throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` IPR 2021-00720
` U.S. Patent No. 9,355,405
` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
` VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v.
` STRATOSAUDIO, INC.,
` Patent Owner.
` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
` IPR 2021-00721
` U.S. Patent No. 8,166,081
` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
` VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v.
` STRATOSAUDIO, INC.,
` Patent Owner.
` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
` May 18, 2022
` 12:00 p.m.
` REMOTE VIRTUAL DEPOSITION of
` TIM A. WILLIAMS, Ph.D., an Expert
` Witness on behalf of Petitioner, taken
` by Patent Owner, pursuant to Notice,
` held at 9000 Crow Canyon Road,
` Danville, California 94506, before
` Kathleen Piazza Luongo, a Notary
` Public of the State of New York.
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2022
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 1 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
` 1100 New York Avenue NW
` Sixth Floor
` Washington, D.C. 20005
` Attorneys for Petitioner
` BY: TIMOTHY T. TANG, ESQ.
` ttang@sternekessler.com
` -and-
` RYAN RICHARDSON, ESQ.
` rrichardson@sternekessler.com
` -and-
` WENHAO XIONG, ESQ.
` wxiong@sternekessler.com
`
` WHITE & CASE LLP
` 1221 Avenue of the Americas
` New York, New York 10020
` BY: HALLIE KIERNAN, ESQ.
` hallie.kiernan@whitecase.com
` -and-
` JOHN SCHEIBELER, ESQ.
` jscheibeler@whitecase.com
`
`12
`
`34
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 2 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
` Tim A. Williams
`
`T I M A. W I L I A M S, Ph.D., called
`as a witness, having first been duly
`sworn, was examined and testified as
`follows:
` MS. KIERNAN: Tim Tang, if you 12:00:53
` don't object I'll just get started. 12:00:55
` MR. TANG: Yes, that's fine. 12:00:57
`EXAMINATION BY MS. KIERNAN: 12:00:58
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Williams, how 12:00:58
`are you? 12:01:01
` A. Good morning, I'm fine, thank 12:01:01
`you. 12:01:03
` Q. Please state your name for the
`record.
` A. Tim A. Williams.
` Q. What is your address?
` A. 9000 Crow Canyon Road, Danville,
`California 94506. 12:01:03
` Q. I just want on to cover a few 12:01:03
`ground rules for today's deposition. 12:01:08
` I understand that you have been 12:01:10
`deposed before in this matter; is that 12:01:11
`correct? 12:01:14
`
`1
`
`23
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 3 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
` Tim A. Williams
` A. Yes. 12:01:14
` Q. And do you currently have 12:01:15
`access to and are able to view Exhibit 12:01:18
`Share? 12:01:22
` A. I do, I have a folder open. 12:01:22
` Q. Okay. 12:01:26
` Right now there shouldn't be 12:01:27
`anything in that folder but I just want 12:01:29
`to confirm that you have it open. 12:01:31
` Since we are conducting this 12:01:34
`deposition via Zoom if for any reason 12:01:36
`you're having difficulty hearing me or 12:01:40
`there is a connection issue, can we agree 12:01:43
`that you will let me know as soon as 12:01:45
`possible? 12:01:47
` A. Yes. 12:01:47
` Q. And if you don't understand a 12:01:49
`question that I ask you please ask for 12:01:51
`clarification; if you answer I will 12:01:54
`assume that you've understood my 12:01:58
`question. 12:02:00
` Is that fair? 12:02:01
` A. Yes. 12:02:01
` Q. And do you understand that 12:02:05
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 4 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
` Tim A. Williams
`unless counsel instructs you not to 12:02:07
`answer you should answer my questions 12:02:09
`despite his objection? 12:02:11
` A. Yes. 12:02:13
` Q. I will do my best to take a 12:02:15
`break every hour or so or when convenient, 12:02:17
`but if you need a break sooner, please 12:02:20
`let me know. 12:02:23
` Do you understand that you're 12:02:25
`under oath today? 12:02:26
` A. Yes. 12:02:28
` Q. Is there any reason that you 12:02:30
`are aware of that you cannot give 12:02:32
`complete, truthful and accurate testimony 12:02:34
`today? 12:02:36
` A. No. 12:02:36
` Q. Did you prepare for your 12:02:42
`deposition today? 12:02:44
` A. Yes. 12:02:45
` Q. For approximately how long did 12:02:48
`you prepare for the deposition today? 12:02:49
` A. Twelve hours. 12:02:54
` Q. And did you speak with anyone 12:02:58
`in preparing for your deposition today? 12:03:02
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 5 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
` Tim A. Williams
` A. Yes. 12:03:05
` Q. Without divulging the content 12:03:07
`of those communications, with whom did 12:03:12
`you speak in preparing for your 12:03:15
`deposition today? 12:03:17
` A. The attorneys who are on this 12:03:18
`call. 12:03:20
` Q. And did you speak with any 12:03:24
`non-attorneys in preparing for your 12:03:27
`deposition today? 12:03:29
` A. No. 12:03:29
` MS. KIERNAN: I am going to 12:03:40
` introduce the first exhibit. You 12:03:42
` should be able to see it in Exhibit 12:03:52
` Share. 12:03:55
` If you do not see it you may 12:03:55
` need to refresh it, and please let me 12:03:56
` know when you see it. 12:04:00
` THE WITNESS: I see it. 12:04:00
` (Whereupon, the above-mentioned 12:04:02
` Reply Declaration in IPR 2021-007020 12:04:28
` was marked as Exhibit 1 and shown to 12:04:28
` the witness on Veritext Exhibit 12:04:28
` Share.) 12:04:28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 6 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
` Tim A. Williams
`CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. KIERNAN: 12:04:04
` Q. Dr. Williams, do you recognize 12:04:04
`this document? 12:04:06
` A. Yes. 12:04:12
` Q. And this document your Reply 12:04:24
`Declaration in IPR 2021-007020; is that 12:04:29
`correct? 12:04:38
` A. Yes. 12:04:39
` Q. Would you please scroll to 12:04:49
`paragraph 4 of this Declaration. 12:04:51
` A. Yes. 12:04:58
` Q. And paragraph 4 provides two 12:05:00
`tables after it that describe documents 12:05:04
`that you have considered and reviewed 12:05:08
`prior to this Declaration; is that 12:05:11
`correct? 12:05:13
` A. Yes. 12:05:14
` Q. Are there any other documents 12:05:18
`that you reviewed in forming the opinions 12:05:21
`in this Declaration? 12:05:25
` A. Well, aside from everything 12:05:28
`that's mentioned in the Declaration I 12:05:31
`can't think of anything. 12:05:34
` MS. KIERNAN: I've introduced 12:05:59
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 7 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
` Tim A. Williams
` what was marked as Exhibit 1016 in 12:06:00
` the 721 IPR; will you let me know 12:06:08
` when you see that document in your 12:06:13
` Exhibit Share. 12:06:15
` (Whereupon, the above-mentioned 12:06:19
` Reply Declaration in IPR 2021-00721 12:06:54
` was marked Exhibit 2 and shown to 12:06:54
` the witness on Veritext Exhibit 12:06:54
` Share.) 12:06:32
` THE WITNESS: Yes. 12:06:32
`CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. KIERNAN: 12:06:35
` Q. And similar to the other 12:06:35
`Declaration, do you recognize this 12:06:37
`document? 12:06:39
` A. I do. 12:06:39
` Q. And this document is your Reply 12:06:50
`Declaration in IPR 2021-00721; is that 12:06:55
`correct? 12:07:04
` A. No. 12:07:04
` Q. That's not correct? 12:07:06
` A. No. 12:07:08
` Q. Would you correct my statement 12:07:10
`for me, please. 12:07:13
` A. It's my rely in IPR 2021-00720. 12:07:14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 8 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
` Tim A. Williams
` Q. Okay. 12:07:26
` MS. KIERNAN: Could you go back 12:07:27
` to the folder and see if you see a 12:07:28
` second exhibit now. 12:07:31
` THE WITNESS: So Exhibit 2 is 12:07:41
` what you're asking about? 12:07:42
` MS. KIERNAN: Yes, I think it 12:07:44
` has Exhibit 2 in front of it, if you 12:07:49
` could open that document for me, 12:07:49
` please. 12:07:52
` THE WITNESS: Okay. 12:07:54
` Is there a question? 12:07:55
`CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. KIERNAN: 12:07:58
` Q. Do you recognize this document? 12:07:58
` A. I do. 12:08:00
` Q. Okay. 12:08:02
` And is this your Reply 12:08:02
`Declaration in IPR 721-00721? 12:08:05
` A. It is. 12:08:14
` Q. Can you go to paragraph 4 of 12:08:20
`the 721 Declaration, please. 12:08:24
` A. Yes. 12:08:27
` Q. And besides the material listed 12:08:27
`in the tables that follow paragraph 4, 12:08:29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 9 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
` Tim A. Williams
`are there any other materials that you 12:08:34
`relied on in forming your opinions in 12:08:37
`this Declaration? 12:08:41
` A. All of the materials that are 12:08:46
`discussed in the Declaration are 12:08:47
`materials that I reviewed and considered 12:08:49
`at the time. I don't recall anything 12:08:53
`other than those materials. 12:08:54
` Q. Thank you. 12:08:56
` MS. KIERNAN: I'm going to stay 12:09:06
` in this exhibit, and can you please 12:09:07
` go to paragraph 25, and let me know 12:09:09
` when you are there. 12:09:20
` THE WITNESS: Yes. 12:09:23
` MS. KIERNAN: Okay. 12:09:24
`CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. KIERNAN: 12:09:24
` Q. And paragraph 25 begins on page 12:09:26
`11 and continues to page 12; is that 12:09:29
`correct? 12:09:32
` A. Yes, it is. 12:09:32
` Q. And in the portion of paragraph 12:09:34
`25 on page 12 you begin to discuss 12:09:40
`Figures 1-B and Figures 1C; is that 12:09:46
`correct? 12:09:50
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 10 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
` Tim A. Williams
` A. Yes. 12:09:51
` Q. In looking at the -- looking at 12:09:54
`Figure 1C as depicted in your Declaration 12:10:02
`at the bottom of page 12, is it correct 12:10:06
`to say that in your opinion Figure 1C is 12:10:18
`an embodiment or a potential embodiment 12:10:23
`of Claim 9 of the '081 Patent? 12:10:28
` A. Can I have the '081 Patent, 12:10:34
`please. 12:10:36
` MS. KIERNAN: It should appear 12:10:57
` in your Exhibit Share Folder 12:10:59
` momentarily. 12:11:02
` (Whereupon, the above-mentioned 12:11:23
` copy of Patent No. US 8,166,081 B2, 12:11:23
` Christensen et al., dated April, 24, 12:11:23
` 2012 was marked Exhibit 3 and shown 12:11:23
` to the witness on Veritext Exhibit 12:11:23
` Share.) 12:12:09
` THE WITNESS: May I have the 12:12:09
` question again, please. 12:12:10
` MS. KIERNAN: Sure. 12:12:15
`CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. KIERNAN: 12:12:15
` Q. In looking at Figure 1C as 12:12:15
`depicted in your Declaration at the 12:12:17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 11 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
` Tim A. Williams
`bottom of page 12, is it correct to say 12:12:20
`that in your opinion that Figure 1C is an 12:12:22
`embodiment or a potential embodiment of 12:12:25
`Claim 9 of the '081 Patent? 12:12:27
` A. I have not expressed that 12:12:41
`opinion. 12:12:43
` Q. So you say at the beginning of 12:12:46
`paragraph 25 of the 721 Declaration that: 12:12:49
`"The specification also describes a 12:12:54
`single hardware device that implements 12:12:57
`the claimed functionality corresponding 12:12:59
`to the first and second receiver 12:13:02
`modules." 12:13:06
` So would the correct statement 12:13:06
`be that Figure 1C demonstrates a single 12:13:08
`site corresponding to the first and 12:13:14
`second receiver module? 12:13:16
` A. You paraphrased my first 12:13:27
`sentence; I think my first sentence is 12:13:29
`accurate. 12:13:31
` Q. And when looking at the Figure 12:13:33
`1C, which portion of Figure 1C are you 12:13:35
`referring to as "the single hardware 12:13:41
`device that implements the claimed 12:13:45
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 12 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
` Tim A. Williams
`functionality corresponding to the first 12:13:48
`and second receiver module"? 12:13:50
` A. Primary device 4. 12:13:52
` Q. And Figure 1C also includes a 12:14:00
`depiction for ancillary device(s) 5; is 12:14:04
`that correct? 12:14:09
` A. Yes, I'd like to amend my 12:14:09
`answer, it could also be ancillary device 12:14:11
`5. 12:14:16
` Q. Okay. 12:14:16
` So just to clarify, when 12:14:17
`looking at Figure 1C, either primary 12:14:19
`device 4 or ancillary device(s) 5 could 12:14:23
`be the single hardware device that 12:14:27
`implements the claimed functionality 12:14:30
`corresponding to the first and second 12:14:34
`receiver module? 12:14:35
` A. Well, as I say in this 12:14:36
`paragraph: "In both passages the use of 12:14:38
`the term 'and/or' indicates a single 12:14:40
`device, such as primary device 4, may 12:14:43
`have the necessary modules for receiving 12:14:43
`both the advertisement media signal 113 12:14:48
`and the related signal 114 corresponding 12:14:49
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 13 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
` Tim A. Williams
`to the claimed second media content." 12:14:52
` Q. Great. 12:15:21
` And so you state in the 12:15:21
`paragraph you're referring to "primary 12:15:23
`device 4" and you stated that you wanted 12:15:25
`to amend your answer so that it could 12:15:27
`also be ancillary device 5; so I just 12:15:29
`want to clarify that it is your opinion 12:15:33
`that either primary device 4 or ancillary 12:15:36
`device(s) 5 can be a single -- sorry? 12:15:41
` A. No, go ahead, finish your 12:15:48
`answer [sic] please. 12:15:50
` Q. Thank you. 12:15:52
` Could be a single hardware 12:15:53
`device that implements the claimed 12:15:54
`functionality corresponding to the first 12:15:56
`and second receiver module? 12:15:58
` A. I believe you're 12:16:01
`misinterpreting my testimony. If you 12:16:02
`read the sentence it says such as primary 12:16:05
`device 4, or e.g. primary device 4. 12:16:09
`Primary device 5 could also be the single 12:16:14
`device, because the specification 12:16:18
`includes the "and/or" language. 12:16:20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 14 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
` Tim A. Williams
` Q. Okay. 12:16:31
` MS. KIERNAN: Okay. 12:16:53
` Could you please go to 12:16:54
` paragraph 30 of your Declaration and 12:16:55
` let me know when you are there. 12:16:57
` THE WITNESS: Are you on 12:17:01
` Exhibit 2? 12:17:02
` MS. KIERNAN: Yes. 12:17:03
` THE WITNESS: I'm there. 12:17:05
` Q. And in paragraph 30 of your 721 12:17:08
`Declaration you state that, "I note that 12:17:11
`the claim language recites an 'or,' which 12:17:14
`indicates that the claim is satisfied 12:17:18
`when a single output outputs both the 12:17:19
`first media content and the second media 12:17:22
`content concurrently." 12:17:26
` Did I read that correctly? 12:17:28
` A. You did. 12:17:30
` Q. When you are referring to a 12:17:32
`"single output," what is an example of an 12:17:34
`output as you understand it from the '081 12:17:37
`Patent? 12:17:40
` A. The word "output" is 12:18:11
`contextual; so I don't understand the 12:18:29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 15 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
` Tim A. Williams
`question. 12:18:35
` Q. Okay. 12:18:35
` Well, would a speaker be an 12:18:35
`"output" as you have used it in the 12:18:38
`sentence that I read in paragraph 30? 12:18:42
` A. So a speaker would be -- a 12:18:48
`speaker would be an example of an output 12:19:37
`system that's perceivable by a human. 12:19:40
` Q. Okay. 12:19:52
` And what then is the difference 12:19:52
`between an output system and an output, 12:19:54
`in your opinion? 12:19:59
` A. An output of a module can be a 12:20:02
`digital signal, it could be an analog 12:20:08
`signal, it could be something that's the 12:20:11
`not perceivable by a human. 12:20:13
` Q. Okay. 12:20:22
` So when you're referring to a 12:20:23
`"single output" in the last sentence of 12:20:26
`paragraph 30 you're referring to a single 12:20:29
`module that can be a digital signal, an 12:20:33
`analog signal or some other non- 12:20:37
`perceivable signal; is that fair to say? 12:20:41
` A. No, I think it's fair to say 12:20:44
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 16 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
` Tim A. Williams
`exactly what I wrote there. 12:20:48
` Q. Well, I'm trying to understand 12:20:50
`what you meant by "single output" in what 12:20:52
`you wrote there. 12:20:57
` So if a speaker is an output 12:21:01
`system, what is an output as you've used 12:21:04
`it in the last sentence of paragraph 30 12:21:10
`of your Declaration? 12:21:13
` A. Exactly what I've testified to 12:21:16
`earlier. 12:21:19
` Q. And by that you mean an output 12:21:21
`module for digital signals, et cetera? 12:21:24
` A. No, you're misrepresenting my 12:21:28
`testimony. 12:21:31
` Q. So then when you mean exactly 12:21:32
`what I testified earlier, could you 12:21:34
`please repeat for me what is an output as 12:21:37
`you used it in the last sentence of 12:21:41
`paragraph 30 of your Declaration. 12:21:43
` A. An output of a module can be a 12:21:46
`signal, such as an analog or digital 12:21:49
`signal, which is not perceivable by a 12:21:54
`human. 12:21:56
` Q. And what do you base your 12:22:06
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 17 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
` Tim A. Williams
`understanding of an output of a module 12:22:09
`on? 12:22:13
` A. Um, common understanding of the 12:22:14
`term "output." Again, the term "output" 12:22:25
`is highly contextual; but typically when 12:22:29
`discussing a module, the module does not 12:22:33
`necessarily have to include outputs that 12:22:36
`are perceivable by a human. 12:22:41
` Q. You've used "module" now in 12:22:50
`multiple instances when discussing the 12:22:53
`output, where is the word module coming 12:22:54
`from in paragraph the 30? 12:22:59
` I see it in the earlier 12:23:03
`sentences but I don't see it in the later 12:23:05
`ones. 12:23:08
` A. Claim 9, element [d], uses the 12:23:09
`word "module." 12:23:14
` Q. Okay. 12:23:21
` So when discussing the single 12:23:21
`output you are referring to the output of 12:23:23
`either the first receiver module or the 12:23:26
`second receiver module as used in element 12:23:30
`9[d] of the '081 patent? 12:23:33
` A. I am. 12:23:35
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 18 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
` Tim A. Williams
` Q. Continuing in your Declaration 12:23:38
`to paragraph 32, please, if you let me 12:23:54
`know when you're there. 12:24:00
` A. Yes. 12:24:02
` Q. And you contend in paragraph 32 12:24:03
`that, "As I previously explained, the 12:24:10
`presenting can occur on a single device 12:24:16
`or multiple devices." 12:24:18
` Did I read that correctly? 12:24:21
` A. You did. 12:24:23
` Q. And then you go on in paragraph 12:24:24
`32 as it continues on to page 17 to rely 12:24:28
`on Figure 3 as an example; is that 12:24:32
`correct? 12:24:39
` A. Yes. 12:24:41
` Q. And looking at the reproduced 12:24:43
`Figure 3 in your Declaration -- I'm now 12:24:53
`on page 17 -- the figure appears to 12:24:58
`include a cell phone-looking device; is 12:25:04
`that correct? 12:25:07
` A. Yes. 12:25:08
` Q. And what number does the '081 12:25:10
`patent attribute to that cell phone 12:25:16
`device? 12:25:18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 19 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
` Tim A. Williams
` A. Column 21, for example, column 12:25:19
`21, line 1, calls the cell phone primary 12:27:19
`device 4. 12:27:28
` Q. Okay. 12:27:32
` And do you see the computer to 12:27:32
`the right of the cell phone in Figure 3? 12:27:40
` A. Yes. 12:27:45
` Q. And that computer is assigned 12:27:46
`No. 5 with respect to Figure 3; is that 12:27:53
`correct? 12:27:57
` A. Yes. 12:27:57
` Q. And do you understand that to 12:27:59
`be referring to what the '081 Patent 12:28:03
`calls the ancillary device 5? 12:28:08
` A. Yes. 12:28:12
` Q. In paragraph 33 of your 12:28:15
`Declaration you refer to Figure 3 and you 12:28:24
`explain that you're providing relevant 12:28:28
`sections below explaining that multiple 12:28:32
`output, e.g., audio and video, may be 12:28:36
`received and presented at a single 12:28:43
`device; is that correct? 12:28:46
` A. You read that correctly, yes. 12:28:49
` Q. So then the block quotes that 12:28:51
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 20 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
` Tim A. Williams
`follow, in your opinion, are examples 12:28:54
`describing Figure 3 that show that a 12:28:57
`single device can present -- well, I'm 12:28:59
`sorry, that a single device can contain 12:29:02
`multiple outputs; correct? 12:29:05
` A. I believe your question was 12:29:16
`worded incorrectly. What I'm explaining 12:29:18
`is that multiple outputs may be received 12:29:20
`and presented at a single device. 12:29:24
` Q. Okay. 12:29:38
` And is it your position that 12:29:38
`the block quotes that you have included 12:29:40
`following paragraph 33 support the 12:29:43
`position that presenting using a single 12:29:46
`device would be sufficient to satisfy 12:29:51
`Claim 9 of the '081 Patent? 12:29:54
` A. Um, I don't understand your 12:29:59
`question. The block quotes are part of 12:30:00
`paragraph 33. 12:30:03
` Q. Okay. 12:30:06
` So is it your position that the 12:30:07
`block quotes that are part of paragraph 12:30:09
`33 support the position that presenting 12:30:12
`using a single device would be sufficient 12:30:14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 21 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
` Tim A. Williams
`to satisfy Claim 9 of the '081 Patent? 12:30:16
` MR. TANG: Objection to form. 12:30:19
` A. Well, again, I cited some 12:30:38
`relevant sections below explaining how 12:30:41
`multiple outputs may be received and 12:30:44
`presented in a single device, that's my 12:30:46
`opinion. 12:30:49
` Q. Just to clarify that, when you 12:30:53
`say "multiple outputs may be received at 12:30:55
`a single device," what do you mean by 12:31:00
`that? 12:31:04
` A. I don't understand your 12:31:10
`question. 12:31:11
` Q. Okay. 12:31:13
` Well, when we talked about 12:31:14
`outputs of a module earlier, you 12:31:19
`mentioned that they could be digital 12:31:21
`analog or not perceivable to a human; is 12:31:24
`that the same definition that you're 12:31:29
`referring to here with respect to outputs 12:31:30
`in paragraph 33? 12:31:32
` A. I don't understand your 12:31:36
`question. 12:31:37
` Q. Does the use of the word 12:31:38
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 22 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
` Tim A. Williams
`"output" in paragraph 33 differ from the 12:31:44
`definition of outputs of a module that we 12:31:49
`discussed earlier? 12:31:52
` A. No, but the thing in Claim 9 12:32:00
`that is presenting the information that 12:32:06
`has been received via multiple sources is 12:32:09
`the output system. 12:32:13
` Q. Okay. 12:32:24
` So just to clarify though, 12:32:24
`when you're using the term "output" in 12:32:26
`paragraph 33, you're using it with the 12:32:30
`same understanding as an output of a 12:32:34
`module that we discussed? 12:32:37
` A. Yes, with the understanding 12:32:41
`that the presentation process involves 12:32:44
`the output system per Claim 9. 12:32:48
` Q. Would you turn to the '081 12:33:00
`Patent, please. 12:33:08
` A. Yes. 12:33:09
` Q. And the '081 Patent has a what 12:33:15
`you refer to as a lengthy description of 12:33:22
`Figure 3, and it begins at column 18, 12:33:27
`line 56 and continues until column 22, 12:33:29
`line 32; is that correct? 12:33:33
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`Page 23 of 98
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
` Tim A. Williams
` A. I'll take your representation 12:33:37
`for that. 12:33:40
` Q. Okay. 12:33:46
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket