throbber
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 93, PJ?· 5460-5465, May 1996
`Applied B10logical Sciences
`
`Irreversible inactivation of interleukin 2 in a pump-based
`delivery environment
`(interleukin 2 physical stability/protein delivery/protein-surface interactions)
`
`STELIOS T. TZANNIS*, WILLIAM J.M. HRUSHESKYt, PATRICIA A. WooDt, AND TODD M. PRZYBYCIEN**
`*The Howard P. lsermann Department of Chemical Engineering, Applied Protein Biophysics Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590;
`and toepartment of Medical Oncology, Stratton Veterans Adminstration Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208
`
`Communicated by Robert Langer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, October 23, 1995
`
`The physical stability of pharmaceutical pro(cid:173)
`ABSTRACT
`teins in delivery environments is a critical determinant of
`biological potency and treatment efficacy, and yet it is often
`taken for granted. We studied both the bioactivity and physical
`stability of interleukin 2 upon delivery via continuous infu(cid:173)
`sion. We found that the biological activity of the delivered
`protein was dramatically reduced by =90% after a 24-hr
`infusion program. Only a portion of these losses could be
`attributed to direct protein deposition on the delivery sur(cid:173)
`faces. Analysis of delivered protein by size exclusion chroma(cid:173)
`tography gave no indication of insulin-like, surface-induced
`aggregation phenomena. Examination of the secondary and
`tertiary structure of both adsorbed and delivered protein via
`Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, circular dichroism,
`and fluorescence spectroscopy indicated that transient sur(cid:173)
`face association of interleukin 2 with the catheter tubing
`resulted in profound, irreversible structural changes that were
`responsible for the majority of the biological activity losses.
`
`The physical stability of formulated therapeutic proteins in
`delivery environments is a necessity for successful short- or
`long-term delivery via implantable or portable pumps. Protein
`delivery device surface interactions may induce conforma(cid:173)
`tional changes and aggregation, which may result in the
`inactivation of the delivered protein and therefore compro(cid:173)
`mise the intended therapeutic benefit.
`Protein-surface interaction phenomena have been studied
`extensively over the past 15 years. However, the focus has
`typically been to assess implantable materials for hemocom(cid:173)
`patibility (1). A notable exception is given by the extensive
`studies of the delivery of insulin via micropumps, which have
`shown surface-induced aggregation and consequent inactiva(cid:173)
`tion phenomena (2, 3). It has also been demonstrated that
`administration of low concentrations of interleukin (IL )-1 J3 via
`a syringe-pump system results in adsorptive losses of 20-80%
`(4). Our previous studies revealed =99% losses in the biolog(cid:173)
`ical activity of formulated IL-2 after 24-hr exposure to com(cid:173)
`mercial silicone rubber tubing in a recirculating system (S.T.T.,
`J.M. Hrushesky, P.A.W., & T.M.P., unpublished work). Sim(cid:173)
`ilarly, reductions of 80-90% of the biological activity of a Food
`and Drug Administration-approved IL-2 formulation have
`been reported during delivery via polyethylene catheter tubing
`(6). Addition of human serum albumin or surfactants to the
`reconstitution medium can significantly decrease adsorptive
`losses (2, 4, 7), although in the case of IL-2, the effectiveness
`of human serum albumin as a passivating agent is limited (6).
`In the present effort, we assessed the nature and extent of
`interactions of a commercial IL-2 formulation with a portable
`infusion pump/catheter tubing system. We also explored the
`impact of these interactions on the active delivery profile and
`established a structure-function relationship for both the
`
`adsorbed and delivered protein via a variety of spectroscopic
`techniques. IL-2 is a potent anti-tumor and immune modulator
`that has been administered using both high-dose bolus and
`continuous infusion strategies with promising clinical results in
`the treatment of cancer and acquired immune deficiency
`syndrome (AIDS). Moreover, IL-2 is representative of the
`hematopoietic growth factor family, with high sequence and
`structural homology with other therapeutic proteins such as
`granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte macro(cid:173)
`phage colony-stimulating factor, erythropoietin, and growth
`hormone. The IL-2 case may serve as a paradigm for the
`optimal delivery of these therapeutic proteins.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Materials. Recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2) ex(cid:173)
`pressed in E. coli (RU 49637, Batch no. BV 23621-066A;
`Roussel-Uclaf) was obtained as a monomeric, powdered clin(cid:173)
`ical formulation (1.2 ± 0.6 x 107 units/mg) with 0.01 mg of
`isopropanol per 0.5 mg of IL-2. The powder was stored at
`- 20°C before use and was reconstituted in 10 mM phosphate
`buffer (pH 7.4) with 150 mM NaCl at 25°C. The delivery
`system consisted of a programmable, portable, piston(cid:173)
`operated clinical infusion system (Panomat V-5; Disetronic
`Medical Systems, Plymouth MN) connected to a 60-cm length
`of 1.0-mm i.d. radiopaque medical grade silicone rubber
`catheter tubing (Dow-Corning) provided by Medtronic (Min(cid:173)
`neapolis). The tubing was cleaned, steam-sterilized, and hy(cid:173)
`drated with water for injection-grade water before use.
`Delivery Apparatus and Protocol. The borosilicate glass
`reservoir of the pump was loaded under sterile conditions with
`freshly reconstituted IL-2 solution at a concentration of either
`0.1 or 0.05 mg per ml and then connected to the catheter
`tubing. The entire experimental system was placed in a 37°C
`incubator. Following actual clinical protocols, the tubing was
`primed with the protein solution at the initiation of the
`experiment. The solution was pumped at 100 µ,L per hr and
`collected in 300-µ,l capacity sterile vials (flow system). Under
`these conditions the Reynolds number was 0.05, the wall shear
`rate was 0.28 sec- 1, and the Peclet number was 0.5. At 2, 6, and
`24 hr, a 10-cm portion of the tubing was removed from the
`collection vial end of the system and subjected to Fourier(cid:173)
`transform infrared (FTIR) analysis. In order to control for
`exposure at 37°C and adsorption on the pump reservoir walls,
`a similar reservoir loaded with IL-2 solution of the same
`volume and concentration was placed in the incubator (non(cid:173)
`flow system) and similarly sampled over 24 hr.
`Delivered Protein Characterization. Bioactivity. IL-2 bio(cid:173)
`logical activity was assessed via a proliferation assay based on
`the IL-2-dependent mouse spleen cell line, CTLL-2; this assay
`is described in detail elsewhere (Tzannis et al., unpublished
`work).
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in
`accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: IL, interleukin; FTIR, Fourier-transformed infrared.
`tro whom reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`5460
`
`Downloaded by guest on July 11, 2021
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2177.001
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Applied Biological Sciences: Tzannis et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996)
`
`5461
`
`Protein concentration. The bicinchoninic acid protein deter(cid:173)
`mination method (Pierce) was used to quantitate the concen(cid:173)
`tration of delivered IL-2 over time.
`Secondary structure. Solution phase IL-2 secondary structure
`was characterized via far-UV CD, using a previously reported
`spectral acquisition and manipulation protocol (8) in conjunc(cid:173)
`tion with the structure fitting technique of Sreerama and
`Woody (9).
`Tertiary structure. Fluorescence spectroscopy was used to
`examine the environment of Trp121, the lone tryptophan of
`IL-2. Steady-state fluorescence measurements were per(cid:173)
`formed on a Perkin-Elmer LS50B Luminescence spectropho(cid:173)
`tometer equipped with a Neslab RTE-111 thermostat (Neslab
`Instruments, Portsmouth, NH) set at 25°C. The samples were
`excited at 295 nm (10), and five emission spectra, recorded
`between 300-450 nm with a 1-nm band width, were collected
`and averaged; the excitation and emission slits were set at 4.5
`nm. We also used iodide and acrylamide in static quenching
`experiments to probe the solvent accessibility of Trp121 (10-
`12). Iodide was added from a 5 M stock solution in the
`reconstitution buffer along with 1 mM Na2S2O3 to prevent lz
`formation, which could cause precipitation of the protein (13).
`Similarly, acrylamide was added from a 5 M stock solution also
`in the reconstitution buffer. The emission spectra of the
`protein solutions were corrected for background scatter, di(cid:173)
`lution and, in the quenching experiments, absorbance by KI
`and acrylamide (13, 14).
`Aggregation state. The extent of aggregation was determined
`via size exclusion HPLC analysis as follows: the stationary
`phase was a 30 cm x 7.8 mm i.d. Ultrahydrogel-250 (Waters)
`column; the mobile phase consisted of the IL-2 reconstitution
`buffer; the sample size was 50 µ,l; the mobile phase flow rate
`was 0.75 ml/min; and detection was performed at 280 nm by
`a Waters 486 UV /VIS detector. Relative IL-2 concentrations
`were determined by peak area integration using the Waters
`MILLENIUM software package.
`Adsorbed Protein Characterization. Attenuated total re(cid:173)
`flectance FTIR spectroscopy was used to characterize the
`adsorbed IL-2. Spectra were collected on a Perkin-Elmer 1800
`FT-IR spectrophotometer equipped with a DTGS detector
`that was continuously purged with dry nitrogen. Five hundred
`twelve double-sided interferograms were collected using a 45°
`germanium attenuated total reflectance crystal in the 4000-
`700 cm-1 range at 2 cm-1 resolution, coadded, triangularly
`apodized, and Fourier-transformed. IL-2 solution spectra were
`recorded at 0.1 mg/ml in 10 mM phosphate buffer saline (pH
`7.4). The observed spectra consist of contributions from the
`silicone rubber tubing, adsorbed protein, adherent residual
`buffer solution, and residual water vapor in the light path;
`solution spectra have contributions from buffer and water
`vapor. These contributions were subtracted based on a pro(cid:173)
`tocol detailed elsewhere (Tzannis et al., unpublished work).
`Surface concentration. The amide II band (1495-1590 cm-1)
`was used to determine the adsorbed protein concentration (5).
`The estimated catheter surface concentration for monolayer
`coverage of IL-2 is 0.41 µ,g/cm2, assuming an Euclidean
`surface (Tzannis et al., unpublished work). However, topog(cid:173)
`raphy information for the inner surface of the catheter tubing
`used in this work, obtained via scanning electron microscopy
`in the secondary electron mode, indicated that the actual
`surface area is 2 to 4 times greater than the Euclidean area.
`Secondary structure. The amide I (1600-1700 cm-1) band
`was used to assess the secondary structure content of adsorbed
`IL-2 as a function of the duration of surface exposure. The
`spectral processing and fitting routines and their method
`validation are described elsewhere (Tzannis et al., unpublished
`work).
`
`RESULTS
`Bioactivity of Delivered IL-2. As the results given in Table
`1 indicate, the biological activity of delivered IL-2 is severely
`reduced; after 24 hr of delivery, the 0.1 and 0.05 mg/ml
`solutions retain only =10% and =6% of their original activity,
`respectively. The activity of the nonflow control samples was
`essentially constant. The majority of these losses occur within
`the first 2 hr; thereafter the losses continue but at a diminished
`rate. The activity profile reflects the solution residence time in
`the catheter. The 0.05 mg/ml system suffered a greater activity
`loss on a percentage basis than the 0.10 mg/ml system.
`To what may these losses be attributed? The unchanged
`activity of the control samples allows us to rule out any
`significant role for the pump reservoir surfaces or mere
`incubation at 37°C. Exposure to the catheter at 37°C must be
`responsible. We dismiss denaturation due to flow effects in the
`tubing a priori, as Reynolds numbers in the creeping flow
`regime put wall shear rates at least three orders of magnitude
`smaller than the threshold reported for enzyme inactivation in
`Couette flow (15). Nor do we expect chemical degradation
`over the 24-hr period to be responsible. The known major
`degradation products of IL-2, oxidized Met104 and Cys125, have
`been shown to retain full activity (16-18); these residues are
`not crucial for the biological activity of IL-2. Disulfide scram(cid:173)
`bling is known to diminish IL-2 bioactivity (19), but at the
`temperature studied, it appears to be significant only at
`alkaline pH (20). Thus, we suspect that the catheter surface has
`mediated the physical inactivation of IL-2 by either direct
`adsorption, aggregation, or denaturation.
`Aggregation Status of Delivered IL-2. As IL-2 aggregates
`often lack biological activity [refs. 17 and 21; although one
`commercial IL-2 preparation is formulated as a reversible
`aggregate (refs. 19 and 22)], we examined delivered IL-2 for
`evidence of increased levels of aggregates. The results in Table
`1 show that the delivered IL-2 is at all times largely monomeric.
`Both the flow and nonflow samples exhibited similar aggre(cid:173)
`gation patterns over the time examined. At all times the
`chromatograms are characterized by four distinct peaks with
`the monomer (15.1 ± 0.4 kDa) forming the predominant
`species ranging from 73 wt % initially to 93 wt % after 24 hr
`in the flow system. Two higher molecular weight species, which
`probably reflect dimers/trimers (35.2 ± 0.5 kDa) and pen(cid:173)
`tamers/hexamers (79.4 ± 1.0 kDa), represent only a small
`portion of the overall delivered protein and decrease with time.
`These high molecular weight species likely represent reversible
`aggregates formed upon reconstitution. Further, these aggre(cid:173)
`gates are likely biologically active, as the initial solution activity
`is within experimental error of the nominal bioactivity ex(cid:173)
`pected upon reconsitution per the manufacturer's product
`literature. The decline and disappearance of high molecular
`weight species also suggests that the surface-induced inactiva(cid:173)
`tion of IL-2 does not proceed through disulfide reduction,
`because that would probably lead to enhanced self-association
`in solution. Based on these findings, we conclude that aggre(cid:173)
`gation phenomena cannot explain the observed biological
`activity losses.
`In the course of this analysis of aggregation state, a low
`molecular weight species (8.0 ± 0.3 kDa) was detected at low
`levels throughout the 0.1 mg/ml experiments. This apparent
`cleavage fragment may account for a small percentage of the
`observed activity losses for these experiments. It is unlikely
`that this species is the result of a catheter surface-induced
`cleavage process, because a similar peak (8.4 ± 0.3 kDa)
`appears at comparable concentrations in the corresponding
`nonflow control. No such species was observed in the 0.05
`mg/ml experiments; if it is present at all, it may be at levels
`below the detectable limit.
`Delivered IL-2 Concentration Profile. Another possibility is
`that significant amounts of IL-2 have been physically removed
`
`Downloaded by guest on July 11, 2021
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2177.002
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`5462
`
`Applied Biological Sciences: Tzannis et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996)
`
`Table 1. Delivered and adsorbed IL-2 assay results
`
`Bioactivity (x105 units/ml)*
`Flow
`Nonflow
`Concentration (µg/ml)
`Flow
`Nonflow
`Mass delivered (% of initiaI)t
`Size distribution (wt % )
`Flow
`Low molecular weight species
`Monomer
`Dimer/trimer
`Pentamer/hexamer
`Nonflow
`Low molecular weight species
`Monomer
`Dimer/trimer
`Pentamer/hexamer
`
`Surface exposure, 0.1 mg/ml IL-2 solution
`
`Surface exposure, 0.05 mg/ml IL-2 solution
`
`Initial
`solution
`
`2 hr
`
`10 hr
`
`24 hr
`
`Delivered IL-2
`
`Initial
`solution
`
`2 hr
`
`10 hr
`
`21 hr
`
`3.2 ± 1.2 0.75 ± 0.16
`6.8 ± 2.2
`ND
`
`0.52 ± 0.03 0.30 ± 0.09 5.2 ± 1.5 0.53 ± 0.21
`ND
`6.1 ± 1.9
`5.2 ± 1.5
`ND
`
`0.52 ± 0.22 0.35 ± 0.09
`ND
`5.35 ± 0.49
`
`103 ± 8
`108 ± 8
`100.0
`
`77 ± 5:f:
`106 ± 8:f:
`78.4 ± 6.6:f:
`
`79 ± 6
`106 ± 8
`77.8 ± 7.2
`
`82 ± 7
`100 ± 7
`87.0 ± 9.2
`
`54 ± 4
`57 ± 4
`100.0
`
`34 ± 2:f:
`55 ± 4:f:
`69.1 ± 7.2:f:
`
`34 ± 2
`55 ± 4
`68.8 ± 6.6
`
`39 ± 3
`59 ± 4
`69.1 ± 5.3
`
`0.0
`61.9
`27.1
`11.0
`
`0.0
`61.9
`27.1
`11.0
`
`6.1
`67.9
`19.1
`6.9
`
`0.0
`100§
`0.0
`0.0
`
`5.3
`92.2
`1.7
`0.8
`
`11.6
`88.4
`0.0
`0.0
`Adsorbed IL-2
`
`4.8
`93.0
`0.9
`1.3
`
`5.0
`95.0
`0.0
`0.0
`
`0.0
`70.5
`25.1
`4.4
`
`0.0
`70.5
`25.1
`4.4
`
`0.0
`61.0
`19.0
`20.0
`
`0.0
`50.2
`26.2
`23.6
`
`0.0
`82.2
`10.3
`7.5
`
`0.0
`95.5
`2.2
`2.3
`
`0.0
`96.9
`1.1
`2.0
`
`0.0
`83.0
`7.8
`9.2
`
`Surface Concentration (µg/cm 2)
`0.12,r
`0.44
`FTIR
`0.05
`0.0
`1.1
`0.31
`0.0
`0.05'
`0.35 ± 0.1
`0.08 ± 0.03
`0.43 ± 0.11
`0.12 ± 0.07:f:
`0.92 ± 0.2
`0.5 ± 0.1
`0.0
`0.0
`Mass balance from solution assayt
`*The Roussel-Uclaf batch records give activities for their bioassay equivalent to 12 ± 6 X 105 and 6.0 ± 3.0 X 105 units/ml for the 0.1 and 0.05
`mg/ml solutions, respectively; errors represent standard deviations of octuplicate assays.
`tconcentrations corrected for adsorption in nonflow system; error propagated from standard deviations of the protein assay standardization curve.
`:!:Samples determined at 4 hr.
`§A tail at low retention times signifies the presence of higher molecular weight species; their actual size is indeterminant.
`'liSamples determined at 6 hr.
`
`from solution by adsorption to the catheter surface, thereby
`reducing the total activity. The delivered IL-2 concentration
`was measured at 2-hr intervals; only the 2-, 10-, and 24-hr
`measurements are shown in Table 1. At 24 hr, the delivered
`IL-2 concentration was 20-30% less than that charged to the
`device, after correction for adsorption to the reservoir. The
`adsorptive losses are higher on a percentage basis for the lower
`concentration solution, reflecting the adsorptive capacity of
`the tubing. Thus, adsorptive losses can only account for a
`fraction of the observed bioactivity reduction.
`For both initial IL-2 concentrations, the adsorptive losses
`occur rapidly during the first 4 hr. After this point, the
`delivered concentrations appear to level off. This pseudo(cid:173)
`steady state may reflect a shift from kinetic to thermodynamic
`control of protein adsorption as the competition for adsorption
`sites stiffens and as adsorbed species optimize their interac(cid:173)
`tions with the surface (23).
`Adsorbed IL-2 Concentration Profile. To show that protein
`was indeed adsorbed to the catheter, we examined the exposed
`tubing via FTIR spectroscopy. The concentration of IL-2
`adsorbed on the catheter as a function of exposure time,
`calculated from the FTIR amide II band spectra as well as that
`obtained from a mass balance from the bicinchoninic acid
`assay of the solution concentration, is given in Table 1. The
`results from these techniques are in good agreement, indicat(cid:173)
`ing that our spectral processing is conservative. As expected,
`the surface concentration is higher when the solution concen(cid:173)
`tration is higher. The surface concentrations in both the 0.05
`and 0.1 mg/ml solution experiments track upwards, indicating
`that the adsorptive capacity of the tubing has not yet been
`reached. Our calculated value for monolayer coverage (5) and
`the Euclidean area of the tubing imply that there are multiple
`layers of IL-2 on the surface after 24 hr of exposure, in
`agreement with the reported behavior of silicone rubber
`surfaces in similar adsorption studies (24). However, by ac-
`
`counting for the roughness of the tubing surface, we estimate
`that the actual surface coverage is closer to a single IL-2 layer
`after 24 hr of exposure.
`Adsorbed IL-2 Secondary Structure. Numerous studies
`have shown that protein-surface interactions can be denatur(cid:173)
`ing, particularly when the surface is hydrophobic (25). Amide
`I band IR spectra for adsorbed IL-2 and the underlying
`component bands obtained by our deconvolution procedure
`are shown as a function of exposure time in Fig. 1; the
`corresponding secondary structure estimates are listed in
`Table 2. Native IL-2 in solution is a highly helical protein, as
`shown by the intense band located at 1657 cm- 1; a-helix
`content comprises almost 63% of the structure. This is in good
`agreement with published IL-2 structural analyses that indi(cid:173)
`cate a total of 42-65% helix and little or no /3-sheet content
`(16, 26). The band appearing at 1630 cm- 1 can be assigned to
`extended loop structures that connect the helical segments of
`the four-helix bundle.
`Upon adsorption, IL-2 molecules lose an important part of
`their native structure; a-helices and extended loop bands
`disappear while /3-sheet signals appear. After 2 hr of surface
`exposure, the prominent a-helix signal is replaced by intense
`/3-sheet bands located at 1625, 1633, and 1639 cm-1 and a
`random structure band at 1650 cm- 1; at this point, /3-sheet and
`random structures compose =50% and 25% of the secondary
`structure content, respectively. Over time, the patterns of
`increased /3-sheet and random structures persist ( =43% and
`13% of the structure at 24 hr, respectively), while there is
`partial recovery of a-helix ( =20%) and diminution of /3-tum
`( = 12%) bands. Either the sampled surface population relaxes
`to a more native-like state, or the subsequently deposited IL-2
`molecules fail to undergo the initial dramatic secondary
`structure changes. During this time, the dominant /3-sheet
`band position shifts from 1625 (2 and 6 hr) to 1631 cm- 1 (24
`hr). This high wavenumber /3-sheet shift is accompanied by a
`
`Downloaded by guest on July 11, 2021
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2177.003
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`Applied Biological Sciences: Tzannis et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996)
`
`5463
`
`1600
`
`1620
`1640
`1660
`1680
`Frequency, cm·1
`
`1700
`
`1600
`
`1620
`1640
`1680
`1680
`Frequency, cm·1
`
`1700
`
`1600
`
`1820
`1840
`1660
`1660
`Frequency, cm·1
`
`1700
`
`1600
`
`1820
`1840
`1660
`1680
`Frequency, cm·1
`
`1700
`
`FIG. 1. Deconvoluted and curve-fitted infrared amide I band envelopes of IL-2 (A) in solution and adsorbed on the catheter after 2 hr (B),
`6 hr (C), and 24 hr (D). The IL-2 concentration charged to the device was 0.1 mg/ml. Spectra are corrected for buffer, silicone rubber tubing,
`and water vapor contributions where appropriate (5).
`
`similar rearrangement of the /:I-turns, as their major band shifts
`from 1667 to 1679 cm-1 after 24 hr, indicating stronger hydrogen
`bonding patterns of the surface-stabilized molecules. Thus, IL-2
`is denatured upon adsorption to silicone rubber tubing.
`
`Table 2. Secondary structure of adsorbed and delivered IL-2 as a
`function of exposure time
`
`Surface exposure
`time
`
`2 hr
`
`6 hr
`
`24 hr
`
`Initial
`solution
`
`Delivered IL-2 Secondary Structure. To probe the hypoth(cid:173)
`esis that surface-denatured protein may desorb and persist in
`solution, we analyzed the delivered IL-2 samples via CD
`spectroscopy. Far-UV CD spectra of the delivered IL-2 as a
`function of exposure time are shown in Fig. 2; the correspond(cid:173)
`ing secondary structure estimates are given in Table 2. The
`initial solution sample estimates are in good agreement with
`the FTIR results. Deconvolution results for the flow system
`spectra show a rapid =75% decrease in a-helix content and an
`
`40000r-T""r-T""r-T""r-T""r-T""r-T""T"T""T"T""T"T""T"T""T"'T"T"'T"T"'T"T"'T",......,
`
`20000
`
`0
`
`-20000
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`190
`
`200
`
`210
`
`220
`
`230
`
`240
`
`250
`
`Wavelength, nm
`
`Flo. 2. Far-UV CD spectra of delivered IL-2 as a function of
`exposure time are shown: native IL-2 in solution (--) and after 2 hr
`(· • • • • ·), 6 hr(--), 12 hr (-•-),and 24 hr (- .. -)of exposure to the
`catheter. All spectra refer to 0.1 mg/ml delivery experiments.
`
`28
`42
`13
`17
`0
`
`39
`38
`9
`7
`
`52
`21
`13
`13
`
`63
`0
`17
`0
`20
`
`65
`10
`16
`10
`
`8
`48
`20
`25
`0
`
`19
`50
`23
`11
`
`19
`48
`21
`12
`0
`
`31
`43
`17
`8
`
`Adsorbed IL-2:
`FTIR estimates (structure % )
`a-Helix
`/3-Sheet
`/3-Turns
`Random
`Extended
`Delivered IL-2:
`CD estimates (structure % )*
`a-Helix
`{3-Sheet
`/3-Turns
`Random
`Nonflow control:
`CD estimates (structure % )*
`a-Helix
`65
`54
`56
`/3-Sheet
`10
`24
`20
`/3-Turns
`16
`16
`10
`Random
`10
`10
`9
`All data correspond to 0.1 mg/ml delivery experiment.
`*Standard errors associated with CD estimates were determined to be
`on the order of ±6%via the use of the SELCONprogram (9) on a series
`of native IL-2 solution spectra.
`
`Downloaded by guest on July 11, 2021
`
`Novartis Exhibit 2177.004
`Regeneron v. Novartis, IPR2021-00816
`
`

`

`5464
`
`Applied Biological Sciences: Tzannis et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996)
`
`increase in /3-sheet content relative to the nonflow system over
`the first 2 hr of delivery. After longer exposure times, the
`secondary structure contents appear to relax back toward the
`initial native contents. This apparent partial recovery of helix
`content likely reflects changing protein populations in solution
`as time progresses. At all exposure times, there is good
`agreement between the CD structural estimates for delivered
`IL-2 and the FfIR structure estimates for adsorbed IL-2. This
`agreement is particularly striking with respect to the rapid loss
`and partial recovery of helix content as well as the increase in
`/3-sheet content on surface exposure. These results are con(cid:173)
`sistent with the hypothesis above.
`Delivered IL-2 Tertiary Structure. To further probe the
`conformational status of the delivered protein, fluorescence
`spectroscopy was employed. Steady-state fluorescence spectra
`of IL-2 during delivery, which are indicative of the polarity of
`the environment of the lone Trp residue at position 121, are
`shown in Fig. 3. The maximum intensity of the initial native
`IL-2 emission spectrum is located at 328 nm, indicating that
`Trp121 is buried in the interior of the helix bundle (11, 12). For
`IL-2 denatured in 6 M guanidinium chloride, there is a 30-nm
`red shift of the emission maximum, indicating that this residue
`becomes solvent-exposed. Also, a signal intensity comparison
`of these spectra reveals substantial fluorescence quenching in
`the native state. This quenching is thought to arise via inter(cid:173)
`
`action with the neighboring Cys125 residue (11, 12r When the
`
`C-terminal helix on which both Trp121 and Cys 25 reside is
`disrupted, this quenching is reduced; this helix is known to be
`crucial for biological activity (27). After 2 and 6 hr of surface
`exposure, the IL-2 samples exhibit a 12- to 15-nm red shift as
`well as a dequenching, which are intermediate to the native and
`guanidinium chloride-denatured spectra, indicative of a large
`population of nonnative molecules in the solution. The static
`quenching experiments yielded similar results as shown by the
`Stern-Volmer plots in Fig. 4. In native IL-2, Trp121 is buried
`in the core of the four-helix bundle and is inaccessible to iodide
`and partially accessible to acrylamide, in good agreement with
`literature studies on IL-2 (11, 12) and human growth hormone
`(10). In the guanidinium chloride-denatured state, Trp121
`becomes fully accessible to both quenchers. The surface(cid:173)
`exposed samples (2- and 6-hr) again give results intermediate
`to the native and guanidinium chloride-denatured states.
`Trp121 has become partially accessible to both quenchers after
`incubation with the tubing, indicating a swelling or partial
`unfolding of the delivered IL-2 molecules.
`
`DISCUSSION
`To elucidate the role of protein-surface interactions in a
`medical-grade silicone standard central venous catheter, com-
`
`mon to virtually all implantable and portable delivery systems,
`we examined the biological activity and structural stability of
`IL-2 during delivery at 37°C. In agreement with previously
`published clinical studies that ascribed the bioactivity losses of
`IL-2 during continuous infusion to deposition on the polyeth(cid:173)
`ylene catheter tubing (6), we found order of magnitude
`bioactivity losses resulting after exposure of the protein solu(cid:173)
`tion to silicone rubber catheter tubing. Losses due to deposi(cid:173)
`tion were significant but small; losses due to incubation at
`elevated temperature, shear-induced denaturation, and sur(cid:173)
`face-mediated aggregation were insignificant. The majority of
`these losses were attributed to transient, denaturing interac(cid:173)
`tions between IL-2 and the surface of the catheter. The
`similarities between the secondary structure analyses of ad(cid:173)
`sorbed IL-2 by FfIR spectroscopy and delivered IL-2 by CD
`spectroscopy, both in extent of perturbation of the native
`helical structure and in temporal pattern, are consistent with
`this interpretation. The Trp121 emission spectra and static
`quenching results for delivered IL-2 provide further insight
`into the nature of the surface-induced perturbation and the
`observed loss of activity: the catheter surface induces a
`transition to a state with expanded hydrophobic core (10)
`accompanied by alterations in helix D, which is critical for
`biological activity (27). The surface catalyzes structural
`changes that are not readily reversed upon desorption.
`Protein denaturation upon surface interaction is a well(cid:173)
`documented phenomenon (28-32). Kondo et al. (29) have
`indicated that a relationship exists between the extent of
`surface-induced conformational changes and the value of the
`adiabatic compressibility, /3s, of the protein. The value of /3s for
`IL-2, as calculated from its partial specific volume (32), is 9.77
`x 1012 cm2dyne- 1 (1 dyne= 10 µ,N). This is close to the value
`reported for bovine serum albumin, which is known to undergo
`dramatic conformational changes upon surface exposure (28,
`29). It has also been shown by Gavish et al. (33) and Gekko et
`al. (32) that a-helices, in contrast to /3-sheets, form dynamic
`domains of the protein structure and are responsible for
`volume and energetic fluctuations of proteins in the solution
`state; this may predispose helical proteins such as IL-2 to
`alterations upon adsorption. Further, in lattice-based simula(cid:173)
`tions of homopolymer chains adsorbing to surfaces, the chains
`were observed to "dock" initially and then flatten out, under(cid:173)
`going conformational changes as the polymer-surface contacts
`are maximized (34). The same studies also indicated that
`certain types of organized secondary structures become prev(cid:173)
`alent as a surface is approached. These altered, surface(cid:173)
`adapted species may desorb due to unfavorable lateral inter(cid:173)
`actions on the surface or to the attainment of an unstable,
`high-energy intermediate state (35, 36).
`Structure analyses of adsorbed species indicate that the
`extended loop structures of IL-2 disappear upon adsorption,
`tempting speculation as to the mechanism by which the protein
`and surface interact. The loops are on the exterior of IL-2 and
`are rich in hydrophobic residues and are therefore likely to be
`the part of the molecule that is first presented to the surface .
`Chou and Scheraga (5) have proposed that the loop-helix
`interactions are crucial to the structural integrity of four-helix
`bundle proteins like IL-2. We hypothesize that once these
`segments are involved in surface interactions, their stabilizing
`effect on the four-helix bundle is dissipated. As a consequence,
`the helices of the molecule are able to engage the surface,
`initiating a surface-contact optimization process, resulting in
`further deviations from the native structure.
`IL-2 is one of a number of pharmaceutical proteins that are
`currently under clinical investigation for intermittent and/or
`continuous infusion, pump-based delivery strategies. However,
`with the currently available devices and catheters, such treat(cid:173)
`ment programs do not guarantee complete or even predictable
`delivery. This is of particular concern when the dose-response
`relationship is highly uncertain.
`
`,,,,..
`
`....
`
`'
`
`/
`
`I
`_.--/.. . ..._
`I
`.. -·f
`I
`
`··---
`
`/
`
`/
`
`I
`
`Q)
`
`120
`.... 100
`~
`=
`rn
`j
`5
`~
`~
`-
`::I
`ll.
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`'-
`
`"
`
`'-
`
`'-
`
`'
`··, ..
`-.:\_,
`
`·;,;
`
`'-
`
`'-
`
`'-
`
`'
`
`'
`
`'-
`
`"
`'
`'
`' ' ....
`400
`
`'-
`
`'- -...;:
`
`420
`
`320
`
`340
`
`360
`
`380
`
`Wavelength, nm
`
`FIG. 3. Trypt

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket