throbber
C)phthaln1ic Pearls
`
`RETINA
`
`How to Give
`I ntravitreal Injections
`
`BY MICHELLE E . WILSON, BS, AND ADRIENNE W . SCOTT, MD
`
`EDITED BY INGRID U . SCOTT, MD, MPH, AND SHARON FEKRAT, MD
`
`ntravitreal injection enables
`highly targeted drug therapy,
`maximizing therapeutic drug
`delivery to the posterior pole
`while minimizing systemic
`toxicity. With the increasing use of
`intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the
`treatment of neovascular age-related
`macular degeneration (AMD), dia(cid:173)
`betic macular edema, retinal vein
`occlusion, and various other retinal
`vascular disorders, intravitreal injec(cid:173)
`tion has become the most common
`ophthalmic procedure performed in
`the United States.
`This review offers practical guid(cid:173)
`ance for the delivery of intravitreal
`injections based on published, peer(cid:173)
`reviewed literature, and expert consen(cid:173)
`sus where evidence is lacking.
`
`Overview
`Background and indications. Intra(cid:173)
`vitreal injection was first described
`in 1911 with the use of an air bubble
`to tamponade a retinal detachment.
`Triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog)
`became the first intravitreal agent
`with widespread application, used as a
`treatment for macular edema associ(cid:173)
`ated with a variety of etiologies, such
`as diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein
`occlusion. It also was used as an ad(cid:173)
`junct to photodynamic therapy in the
`treatment of choroidal neovasculariza(cid:173)
`tion (CNV) related to AMD.
`Potential complications. These
`include intraocular inflammation,
`retinal detachment or perforation,
`traumatic lens damage, intraocular
`
`hemorrhage, sustained ocular hyper(cid:173)
`tension, and hypotony. 1
`Of all postinjection complications,
`endophthalmitis has greatest potential
`to be visually devastating. According
`to studies assessing the safety profile
`of intravitreal injection, the rate of en(cid:173)
`dophthalmitis has been found to be as
`low as 0.05 percent per injection.2
`Contraindications. Active external
`eye infection (including conjuncti(cid:173)
`vitis, meibomianitis, and significant
`blepharitis) is a contraindication to
`intravitreal injection and should be
`treated prior to injection.3 Glaucoma is
`common among patients requiring in(cid:173)
`travitreal injection and is not a contra(cid:173)
`indication to therapy despite the tran(cid:173)
`sient rise in intraocular pressure (IOP)
`that may occur following injection.
`Despite the theoretical increased risk
`of intraocular hemorrhage in patients
`on long-term anticoagulation who
`receive intravitreal injection, that risk
`has not been substantiated in studies.
`
`Preinjection Risk Management
`We recommend the following steps:
`1) Apply a topical anesthetic; 2) apply
`5 percent or 10 percent povidone(cid:173)
`iodine drops and/or periocular povi(cid:173)
`done-iodine eyelid preparation; 3) in(cid:173)
`sert a sterile speculum to separate the
`lids; and 4) reapply povidone-iodine
`immediately over the injection site
`prior to injection.
`Local anesthetic. Nearly all injec(cid:173)
`tions are performed with local anes(cid:173)
`thesia, with topical anesthetic drops
`employed most commonly. Studies
`
`show no significant difference in injec(cid:173)
`tion-related pain with the use of topi(cid:173)
`cal drops, subconjunctival anesthesia,
`or topical anesthetic gel. There is some
`concern that viscous anesthetic gel
`may prevent adequate sterilization of
`the ocular surface.
`Povidone-iodine. Povidone-iodine
`is the only agent shown to decrease
`bacterial colonization as well as the
`risk of endophthalmitis. Application
`ofpovidone-iodine to the conjunctival
`surface, eyelids, and lashes is recom(cid:173)
`mended prior to introducing the sterile
`speculum. (The speculum prevents
`the needle tip from touching the lids
`or lashes prior to needle insertion.)
`Studies have found that a 5 percent
`povidone-iodine solution is as effec(cid:173)
`tive as 10 percent and is less irritating
`to the eye. There is controversy as to
`
`EYE N ET
`
`45
`
`. ,
`a .
`
`,:
`I a
`
`0
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2305.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`whether using drops or a flush is more
`effective. We recommend reapplication
`of povidone-iodine immediately over
`the injection site prior to injection.
`Antibiotics. The use of preinjection
`antibiotics is controversial. There is
`evidence showing decreased coloniza-
`tion of the ocular surface with the use
`of preinjection antibiotics, particularly
`in conjunction with povidone-iodine;
`however, there is no evidence to sug-
`gest that the use of preinjection anti-
`biotics actually decreases the risk of
`endophthalmitis. Moreover, repeat
`injections are associated with more
`resistant flora.
`Using a face mask. The use of a
`face mask for the injecting physician,
`injection assistants, and the patient is
`not currently considered standard of
`care.4 However, recovery of common
`respiratory flora from vitreous culture
`aspirates in patients diagnosed with
`endophthalmitis after intravitreal
`injection strongly supports efforts to
`minimize talking, coughing, or sneez-
`ing during the injection procedure.5
`Bilateral injections. For bilateral
`injections, we recommend separate
`preparation of each eye. Separate in-
`struments and medication vials should
`be used for each eye to decrease the risk
`of potential bilateral contamination.
`IOP rise. A transient, volume-relat-
`ed rise in IOP is common following in-
`jection. There is no evidence to suggest
`that prophylactic IOP-lowering agents
`are effective in preventing the post-
`injection volume-mediated IOP spike,
`and their use is not recommended.
`
`Peri-injection Risk Management
`Injection volume. An injection volume
`of 0.05 mL is most commonly used.
`The maximum safe volume to inject
`without preinjection paracentesis is
`believed to be 0.1 mL to 0.2 mL. Larger
`injection volumes are uncommon,
`with two exceptions: the injection of
`gas for pneumatic retinopexy and the
`injection of multiple intravitreal agents
`in one session.
`Needle selection. Needle size varies
`according to the substance injected,
`with 27-gauge needles often used for
`crystalline substances such as triam-
`
`46 a p r i l 2 0 1 3
`
`cinolone acetonide and 30-gauge nee-
`dles commonly used for the anti-VEGF
`agents ranibizumab, bevacizumab,
`and aflibercept. Studies suggest that
`smaller, sharper needles require less
`force for penetration and result in less
`drug reflux. Some physicians have
`begun using 31-gauge needles (the size
`commonly used by diabetic patients to
`test blood sugar and inject insulin), as
`smaller needle size may decrease pa-
`tient discomfort.
`Needle length between 0.5 and
`0.62 inches (12.7 to 15.75 mm) is rec-
`ommended, as longer needles may
`increase risk of retinal injury if the
`patient accidentally moves forward
`during the procedure.
`Injection site. The patient should
`be instructed to direct his or her gaze
`away from the site of needle entry (Fig.
`1). The injection is placed 3 to 3.5 mm
`posterior to the limbus for an aphakic
`or pseudophakic eye, and 3.5 to 4 mm
`posterior to the limbus for a phakic
`eye. Injection in the inferotemporal
`quadrant is common, although any
`quadrant may be used.
`Sterile ophthalmic calipers or the
`hub of a sterile tuberculin syringe may
`be used to mark the injection site and
`to verify that adequate anesthesia has
`been achieved.
`Injection technique. Some guide-
`lines suggest pulling the conjunctiva
`over the injection site with forceps or a
`sterile cotton swab to create a steplike
`entry path. While this approach may,
`in theory, decrease reflux and risk of
`infection, a straight injection path is
`most commonly employed.6
`After the sclera is penetrated, the
`needle is advanced toward the center
`of the globe and the solution is gently
`injected into the midvitreous cavity.
`The needle is removed, and a sterile
`cotton swab is immediately placed over
`the injection site to prevent reflux.
`
`Postinjection Risk Management
`Antibiotics. These are used by many
`physicians postinjection and often
`consist of a fourth-generation fluoro-
`quinolone. However, as with preinjec-
`tion antibiotics, there is no evidence
`showing clinical benefit of use. Ex-
`
`perimental evidence suggests insuf-
`ficient penetration into the vitreous
`to prevent infection. There is also an
`increase in resistant bacterial strains
`with repeated use.
`IOP measurement. Postinjection
`IOP may be measured, especially
`for patients who have glaucoma,
`who are receiving large injection vol-
`umes, or who complain of pain or
`reduced vision. Some guidelines rec-
`ommend a funduscopic examination
`after each injection to assess central
`retinal artery perfusion and identify
`injection-related hemorrhage or retinal
`detachment. Instead, many physicians
`employ functional tests such as a de-
`termination of at least counting fingers
`vision or assessment of absence of light
`perception.
`Central retinal artery occlusion is
`indicated by the absence of light per-
`ception. In this case, paracentesis is in-
`dicated in an attempt to restore central
`retinal artery perfusion immediately.
`Vision is typically recovered quickly
`after decreasing IOP with rapid para-
`centesis. Routine pre- or postinjection
`paracentesis is not recommended for
`standard 0.05 mL intravitreal injec-
`tions.
`Complications. Transient, mild
`elevations of IOP are common, al-
`though IOP usually drops below 30
`mmHg 15 to 20 minutes postinjection
`and returns to within 4 to 5 mmHg
`of baseline after 30 minutes. IOP nor-
`malization may take slightly longer in
`patients with glaucoma.
`As noted above, endophthalmitis is
`the most feared complication of intra-
`vitreal injection, because of the poten-
`tial for severe vision loss.
`If postinjection endophthalmitis is
`suspected, recommended management
`includes immediate vitreous tap (for
`culture) and injection of intravitreal
`antibiotics (vancomycin 1 mg/0.1 mL
`and ceftazidime 2.25 mg/0.1 mL). Ur-
`gent vitrectomy may be considered.
`Pseudoendophthalmitis is a sterile
`inflammatory reaction that does not
`involve true microbial infection. This
`has been reported most commonly
`following injection of triamcinolone
`acetonide and bevacizumab. Unlike
`
`O p h t h a l m i c Pe a r l s
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2305.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`true endophthalmitis, pseudoendo(cid:173)
`phthalmitis occurs earlier, typically
`within one day of injection, and often
`subsides without specific treatment.
`Follow-up. After the injection,
`all patients should be provided with
`information regarding the signs and
`symptoms of complications, such as
`eye pain or discomfort, redness, pho(cid:173)
`tophobia, and diminished vision. Pa(cid:173)
`tients should be instructed to contact
`the physician's office immediately if
`symptoms develop.
`
`NOTE: For a slideshow of images illustrating
`the steps outlined in this article, go to www.
`eyenet.org. lt will be available in mid-April.
`
`1 Jager RD et al. Retina. 2004;24(5):676-698.
`2 Bhavsar AR et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;
`144(3):454-456.
`3 Aiello LP et al. Retina. 2004;24(5 suppl):
`S3-S19.
`4 Schimel AM et al. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;
`129 (12) :1607-1609.
`5 McCannel CA. Retina. 2011;31( 4):654-661.
`6 Knecht PB et al. Retina. 2009;29(3):1175-
`1181.
`
`Ms. Wilson is a medical st11dent and research
`assistant, and Dr. Scott is assistant professor
`of ophthalmology; both are at the Wilmer Eye
`Institllte. The authors report no related finan(cid:173)
`cial interests.
`
`Got Pearls?
`
`INTERESTED IN SHARING TIPS WITH
`YOUR COLLEAGUES?
`Write a Pearls article!
`Ophthalmic Pearls, EyeNet Magazine
`655 Beach Street
`San Francisco, CA 94109
`eyenet@aao.org
`
`Writers guidelines are available at
`www.eyenet.org under the "Write
`for Us" tab at the top of the screen.
`Samples of previous columns can be
`provided upon request.
`
`ARE YOU A RESIDENT? A resident ar(cid:173)
`ticle published in Ophthalmic Pearls
`wi ll satisfy the RRC requirements for
`resident scholarly activity.
`
`Round Out Your Clinical Knowledge With
`Focal Points
`
`Clinical
`pearls from
`Academy experts,
`delivered yeor(cid:173)
`round!
`
`Get the concise1 cltnJcolly relevant knowledge you need!
`F.<Jch Fo<:,cl Points luue focm1t~ on a •pec:W.c ()f)ht hcilmlc topic, with
`to-the-point dlscussk>ns of dlognosls, treatment ond the latest reseorch
`
`All knowledge gaps ood stay up lo dote with ~ompact d inkRI
`guldoncc wrltte-n by e-,cpcrts
`Refer to u5etul tables, diagni-ms, p-horo1 and surgical Yidco1.
`Chooffl the l~nlng styln you prnf er-prlnt or onllno
`Earn up 10 2 AMA PRA Cotogory I Cuxfrts ... pcir modulo.
`Subscribe ann1JOlly and receive 12 issues per yegr.
`. -
`Fcca'.Points
`
`2013 Highlights
`m,1e~ :wbjK't lo change)
`• Medical Treatment of Glcucomo
`• lntiooculor Lens A:)wc,,(cid:173)
`Colcvlollon In Pati(tnts With Prl«
`Rcfroctrve Surgery
`• Glovccmo Progression;
`Structure and Function
`• lmplona in Ophtholmlc Pla5tk
`Surgery
`• Menage-men! ol Orbitol Troumo
`• Evolvotlon end Treotrncnt of the
`Tearing Pot1«1t
`• Her~ltory Moculopothle,
`• DKJ900stic Approach to Uveitk
`• M01querade Svr,dromn
`
`Choose
`print or
`online
`
`Subscribe
`annually or buy
`individual
`issues onlinc
`
`Get ophthalmic
`info rou can' t miss !
`Visit www.aao.org/focolpoint, or coll + 1 41S.561 .8540
`
`CME Information (!Mir Focol Polnu l.uue)
`n,.. .Am,,ti,cr," ~ nf Opl,thnlmclnqf it ......,....,tJtNI bv ti,,, AC'rN'ri.i1nrr<W1 C()l..,.11 fnr
`Ccn1Jnui119 M«lical Educoti011 l!O .,..,.ide conti"uJng medical educatlan lo, ph;,•rcW>nL
`1lw Ameria:in A..od,,my of Opl,Jhalmologv d.,.1gna1 .. 1Jw. l'ndu,v,g mal..-.,1 lot a maaJmum
`of 2 AMA Pl?AC.Ou,go,r I c...f,o ... ~,..d,o,.ld d""" otllv!ho c,o,d.1 C4mrn.,,.,...,rau
`w,rh 1"" ._,,.n1 ol rhtl! PortlciP<Mt00111 rh. ~
`-
`
`Q~ AMERICAN ACAO[MY
`\,.V Of OPHfHALM0l0C.V
`JJ._ f•• \tt) t ....... ,,.,,,.,.
`
`EYE N ET
`
`47
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2305.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket