throbber
REVIEW ARTICLE
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1): 75-93
`0012-6667/07/0001-0075/$49.95/0
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Ocular Adverse Effects Associated
`with Systemic Medications
`Recognition and Management
`
`Ricardo M. Santaella and Frederick W. Fraunfelder
`Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
`
`Contents
`Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
`1. Categorising Adverse Drug-Related Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
`2. Medications and Adverse Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
`2.1 Bisphosphonates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
`2.2 Antiepileptic Drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
`2.2.1 Topiramate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
`2.2.2 Vigabatrin and Tiagabine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
`2.3 Isotretinoin and Other Retinoids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
`2.4 Ethambutol and Isoniazid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
`2.5 Amiodarone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
`2.6 Hydroxychloroquine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
`2.7 Erectile Dysfunction Agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
`2.8 Tamoxifen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
`2.9 Cyclo-Oxygenase-2 Inhibitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
`2.10 Nicotinic Acid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
`2.11 Herbal Medications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
`2.11.1 Canthaxanthine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.2 Chamomile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.3 Datura . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.4 Echinacea purpurea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.5 Ginkgo biloba . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.6 Liquorice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.7 Vitamin A (Retinol) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
`2.11.8 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
`3. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
`
`Abstract
`
`This article reviews several retrospective case series and reported adverse
`events regarding common ocular adverse effects related to systemic therapy. It is
`not intended as a comprehensive summary of these well described adverse drug
`reactions, nor is it intended to cover the complete spectrum of all ocular adverse
`effects of systemic therapy. Many systemic drugs may produce ocular toxicity,
`including bisphosphonates, topiramate, vigabatrin, isotretinoin and other reti-
`noids, amiodarone, ethambutol, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, tamoxifen,
`quetiapine, cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, erectile dysfunction agents and
`some herbal medications. For this review, the certainty of the adverse effect
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`76
`
`Santaella & Fraunfelder
`
`profile of each medication was evaluated according to the WHO Causality
`Assessment Guide.
`A certain relationship has been established for pamidronate and alendronate as
`causes of scleritis, uveitis, conjunctivitis and blurred vision. Topiramate has been
`established as adversely causing symptoms consistent with acute angle-closure
`glaucoma, typically bilateral. Vigabatrin has been shown to cause bilateral irre-
`versible visual field defects attributed to underlying medication-induced retinal
`pathology. Isotretinoin should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any
`patient with pseudotumour cerebri. Patients taking amiodarone and hydroxy-
`chloroquine should be monitored and screened regularly for development of optic
`neuropathy and maculopathy, respectively. Sildenafil has been reported to cause
`several changes in visual perception and is a possible, not yet certain, cause of
`anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Patients taking tamoxifen should also be
`monitored for development of dose-dependent maculopathy and decreased colour
`vision. COX-2 inhibitors should be included in the differential diagnosis of
`reversible conjunctivitis. Several herbal medications including canthaxanthine,
`chamomile, datura, Echinacea purpurea, Ginkgo biloba and liquorice have also
`been associated with several ocular adverse effects.
`It is the role of all healthcare professionals to detect, treat and educate the
`public about adverse reactions to medications as they are an important health
`problem.
`
`er, if undetected, toxic effects may progress and
`The term ‘side effect’ usually refers to an unde-
`cause irreversible ocular damage often with an asso-
`sired or negative effect of medication that is extrane-
`ciated reduction in visual function.[3,4]
`ous to the intended therapy. When the effect is
`negative, the term ‘adverse effect’ is used. Drug-
`For ophthalmic drugs to be effective, they must
`induced ocular adverse effects are the second most
`reach ocular tissue in relatively high concentrations.
`frequent reason for claims against ophthalmolo-
`There are several different administration routes for
`gists.[1,2] This may not be surprising given that pre-
`ophthalmic drugs, including the topical, oral, paren-
`scribing medications is the most common therapeu-
`teral, periocular, intracameral (intraocular adminis-
`tic service provided by physicians. According to the
`tration into the anterior segment) and intravitreal
`National Center for Health Statistics, new or contin-
`routes. Topical application is the most common
`ued medications are ordered or provided at 41% of
`route of administration because it is simple, less
`visits to an ophthalmologist’s office. Because seri-
`invasive and does not involve the passage of drugs
`ous injury can occur, drug-related adverse effects
`through the blood-aqueous barrier. However, some
`can be costly to defend, indemnify or settle.[2]
`disorders require systemic drug administration to
`achieve adequate therapeutic levels of the drug in
`The rich blood supply and relatively small mass
`and around the ocular tissues.
`of the eye make it particularly susceptible to drug-
`Certain factors increase the probability of an
`induced adverse reactions. Adverse ocular reactions
`adverse ocular reaction. One such factor is use of a
`to drugs are diverse. Drug molecules present in the
`system may become selectively deposited in specif- medication over long periods of time, for example,
`ic ocular tissues such as the cornea, lens and retina,
`in cases of arthritic and cardiovascular diseases. In
`causing varied symptoms of drug toxicity. Fortu-
`some patients, it may be difficult to establish wheth-
`nately, most adverse reactions induced by systemic
`er ocular pathology is caused by the condition being
`medications are reversible if detected early. Howev-
`treated or by a drug used to treat the condition.
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ocular Adverse Effects Associated with Systemic Medications
`
`77
`
`We performed a MEDLINE literature search us-
`Patient age is also a significant factor in the preva-
`ing the following keywords: ‘ocular’, ‘visual’, ‘eye’,
`lence of ocular drug reactions. Older patients are
`‘side effects’, ‘adverse effects’, ‘medication’ and
`more likely to have used medications for protracted
`‘treatment’. Some of the medication adverse effects
`periods. Also, the metabolism and excretion of a
`obtained through this search are summarised below;
`drug can be affected by decreased efficiency of the
`these were selected at the authors’ discretion, taking
`kidney and liver secondary to the patient’s age, or by
`into account some of the more recent published
`conditions adversely affecting these organs.[3,4]
`medication adverse effects, and are not presented in
`Some drug responses cannot be predicted from any particular order. This brief review is not intend-
`the drug’s pharmacological mode of action. A ge-
`ed as a comprehensive summary of these well de-
`netic basis may underlie many of these unpredict-
`scribed adverse drug reactions, nor is it intended to
`able responses, as observed in the rapid rise in
`cover the complete spectrum of all ocular adverse
`intraocular pressure reported with topical corticoste-
`effects of systemic therapy. Interested readers are
`encouraged to refer to textbooks cited within the
`roids.[5]
`references.
`The prevalence of adverse reactions is closely
`associated with drug dosage. Most reported ocular
`reactions occur when the dose is beyond the thera-
`peutic range. It is essential that clinicians try to
`establish whether the ocular problem coincided with
`the start of drug therapy or with a change in drug
`dosage. A useful marker is seen when the onset of
`the reaction coincides with commencement of the
`medication, but reactions can occur at any time
`during or after a course of medication, and can
`continue for years after cessation.
`
`The WHO Causality Assessment Guide of Sus-
`pected Adverse Reactions was used to classify the
`reported adverse drug-related events into the follow-
`ing categories: certain, probable/likely, possible, un-
`likely, conditional/unclassified and unassessable/
`unclassifiable.[6] The ‘certain’ category includes
`plausible time relationship to drug administration
`
`1. Categorising Adverse
`Drug-Related Events
`
`Table I. WHO definitions: causality assessment of suspected adverse reactions (reproduced from Brick,[2] with permission)
`
`Certain
`A clinical event, including a laboratory test abnormality, occurring in a plausible time relationship to drug administration, and which
`cannot be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals. The response to withdrawal of the drug (dechallenge) should
`be clinically plausible. The event must be definitive pharmacologically or phenomenologically, using a satisfactory rechallenge procedure
`if necessary
`Probable/Likely
`A clinical event, including laboratory test abnormality, with a reasonable time sequence to administration of the drug, unlikely to be
`attributed to concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals, and which follows a clinically reasonable response on withdrawal
`(dechallenge). Rechallenge information is not required to fulfill this definition
`Possible
`A clinical event, including laboratory test abnormality, with a reasonable time sequence to administration of the drug, but which could
`also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals. Information on drug withdrawal may be lacking or unclear
`Unlikely
`A clinical event, including laboratory test abnormality, with a temporal relationship to drug administration which makes a causal
`relationship improbable, and in which other drugs, chemicals or underlying disease provide plausible explanations
`Conditional/Unclassified
`A clinical event, including laboratory test abnormality, reported as an adverse reaction, about which more data is essential for a proper
`assessment or the additional data are under examination
`Unassessable/Unclassifiable
`A report suggesting an adverse reaction which cannot be judged because information is insufficient or contradictory, and which cannot
`be supplemented or verified
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`78
`
`Santaella & Fraunfelder
`
`Table II. Classification of adverse ocular effects associated with medication usage
`
`Medication
`Pamidronate
`
`Alendronate
`
`Risedronate
`
`Etidronate
`
`Topiramate
`
`Isotretinoin
`
`Amiodarone
`
`Certain
`Blurred vision
`Pain
`Photophobia
`Ocular irritation
`Nonspecific conjunctivitis
`Anterior uveitis (rare posterior)
`Anterior scleritis (rare posterior)
`Episcleritis
`
`Blurred vision
`Pain
`Conjunctivitis
`Uveitis
`Scleritis
`
`No effects
`
`Blurred vision
`
`Acute glaucoma (mainly bilateral)
`Anterior chamber shallowing
`Increased ocular pressure
`Mydriasis
`Suprachoroidal effusions
`
`Abnormal meibomian gland secretion
`Blepharoconjunctivitis
`Corneal opacities
`Decreased dark adaptation
`Decreased tolerance for contact lens wear
`Decreased vision
`Increased tear osmolarity
`Keratitis
`Meibomian gland atrophy
`Myopia
`Ocular sicca
`Ocular discomfort
`Photophobia
`Pseudotumour cerebri
`Teratogenic ocular abnormalities
`
`Aggravated sicca (drug in tears)
`Blepharoconjunctivitis
`Bright lights
`Coloured haloes around lights
`Corneal microdeposits
`Glare
`Hazy vision
`Photosensitivity
`Periocular skin pigmentation
`Thyroid eye disease
`Visual sensations
`
`Possible
`Probable
`Periocular, lid, and/or orbital Diplopia
`oedema
`Visual hallucinations
`Yellow vision
`Retrobulbar neuritis
`Cranial nerve palsy
`
`Diplopia
`
`Glaucoma
`
`Conjunctivitis
`Pain
`Scleritis
`Uveitis
`Blurred vision
`
`Conjunctivitis
`
`Blepharospasm
`Oculogyric crisis
`Retinal bleeds
`Uveitis
`
`Decreased colour vision
`Permanent loss of dark
`adaptation
`
`Diplopia
`Papilloedema
`Episcleritis
`
`Diplopia
`
`Scleritis
`Teratogenic effects, including
`ocular malformations
`
`Corneal ulcers
`Diplopia
`Eyelid oedema
`Optic neuritis
`Idiopathic intracranial
`hypertension with optic disc
`oedema
`Permanent sicca-like syndrome
`Subconjunctival haemorrhage
`
`Autoimmune reaction (dry mouth,
`dry eyes, peripheral neuropathy
`and pneumonitis)
`
`Anterior subcapsular lens
`opacities
`Corneal ulceration
`Loss of eyelashes or
`eyebrows
`Non-arteritic ischaemic optic
`neuropathy
`Pseudotumour cerebri
`
`Continued next page
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ocular Adverse Effects Associated with Systemic Medications
`
`79
`
`Table II. Contd
`
`Medication
`Sildenafil
`
`Tamoxifen
`
`COX-2 inhibitors
`
`Nicotinic acid
`
`Certain
`Changes in colour perception
`coloured tinge
`decreased colour vision
`dark colours appear darker
`Blurred vision
`central haze
`transitory decreased vision
`Changes in light perception
`increased perception of brightness
`flashing lights, especially when blinking
`ERG changes
`Conjunctival hyperaemia
`Ocular pain
`Photophobia
`Corneal opacities
`Retinal opacities, degeneration, pigmentary
`changes, haemorrhage
`Loss of visual acuity
`Conjunctivitis
`Blurred vision
`No effects
`
`Canthaxanthine
`Chamomile
`Datura
`Echinacea purpurea
`Ginkgo biloba
`
`Crystalline retinopathy
`Allergic conjunctivitis
`Mydriasis
`No effects
`No effects
`
`Liquorice
`
`No effects
`
`Vitamin A
`
`Intracranial hypertension (when taken in
`large doses)
`COX = cyclo-oxygenase; ERG = electroretinogram.
`
`and inability to explain the adverse effect by concur-
`rent disease or other drugs or chemicals. Dechal-
`lenge data are necessary and rechallenge should be
`positive. ‘Probable’ is the same as ‘certain’ without
`positive rechallenge data. ‘Possible’ is an adverse
`event in a reasonable time sequence to administra-
`tion of the drug, but could also be explained by
`concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals. Pos-
`itive dechallenge data are lacking or unclear in this
`category (table I).
`
`Probable
`No effects
`
`Possible
`Mydriasis (emotional effect?)
`Retinal vascular accidents
`(secondary to exertion?)
`Subconjunctival haemorrhage
`Anterior ischaemic optic
`neuropathy
`
`No effects
`
`No effects
`
`No effects
`
`No effects
`
`Cystoid macular oedema
`
`No effects
`No effects
`No effects
`Conjunctivitis
`No effects
`
`No effects
`
`No effects
`
`Decreased vision, dry eyes,
`discoloration of the eyelids,
`eyelid oedema,
`Proptosis
`Loss of eyebrows and eyelashes,
`and superficial punctate keratitis
`No effects
`No effects
`No effects
`No effects
`Spontaneous hyphema
`Retinal haemorrhage
`Vasospasm, visual loss
`associated with migraine-like
`symptoms
`No effects
`
`2. Medications and Adverse Effects
`
`2.1 Bisphosphonates
`
`Bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption by bind-
`ing to hydroxyapatite crystals and inhibiting their
`dissolution.[7] Different bisphosphonates vary great-
`ly in their efficacy and their adverse-effect profiles
`depending on the structure of the individual drug.
`These medications are associated with ocular ad-
`verse effects that are mainly inflammatory, i.e. con-
`junctivitis, uveitis and episcleritis.[8,9] Recent studies
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`80
`
`Santaella & Fraunfelder
`
`have proved that pamidronate can cause scleri-
`tis.[10,11]
`Pamidronate disodium, an intravenous bisphos-
`phate, has been reported to cause anterior uveitis and
`nonspecific conjunctivitis.[9-12] Its most striking as-
`sociation is that of being the first medication report-
`ed to cause scleritis.[10] Case reports have also asso-
`ciated pamidronate with episcleritis,[13] nerve pal-
`sy,[14] ptosis[14] and retrobulbar neuritis[15] (table II).
`Pamidronate bears a ‘certain’ relationship to uve-
`itis, conjunctivitis, episcleritis and scleritis when
`taken at standard doses between 30 and 90mg intra-
`venously. The onset of ocular signs and symptoms
`was usually noted within 48 hours.
`Alendronate is an oral bisphosphonate widely
`prescribed for the treatment and prevention of osteo-
`porosis, in particular postmenopausal osteoporosis,
`and for the treatment of Paget’s disease of the
`bone.[16] This bisphosphonate has been associated
`with a ‘certain’ relationship to blurred vision, ocular
`pain, conjunctivitis, uveitis and scleritis when taken
`in dosages ranging from 5 to 40mg daily (table II).
`Onset of ocular signs and symptoms was noted an
`average of 2 days to 2 weeks (range 1 day to 1 year)
`after starting therapy[11] (table II).
`Risedronate is taken orally and is indicated in the
`treatment of Paget’s disease of the bone.[16] The data
`are not sufficiently complete to classify any ocular
`adverse effect as ‘certain’. However, there are posi-
`tive rechallenge data on a single report of scleritis
`associated with this medication, which indicates
`there could be a cause and effect relationship.[10]
`Etidronate is an oral medication indicated in the
`treatment of symptomatic Paget’s disease, or for
`heterotopic ossification in hip replacement and spi-
`nal cord injury patients. This medication has been
`associated with conjunctivitis and blurred vision[11]
`(table II).
`Clodronate is used in Europe and Canada for
`tumour-induced bone disease.[7] It has not been ap-
`proved by the US FDA. This medication is also used
`by some to prolong survival in breast cancer pa-
`tients. Although some studies indicate there are few-
`er metastases with clodronate therapy, there is no
`evidence of prolonged survival in patients taking
`
`clodronate.[17] Reports of clodronate-induced uveitis
`have a ‘probable’ association and blurred vision is
`classified as having a ‘possible’ association[18] (table
`II).
`Pamidronate is the first medication ever reported
`to cause scleritis. Bisphosphonates are high molecu-
`lar weight drugs that have been described as poten-
`tially causing immune complex formation and pos-
`sibly being secreted by the lacrimal gland, thus
`causing transient irritation to mucus membranes.[3]
`Pamidronate stimulates the production of a distinct
`subgroup of T cells to inhibit bone resorption. As
`analogues of pyrophosphate, they can activate re-
`ceptors in T cells leading to cytokine release.[18,19]
`This may contribute to an immunological reaction in
`patients who develop uveitis and/or scleritis. Some
`authors have contended that the nitrogen-containing
`bisphosphonates (alendronate, pamidronate, rise-
`dronate) are more likely to cause uveitis.[20-23] Nitro-
`gen-containing bisphosphonates are known to cause
`transient pyrexia, a flu-like syndrome and serologi-
`cal changes resembling a typical acute phase re-
`sponse.[3,18,19] The cytokines released with this acute
`phase response could act as adjuvants in an immune
`reaction with the uvea of the eye as the target organ.
`However, a non-nitrogen-containing bisphospho-
`nate, clodronate, has also been reported as inducing
`uveitis.[18] Still, there are many more reports of
`uveitis associated with nitrogen-containing bisphos-
`phonates than there are for the bisphosphonates that
`do not contain nitrogen (etidronate, clodronate,
`tiludronate).
`In summary, bisphosphonates are associated with
`ocular inflammation. Ocular pain, photophobia,
`blurred vision, periorbital changes and glaucoma
`can be due to uveitis, scleritis and other types of
`ocular inflammation. Ocular inflammation, espe-
`cially scleritis and uveitis, is of the greatest concern
`in the eye care of patients taking bisphosphonates.
`Scleritis causes a severe deep eye pain, and can lead
`to structural damage of the globe and loss of vision.
`Patients typically present with a piercing ocular pain
`that is worse at night and awakens them from sleep.
`The sclera assumes a violaceous hue in natural sun-
`light and scleral vessels become inflamed and can
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ocular Adverse Effects Associated with Systemic Medications
`
`81
`
`2.2 Antiepileptic Drugs
`
`the drug may need to be discontinued for uveitis to
`resolve. Episcleritis may require topical ocular med-
`ication; however, the bisphosphonate may be con-
`tinued. In all patients studied by Fraunfelder et
`al.,[11] the bisphosphonate had to be discontinued for
`the scleritis to resolve, even on full medical therapy.
`
`have a crisscross pattern. Scleral oedema develops
`acutely and scleral thinning can occur, along with
`vision loss, if necrotising scleritis persists or inflam-
`mation is left unchecked. Ocular complications from
`scleritis can include keratitis, cataract, uveitis and
`glaucoma.[12,24]
`In uveitis associated with bisphosphonate ther-
`apy, the early symptoms may be mild or severe,
`depending on which part of the uvea is affected and
`2.2.1 Topiramate
`on the amount of inflammation. Anterior uveitis
`Topiramate, a sulfamate-substituted monosac-
`usually has the most dramatic symptoms, typically
`charide, is structurally unrelated to any other
`presenting with severe pain in the eye, redness of the
`antiepileptic drug (AED). This AED is also used in
`conjunctiva, sensitivity to bright light and a decrease
`the management of migraine, depression and neuro-
`in vision. The examiner may see prominent blood
`pathic pain. Off label, it has gained popularity as a
`vessels on the conjunctiva near the edge of the iris,
`weight reduction agent, to treat migraine headaches
`white blood cells floating in the aqueous humour
`and to treat bipolar disorder.
`and deposits of white blood cells on the inside
`Topiramate has been associated with acute angle-
`surface of the cornea. Intermediate uveitis is typical-
`closure glaucoma. Findings associated with topira-
`ly painless. Vision may be decreased and the patient
`mate-associated acute, bilateral, secondary angle-
`may see floaters (irregular floating black spots).
`closure glaucoma syndrome include blurred vision,
`Posterior uveitis typically produces decreased vision
`conjunctival hyperaemia, corneal oedema, shallow
`with or without floaters. There may also be retinal
`anterior chamber, cataracts, pupil changes, elevated
`detachment and inflammation of the optic nerve
`intraocular pressure, visual field defects and blind-
`(symptoms include loss of vision, which may vary
`ness. Topiramate has also been associated with
`from a small blind spot to total blindness). Diffuse
`causing bilateral myopia, bilateral suprachoroidal
`uveitis may produce any or all of these symptoms.
`effusions, blepharospasm, myokymia, nystagmus
`Uveitis can rapidly damage the eye and can produce
`and diplopia. Scleritis has also been reported.[25]
`long-term, vision-threatening complications, such as
`Topiramate-associated visual adverse effects and
`swelling of the macula, glaucoma and cataracts.
`their WHO classifications are listed in table II. The
`Those affected may have only one episode or peri-
`entity described as topiramate-associated acute, bi-
`odic recurrences over months to years.
`lateral, secondary angle-closure glaucoma[26,27] can
`Suggestions for treatment of bisphosphonate-in-
`present in the same manner as an acute angle closure
`duced ocular adverse effects are as follows. If there
`glaucoma attack. All the findings of acute glaucoma,
`is a persistent decrease in vision or if ocular pain
`such as ocular pain, headache, nausea and vomiting,
`occurs, examination by an ophthalmologist is neces-
`pupillary changes, hyperaemia, corneal oedema,
`sary. Nonspecific conjunctivitis seldom requires
`cataracts, retinal and vascular accidents, visual field
`treatment and usually decreases in intensity or may
`defects and blindness have been reported.[25] In most
`be absent on subsequent treatments. In rare in-
`patients, this is a bilateral process. If not recognised
`stances, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drop
`as a drug-related event, this condition can easily be
`may be needed. More than one ocular adverse effect
`confused with acute, pupillary block, narrow angle
`can occur at the same time, i.e. episcleritis with
`glaucoma for which a peripheral iridectomy is indi-
`uveitis. Bilateral anterior uveitis or, rarely, posterior
`cated. However, if the drug is stopped and medical
`or bilateral uveitis may occur and can vary markedly management instituted, pressure may return to nor-
`in severity. Many patients require intensive topical mal in hours to days without the need for an iridecto-
`ocular or systemic medication. In some instances, my. The acute pressure elevation usually occurs
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.007
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`82
`
`Santaella & Fraunfelder
`
`the last decade, the marked efficacy of this medica-
`within the first 2 weeks after starting topiramate
`therapy, but it has been reported within hours after
`tion and its low toxic effects prompted widespread
`doubling the dose. If pressure elevation goes un-
`use in Europe. The manufacturers of vigabatrin
`treated, serious outcomes are possible, including
`(Hoechst Marion Roussel) had received 28 reports
`blindness.
`of visual field abnormalities worldwide by January
`1997 in an estimated 140 000 patients treated.[38]
`Acute myopia up to 8.75 diopters may occur in a
`matter of hours after starting topiramate use, but
`This information appears to have not been released
`may take weeks to fully resolve on or off medica-
`during that time. Since 1997, numerous reports have
`tion. Sulfa-containing medications, such as topira-
`appeared of visual field abnormalities in adults and
`mate, are known to cause transient myopia. Lenticu-
`children treated with this AED. In most documented
`lar swelling, forward rotation of the lens-iris dia-
`cases, the visual field defect seems to be a specific,
`phragm, ciliary body swelling causing increased
`bilateral, symmetrical and irreversible peripheral
`curvature of the lens surfaces, and spasm of accom-
`constriction.[38-40] The fact that most patients are
`modation have all been proposed as the mechanism asymptomatic with normal visual acuity may have
`behind this occurrence.[3,25,28-31]
`contributed to the late recognition of these visual
`field defects that apparently occur in more than 30%
`The management of topiramate-related acute
`of patients but were initially estimated to affect
`pressure elevation requires stopping the drug in con-
`fewer than 0.1%.[41-44]
`sultation with the prescribing physician, since de-
`creasing the dosage as little as 50mg may exacerbate
`The site of toxicity is proposed to be the retina,
`pre-existing systemic conditions. Instituting maxi- where GABA is an important modulatory neuro-
`mal medical therapy, including oral and topical
`transmitter. Vigabatrin increases GABA levels by
`aqueous suppressants, is indicated. Laser iridotomy
`inhibiting the GABA transaminase enzyme. GABA
`or peripheral iridectomy may not be beneficial if the
`is an inhibitory neurotransmitter in bipolar cells and
`glaucoma is only associated with topiramate ther-
`some amacrine cells and may have a role in the
`apy, but would be considered adequate in the setting modulation of phototransduction from the retinal
`of angle closure if one is not certain that it is
`photoreceptor cells to the ganglion cells.[45] System-
`completely medication-induced. Topical miotics are
`ic vigabatrin has been shown to cross the blood-
`probably contraindicated, as these could precipitate
`retinal barrier and can be detected immuno-
`a relative pupillary block that would exacerbate the
`cytochemically in the retina.[46] Vigabatrin causes
`condition.
`white matter microvacuolation and intramyelinic
`oedema in the brains of rodents and dogs but not in
`monkeys and humans.[47] It also has been shown to
`cause accumulation of GABA in the retinal Muller
`cells.[48] How an increase in retinal GABA levels
`may produce visual field constriction is not clear,
`but the lower density of ganglion cells in the periph-
`eral retina or a toxic effect on the retinal Muller cells
`has been suggested as being possibly related.[49]
`Thus far, the understanding of the role played by
`GABA in retinal transmission is not sufficient to
`allow for a mechanistic explanation of the adverse
`effects of vigabatrin.
`There is no consensus regarding screening visual
`field examinations for patients taking vigabatrin.[49]
`The incidence, higher than previously estimated, of
`
`2.2.2 Vigabatrin and Tiagabine
`Vigabatrin is a selective, enzyme-activated, irre-
`versible GABA aminotransferase inhibitor.[32] It is a
`custom-made AED that is particularly useful in the
`management of drug-resistant partial seizures and
`infantile spasms, especially those secondary to tu-
`berous sclerosis.[33-36] The antiepileptic effect is pre-
`sumably mediated by elevation of GABA levels of
`the brain caused by inhibition of GABA metabo-
`lism.[36]
`Initially, only relatively minor adverse effects
`were attributed to vigabatrin use.[37] It was first
`introduced into clinical practice in the UK on a trial
`basis in the mid 1980s and granted licence in 1989.
`The FDA has not approved its use in the US. Over
`
`© 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Drugs 2007; 67 (1)
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2296.008
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Ocular Adverse Effects Associated with Systemic Medications
`
`83
`
`acitretin and etretinate have been reported as having
`this complication, particularly in asymptomatic pa-
`a ‘probable’ causal relationship to IH.[59]
`tients, suggests that screening visual field examina-
`tions may be necessary. Daneshvar et al.[49] have
`The mechanism of how retinoids cause IH has
`recommended visual field examinations covering
`been postulated as being through a common path-
`the peripheral 60° of the visual field for all patients way.[61] It is possible that high doses of this class of
`taking vigabatrin, before or soon a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket