throbber
Ranibizumab pre-filled syringe approved in the
`European Union: innovation to improve dose
`accuracy, reduce potential infection risk, and offer
`more efficient treatment administration
`
`
`
`Abstract
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2280.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`FREE
`ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2014
`Jean-Eric Michaud; Juergen Sigg; Lina Boado; Joachim Momm; Cornelia Weber; Daniel Alete; Eva Peregi; Marie Picci
`Author Aliations & Notes
`Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2014, Vol.55, 1949. doi:
`Purpose
`Ready-to-use injections eliminate aseptic preparation steps, reducing potential iatrogenic eye infection risks due to
`suboptimal drug and device handling. Currently used pre-lled syringes (PFS) are unsuitable for intravitreal use as
`they are coated with a high amount of silicone (Si) oil, which over time may emulsify into the drug and upon injection
`may impact vision. The recently European Union (EU) approved ranibizumab (RBZ) PFS was specically designed for
`single-use intraocular injection and may save physicians’/patients’ time, improve dose accuracy, and help reduce eye
`infection risk
`Methods
`We describe some of the features, development process, and potential benets of the RBZ PFS
`Results
`Design features of RBZ PFS (Figure) include: (i) a Luer-lock closure system that holds the needle tightly and enables a
`choice of needle; (ii) a small syringe barrel (0.5 mL) with low void volume, an unambiguous dose mark ensuring high
`dose accuracy, and non-reactive borosilicate glass for storage stability; (iii) a latex-free non-retractable plunger
`preventing inadvertent drawing of non-sterile air and thereby minimizing sterility-related ocular adverse events; (iv)
`an optimized siliconization process; and (v) a specially designed blister packaging preventing any contamination of
`sterile outer syringe surface. The development of minimally siliconized RBZ PFS used a ‘baked silicone’ process.
`Briey, Si oil-in-water emulsion is spray coated to the barrel’s inner surface and subsequently heat-xed. Si oil
`migration into the RBZ solution was assessed using 2 orthogonal methods (inductively coupled plasma atomic
`emission spectroscopy and particulate matter analysis by microow imaging), and was found to be minimal. No
`relevant dierences in product stability between vials and syringes were observed (e.g. when assessed using cation
`exchange chromatography). The RBZ PFS is easy to hold and may increase the injection preparation eciency by
`saving clinicians’ time, compared to conventional vial use
`Conclusions
`

`

`Novartis Exhibit 2280.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`The RBZ PFS aims to improve overall eciency of RBZ administration in clinical practice by potentially oering
`improved dose accuracy, a reduced risk of eye infection, and time savings for physicians and patients. RBZ PFS was
`approved for use in the EU in October 2013
`View Original Download Slide
`Ranibizumab pre-lled syringe
`Keywords: 465 clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques • 688 retina  
`© 2014, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Permission to
`republish any abstract or part of an abstract in any form must be obtained in writing from the ARVO Oce prior
`to publication.
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket