throbber


  
` 

` 
`  
`
` 
`    
`
` 
`

`&  '
`()*+,-./**01*234*35,06789:72**9;<6478.8=8>;?,=1,-4,>
`

  
`  
`

  
`   
  
`

`
 
`    
 
`
!

`"

   
`
`#
#   #
#  $  
`
@ABCABBDEFGHBIGBBIHJGDCKBID
` 
`

` %  
 
`

`
`LMNOPQRNMSOPMTQUMVTMNWXUQSQUOMYZXWWV[PYOX[TO[\V]Q[T^_\OTUMSOM`
`$ 
`MRQaXUQYMTX[Y\MYZbMTXWYMTYTVTMNYXMSQRVQYMaOXPX]bQYOaOROYZXWY\M
` 
`O[YMUQPYOX[TaMY`MM[]Q[c]QNM]MNOPQRNMSOPMTQ[N\XTYYOTTVMTQ[N
`XUdQ[T^_\MXVYPX]MXWY\MUMTbX[TMNMbM[NTX[Y\MTOYMXWO]bRQ[YQYOX[e
`Y\MTbMPOMTXWY\M\XTYeY\MdM[MYOP]QfMVbXWY\M\XTYeY\MTYMUOROYZXWY\M
`O]bRQ[YeQ[NY\MMWWMPYY\MNMSOPM\QTX[aOXRXdOPQRbUXPMTTMT^gOXRXdOPQR
`bUXPMTTMTO[SXRSMNO[\XTYYOTTVMUMTbX[TMTYXO]bRQ[YQaRM]MNOPQRNMSOPMT
`UMhMPYQPYOSQYOX[XWQTMUOMTXWPQTPQNMTY\QYUMiVOUMaRXXNbUXYMO[TXUXY\MU
`PX]bX[M[YTWXV[NO[Y\MaRXXN^
`jklmnopqlrsptuvwmlsnwooslxwvqrlsypz{|wvzpx{|pqp}{qm{~
`zpx{|pq|l~q{qmlrwqqpy’v{pqlrolvnypsq‚ypmwvq‚|pswy{|q‚
`mp€~{mpzmwmpq‚ƒ„…†‡ˆ~lm{‰|wm{l~w~zospyws‡pmwooslxwv
`w~z|lyolq{mpqmwmwspuqpz{~z{wt~lqm{|osl|pzuspqw~z
`†Š‹Œˆjpqop|{‰|mpqmqspŽu{spzos{lsmlsptuvwmlsnwooslxwv
`wq{yovw~mq{~w~{ywvqw~z{~uyw~q“~mp€~{mpzmwmpq‚
`xwsnk{mmpmnoplrzpx{|pw~zwoov{|wm{l~lkpxps‚qlyp
`p}mp~q{xp’{l|lyowm{’{v{mnmpqm{~tl||usq’prlspmpzpx{|pq
`wspyws‡pmpzmlmptp~pswvou’v{|Šs{lsml„š›œ‚~lrpzpswv
`tp~pswvmpqm{~t{ququwvvnsp|lyyp~zpzlsywvvn‚w~{ywvmpqm‘
`{~t{q|l~zu|mpzmlzpyl~qmswmpmwmwypz{|wvzpx{|p{qqwrp‚
`sptuvwm{l~qp}{qmpzmllxpsqppmpqwvpw~zuqpqlrypz{|wv
`w~zkp~{yovw~mpz{~uyw~qmpzpx{|pk{vvspzu|p‚wvvp‘
`zpx{|pq{~mp€~{mpzmwmpq“~„š›œ‚mp€l~tspqqp~w|mpz
`x{wmp‚lspv{y{~wmpmpolqq{’{v{mnlrwzxpsqpypz{|wvspw|m{l~q
`mp‹pz{|wv™px{|pŒyp~zyp~mqmlmp˜pzpswv‚˜llz‚™sut‚
`ls|l~z{m{l~qjpŒyps{|w~l|{pmnrlsjpqm{~tw~z‹wmps{wvq
`w~zlqypm{|Œ|mlr„šžŸ‚k{||wvvpzrlsmppqmw’v{qyp~m
`†Œj‹ˆwqkpvvwqmp“~mps~wm{l~wv”stw~{•wm{l~rlsmw~zwsz‘
`lrmspp|vwqqpqlrypz{|wvzpx{|pq† ¡¢£¤¥¡ˆvwqq„zpx{|pq
`{•wm{l~†“”ˆou’v{qpqqmw~zwszqrlsmpqm{~typz{|wvzpx{|pq
`wspmlqpmwmospqp~mv{mmvpls~ls{q‡mlmpuqps‚kpspwqvwqq
`¦w~zžzpx{|pqospqp~mqlyps{q‡w~zw{tzptspplrs{q‡ml
`jpsp|lyyp~zpzmpqmq{~|vuzp|uvmusp|nmlml}{|{mn‚q‡{~{ss{mw‘
`m{l~‚qlsm‘mpsy{~mswyuq|uvws{yovw~mwm{l~‚qlsm‘mpsyqu’|umw‘
`mpuqps‚spqop|m{xpvnjpqpzpx{|pqwspsptuvwmpz’nspŽu{s{~t
`~pluq{yovw~mwm{l~‚’vllz|lwtuvwm{l~‚vl~t‘mpsy{yovw~mwm{l~‚
`v{y{mpzw~{ywvmpqm{~t†vwqq¦ˆw~zp}mp~q{xpw~{ywvw~zuyw~
`

  
`
`yu|luqypy’sw~p{ss{mwm{l~‚qnqmpy{|{~–p|m{l~‚qp~q{m{•wm{l~
`mpqm{~t†vwqqžˆjp§uslopw~€~{l~wqwqnqmpylrzpx{|p
`wqqwnq‚w~zyumwtp~{|{mnmpqm{~t
`|vwqq{‰|wm{l~q{y{vwsmlmp€~{mpzmwmpqwqsp|lt~{•pz’nmp
`  
`‹pz{|wv™px{|p™{sp|m{xp† ¡¢£¤¥¢ˆ
`jpmpsy’{l|lyowm{’vp{quqpzk{zpvnml{~rpsmwmw~{yovw~m
`{qqwrprlsuqp{~mptp~pswvolouvwm{l~Œvmlutm{qmpsy{q
`uqpz’slwzvn‚{mywn’pwy{q~lyps’p|wuqpl~vnywmps{wvqmwm
`wsprlu~z{~v{x{~tm{qqupqwspmsuvn’{l|lyowm{’vp¨pvlk‚kp
`

  
`   

`p}wy{~pkwmypmlzqwspuqpzmlpxwvuwmpmp’{l|lyowm{’{v{mn
`‹pz{|wvzpx{|pqwspuqpzrlswxws{pmnlrru~|m{l~qrsly
`lrywmps{wvquqpz{~ypz{|wvzpx{|pq
`  
`oslylm{~tmppwv{~tlrqywvvklu~zquq{~twzpq{xp’w~zwtpq
`mlyw{~mw{~{~tmp—lklr’vllzmslutwsmps{pq~wsslkpz’n
`wmpslq|vpslq{quq{~typmwvv{|xwq|uvwsqmp~mqjpousolqplr
`m{qwsm{|vp{q~lmmlt{xpw~lxpsx{pklrmpyw~nzpx{|pq
`uqpz{~ypz{|{~pmloslylmpkpvv~pqqw~zlyplqmwq{q’umml
`pvw’lswmpl~mpmnopqlrmpqmquqpzmlpxwvuwmpmp{~mpsw|m{l~q
`jpklsz’{l|lyowm{’{v{mn{qwspvwm{xpmpsymwmypw~qmwm
`’pmkpp~yw~‘ywzpzpx{|pqw~zlqmm{qqupqw~zlstw~qjpqp
`mpywmps{wvquqpz{~wypz{|wvzpx{|pzl~lmpv{|{mwspw|m{l~
`yw~‘ywzpzpx{|pqwsp|wvvpzypz{|wvzpx{|pq{~mp€~{mpz
`mwmp{mps„ˆyw‡pqmpzpx{|p~lmopsrlsy{mq{~mp~zpzuqp
`mwmpqw~zwspsptuvwmpzrls{~mpsqmwmpz{qms{’um{l~’nmp˜pzpswv
`ls¦ˆ|wuqpqspw|m{l~qmwmwrrp|mmpru~|m{l~{~tw~zpwvmlr
`˜llzw~z™sutŒzy{~{qmswm{l~†˜™Œˆ“~yw~n|wqpq‚ypz{|wv
`A
`©ª«¬­¬®¯­¯«°±¬²ª³°´¯µ¬Lª¯³«gª°«°¶­·¸¹¹ºe»X\[©ORMZ¼½X[Teª[P^
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2180.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Biocompatib1lity of Materials m Medical Devices
`
`Table la Classification s of medical devices marketed in the uni ted states
`
`Class
`
`Type of dev ice
`
`FDA filing requi red
`
`II
`
`m
`
`Crutches, bedpans, depressors, adhesive
`bandages, hospi tal beds
`Hearing aids, blood pumps, catheters
`con tact lens, electrodes
`Cardiac pacemakers, intrauterine devices,
`intraocular lens, heart valves, orthopedic
`devices
`
`PMN/S I0K
`
`5 1 0(k)
`
`PMA
`
`PMN, premarket notification.
`
`Table lb Classifications of med ical dev ices of the european union
`
`Class
`
`Type of device
`
`Stethoscopes, hospital beds, wheelchairs
`
`Ila
`
`li b
`
`Ill
`
`Heari ng aids, electrographs, ultrasound
`assessmen t equipment
`Surg ical lasers, infusion pumps, ven tilators
`Intensive care moni toring equ ipment
`Ball oon catheters, heart valves
`
`Reg ulatory requirements
`
`Techn ical file, other
`assurances
`Technical file, conformity
`
`Techn ical file, type
`examination
`Aud it of quality assurance,
`examination of des ign
`
`the host. All materials used in devices will elicit a response
`from the host; it could be an immediate response, one that is
`prolonged, or even a de layed reaction that occurs sometime after
`contact with the dev ice. The outcome of the response depends
`on the site of implan tation, the spec ies of the host, the genet ic
`makeup of the host, and the sterility of the implan t. All imp lants
`have a significantly greater rate of infoction when compared
`with the background rate assoc iated with the surgi cal procedure
`performed in the absence of the dev ice. At the very least, an
`implant shou ld not interfere with biological processes that are
`required fo r normal homeostasis of the host.
`
`Biological Systems-Which
`Ones Are Important for Normal
`Homeostasis and Survival?
`
`Devices in contact with the external tissues such as skin typ(cid:173)
`ically are considered separately fro m a biocompatibil ity per(cid:173)
`spective fro m dev ices implanted internally. Implantable dev ices
`affect biological processes that involve blood; therefore, the test(cid:173)
`ing of these devices is somewhat more complicated. Many skin
`contact devices are used short term, and therefore biocompatibil (cid:173)
`ity testi ng is limi ted. However, for permanent internal implants,
`the requ ired testing can be as long as several years and re(cid:173)
`quire analysis of the effects of the device on cells and ti ssues
`as well as on heal ing responses that occur at the interface be(cid:173)
`tween the tissue and the dev ice. For this reason, it is important
`to understand which biological systems may be affected when
`permanen t implants are to be used.
`
`Biological processes involved in host-t issue responses to
`implantabl e medical dev ices reflect the activation of a se(cid:173)
`ries of cascades that require blood proteins or other compo(cid:173)
`nents found in blood. Biological systems activated by implan ts
`include blood clotting, platelet aggregation, complemen t ac(cid:173)
`tivation , kin in formation , fibri nolysis, phagocytosis, imm une
`responses, and wound hea ling ( I) (Table 2). Wound healing
`in volves several biological processes, including blood clott ing,
`in flammat ion, dilat ion of ne ighbori ng blood vessels, accumu la(cid:173)
`tion of blood ce lls and flu id at the point of contact, and fina ll y
`deposition of fibrous ti ssue around an implan t. Vasod il at ion of
`blood vessels and accumu lation of interstitial fl uid arou nd an
`implant can occur through activation of the kinin and com(cid:173)
`plement pathways ( I). Phagocytosis of dead ti ssue occu rs by
`attract ion and migration of inflammatory cells to the site of in(cid:173)
`j ury near an imp lant. The inflammatory ce lls attracted include
`neutrophils and monocytes that are present 10 digest dead tissue
`and implant materials. Once phagocytosis occurs, it may lead
`to di gestion of imp lant remnants and forma tion of fib rous scar
`tiss ue around the implant. If a large blood clot surrounds an
`implant, then fi bri nolysis must proceed to remove the clotted
`blood before the heali ng process can be completed ( I).
`Blood proteins are invo lved in the lysis of fore ign cells via the
`complement pathway ( I). Thi s mechani sm involves activation
`of comp lement proteins in the presence of an ant ibody-antigen
`complex attached to the surface of a foreign cell. Components
`of the complement pathway are sometimes com promised by
`act ivation and/or adsorption onto the surface of a medical de(cid:173)
`vice. Thi s action leads 10 comple men t co mponent depletion that
`causes the patient to be at ri sk fo r bacterial in fection and makes
`evaluation of complement depletion an important aspect of the
`
`2
`
`WILEY ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY © 200B, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2180.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Biocompat1bility of Materials m Medical Devices
`
`Table 2 Biological systems affected by medi cal devices ( I)
`
`System
`
`Funct ion
`
`Dev ice effect
`
`Blood clotting
`
`Maintains blood fl uidi ty
`
`Complement
`Fibrinolys is
`
`Prevent s bacterial invasion
`Degrades blood clots
`
`Immune responses
`
`Limits infec tion
`
`Kin in forma tion
`
`Causes vasodilati on
`
`Pl atelet aggregat ion
`Phagocytosis
`
`Lim its bleeding
`Limits infection
`
`Wound healing
`
`Repairs ti ssue defects
`
`Clot fo rmation-
`occl usion
`Depletes complement
`Degrades tiss ue
`grafts
`Prolongs
`infl ammation
`Prolongs
`infl am mation
`Shortens platelet life
`Prolongs
`Inflammation
`Promotes fibrous scar
`Tissue
`
`design of cardiovascular devices. Act ivated complemen t com(cid:173)
`ponents also pro long infl ammati on by generating CJa and C5a,
`which are agent s that cau se vasod il ation. Complement activation
`is associated with and contributes to who le-body infl ammation ,
`wh ich is observed as a complication to cardi opulmon ary bypass.
`Compl ement activat io n is responsible fo r hyperac ute rejection
`of anim al tissue grafts (2) and is important in reactions to im(cid:173)
`plants (3-5).
`Most foreig n surfaces cause blood to clot as a result of di(cid:173)
`rect con tact with a fo re ign surface. Thi s cl otting occu rs via the
`intrinsic cl ottin g cascade or from injury to tissue that develops
`during im plantat ion as result of act ivation of Hageman factor
`and fac tor IX, whi ch are two prote ins fou nd in blood (Table 2).
`Pl atelets, which are enucleated cell s, are also found in blood;
`they re lease factors that contribute to formation of blood cl ots.
`Devices used in the card iovascul ar syste m normall y are de(cid:173)
`signed to li mit the ir propensity to clot blood. In the case of
`card iovascul ar dev ices, excessive blood clotting will cause the
`device to occlude; in these applications, blood clotti ng is min(cid:173)
`imized. Because fo reign materials ty pi ca ll y cause blood clot s,
`they are onl y used to replace large and medium-sized vessels.
`Host vessels are used to rep lace the func tion of small -diameter
`vesse ls. Several tests are used to measure blood clott ing and
`platelet aggregation caused by contact with a medical device
`(6-8).
`In add ition to act ivating blood clotting (9), act ivated Hage(cid:173)
`man factor activates prekalli krein of the kin in system, whi ch
`leads to bradyk in in that cau ses vasc ular vasodi lation. Acti va(cid:173)
`tion of Hageman fac tor and blood clotti ng also leads to the
`conversion of plasmi nogen 10 plasmin which in it iates the degra(cid:173)
`dation of fibrin for med duri ng clotting by a process termed
`fibrinolys is (I).
`Phagocytic cells including neutro phil s and mac rophages, coat
`med ical dev ices either from direct blood contact or via inflam(cid:173)
`mation and ex travascular movement of these ce ll s in to the ti ssue
`fluids that surround a device. In either situation, first neu trophi ls
`and then monocy tes arrive in the area arou nd the dev ice and at(cid:173)
`tempt to degrade the implant. If the implant is biodegradable,
`then these cell s remain unt il the dev ice is totall y removed. If
`
`the dev ice is nondegradabl e, then the number of ce ll s surround(cid:173)
`ing an implant will depend on the how react ive the implant is.
`For example, although Dacron vascular grafts are permanent de(cid:173)
`vices, monocytes can be observed surround ing the implant fo r
`months and years. In some pat ients, cont in ued reacti vity can
`cause peri- im plant fl uid accumu lat ion, whi ch if left uncorrected
`can require impl ant remova l. In other cases where contact of tis(cid:173)
`sue with the im plant causes a prolonged in flammatory respo nse,
`other white blood cells incl udin g eosinophils, B cell s, and T
`cells can be observed in the vici nity of the device. These cell s
`are an indi cat ion of ei ther an allergic react ion or the fo rmation
`of ant ibodies that st imu late prolonged infl ammati on. Measure(cid:173)
`ment of in fl amm atory ce ll s surroundi ng an impl ant is usuall y
`accom pli shed by direct hi stological evalu ation ( 10- 12).
`As phagocyt ic cells acc umulate near the implant, they elab(cid:173)
`orate hydrolytic enzy mes that degrade both the implant and the
`surround ing ti ssues; fibro blasts and endothel ial cell s are also mi(cid:173)
`gratin g into the area aro und the device and begin to lay dow n
`new ex tracell ular matrix with capi ll aries and coll agen fibrils
`( I). Thu s, the wound healing process invo lves inflammat io n,
`re moval of the implant and tissue components, as well as the
`deposi tion of new extracellu lar matrix. If the implant is no n(cid:173)
`degradable and nonporous, then a fi brous capsule fo rms arou nd
`it. The thickness of the fibro us capsule depends on the degree
`of inflammation caused by the dev ice. If the implant is porous,
`the dev ice may biodegrade and lead to the formation of a small
`amount of fibrous scar ti ssue in the defect when the imp lant is
`removed. In some cases, however, after the impl ant bi odegrades,
`an abundance of scar tissue can be deposi ted where the implant
`was prev iously observed. The thickness of the fibrous capsule
`formed around an implant is usuall y measu red hi stologically.
`Wear part icles generated by a moving dev ice can lead to
`prolo nged in fla mmation and even im pl ant fa il ure in the case of
`hip and knee impl an ts. Small polymeric or metall ic part icl es,
`which are about I µ m in diameter, are ingested by neutrophils
`and monocytes and may lead to necrosis of these cells and the
`re lease of infl ammatory med iators into the wound area. Large
`particles arc surro unded by mo nocytes, which fo rm multin ucle(cid:173)
`ated giant cells that can in many cases be tolerated by ti ssues
`
`WI LEY ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY © 2008, John Wiley & Sons, lnc.
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2180.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Biocompatib1lity of Materials m Medical Devices
`
`without lead ing to imp lant failu re. However, once wear part icles
`are released fro m the implant , they can migrate to other ti ssues
`or even to local lymph nodes causing swelling and systemic
`problems. Impl ant wear particl es are quantitati vely determ ined
`from hi stolog ical and electron-microscopic stud ies ( 13- 15).
`
`Types of Tests-What Types
`of Tests Are Used?
`
`Two types of regul atory approval s ex ist for medical dev ices in
`the United States, 5 10(k) notifi cation and premarket approva l
`(PM A). The types of tests requi red fo r approval depend on the
`classifi cation of the medical dev ice. 510(k) noti ficati on in volves
`marketing a dev ice that is substanti all y equi valent to a dev ice
`on the market prior to 1976. All dev ices introduced after 1976
`that are not substant iall y equivalent to devices on the market
`before 1976 are automaticall y class ified as Class 3 dev ices and
`require PMA ( 16). For a dev ice to be considered substanti all y
`equi valent to a dev ice on the market before I 976, it must have
`the same intended use, no new tec hnological characteristics,
`and have the same performance as one or more dev ices on the
`market prior to 1976. In addit ion, all medi cal dev ices mu st be
`sterili zed either by end-sterili zation or by some other accept(cid:173)
`able means that can be validated, which means that any test
`done in cell culture or in an animal model must be conducted
`on a dev ice that has been validated to be sterile. Sterility vali(cid:173)
`dation is conducted on all medical dev ices as described in the
`literature ( 17).
`The testing conducted on biomaterials intended for use in
`medi cal dev ices mu st address safety and effecti veness criteri a
`th at depend on the intended use as described above as disc ussed
`in depth the literature ( 18, 19). The spec ifi c tests required vary
`with the type of device and application; however, some general
`testing is usually recommended. Norm all y, an imal testing is
`conducted 10 demonstrate that a medical dev ice is safe, and
`when implanted in humans that the dev ice will reduce, all ev iate,
`or eliminate the possib il ity of adverse medi cal reactions or
`conditions ( 17).
`According to the American Society of Testi ng Materials
`(ASTM ) Medical Dev ices Standards (A nnual Book of ASTM
`Standards, Section 13, Medical Devices, ASTM 1916 Race
`Street, Phi ladelphia, PA 19103; availab le at ww1v.ast111. 01:g), the
`type of generic biological 1esl methods fo r material s and dev ices
`depend s on the end-use appli cation. The ASTM as well as the
`International Organi zation for Standard ization (ISO) publishes
`standards fo r testing medical dev ices as listed in Tables 3 and 4.
`Biological reactions that are detrimental to the successful use
`of a materi al in one dev ice app li cation may not be applicable
`to the success of a material in a different end use. A list of
`potenti all y applicable bi ocompatibi lity tests that are related to
`the end use of a materi al and/or a device is given in Table 3 as
`a start ing point. These tests are as follows:
`
`Cell culture cytotoxicity
`
`This test is used 10 evalu ate the toxicity of a material i11
`vitro or an ex tract of a materi al used in a device. Several
`
`Table 3 Biolog ical tests used to evaluate bi ocompat ibilily
`based on ASTM medical device standards, sect ion 13
`
`Test
`
`ASTM standard
`
`Cell culture cytotox icity
`Skin irritation
`Intramu scular and subcutaneous implant
`Blood compatibility
`Hemo lysis
`Carcinogenesis
`Long-term implantation
`Mucous membrane irritation
`Systemic injection acute toxicity
`ln1racu1aneous injection
`Sensitization
`Mutagenicity
`Pyrogeni city
`
`F748
`F7 19
`F748
`F748
`F756
`F748
`F748
`F748
`F750
`F749
`F720
`F748
`F748
`
`di ffe rent tests have been used and have produced a spectrum
`of biocompatibili1 y assessments on the same material (20-22).
`The tests used measure the viability of cells in contact with a
`material or an extract of a material. A variety of cell lines can
`be used; however, a modified fib roblast line is usuall y 1he go ld
`standard. Some tests used incl ude I) direct cell culture, 2) agar
`di ffusion testing, 3) filter di ffusion testing, and 4) barrier testing
`(22).
`As pointed out by Learmonth (23), although the in1ac1 im plant
`may not be cytotoxic to ce lls, an y material and mechani cal
`flex ural mismatch may lead to release of wear part icles that can
`exc ite a cywchemical reaction that culm inates in inflammation
`and cell cytotoxicity. The generation of wear particles and their
`size is of part icular importance to the failure of joint implant s
`through a process termed os1eolysis (23 ).
`
`Skin irritation assay
`
`This 1es1 in volves applying a patch of the materi al (or an extract
`of the materi al) to an area of an animal th at has been shaved;
`in some cases 1he skin is abraded before the test material is
`app lied. After 24 hours of contact, the patch is removed, and
`the skin is graded fo r redness and swel ling. The grading scale
`can vary from Oto 4: 0 means no redness and/or swelling and 4
`means ex tensive redness and/or swe ll ing. Standard test material s
`are used to evaluate skin irritation (24).
`
`Short-term intramuscular implantation
`
`This test is designed to evalu ate the reaction of ti ssue to a
`device for peri ods of 7 to 30 days. This test can be cond ucted
`in 1he mu scle below the skin in rabbits or rodent s including
`mi ce, rats, and guinea pi gs. At the concl usion of the test period,
`the samples are graded both visuall y and based on analysis
`of hi stol og ical sections. A test described in the United States
`Pharmacopia (USP) is widely used. The purpose of thi s test is to
`evaluate the in flammatory potent ial (e.g., redness and swelling)
`grossly. In some cases, hi stological evalu ation of the ti ssue is
`performed at the li ght and electron microscopic levels 10 look
`fo r phagocytic and immu ne cells. Some in vestigators use an
`
`4
`
`WILEY ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMI CAL BIOLOGY © 200B, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2180.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Biocompat1bility of Materials m Medical Devices
`
`Table 4 Biological evaluati on of med ical devices based on ISO standards
`
`Test
`
`Part I: Evaluation and testing
`Part 2: An imal welfare requi rements
`Part 3: Tests fo r genotox icity, carcinogenici ty and
`reproductive toxicity
`Part 4: Selection of tests for interactions wi th blood
`Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotox ici ty
`Part 6: Tests fo r local effects after implantation
`Part 10:Tests fo r irritation and delayed-type hypersensiti vity
`Part 11 :Tests fo r syste mi c toxic ity
`
`ISO standard
`
`I 0993- 1 :2003
`I 0993-2:2006
`10993-3:2003
`
`I 0993-4:2002
`10993-5:1999
`I 0993-6:2007
`10993- 10:2002
`I 0993- 11 :2006
`
`intram uscu lar implantat ion site because the blood suppl y and
`hence the inflammatory poten ti al may be easil y eval uated. In
`addit ion, the res ults of short-term implantation tests may not
`reflect material-mediated inflammatory responses that may al so
`occur (25).
`
`Short-term subcutaneous implantation
`
`Thi s test is an alternative for studying the reaction of tissue to a
`device for a period of days to weeks. In this test, a tissue pocket
`is made in the ski n above the muscle layer, the dev ice is inserted
`into the pocket, and the pocket is su tu red or stapled closed.
`Normall y the device is placed deep into the pocket away from
`the site of insertion of the device so that reactions at the suture
`or cl ip site do not affect the eva luation of biocompatibility.
`Although short-term implantation studies do give an analys is of
`the bioco mpatibil ity of a material at a local site; systemic effects
`can also be observed from corros ion prod ucts that develop from
`vasc ular imp lant s that migrate to other sites (26).
`
`minutes at 37°C (3 1). The amou nt of hemoglobi n re leased into
`solution after lys is of the red cells in contact with the device is
`measured. When red cells undergo \ysis, hemoglobin is released
`from the ce lls, and the absorbance from released hemog lobin
`is proportional to the amount of cell lys is. Extensive red-cell
`lysis is not des irable for devices that are to be imp lanted in the
`card iovascular syste m. The measurement of hemolysis and its
`relevance is a question that shou ld be addressed it each device
`application.
`
`Carcinogenicity
`
`Carcinogenicity test ing in volves long-term implantation (up to
`2 years) in an animal model usually under the ski n to look
`fo r tumor fo rmat ion (32). This test is req ui red for dev ices
`that emp loy materials that have not been ex tensively tested.
`Typicall y these tests are conducted in rodents, although rodents
`do form tumors to most solid implants (I).
`
`Blood coagulation
`
`Long-term implantation tests
`
`Blood coagulat ion is normally assessed by determi nation of
`clotti ng times and extent of platelet aggregation ini ti ated by
`the device surface in either static or dy nami c systems. In a
`dynam ic test, blood flo ws through the device or over a test
`surface made of the materials used in the dev ice. This test
`is normally conducted on blood-contacting devices to ensure
`that the blood-coagulation and platelet-aggregation pathways
`are not modified . The tests are conducted in vitro us ing human
`or an imal blood, ex-vivo in a flow chamber using anim al blood,
`or in vivo in an animal model. It has been noted that variability
`in the resu lts using standard materials is noted in ex-vivo tests
`of blood compat ibility; thi s finding is attributed to the type of
`anima l model used, the flow velocity, the time of exposure, and
`the method used to measure blood cell ad hesion (27). Studies
`of stents used in the cardiovascular system illustrate that clot
`or thrombus formation is depende nt on the type and des ign of
`the device (28, 29) and may be influenced by the corrosion of
`metalli c implants (30).
`
`Hemolysis
`
`Hemolys is is determined by placi ng powder, rods, or extracts of
`a materi al in contact with human or an imal plasma for about 90
`
`These tests are covered by ASTM specifica tions F36 \ and
`F469 for muscle and bone, respective ly. Implant materials are
`placed in the muscle as a soft-tiss ue mode l and in bone as a
`hard-tissue model. T he implan tation site is eva luated gross ly and
`histolog icall y for inflammation, giant cell formatio n, signs of
`implant movement, and for tissue necrosis. Although long-term
`implantation gives so me indication of biocompatibility, it does
`not consider issues such as biofilm for mation, infection, and
`encrustation associated with use of devices such as urologic
`implants (33). It is recommended that long-term imp lantation
`tests be conducted on a model relevant to the intended end
`use. In addition , the effect of wear particles is an important
`considerat ion with long-term implantation (23).
`
`Mucous membrane irritation
`
`Mucous membrane irri tation is eva luated by placing a mate(cid:173)
`ri al in close prox imity to a mucous membrane such as the oral
`mucosa. The test eval uates the amou nt of irritation and infl am(cid:173)
`mat ion from gross and hi stological measurements. The hamster
`cheek pouch or oral mucosa is a model freque ntly used for this
`test (34).
`
`WI LEY ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY © 2008, John Wiley & Sons, lnc.
`
`s
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2180.005
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`
`    
`    
`
    
    
` #@("@.((@"&,'7P"("+7!6Y%"&I#((""+7
`!44%'-"((-A .""+ &+* "&&5
` !"# $%&'& &()
`"+&-'@(,-+7E" ()"+"& )  ."
`* + '"+(,  "'+("- # ((",( "+
`,"(#+"(""+ &++#&) #'(J#("A++
`
`  ."$("!/0'12'% .""("+ -("345) #(
`" @""@"&"(." (@(" &"@5
`,( &!6/%78$(""(,(,"(&#'"+ ( )(
`(""+#. (@ +(" #('(@""++.,"@)
` +# )"#+"* &9#&7:"+"(  (&. (
`#*("&D .),+"!6YZG;%7>(" "+"&"(&
`' . $&"+".( "&"-"( #
`< = =   
`!>[;0YY6%,( -&'#&" &()#*( ."5
`
`(-"+!;%7
`"+"&),)") #+&*&. (")("
`"&, 7:+) #'))("  .) A&+
`#&,&"+("()*"# .D"&#
`(##(@ "' & &+. (' &"+&5
`>("#" # - +-)("  ."""+ "
`-7:+) #'))& '" *"' & &+. (* 
`'+  .""+ (-'"*+ +$(" .""("+7
`,+"*"# .&..(D"&)", ."
`?"**"(  +#&@"&)"(#&&. (' .
`*  ,"( A))#"* @ #&
`9"" !(&"&A++'%") . ("
`   C 
`
`*"# ("++"-"+"*+,+""&(#"(
`,( & .34) #(!6B%7
`"-"+"*+. ("#('(!6Y%7K#( (##(@ 5
`,  @A #&)"+'@"&( &+'&..(A))
`=
`
`)#",+"", ("( +""+ &++ 7
`D" ""- +-$')"("+ ($(")"
`)"* "A)"&-A)E(#&F ,+
`"&#-""&  .)",+ )#*#" #
`#&#('"45A2&# ,( &!63%7:.(4A2@
`)"("+ ($(",+"& )2"() 
`. (4G) #(@"&))2-"+#"&. ((&"&
`A++'7
=H  
`
`K)A (&*  ,"*+,()"," (\(.( )
`"*+ ."("+#&&"+&-  )++
`"&-((" )" #(A),+"&)#"7K
`"*  ,"*+@-("+)"-*&-+ ,&
`I#"'-"+#"&#'): ("J#-"+
`#&)("  ."("+"&* + '"+#7K)
`7K),+ '"++"+(&*"("!*"("A)
`*  ,"*+ .""("+ ("&-(J#()" 
`"+(&#( "+)"("(%@A))"(,+"& "
`"-""* + '"+)  "+#&'*+ &
`A)"$(" .""("+7I#" "( *(-&)"+"&
` "'#+" @,+"+"''('" @9"" @ ,+@ (
` "(-( *"2 )LA+&5,M,) ,)"'( A
`Q*( +7
`
` +#&() ('"+#( "+ & "& #&(
`]  ,"*+' .&"+&-&,& "
` & )""++ A#"'( A)7>)"*(, (&"
`(("7^-)" " +)2"&"(. () (5(
`-("++5A"(,"(+"((+"&.( "+5 5"+
`#(J#(+5(''7K)&-&  (J#(
` " (,+"@"&),"(+""#
`+ '5(',( ( )#"#7> ("@,+""*+
`#"'&""'* ++!46%7N A-(@" .)
`O
`H  
`
`&-(J#( ("."&..-'*. ()
`A"(,"(+""+ * . (""( '7
`"*#&)#"7K), .'(J#(&&,&
`
` )&5#",,+" 7:+) #'))(*  ,"*+
`(+"-@*"#"++&-A+++"&  (" *
`++"&#@, (")")(" "#&")
`P( '#& -"+#".-(5,( &#'#*"
`&-5#(."&  +"& ,+"."+#( ((.(
`)"" """&"+&-7K)"( , 
`A)).# ' ."* + '"+7
` .'("5'"-*"("+++*("!&  $% ("(
`]  ,"*+-"(. () (5(-(#+ '5(
`"("+ .)"+ ('7K),( .&  $&5
`
` "A)#7^,&' A))() "A)
`(&*'"$(" .)&- )(#+" (
`2 (("++@""&"(&)"-*&-+ ,&. (
` ."("**"&"#(',("#()("**F
`*  ,"*+('7:+) #')""(,(&-
`"(7: )() & "#(&  $- +- " .
` .)(,  *(-&&#('# .&-)#"@
`)"("+A)++)""(+&,Q"++*&  $5
`U 
 VUW 
`
`*  ,"*+ ."&-#+"+ +-(Q&".(
`!R#+#:* R"K%7S)"+,( '"(
`_   
` U 
 U X 
`$-)#"+"+("+"&'("+#), ,#+" 7
`&(&*)("**!6T%7
`;7+-(EN@S)("^R7] "("+"&]  ,"5
`*+7;YYY7,('(@`Aa (27S)7TZ;07
`:-"( .""+ &+#& -"+#")*  ,"5
`47I ++K87]  ,"*+b ,+"&" ( .#
`&""'"&""&" ( . ,"*+78$,7S+7># 5
`*+ .&"+&-7K)+#&& '@),@' "@("**@
`'7;YY3\;Gb4GZ4Y7
`c
`defghgijhjfklgmenkojpgqejnfrekfkshtuvvwxyz{|d}~€‚z|ƒxe|„…
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2180.006
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`    
`
    
    
`  !"#"$  !%"$ $&'(#" "!)
`?27 !) ',;8,'UK *"6">86*"6">8
`#'*  !"*"+"!, ( +* - *$!.//012%23..
`!N"'>!(!++"<( #''>' # ' !* " '
`45'6 ",789 #"!,:7" ';*" ("$'6%' 
`C;( !">> "$> ! !(>( "$>W! %' + CM
`#*)<"!#*"'8*  !"8"  "!( <=*>" 7;
`7 (," 'D ?@@.1AB%4023422
`" '?@@41?A%A0B.3A2@
`?BU$"U8LV98U!,89<)-8,"<"U89"
`A-!87(C!,'(8D(')< &EDF(" !*'(*
`,8-!!=L8E!(,8L<'*$, " !"( )!## *"
`"'!!""!"$)>G'*$H"$I6, (?@@21..%
`'66">#' " !XG'!(& ("'*'!),<"!=
`..0/3../.
`" !"C"$5RY" !"GK '"M?@@.1.4?%44A34A.
`0)! 'D89*$<6D89' ! !EJ89!>( '-G8$ 
`?/L"'"G8, $M8'*$!) 'M8H*$ M8FL89*$< !
`D8!C*$987'+ "&K98L'DI7(*"6">
`K89 >#'"$,89*$""87!D8J <!!RM89*$)G
`!>!"$  ""!)#+ !"'*<'"( +* M7"
`D " !#" '*'!'>*  !"#+'<" !""> G
`9* !* H> 'E(?@@@1..%.?/3.?A/
`M'(?@@.1B2%43/
`2M'(!98$=#EIJ+ "$'6' "!

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket