throbber
Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`-----------------------------------x
`VOLKSWAGON GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`STRATOSAUDIO, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`-----------------------------------x
`IPR2021-00720
` U.S. Patent No. 9,355,405
`-----------------------------------x
`January 6, 2022
`12:03 p.m.
`
` VIRTUAL DEPOSITION of TIM A. WILLIAMS,
`PhD, taken by counsel for Patent Owner,
`via Zoom, before Amy Klein Campion, a
`Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public
`within and for the State of New York.
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 1 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`-----------------------------------x
`VOLKSWAGON GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`STRATOSAUDIO, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`-----------------------------------x
`IPR2021-00721
`U.S. Patent No. 8,166,081
`-----------------------------------x
`January 6, 2022
`12:03 p.m.
`
` VIRTUAL DEPOSITION of TIM A. WILLIAMS,
`PhD, taken by counsel for Patent Owner,
`via Zoom, before Amy Klein Campion, a
`Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public
`within and for the State of New York.
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 2 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
` FOR THE PETITIONER:
` SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`599 Lexington Avenue
`New York, New York 10022
` BY: ERIC LUCAS, ESQ.
`Eric.Lucas@Shearman.com
`
` FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
` WHITE & CASE LLP
`3000 El Camino Real, 9th Floor
`2 Palo Alto Square
`Palo Alto, California 94306
` BY: HALLIE KIERNAN, ESQ.
`Hallie.Kiernan@whitecase.com
`
` WHITE & CASE LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, New York 10020-1095
` BY: JOHN SCHEIBELER, ESQ.
`John.Scheibeler@whitecase.com
`
`TIMOTHY KEEGAN, ESQ.
`Timothy.Keegan@whitecase.com
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`89
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 3 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`T I M A R T H U R
`W I L L I A M S, P h D.,
`having been first duly sworn via Zoom by
`the Notary Public (Amy Klein Campion), was
`examined and testified as follows:
`EXAMINATION BY
`MS. KIERNAN:
`Q.
`Good morning, Dr. Williams. How
`are you?
`Good morning.
`A.
`Have you been deposed before?
`Q.
`Yes.
`A.
`Roughly, how many times would
`Q.
`say you have been deposed?
`A.
`Somewhere around 200 times.
`Q.
`Okay. So you're quite familiar
`with it then?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Have you been deposed by Zoom?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And so you're familiar with how
`the deposition will proceed via Zoom
`today?
`A.
`
`I assume so.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 4 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`I apologize. Hopefully that's
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`And if you have any difficulties
`Q.
`or technology difficulties that may arise
`during the proceedings, please be sure to
`let us know as soon as possible.
`A. Yes. Can I ask that you speak
`up a little bit? It's kind of hard to
`hear you.
`Q.
`better.
`Okay.
`A.
`I'll ask that you speak clearly
`Q.
`and slowly, especially as you see right
`now, there could be some issues with
`sounds, for the reporter to hear as well,
`and for you to understand a question.
`Does that seem fair?
`Yes.
`A.
`And we'll try to each give the
`Q.
`other an opportunity to finish their
`statement before answering and asking
`another question, does that seem fair?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And if you have any difficulty
`hearing my question or I become muffled,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 5 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`again, please let me know as soon as you
`realize it and I will make a correction as
`I've already done.
`If you don't understand a
`question, please ask for a clarification.
`If you don't ask for
`clarification, I will assume that you
`understood the question.
`Does that seem fair to you?
`Yes.
`A.
`And unless counsel instructs you
`Q.
`not to answer, you should answer despite
`an objection.
`Do you understand that?
`Yes.
`A.
`I'll do my best to take periodic
`Q.
`breaks throughout the day but for any
`reason you need to take a break, please
`let me know. All I ask is that we don't
`take a break while a question is pending.
`Please complete the question and answer
`before we take a break.
`Does that seem fair to you?
`Yes.
`
`A.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 6 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Wonderful, thank you. Did you
`Q.
`prepare for this deposition today?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`For how long did you prepare?
`A.
`Ten hours and -- with the
`attorneys.
`Q.
`
`With the attorneys, thank you.
`Was anyone besides attorneys
`present at your preparation session?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`Did you review any documents in
`preparing for today's deposition?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`What documents did you review?
`A.
`In general, the documents
`associated with the case.
`Q.
`And by that you mean the
`exhibits and your declaration and
`petition?
`A.
`
`Yes.
`(720 IPR Exhibit 1003 previously
` marked for identification,
` multiple-page document, titled,
` "DECLARATION OF TIM A. WILLIAMS, PhD,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 7 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`- T.A. Williams -
` IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER
` PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO.
` 9,355,405.")
`BY MS. KIERNAN:
`Q.
`I am going to start by sharing
`an exhibit that was previously marked in
`these proceedings. It is the 720 IPR
`Exhibit 1003.
`You should be able to see that
`in your Exhibit Share folder.
`Please let me know if you do not
`
`see it.
`
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`So I need to go somewhere else
`for the Exhibit Share. Hold on.
`Q.
`Yes.
`A.
`Is that right?
`Q.
`Yes. There should be a separate
`Exhibit Share link.
`A.
`Let me find it. Hang on.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`It would have come from
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 8 of 198
`
`

`

`- T.A. Williams -
`
`Page 9
`
`Veritext.
`Q.
`A.
`
`Yes.
`Exhibit Share instructions.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Exhibit Share.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Sorry about this. I didn't know
`there was a separate page. Usually people
`just put them in the Chat.
`Q.
`I apologize.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`It's loading...
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Okay. I'm in.
`Q.
`Wonderful. Are you in the
`document?
`A.
`
`I see the document.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Okay.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 9 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Great. Apologies for not making
`Q.
`sure you had that ready.
`So can you please go to
`paragraph 15 -- before we do that. Have
`you seen this document before?
`A.
`Stand by.
`The question is, have I seen
`this document before? Yes, I have seen
`this document before.
`Q.
`Great. And this document is
`"DECLARATION OF TIM A. WILLIAMS PH.D., IN
`SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES
`REVIEW U.S. PATENT 9,355,405"; is that
`correct? Is that what you see?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And this is Case Number
`IPR2021-00720.
`A.
`It is.
`Q.
`So if I were to refer to
`IPR2021-00720 as the 720 IPR moving
`forward, Dr. Williams, would you
`understand that I am referring to
`IPR2021-00720?
`A.
`Yes.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 10 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`And that's the IPR related to
`Q.
`the Patent Number 9,355,405, correct?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And would you similarly
`understand that when we're referring to
`the '405 Patent, that that is the
`shorthand for that patent number I just
`read to you?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`So could you please turn to
`paragraph 15 of this exhibit which is on
`page 7.
`I'm sorry, you said 16?
`A.
`15.
`Q.
`One-six?
`A.
`One-five.
`Q.
`Okay, one-five. Okay, good.
`A.
`It said you considered the '405
`Q.
`Patent and its prosecution history, the
`exhibits listed in the Exhibit List files
`with the petition as well as any materials
`referenced in this declaration when
`forming your opinions; is that correct?
`A.
`Yes, that's correct.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 11 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`And, to your knowledge, did you
`Q.
`consider any other material that is not
`included in those documents?
`A.
`Not that I recall.
`Q.
`Thank you. How many hours did
`you spend preparing this declaration?
`A.
`I don't recall.
`Q.
`Did you speak with anyone other
`than the attorneys in this matter when
`preparing this declaration?
`A.
`No.
`Q.
`I'm now going to share with you
`a second exhibit which is the 721 IPR
`Exhibit 1003. It will similarly appear in
`your Exhibit Share folder. When you have
`it, please let me know.
`(721 IPR Exhibit 1003 marked for
` identification, "DECLARATION OF TIM A.
` WILLIAMS, PhD, IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
` FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT
` NO. 8,166,081.")
`BY MS. KIERNAN:
`Q.
`You may need to refresh your
`Exhibit Share for it to show up. I just
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 12 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`had that issue.
`A.
`I have it. I see the document.
`I'm downloading it now.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`I have the document.
` Q. Wonderful. And this document is
`titled, "DECLARATION OF TIM A. WILLIAMS
`Ph.D. IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER
`PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NUMBER
`8,126,081," correct?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And this is in case number
`IPR2021-00721, correct?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And if I refer to the 721 IPR
`moving forward, you will understand that
`I'm referring to this case number; is that
`okay with you?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And similarly with Patent Number
`8,166,081, if I refer to it as the '081
`Patent, will you understand that?
`A.
`Yes.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 13 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Thank you. How many hours did
`Q.
`you spend preparing this declaration?
`A.
`I don't recall.
`Q.
`And did you speak with anyone
`other than attorneys in preparing this
`declaration?
`A.
`No.
` Q. Thank you. What is your
`experience with respect to transmission of
`information on subcarrier signals using
`methods known as radio broadcast data
`systems or RBDS, Dr. Williams?
`A.
`In the late eighties I worked at
`Motorola and we designed radio systems for
`Bosch, and that radio system included
`reception of radio data signals in Europe.
`Our RBDS is the U.S. version of that
`standard.
`Q.
`Europe?
`RBDS.
`A.
`So have you ever designed a
`Q.
`system or components thereof that utilize
`RBDS?
`
`What was the standard called in
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 14 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`No.
`A.
`But you did design a system or
`Q.
`component that utilized RBDS?
`A.
`Correct.
`Q.
`Before this case, did you have
`any knowledge of the National Radio
`Systems Committee?
`A.
`Don't recall.
`Q.
`Did you have any knowledge of
`the National Association of Broadcasters
`before this case?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`What was your knowledge of the
`National Association of Broadcasters
`before this case?
`A.
`That they existed; that they
`were an industry group; that they were
`concerned with broadcast information.
`I think you have to be more
`specific if you want more specific
`answers.
`Thank you. I think that's
`Q.
`helpful. Before this case, did you have
`any knowledge of the United States RBDS
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 15 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`
`Standard?
`I knew it existed.
`A.
`And beyond knowing that it
`Q.
`existed, you didn't have any knowledge of
`any specific standards?
`A.
`I'm sorry this is a specific
`standard. So I don't understand the
`question.
`Beyond knowing that the RBDS
`Q.
`Standard existed, did you have any
`specific knowledge of its contents?
`MR. LUCAS: Objection; vague.
`To the extent that it's -- it's
`A.
`a modification of the RDS from Europe,
`yes.
`
`(720 IPR Exhibit 1001 previously
` marked for identification, 35-page
` document, United States Patent, Patent
` No. 9,355,405 B2.)
`BY MS. KIERNAN:
`Q.
`Okay. Thank you.
`I'd like to show you now a
`document that was previously marked in the
`720 IPR proceeding as Exhibit 1001. It
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 16 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`should be -- should appear in your Exhibit
`Share after refreshing.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Still refreshing.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Okay. Exhibit 1001, right?
`Q.
`Correct. Right. Do you
`recognize this document?
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`This is a copy of the '405
`Patent, correct?
`A.
`It is.
`Q.
`Could you please turn to page 35
`of the exhibit number that's shown on the
`bottom right-hand corner. Let me know
`when you're there.
`A.
`I'm there.
`Q.
`Do you see claim 12?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`Do you recognize claim 12?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 17 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Yes.
`A.
`It is in fact one of the
`Q.
`challenged claims, correct?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`I am looking at the beginning of
`claim 12, "A method for combining multiple
`media obtained from a broadcast stream."
`What is your understanding of a
`"broadcast stream"?
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Broadcasts are in the -- are
`signals that are transmitted from one
`location -- typically one location to
`multiple locations, so one to many type of
`transmissions.
`Q.
`And is there anything different
`from a broadcast stream?
`A.
`The stream can be either
`analogue or digital information so it's
`just the -- the continuing set of
`information that's being broadcast.
`Q.
`Were you reviewing something
`just now on your computer as you were
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 18 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`thinking about the question?
`A.
`Exhibit 1.
`Q.
`And only Exhibit 1001?
`A.
`Correct. No. Sorry.
`Exhibit 1, not Exhibit 1001. My '405
`report.
`You're referring to Exhibit 1003
`Q.
`from the first document we looked at
`today, right?
`A.
`Yes, Exhibit 1 to this
`deposition.
`Q.
`Okay. Thank you for that
`clarification. And what in Exhibit 1003
`were you look at exactly?
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Paragraph 27.
`Q.
`What particularly in
`paragraph 27 were you looking at?
`A.
`The broadcast, page 11, second
`line, fourth word.
`Q.
`Beginning with, "In one example,
`'a radio station transmits'"?
`A. No. Fourth word, "broadcast."
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 19 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`Q.
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Okay. Thank you.
`How did that word help you to
`recall what a "broadcast stream" is?
`A.
`It didn't.
`Q.
`So your answer with respect to
`"broadcast stream" was your own
`recollection?
`A.
`It's my opinion based on
`industry experience.
`Q.
`Thank you.
`Turning back to Exhibit 1001,
`page 35, that same line -- let me know
`when you're there, please.
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`It says, "multiple media." What
`is your understanding of "media" in the
`claim?
`"Media" is any -- "media" would
`A.
`be content to be consumed by the user.
`Q.
`Thank you. On that same page,
`if you could look to the next line that
`begins "receiving." "...receiving, using
`an electronic receiving device."
`A.
`Yes.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 20 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`What is your understanding of an
`Q.
`"electronic receiving device"?
`A.
`Electronic receiving device is a
`device capable of bringing information
`that's been modulated onto a carrier in --
`down into a form that's presentable to a
`human for any system that needs to
`interpret that information.
`Q.
`And in the '081 Patent, what
`would be an example of an "electronic
`receiving device," in your opinion?
`MR. LUCAS: Objection. Which
` patent are we talking about here?
`MS. KIERNAN: The '405 Patent.
`MR. LUCAS: So is your question
` with regard to the '405 or the '081
` Patent? Because you said the '081
` Patent.
`MS. KIERNAN: I apologize. I'll
` rephrase the question for the witness.
`BY MS. KIERNAN:
`Q.
`With respect to the '405 Patent,
`what would be an example of an "electronic
`receiving device"?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 21 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`You're asking about as disclosed
`A.
`within the...
`Q.
`Yes.
`A.
`...the '405 Patent; is that
`correct?
`Q.
`
`Yes.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`MR. LUCAS: Maybe you can point
` to at paragraph in his declaration
` about this.
`A.
`Can I have my question again,
`please?
`With respect to the '405 Patent,
`Q.
`what would be an example of an "electronic
`receiving device"?
`A.
`So that would be computer system
`400 is one form of that and then also in
`figure -- Figure 2, the receiving device
`would be -- those elements within 400 and
`those elements within the -- within the
`label for the entire device. Those
`elements within the cellphone on the left
`that provide the functionality that I
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 22 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`described earlier of a receiver.
`Q.
`Just for --
`A.
`Figure 3 shows itself -- I guess
`it's labeled "4," element "4" in the
`drawing.
` Q. Thank you. Turning back to
`page 35, do you see the next line that
`begins with "receiving, using the
`electronic receiving device, at least a
`second media content"?
`A.
`Sorry, you're breaking up there.
`You were asking about the next
`element of claim 12?
`Q.
`Yes, correct.
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Yes, I see it. I see the
`element.
`And at the end of that element
`Q.
`it says, "the second media content
`received discretely from the first media
`content." Correct?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`What is your understanding of
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 23 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`"received discretely" as used in the claim
`there?
`It's my understanding that
`A.
`"received discretely" means that the
`receiver is using resources that are not
`used by the first receiver. So that could
`be different antennas physically, it could
`be different RF front ends physically or
`it could just be different software
`modules within the -- within the computer
`itself to perform the reception.
`So, for example, if the media 1
`were modulated in one particular fashion
`and media 2 were modulated in a different
`fashion, those would be discrete receivers
`because the processing of those received
`streams would be discretely different.
` Q. Thank you. Just to clarify, you
`stated at the beginning that the receiver
`is using resources that are not used by
`the first receiver. Is that correct?
`A.
`Not entirely, yes.
`Q.
`What did you mean when you said,
`"first receiver"?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 24 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`The receiver that is receiving
`A.
`the first media stream, first media
`content.
`And that is a different receiver
`Q.
`than that receiving the second media
`content, in your opinion?
`A.
`In this claim, the second media
`content received discretely from the first
`media content would require that different
`resources be applied to the reception of
`the second media content than the first
`media content and those resources can be
`hardware and/or software.
`Q.
`And those hardware and/or
`software resources could be different
`receivers as well?
`MR. LUCAS: Objection; form.
`I don't understand the question.
`A.
`Well, you said that those
`Q.
`resources that are used could be different
`hardware and/or software. What is an
`example of different hardware used for
`those resources?
`A.
`I just gave some examples in my
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 25 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`previous answer.
`Q.
`I appreciate that. Could you
`give me another?
`A.
`A different antenna, for
`example, it would be a different hardware
`resource.
`Turning back to the "received
`Q.
`discretely," would a signal, a subcarrier
`signal be considered to be "received
`discretely" from a carrier signal?
`A.
`Yes, there -- different
`modulations there are different resources
`used in the demodulating of that
`information and presenting it onto
`whatever system is going to interpret it,
`including a human.
`Q.
`Maybe you can explain that a
`little bit more. What is your
`understanding of a "subcarrier signal"?
`A.
`It's a signal that's broadcast
`in association with a main carrier signal.
`Q.
`Are those signals combined?
`A.
`Well, I don't -- I think your
`terminology is imprecise. There is a
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 26 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`piece of information that is placed onto
`the main carrier, for example, a song, and
`there's a piece of information that's
`placed onto the -- the subcarrier, for
`example, the title of the song. And both
`of those pieces of information are
`modulated in different ways onto carriers
`that are RF carriers that are broadcast
`over the air and then the receiver
`receives that electromagnetic radiation
`and converts that electromagnetic
`radiation into electronic signals.
`Those electronic signals are
`demodulated so the information is taken
`off a carrier wave in two different
`aspects, one being the song and the other
`being the song title. And that process of
`removing the information that's been
`modulated onto the RF carrier is different
`in these two cases.
`Q.
`Okay, thank you. Just for
`clarification, you said that the carrier
`signal and the subcarrier signal are sent
`over R [reporter's error] carriers. Are
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 27 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`they sent in the same carrier or separate
`ones?
`A.
`
`R carriers?
`MR. LUCAS: Objection to form.
`I don't understand your
`
`A.
`question.
`I was trying to use the
`Q.
`real-time. You had mentioned that the
`carrier and the subcarrier are then both
`sent to the receiver as an electronic
`signal, correct?
`A.
`As an electronic magnetic
`signal.
`Okay, thank you. Is it one
`Q.
`electromagnetic signal or two?
`MR. LUCAS: Objection to form.
`At what point? At the point of
`A.
`transmission?
`Q.
`Yes. Let's start there. At the
`point of transmission is the subcarrier
`and carrier signals one electromagnetic
`signal?
`Hmmm, depends on your
`A.
`philosophy, I guess.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 28 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 29
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Okay --
`Q.
`It depends on your philosophy.
`A.
`I would think one POSITA would say it's a
`single signal and another POSITA would say
`it's multiple signals. The RF
`electrodynamic radiation itself is being
`transmitted from the transmitter, I would
`say -- I would say, it just depends on how
`you want to view that.
`Q.
`And how do you view that,
`Dr. Williams?
`A.
`It could be either way. It
`depends on what we're discussing. Again,
`I -- I think a POSITA could look at it
`either as a single signal or multiple
`signals.
` Q. Okay. Going back to the '405
`Patent, page 35, the next line in the
`claim 12 is "determining uniquely
`identifying data."
`Let me know when you're there.
`I'm there.
`What is "uniquely identifying
`
`A.
`Q.
`data"?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 29 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`MR. LUCAS: Objection to form.
`Sorry, can I have the question
`A.
`again, please?
` Q. Yes. The claim states,
`"determining uniquely identifying data."
`What is "uniquely identifying
`
`data"?
`The patent -- the '405 Patent
`A.
`discusses this in column 7 starting at
`line 51, "The terms 'unique event
`identifier' and 'unique identifier' as
`used herein are broad terms that refer to
`any means for identifying a specific
`instance of a broadcast stream
`transmission and/or media signal."
`Q.
`And is that what you were
`reviewing while determining your answer?
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`And it's your understanding that
`"unique event identifier" or "unique
`identifier" is the same as "uniquely
`identifying data" in the patent?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 30 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 31
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`MR. LUCAS: Objection, form;
` misstates testimony.
`A.
`Well, this entire paragraph in
`the spec discusses unique identifiers.
`Q.
`And so it is your opinion that
`this paragraph discusses "uniquely
`identifying data" as well?
`MR. LUCAS: Objection to form.
`I'm sorry, I didn't hear the
`A.
`whole question.
`Q.
`I will restate the question. Is
`it your opinion that the paragraph in the
`'405 Patent in column 7 beginning around
`line 51 also describes "uniquely
`identifying data"?
`(The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
`A.
`Yes.
`Q.
`What would be an example in your
`opinion of "uniquely identifying data" as
`used in this claim?
`A.
`Well, the patent discusses at
`column 7, line 63 an advertise --
`"advertisement, related media, associated
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 31 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 32
`
` - T.A. Williams -
`media, device, language user of a device
`and/or first media signals."
` Q. And it is your opinion that
`those are examples of "uniquely
`identifying data" in the patent?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Would a URL constitute "uniquely
`identifying data" described in this claim?
` (The witness reviewing computer
` screen.)
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you were reviewing the
`patent on the screen as you were
`determining that answer, correct?
` A. I was.
` Q. Were you looking at any other
`documents?
` A. No.
` Q. Thank you.
` Similarly, would an IP address
`be an example of "uniquely identifying
`data" under this claim?
` A. It could.
` Q. Would a user identification
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 32 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 33
`
` - T.A. Williams -
`number be an example of "uniquely
`identifying data" under this claim?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Would a phone number be
`considered a "uniquely identifying data"
`under this claim?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Turning back to the '405 Patent,
`claim 12, moving to the element beginning
`with "presenting concurrently," can you
`let me know when you're there?
` A. Yes. I'm there.
` Q. Thank you. What is your
`understanding of "presenting concurrently"
`as used in claim 12 of the '405 Patent?
` A. That the first media content and
`the second media content be presented to
`the user using an electronic output
`device.
` Q. So if you present the first
`media signal for the user using the
`electronic device and then wait five
`minutes and then present the second media
`content for the user in that electronic
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 33 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 34
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`device, would that meet this claim
`element, in your opinion?
`A.
`Depends on the length of the
`first media content.
`Q.
`So if the length of the first
`media content was 20 seconds, and there
`was still a delay by five minutes in
`presenting the second media content on the
`same user devise, would that meet the
`claim, in your opinion?
`A.
`I have not opined on that
`particular situation.
`Q.
`But sitting here today, would
`you say that that's the case -- or no?
`A.
`Depends on the time resolution
`of concurrently.
`Q.
`What do you mean by that?
`A.
`Well, if your time resolution is
`a century, the First World War and the
`Second World War occurred concurrently.
`If your time resolution is
`nanoseconds, the first bit of a data
`stream and a second bit of a data stream
`are not concurrent.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2020
`Volkswagen v StratosAudio
`IPR2021-00721
`Page 34 of 198
`
`

`

`Page 35
`
`- T.A. Williams -
`Did the '405 Patent talk about
`Q.
`time resolution in your understanding?
`A.
`I'm sorry, could I have the
`question again, please?
` Q. Yes. Does the '405 Patent talk
`about time resolution as you understand
`it?
`
`I think that -- not
`A.
`specifically. I think --
`Q.
`And -- go ahead.
`A.
`I think that a receiver
`receiving the '405 would interpret that
`concurrently in terms of the human scale
`of time perception.
`Q.
`What's "the human scale of time
`perception"?
`A.
`Depends on what you're doing.
`Q.
`So if you were wr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket