conclusions: The application of PI after placement of the lid
`speculum reduced the incidence of eadopbthalmilis occurring after
`injection approximately 7-fold compared with other aseptic pro(cid:173)
`tocols. Preventing the eyelid from contacting the injection site after
`the fiaal application of PI is an important step in improving the
`safety of iatmvitreal injections.
`Ophthalmology Rerina 2018;2:654-658.
`
`REGITC01118687
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2316.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Fluorescein Angiography Does Not Alter
`the Initial Clinical Management of Choroidal
`Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration
`Pra.sham K. Parekh, MD, MBA, James C. Folk, MD, Priya Gu/)Ca,
`MD, PhD, SreJ>hen R. Ru.ssell, MD, Elliott H. Sohn, MD, Michael D.
`Abramoff, MD, PhD
`
`Purpose: Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) is the standard
`modality to diagnose and manage cboroidal neovascularization
`(CNV). However, FFA is costly and bas considerable morbidity
`from allergic reactions and a morraLity of J per 220 000. Since the
`advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy
`for CNV, OCT bas been used extensively to manage CNV, but FFA
`is still widely used. One recent study found the sensitivity and
`specificity of OCT compared with FF A in diagnosis of CJ\TV were
`100% and 80.8%, respectively. We hypothesize that FFA does not
`affect the management of patients initially suspected of having CNV
`to a clinically significant degree.
`Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test using vignettes.
`Participants: A total of99 patients (99 eyes) who had an initial
`presentation of later confirmed CNV.
`Methods: We retrospectively exti:acted in de-identified form
`the FFA, OCT, and clinical histories of the subjects. Vignettes
`were created with a standard narrative cl.inical history, posterior(cid:173)
`pole color fundus image, central 8 -scan OCT of the initial visit,
`and early, mid, and late FFA of the affected eye. Four masked
`retinal specialists reviewed, in randomized order, these vignettes
`without FF A images (FF A- arn1) and answered a forced choice
`management question: observation, 3 consecutive anti-VEGF in(cid:173)
`jections, or other. After re-randomization, experts again reviewed
`the vignettes with the addition of the FFA images (FFA+ arm).
`Main Outcome Measures: Tntraobserver and interobserver
`concordance and reliability statistics within and between specialists.
`Results: Among our retina specialists, intraobserver concor(cid:173)
`dances were 89.7%, 88.7%, 88.7%, and 95.9% (average 90.7%,
`95% confidence interval [CI], 83.7-97.6). The avernge interob(cid:173)
`server concordance for the FFA- ann was 84.0% (95% CI,
`72.6-95.4), and for the FFA+ arm, 81.8% (95% CI, 68.5-95.2);
`paired t testing demonstrated no significant difference between the
`FFA- and FFA+ anns: t = 0.6, P = 0.55.
`Conclusions: Our data suggest a high degree of agreement in
`clinical decision making whether FF A was used or not. There was a
`similar level of agreement among specialists in the FFA- and FFA+
`groups, albeit at higher, not statistically significant, variabiLity. We
`believe these findings further support deferring the use of FF A in the
`initial management of CNV in AMD, except in treatment failures
`and nonstandard cases.
`Oph1halmology Re1ina 2018;2:659-666.
`
`The Systemic Safety of Ranibizumab in
`Patients 85 Years and Older with
`Neovascular Age-Related Macular
`Degeneration
`Pravin U. Dugel, MD, Nauisha Singh, PhannD, Steven Francom,
`PhD, Ronald A. Cantrell, PhD, Susanna M. Grzeschik, PhD, RPh,
`Anne E. Fung, MD
`
`Objective: Ranibizumab safety is well established for treatment
`of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), but less
`is known about the risk of systemic serious adverse events (SAEs),
`specifically among patients with heightened baseline risk due to
`age (?::85 years). This analysis examines whether patients ?::85
`years of age versus those < 85 years experience an incre,L~ed risk of
`key systemic SAEs during intravitreal ,dllibizumab treatment for
`nAMD.
`Design: Retrospective, pooled analysis of safety data from 5
`pha~e ITI/fllb multicenter randomized clinical trials in patients with
`nAMD: ANCHOR, MARINA, PIER, SAILOR, and HARBOR.
`Participants: Patients with nAMD receiving rnnibizumab
`(n = 4347) or control (sbam/verteporfin pbotodynamic therapy,
`n = 441) treatment included in the safety-evaluable set of the
`5 trials.
`Methods: The incidence of nonocular SAEs was analyzed
`stratified by age ( < 85 years [n = 3795] vs ?::85 years [n = 993]),
`treatment (control, ranibizumab 0.3 mg, ranibizumab 0.5 mg,
`ranibizumab 2.0 mg), and injection frequency (monthly, as needed
`[PRN]).
`Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of key systemic SAEs,
`defined as total nonocular SAEs, deaths, cardiovascular events,
`cerebrovascular (CBV) events, and Antiplatelet Trialists' Collab(cid:173)
`orntion events.
`Results: The MARINA and ANCHOR trials bad greater rates
`of key SAEs for patients 2:85 years versus those < 85 years.
`Ranibizumab exposure did not increase the risk of most SAEs in
`elderly patients; for CBV events and death, the effect of ranibi(cid:173)
`zumab versus control treatment for age ?::85 years was not inter(cid:173)
`pretable due to small number of events (CBV: n = 2, 2, 5 for
`control, rdllibizumab 0.3 mg, and ranibizumab 0.5 mg, respec(cid:173)
`tively; death: n = 2, 4, 5, respectively). Across all 5 trials, an
`increased risk was found for age 2:85 years versus < 85 years for
`the marketed dose of ranibizumab 0.5 mg. In the HARBOR trial,
`increased rates of key SAEs (excluding total nonocular SAEs) for
`age 2:85 years versus < 85 years were observed with monthly
`dosing but not with PRN dosing; event rates were similar for 2.0
`mg versus 0.5 mg.
`Conclusions: Consistent with general trends, the risk of key
`systemic SAEs was associated with age 2:85 years versus < 85
`years, but not with ranibizumab dmg exposure. The difference
`between monthly versus PRN was inconclusive. There was no
`evidence of a dose effect. lnterpretation of this retrospective
`analysis is limited because it was not prospectively powered for
`statistically definitive conclusions.
`Ophlhalmology Retina 2018;2:667-675.
`
`Impact of Baseline Characteristics on
`Treatment Response to lntravitreal
`Aflibercept Injection for Wet Age-Related
`Macular Degeneration
`Allen C. Ho, MD, Namraw. Saroj, OD, Keirli Baker, MD, Robert
`Vitti, MD, Alyson]. Berliner, MD, PhD, Desmond ThomJ>son, PhD,
`Daniel B. Roth , MD
`
`Purpose: To determine whether wet age-related macular
`degeneration (AMO) treatment outcomes within prespeci.fied pa(cid:173)
`tient subgroups were consistent with overall study results.
`
`1131
`
`REGITC01 118688
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2316.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Additionally, this subanalysis investigated whether there were any
`relationships between baseline characteristics and evaluated treat(cid:173)
`ment outcomes.
`Design: Post hoc subanalysis of The VEGF Trap-Eye: Inves(cid:173)
`tigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMO (VIEW) l and 2, 2
`similarly dei;igned prospective, multicenter, double-ma~ked,
`acti ve-controUed, parallel-group, randomized clinical trials.
`Participants: Two thousand four hundred twelve patients with
`an active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion of
`any subtype secondary to AMO.
`Methods: Primary and key secondary visual end points at week
`52 were examined to explore the consistency of effect among
`prespecified subgroups of 5 baseline characteristics: age, best(cid:173)
`corrected visual acuity (BCV A), lesion type, lesion size, and
`central retinal thickness (CRT). Additionally, within-group ana(cid:173)
`lyses were conducted to detenn ine whether lhe mean changes in
`BCV A and CRT al 52 weeks were associated positively or nega(cid:173)
`tively with tbe baseline cbarncteristics of interest.
`Main Outcome Measures: Consistency of treatment outcomes
`among prespecified subgroups of baseline characteristics.
`Results: For each baseline characteristic, tests for interaction
`within each prespecified subgroup and among the subgroups were
`not significant, suggesting that relative visual outcomes for each
`treatment arm were consistent with overall study outcomes.
`Within-group analysis revealed a significant association between
`baseline age, BCV A, and lesion size with BCV A outcomes at 52
`weeks; namely, older age, greater BCVA, and larger lesion size
`were ,L~sociated with lower mean BCV A gains at 52 weeks.
`Conclusions: Patients in all subgroups of baseline age, BCV A,
`lesion type, lesion size, and CRT experienced visual outcomes
`consistent with those of the overall study population. Additionally,
`baseline older age, better BCV A, and larger CNV lesion size were
`found to be associated independently with lower mean BCV A
`gains after 52 weeks of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor
`therapy. The influence of baseline age, BCVA, and Cl\TV lesion
`size on treatment outcomes is consistent with other reports from
`large, prospective trials in wet AMO.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:676-683.
`
`Joint Contribution of Genetic Susceptibility
`and Modifiable Factors to the Progression
`of Age-Related Macular Degeneration over
`10 Years: The Three Continent AMD
`Consortium Report
`Nichole]oadiim, BSc(Hons), PhD, Annetre Kiftey, MA/>/>Suu, PhD,
`Johanna Maria Colijn, MD, MSc, Kristine E. Lee, MS, Gabrielle
`H.S. Buicendijk, MD, MSc, Barbara E.K. Klein, MD, MPH,
`Chelsea Myers , MStat, StaC)' M. Meuer, BS, Ava G. Tan, MAIT,
`MPH, Victoria Flood, MPH, PhD, Josje D. Sd1oufour, PhD, Oscar
`H. Fmnco, PhD, ElizabethG. Holliday, PhD, Jo/111 Attia, MD, PhD,
`Gerald Liew, MD, PhD, Sudha K. Iyengar, PhD, Pau!tts T.V.M. de
`Jong, MD, PhD, Albert Hofman, MD, PhD, Johannes R. Vingerling,
`MD, PhD, Paul Mirchell, MD, PhD, Ronald Klein , MD, MPH,
`Caroline C.W. Klaver, MD, PhD, Jie Jin Wang, MMed, PhD
`
`Purpose: To assess joint effect~ of genetic and modifiable
`factors on the 10-year progression of age-related macular degen(cid:173)
`eration (AMD).
`
`I I 32
`
`Design: Individual and pooled data analyses of 2 population(cid:173)
`based cohorts.
`Participants: Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES) and Rot(cid:173)
`terdam Study (RS) participants (n = 835).
`Methods: Participants of the BMES and RS were followed up
`over 10 years or more. Al b,L,eline and follow-up visits, interviews
`using questionnaires and eye examinations with retinal photog(cid:173)
`raphy we.re perfonned. Age-related macular degeneration was
`assessed by trained photographic graders and verified by retinal
`special.isl,. Genetic susceptibility to AM O meant carrying 2 or
`more risk alleles of the CFH or ARMS2 SNPs, or both (rsl061 l 70
`and rs10490924), relative to O or 1 risk allele. Discrete logistic
`regression models were used to investigate the joint associations of
`genetic susceptibility and either smoking, fish consumption, dietary
`intake of lutein-zeaxanthin, or combined environmental risk scores
`from the 3 modifiable factors with the risk of AMD progression.
`Odds rntios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (Cls) and synergy
`indexes are reported.
`Main Outcome Measure: Ten-year progression of AMD,
`categorized as any (?"..l step) or 2-step (?"..2 steps) progression on
`the Three Continent AMD Consortium 5-step severity scale.
`Results: Older age, the presence of AMD genetic susceptibility,
`and baseline AMO status were associated strongly with AMO
`progression (P < 0.0001). In analyses of pooled data, each addi(cid:173)
`tional score from the combined environmental risk scores was
`associated with an increased risk of 2-step progression over 10
`years (OR, 1.26; 95% Cl, 1.02-1.56). The copresence of AMO
`genetic susceptibility and combined risk score of 3 or more was
`associated with a substantially higher risk of 2-step progression
`compared with the presence of either factor alone. There wa~ a
`significant synergistic effect (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.07-15.95) and
`interaction (P = 0.025) between genetic susceptibility and envi(cid:173)
`ronmental risk score of 3 or more.
`Conclusions : Among persons with AMD genetic susceptibility
`and pre-existing early AMO lesions, presenting with high environ(cid:173)
`mental risk scores from 3 modifiable factors (smoking, infrequent
`consumption of fish, low lutein-zeaxanthin intake) were associated
`with an increa,ed risk of2-step progression over JO years.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:684-693.
`
`Suspended Scattering Particles in Motion: A
`Novel Feature of OCT Angiography in
`Exudative Maculopathies
`Amir H. Kashani, MD, PhD, Kyle M. Green, BA, Julie Kwon, MD,
`Zhongdi Chu, MS, Qinqin Zhang, PhD, Ruikang K. Wang, PhD,
`Sean Garrity, MD, David Sarra[, MD, Ca1·l B. Rebhun, BA, Nadia
`K. Waheed, MD, MPH, Karen B. Schaal, MD, Ma1"ion R. Munk,
`MD, PhD, Sarra Gauoussi, MD, K. Bailey Freund, MD, Fang
`Zheng, MD, Guanghui Liu, PhD, Philip J. Rosenfeld, MD, PhD
`
`Objective: To characterize features of extravascular OCT
`angiography (OCTA) signals corresponding to hyperreflective
`intraretinal fluid across various exudative maculopathies.
`Design: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study.
`Participants: Patients whose eyes had various fonns of
`exudative maculopathy,
`including diabetic retinopathy (DR),
`retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and neov,L,cular age-related macular
`degeneration (nvAMD).
`
`REG ITC01118689
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2316.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Methods: Patients with extravascular OCTA signal identified
`on en face OCTA images were included in this study. This signal
`was readily distinguishable from projection artifact~. The regions
`with the extravascular motion signal on OCTA were named
`"suspended scattering particles in motion" (SSPiM). Depth(cid:173)
`encoded, color en face OCTA images (3 mm x 3 mm) centered
`on the fovea and their corresponding structural OCT scans were
`used to quantify features of SSPiM and the corresponding hyper(cid:173)
`reflective fluid. Longitudinal data were collected when available.
`Main Outcome Measures: Anatomic location, the association
`with hyperreflective material, changes in location and appearance
`of SSPiM over time, and replication of SSPiM OCT A signal in an
`in vitro phantom.
`Results: Seventy-six eyes in 62 patients with various forms of
`exudative maculopathy were evaluated (60 eyes with DR, 9 eyes
`with RVO, and 5 eyes ovAMD, l eye with macroaneurysm, and 1
`eye with radiation retioopathy). lntraretioal accumulations of fluid
`with increased OCT signal intensity corresponded to regions of
`SSPiM in several exudative maculopathies. Ao in vitro phantom
`model demonstrates that particulate matter in suspension can
`generate a similar OCT A signal. SSPiM showed an anatomic
`preference for vascular-avascular junctions. The hyperreflective
`fluid corresponding to SSPiM appeared more frequently in the
`Henle fiber layer (HFL) than the inner nuclear layer (INL) and was
`highly associated with hyperreflective material (HRM) found
`bordering the fluid. In 5 of 8 longitudinal cases, the resolution of
`SSPiM resulted in the fonnatioo of confluent HRM. Clinically, this
`appeared as bard exudate on ti.mduscopic images.
`Conclusions: Clinical data suggest that SSPiM is a novel
`imaging feature of retinal vascular diseases that was not appre(cid:173)
`ciated before the use of OCTA. We characterized several novel
`features of SSPiM and demonstr<1ted that at least in some cases it
`resolves with residual hard exudate.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:694-702.
`
`Three-Year Results of Fluorescein
`Angiography Guided Standard
`Photodynamic Therapy with Multiple Spots
`for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
`loannis D. Ladas, MD, Konstantinos D. Andreanos, MD, Dimirrios
`S. Ladas, MD, Ma1·ilita M. Mosc/10s, MD, Tr)fon Rocsos, MD,
`Athanasios I. Kotsolis , MD
`
`Purpose: To report the long-term results of fluorescein angi(cid:173)
`ography (FA)-guided standard photodyoamic therapy (PDT) for
`centrnl serous cborioretinopathy (CSCR) and its adverse effects.
`Design: Prospective, noncomparative, ioterventional study.
`Participants: Consecutive patients (N = 63 eyes) with acute
`(39 eyes) or chronic (24 eyes) CSCR.
`Methods: All eyes underwent FA-guided conventional PDT,
`using multiple spots in 1 session if appropriate, and were assessed
`before PDT, as well as at months 3, 6, and 12 after PDT, and every
`6 months thereafter until the end of the 3-year follow-up time.
`Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures were
`the resolution of subretioal fluid (SRF) and the improvement of the
`Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to better than 20/100
`at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes were the changes
`in mean BCV A and centrnl foveal thickness (CFT) during the
`follow-up time.
`
`Results: All 63 eyes with acute or chronic CSCR demonstrated
`complete resolution of SRF at the end of the study. Of the studied
`eyes, 51 (80.95%) underwent a single PDT application. The mean
`CFT improved significantly at all time points in the acute CSCR
`group (P < 0.001) from 515.13± 110.5 ~Im to 297.75± 22.3 ~Im at
`3 years and in the chronic CSCR group from 484.12± 62.49 µm to
`293.81± 16.89 µm. At 3 years, a gain of more than 20/100 in
`Snellen BCVA was seen in 28 acute and 16 chronic CSCR PDT(cid:173)
`treated eyes (71.8% vs. 66.67%; P = 0.779). The mean logarithm
`of the minimum angle of resolution BCV A improved from
`0.349± 0.18 at baseline to 0.060± 0.06 at the end of the study
`(P < 0.001) for eyes with acute CSCR and from 0.502± 0.28
`to 0.198± 0.ll correspondingly for the eyes with chronic CSCR
`(P < 0.001). None of the study eyes demonstrated any serious
`systemic or ophthalmologic complication related to the use of the
`standard PDT with verteporfin.
`Conclusions: Fluorescein angiogrnpby-guided conventional
`PDT achieved outcomes for acute and cbrooic CSCR comparable
`with those reported with modified PDT techniques. We did not
`identify new safety concerns.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:703-711.
`
`Swept-Source OCT Angiography of
`Serpiginous Choroiditis
`Kaioon Pakzad-Vaezi, MD, Kosar Khaksari, PhD, Z/1ongdi Chu,
`MSc, Russell N. Van Gelder, MD, PhD, Ruikang K. Wang, PhD,
`Kathryn L. Pepple, MD, PhD
`
`Purpose: To examine and quantify choriocapillaris lesions in
`active and quiescent serpiginous choroiditis (SC) using swept(cid:173)
`source (SS) OCT angiography (OCTA) and en face image analysis.
`Design: Prospective, observational case series.
`Participants: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of SC.
`Methods: A SS-OCT A prototype was used to image active and
`quiescent serpiginous lesions longitudinally before and after anti(cid:173)
`inflammatory treatment. En face slabs of cboriocapillaris flow or
`outer nuclear layer structure were generated from OCfA and OCT
`data, respectively.
`Main Outcome Measures: Qualitative and quantitative ana(cid:173)
`lyses on lesion boundary and area using a semiautomated MAT(cid:173)
`LAB algorithm. Lesions also were compared with trnditional
`multimodal imaging.
`Results: Six eyes of 3 patients were imaged. Choroidal lesions
`were identified and analyzed in 4 of 6 eyes. Lesions with well(cid:173)
`defined boundaries were identified in the choriocapillaris slab in
`areas of both active and inactive cboroiditis. The cboriocapillaris
`slab lesion size and shape showed good correlation with lesions
`identified on indocyanine green angiogrnpby. The cboriocapillaris
`slab lesion area increased with disease activity and decreased with
`corticosteroid treatment. During active disease, the choriocapillaris
`slab lesion area was larger than both the outer nuclear layer (ONL)
`slab and fundus autofluorescence lesion areas. Active chorioca(cid:173)
`pillar:is slab lesions not associated with corresponding abnonnal
`autofluorescence resolved without clinical scarring after treatment.
`In inactive scars, the areas of retinal and choriocapillaris lesions
`were si1ni.lar and d id not change over time.
`Conclusions: En face analysis of SS-OCTA cboriocapi.llaris
`flow voids provide a noninvasive method for the detection of
`lesions in patients with SC. The presence of lesions in the
`
`I 133
`
`REGITC01 118690
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2316.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`choriocapillaris in the absence of retinal pigment epithelium
`and outer retinal abnormalities supports the hypothesis that
`choriocapillaris is the primary site of pathologic features in
`SC and may be a sensitive early sign of disease activity. We
`propose a simple grading system of SC lesions based on SS(cid:173)
`OCTA and fundus autofluorescence findings. Swept-source
`OCTA is a promising noninvasive method for monitoring
`patients with SC.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:712-719.
`
`Characteristics of Retinal Breaks and
`Surgical Outcomes in Rhegmatogenous
`Retinal Detachment in Familial Exudative
`Vitreoretinopathy
`Satoshi Katagiri, MD, PhD, Tad.as/ii Yokoi, MD, PhD, Tomo:yo
`Yoshida,Uemura, MD, Sachiko Nishina, MD, PhD, Noriyuki Azuma,
`MD, PliD
`
`Purpose: To determine the characteristics of retinal breaks and
`surgical outcomes in eyes with a rhegmatogenous retinal detach(cid:173)
`ment (RRD) with f,unilial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR).
`Design: Retrospective, noncomparntive case series.
`Participants: Thirty-seven patients (46 eyes) with a RRD in
`FEVR.
`Methods: The medical records were reviewed and tbe types,
`directions, and positions of the retinal breaks and surgical out(cid:173)
`comes were analyzed.
`Main Outcome Measures: Fundus examinations, including
`opbthalmoscopy, fiuorescein angiography, and RetCam imaging
`(Natus Medical Incorporated, Pleasanton, CA).
`Results: The retinal breaks were identified as tears in 12 eyes,
`atrophic boles in 24 eyes, tears and atrophic holes in 2 eyes,
`dialysis-related in l eye, a retinal break in the ora sem1ta in 1 eye,
`and unidentified in 6 eyes. Most retinal breaks (86.1 %) were
`identified only in the temporal retina. Most tears (85.7%) were
`observed on the demarcation line, whereas atrophic holes were
`identified both on the demarcation line (53.8%) and the avascular
`retina (42.3%). The representative tears were almond-shaped,
`which differs from the typical horseshoe-shaped tears. Sciera!
`buckling was performed as the initial surgery in 37 eyes and
`resulted in reattachment in 35 eyes (94.6%). Vitrectomy with or
`without scleral buck.le was perfonned for eyes with more complex
`RRD in FEVR and resulted in reattachment in 5 of 9 eyes (55 .6% ).
`In total, reattachment was achieved in 40 of 46 eyes (87 .0 % ). There
`was a history of stage l A or 2A FEVR in 45 eyes and a history of
`stage 28 FEVR in l eye.
`Conclusions: Our data clarified the types, directions, and
`positions of the retinal breaks and the effectiveness of sclernl
`buck.ling as the first surgical choice for treating RRDs in FEVR.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:720-725.
`
`Number of Hyperreflective Foci in the Outer
`Retina Correlates with Inflammation and
`Photoreceptor Degeneration in Retinitis
`Pigmentosa
`Yosuke Nagasaka, MD, Yasuki lr.o, MD, Shinji Ueno, MD, Himko
`Terasaki, MD
`
`1134
`
`Purpose: Hyperreflective foci (HRF) in the outer retina are
`associated with the progression of multiple retinal diseases, but
`their pathogenic significance in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) remains
`obscure. We studied outer retinal HRF number and distribution in
`RP using spectral-domain (SD) OCT and assessed associations
`with visual field loss, retinal inflammation, and photoreceptor
`degenerntion.
`Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
`Participants: Medical records of 128 eyes of 66 RP patients
`(mean age, 45.7± 16.l years; range, 10-85 years).
`Methods: All participants underwent high-resolution SD-OCT.
`Outer retinal HRF were counted on vertical and horizontal SD-OCT
`images centered at the fovea of 55 eyes of 29 patients. In addition,
`SD-OCT macular volume scans of 92 eyes of 48 patients were
`reviewed and compared with fundus autofluorescence images of the
`same area to investigate outer retinal HRF distri.bution and the spatial
`relations to areas of low autofluorescence and photoreceptor inner
`segment and outer segment junction (IS/OS) preservation.
`Main Outcome Measures: The number and distribution of
`outer retinal HRF, aqueous flare value, thickness of outer layen;,
`visual field area, and fundus autofluorescence.
`Results: In the HRF counting analysis, the mean number of
`outer retinal HRF per scan was 24.0± 18.6, mean aqueous flare
`value was 7.7±3.2 photon count/ms, visual field area was
`25.2± 26.6%, and thickness of the outer layers was 95.2± 39.6 µm.
`Generalized estimating equations revealed that the number of outer
`retinal l{Rf was associated positively with aqueous flare value
`(P = 0.01) and associated negatively with visual field area and
`outer layer thickness (P = 0.016 and P < 0.001, respectively). In
`the distribution analysis, macular areas exhibiting outer retinal
`HRF (HRF areas) spatially overlapped with areas of low auto(cid:173)
`fluorescence. In contrast, HRF areas did not overlap with areas
`showing preserved IS/OS.
`Conclusions: Outer retinal HRF number is a%ociated with
`intraocular inflammation and photoreceptor degeneration in RP.
`Their distribution in areas with IS/OS dismption and low auto(cid:173)
`fluorescence suggests that outer retina.I HRF reflect defects in the
`retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layer caused by RPE cell or
`microgl.ial migration in response to photoreceptor degeneration.
`Ophthalmology Retina 2018;2:726-734.
`
`Ultra-Widefield Fundus Autofluorescence
`Imaging of Patients with Retinitis
`Pigmentosa: A Standardized Grading
`System in Different Genotypes
`Amir H. Hariri, MD, \Vei Gui, MD, Ghazala A. Dawo O'Keefe,
`MD, Michael S. Ip, MD, SriniVas R. SIJllda, MD, Michael 8. Gorin,
`MD, PhD
`
`Purpose: To report a genotype-phenotype correlation study of
`patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) b,t~ed on ultra-widefield
`(lJWF) fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.
`Design: Case series.
`Participants: Thirty-four patients with RP.
`Methods: This retrospective study included RP patients with
`confirmed causative genetic variants and UWF FAF imaging data.
`Qualitative grading criteria including the pattern of macular
`abnormal autofluorescence, decreased autofluorescence (DAF), and
`
`REGITC01 118691
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2316.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`its extent and distribution were applied to evaluate the genotype(cid:173)
`phenotype correlation.
`Main Outcome Measures: The main parameters measured
`patterns
`and
`extent of
`increased or decrea~ed
`were
`autofluorescence.
`Results: Thirty-four unrelated patients 38± 19 years of age
`(nmge, 9-82 yean;) were enrolled. Mutations in 17 different genes
`were detected in patients, including 7 patients having mutations in
`USH2A, 4 in DHDDS, 4 in RPGR, 3 in PRPFJJ, and 3 in RPI.
`Patients with nummular OAF and widespread DAF were signifi(cid:173)
`cantly older (59± 14 yean; and 56± 19 years, respectively). All 3
`
`patients with PRPFJJ mutations showed an abnonnal macular ring
`hypernutofluorescence and a circular pattern of coarse DAF
`distributed in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study fields 1,
`2, and 3 with sparing of the far periphery. In other genotypes, no
`specific DAF or macular abnormal autofluorescence pattern could
`be discerned.
`Conclusions: Specific lJWF FAF cbarncteristics in RP patients
`were correlated strongly with patient age and stage of the disease.
`Particular lJWF FAF characteristics were found to be more promi(cid:173)
`nent in a unique genotype.
`Ophthalmology Rerina 2018;2:735-745.
`
`I 135
`
`REGITC01118692
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2316.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket