`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`KOSS CORPORATION,
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-00665-ADA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
` v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`JOINT MOTION TO AMEND AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`Koss Corporation (“Koss”) and Apple Inc. (“Apple”) jointly move to modify the Amended
`
`Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 85) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). There is good cause for the
`
`Court to exercise its discretion under Rule 16 to allow for such modification.
`
`The parties are in the process of fact discovery and are working diligently to comply with
`
`the deadline for Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. To date, and as relevant to the
`
`foregoing, Koss has served technical 30(b)(6) deposition topics as well as document requests
`
`seeking technical documentation and source code, and is working with Apple to schedule the
`
`appropriate depositions and obtain the requested documentation. Apple has served eight third-
`
`party subpoenas relating to prior art and is working with the subpoenaed parties to identify
`
`responsive documents and deposition dates. As there is sufficient time in the schedule to extend
`
`the July 16th date by approximately one month, to August 13th, without impacting any other dates
`
`in the calendar, and as the July date is a service deadline not a filing deadline, such that there is no
`
`impact on the Court’s ability to manage its schedule, the parties jointly move to enter the amended
`
`schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Date: July 19, 2021
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /s/ Darlene F. Ghavimi
`Darlene F. Ghavimi (TX Bar No. 24072114)
`K&L GATES LLP
`2801 Via Fortuna, Suite #350
`Austin, TX 78746
`Tel.: (512) 482-6919
`Fax: (512) 482-6859
`darlene.ghavimi@klgates.com
`
`James A. Shimota (admitted pro hac vice)
`Benjamin E. Weed (admitted pro hac vice)
`Philip A. Kunz (admitted pro hac vice)
`Erik J. Halverson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Gina A. Johnson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Amanda C. Maxfield (admitted pro hac vice)
`K&L GATES LLP
`Suite 3300
`70 W. Madison Street
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Tel.: (312) 372-1121
`Fax: (312) 827-8000
`james.shimota@klgates.com
`benjamin.weed@klgates.com
`philip.kunz@klgates.com
`erik.halverson@klgates.com
`gina.johnson@klgates.com
`amanda.maxfield@klgates.com
`
`Peter E. Soskin (admitted pro hac vice)
`K&L GATES LLP
`Suite 1200
`4 Embarcadero Center
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel.: (415) 882-8046
`Fax: (415) 882-8220
`peter.soskin@klgates.com
`
`Attorneys for Koss Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`Date: July 19, 2021
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Michael T. Pieja
`Michael T. Pieja (pro hac vice)
`Alan E. Littmann (pro hac vice)
`Doug Winnard (pro hac vice)
`Samuel E. Schoenburg (pro hac vice)
`Whitney Woodward (pro hac vice)
`Jennifer M. Hartjes (pro hac vice)
`GOLDMAN ISMAIL TOMASELLI
` BRENNAN & BAUM LLP
`200 South Wacker Dr., 22nd Floor
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: (312) 681-6000
`Fax: (312) 881-5191
`mpieja@goldmanismail.com
`alittmann@goldmanismail.com
`dwinnard@goldmanismail.com
`sschoenburg@goldmanismail.com
`wwoodward@goldmanismail.com
`jhartjes@goldmanismail.com
`
`Stephen E. McConnico
`State Bar No. 13450300
`Steven J. Wingard
`State Bar No. 00788694
`Stephen L. Burbank
`State Bar No. 24109672
`SCOTT DOUGLASS & MCCONNICO
`Colorado Tower
`303 Colorado St., Ste. 2400
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel: (512) 495-6300
`Fax: (512) 495-6399
`smcconnico@scottdoug.com
`swingard@scottdoug.com
`sburbank@scottdoug.com
`
`Counsel for Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88 Filed 07/19/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been
`
`served on July 19, 2021, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Darlene F. Ghavimi
`Darlene F. Ghavimi
`
`
`
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`KOSS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6:20-cv-00665-ADA
`
`Case No.
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`AGREED [PROPOSED] AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`PROPOSED
`ORIGINAL
`DATE1
`DATE
`June 17, 2021 August
`2021
`
`13,
`
`EVENT
`
`Invalidity
`Infringement and
`to serve Final
`Deadline
`Contentions. After this date, leave of Court is required for any
`amendment to Infringement or Invalidity contentions. This
`deadline does not relieve the Parties of their obligation to
`seasonably amend if new information is identified after initial
`contentions.
`
`August 12,
`2021
`
`No change
`
`Deadline to amend pleadings. A motion is not required unless
`the amendment adds patents or patent claims. (Note: This
`includes amendments in response to a 12(c) motion.)
`
`October 21,
`2021
`
`No change
`
`Deadline for the first of two meet and confers to discuss
`significantly narrowing the number of claims asserted and
`prior art references at issue. Unless the parties agree to the
`narrowing, they are ordered to contact the Court’s Law Clerk
`to arrange a teleconference with the Court to resolve the
`disputed issues.
`
`November 4,
`2021
`
`No change
`
`Close of Fact Discovery.
`
`
`1 Events in the schedule that have already occurred have been removed from the Proposed
`Amended Scheduling.
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`ORIGINAL
`DATE1
`November 19,
`2021
`
`
`
`December 23,
`2021
`
`January 20,
`2022
`
`January 20,
`2022
`
`January 27,
`2022
`
`February 10,
`2022
`
`February 24,
`2022
`
`PROPOSED
`DATE
`No change
`
`EVENT
`
`Opening Expert Reports.
`
`No change
`
`Rebuttal Expert Reports.
`
`No change
`
`Close of Expert Discovery.
`
`No change
`
`Deadline for the second of two meet and confers to discuss
`narrowing the number of claims asserted and prior art
`references at issue to triable limits. To the extent it helps the
`parties determine these limits, the parties are encouraged to
`contact the Court’s Law Clerk for an estimate of the amount of
`trial time anticipated per side. The parties shall file a Joint
`Report within 5 business days regarding the results of the meet
`and confer.
`
`No change
`
`Dispositive motion deadline and Daubert motion deadline.
`
`No change
`
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures (jury instructions, exhibits lists,
`witness lists, discovery and deposition designations).
`
`No change
`
`Serve objections to pretrial disclosures/rebuttal disclosures.
`
`March 3, 2022 No change
`
`Serve objections to rebuttal disclosures and File Motions in
`limine
`
`March 10,
`2022
`
`March 17,
`2022
`
`No change
`
`No change
`
`File Joint Pretrial Order and Pretrial Submissions (jury
`instructions, exhibits lists, witness lists, discovery and
`deposition designations); file oppositions to Motions in limine.
`
`File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or Real Time
`Reporting. If a daily transcript or real time reporting of court
`proceedings is requested for trial, the party or parties making
`said request shall file a notice with the Court and e-mail the
`Court Reporter, Kristie Davis at kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com.
`
`Deadline to meet and confer regarding remaining objections
`and disputes on Motions in limine.
`
`March 28,
`2022
`
`March 31,
`2022
`
`No change
`
`No change
`
`File joint notice identifying remaining objections to pretrial
`disclosures and disputes on Motions in limine.
`
`Final Pretrial Conference. The Court expects to set this date at
`the conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00665-ADA Document 88-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`PROPOSED
`ORIGINAL
`DATE1
`DATE
`April 18, 2022 No change
`
`
`
`EVENT
`
`Jury Selection/Trial. The Court expects to set these dates at the
`conclusion of the Markman Hearing.
`
`SIGNED this ____ day of _________________________, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`504979259.1
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 8
`
`KOSS-2004
`IPR2021-00686
`
`