IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`JOLED INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
`DISPLAY CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No. 6:20-CV-00559-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOLED INC.’S PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Order Governing Proceedings for Patent Cases (“OGP version 3.2”),
`
`Plaintiff JOLED Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “JOLED”) hereby submits its preliminary infringement
`
`contentions against Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“SEA”), Samsung Display
`
`Co., Ltd. (“SDC”), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) (collectively, “Defendants” or
`
`“Samsung”). JOLED reserves the right to add, delete, substitute, or otherwise amend these
`
`contentions based on discovery, the Court’s claim construction rulings, JOLED’s ongoing
`
`investigation, or other circumstances, or as new models are released, in a manner consistent with
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court’s Orders, including OGP version 3.2, and the
`
`Court’s rules, including the Local Court Rules for the Western District of Texas. JOLED
`
`reserves the right to modify and/or supplement these contentions with additional or different
`
`theories and/or additional or different evidence.
`
`sf-4368928
`
`1
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 1/16
`
`

`

`I.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND PRELIMINARY
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS.
`A.
`Asserted Patents and Claims.
`
`JOLED contends that Samsung infringes each of the following patents (“Asserted
`
`Patents”):
`
` U.S. Patent No. 9,728,130 B2 (“the ’130 Patent”), entitled “EL Display
`Apparatus”;
`
` U.S. Patent No. 9,922,597 B2 (“the ’597 Patent”), entitled “EL Display
`Apparatus”;
`
` U.S. Patent No. 9,997,108 B1 (“the ’108 Patent”), entitled “EL Display
`Apparatus”;
`
` U.S. Patent No. 10,134,336 B2 (“the ’336 Patent”), entitled “EL Display
`Apparatus”;
`
` U.S. Patent No. 10,198,992 B2 (“the ’992 Patent”), entitled “EL Display
`Apparatus.”
`
`Based on JOLED’s investigation thus far, Samsung is liable under at least 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271 (a) and (b) for infringement of at least the following claims (“Asserted Claims”):
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`Asserted Claims
`
`’130 Patent
`
`’597 Patent
`
`’108 Patent
`
`’336 Patent
`
`’992 Patent
`
`1-9, 11-13
`
`1, 4-14, 16-19
`
`1, 4-7, 9-20
`
`1-2, 5-12, 14-19
`
`1, 4-10, 13-15
`
`
`Samsung was aware of each of the Asserted Patents and its infringement of the Asserted
`
`Patents by no later than May 15, 2020, the date upon when JOLED sent Samsung a letter
`
`attaching copies of each of the Asserted Patents and demanding that Samsung abate infringement
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`2
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 2/16
`
`

`

`of each of the Asserted Patents by taking a license or otherwise. Despite being aware of the
`
`Asserted Patents, Samsung has continued, and is continuing, to use, sell, and offer to sell the
`
`accused products identified in Section I.B below (the “Accused Products”) within the United
`
`States, and to import the Accused Products into the United States, in each case without taking a
`
`license, and has provided, and continues to provide, instructions and support for the Accused
`
`Products to Samsung’s customers and end users in the United States, including with the
`
`knowledge or willful blindness that Samsung’s conduct will induce its customers and end users
`
`in the United States to infringe directly the Asserted Claims of each Asserted Patent. Samsung
`
`engages in activities that encourage its customers and end users in the United States to infringe
`
`the Asserted Patents, including providing instruction manuals that instruct users to operate the
`
`Accused Products in an infringing manner, as described in detail in the accompanying claim
`
`charts. Through such activities, Samsung intends that its customers and end users in the United
`
`States directly infringe the Asserted Claims, including each of the asserted method claims.
`
`Samsung has also directly infringed each of the asserted method claims through activities in the
`
`United States such as testing, retail displays/demonstrations, marketing, and other activities.
`
`JOLED has yet to receive production or disclosure of certain documents or information,
`
`such as technical manuals or design specifications sufficient to show the operation of the
`
`Accused Products, that may affect the substance of JOLED’s disclosure of asserted claims.
`
`Accordingly, JOLED reserves the right to amend or otherwise modify its identification of
`
`asserted claims based upon JOLED’s review of the relevant documents and information to be
`
`produced by Samsung and JOLED’s continuing investigation.
`
`The Defendants have stated in their answer that they lack knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to whether the Defendants had knowledge of the Asserted Patents
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`3
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 3/16
`
`

`

`before the notice date of May 15, 2020. (Dkt. 16, ¶¶ 27, 67, 78, 110, and 130.) The Defendants
`
`have also asserted in their answer an affirmative defense that “JOLED’s claims for damages
`
`prior to the date of notice to Defendants are barred to the extent the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287 have not been met.” (Dkt. 16, p. 26, Seventh Defense.) The Court has not yet entered a
`
`Scheduling Order. When allowable under the Court’s Scheduling Order, JOLED intends to take
`
`discovery regarding (a) when each of the Defendants first had knowledge of each of the Asserted
`
`Patents, and (b) the Defendants’ affirmative defense based on 35 U.S.C. § 287. The results of
`
`such discovery will inform JOLED’s decision whether or not to drop certain apparatus claims
`
`from its infringement contentions and to assert instead only method claims as to which the
`
`requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 do not apply. JOLED therefore reserves its right to withdraw
`
`voluntarily one or more of the asserted apparatus claims set forth in these preliminary
`
`infringement contentions, on a patent-by-patent basis, after such discovery is complete and
`
`without prejudice to JOLED’s ability to seek past damages prior to notice with respect to the
`
`remaining asserted method claims. See, e.g., CliniComp Int’l, Inc. v. athenahealth, Inc.,
`
`No. A-18-CV-00425-LY, 2020 WL 5745914, at *4 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2020).
`
`B.
`
`Accused Products.
`
`JOLED identifies all Samsung smartphones with OLED displays used, sold, or offered
`
`for sale within the United States, or imported in the United States, on or after August 8, 2017, as
`
`the “Accused Products.”
`
`Based on JOLED’s investigation thus far, the Accused Products include all Samsung
`
`smartphones that (i) include OLED displays, and (ii) were or will be used, sold, or offered for
`
`sale within the United States and/or imported into the United States by Samsung or any other
`
`entity. For the ’130 Patent, JOLED accuses Samsung smartphones with OLED displays that
`
`were or will be used, sold, or offered for sale within the United States and/or imported into the
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`4
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 4/16
`
`

`

`United States on or after August 8, 2017. For the ’597 Patent, JOLED accuses Samsung
`
`smartphones with OLED displays that were or will be used, sold, or offered for sale within the
`
`United States and/or imported into the United States on or after March 20, 2018. For the
`
`’108 Patent, JOLED accuses Samsung smartphones with OLED displays that were or will be
`
`used, sold, or offered for sale within the United States and/or imported into the United States on
`
`or after June 12, 2018. For the ’336 Patent, JOLED accuses Samsung smartphones with OLED
`
`displays that were or will be used, sold, or offered for sale within the United States and/or
`
`imported into the United States on or after November 20, 2018. For the ’992 Patent, JOLED
`
`accuses Samsung smartphones with OLED displays that were or will be used, sold, or offered for
`
`sale within the United States and/or imported into the United States on or after February 5, 2019.
`
`JOLED accuses Samsung smartphones with OLED displays that were or will be used,
`
`sold, or offered for sale within the United States and/or imported into the United States within at
`
`least the following categories as Accused Products: Samsung Galaxy S products, Samsung
`
`Galaxy Note products, Samsung Galaxy A products, Samsung Galaxy J products, Samsung
`
`Galaxy Fold/Flip products, and Other Samsung Galaxy Products. JOLED has also made
`
`reasonable efforts to determine the specific model names of Samsung products that satisfy the
`
`above criteria. Based on JOLED’s investigation thus far, the Accused Products include but are
`
`not limited to the following1:
`
`
`1 JOLED accuses all versions of the listed products regardless of any options such as carrier,
`storage capacity, color, 4G capability, 5G capability, UW (Ultra Wideband) capability, release
`year, etc. JOLED has endeavored to identify all model names for each Accused Product,
`including where a separate “4G,” “5G,” “UW,” release year, or other version of a model has
`been used, sold, offered for sale, or imported, but accuses any and all such versions of each
`Accused Product regardless of whether a “4G,” “5G,” “UW,” release year, or other version is
`expressly identified in the list of Accused Products.
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`5
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 5/16
`
`

`

`Samsung Galaxy S Products:
`
`
` Samsung Galaxy S5
` Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus
` Samsung Galaxy S5 Mini
` Samsung Galaxy S5 Active
` Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
` Samsung Galaxy S6
` Samsung Galaxy S7
` Samsung Galaxy S7 Active
` Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
` Samsung Galaxy S8
` Samsung Galaxy S8 Active
` Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
` Samsung Galaxy S9
` Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
` Samsung Galaxy S10
` Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
` Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
` Samsung Galaxy S10e
` Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
` Samsung Galaxy S20 5G
` Samsung Galaxy S20 5G UW
` Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus 5G
` Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G
` Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
`
`
`
`Samsung Galaxy Note Products:
`
`
` Samsung Galaxy Note 4
` Samsung Galaxy Note Edge
` Samsung Galaxy Note 5
` Samsung Galaxy Note 7
` Samsung Galaxy Note 8
` Samsung Galaxy Note 9
` Samsung Galaxy Note 10
` Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
` Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus 5G
` Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite
` Samsung Galaxy Note 20 5G
` Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G
`
`
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`6
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 6/16
`
`

`

`Samsung Galaxy A Products:
`
`
` Samsung Galaxy A20
` Samsung Galaxy A30s
` Samsung Galaxy A31
` Samsung Galaxy A50
` Samsung Galaxy A51
` Samsung Galaxy A51 5G
` Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
` Samsung Galaxy A71 5G
` Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
` Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
` Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)
` Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy A70
` Samsung Galaxy A71
` Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
` Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy A8 Plus (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)
`
`
`Samsung Galaxy J Products:
`
`
` Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
` Samsung Galaxy J1 4G
` Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace
` Samsung Galaxy J2
` Samsung Galaxy J2 Pro (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016)
` Samsung Galaxy J3 Pro
` Samsung Galaxy J3 Sky 4G LTE
` Samsung Galaxy J3 Mission
` Samsung Galaxy J3 Luna Pro
` Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
` Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)
` Samsung Galaxy J5 Pro (2017)
` Samsung Galaxy J7
` Samsung Galaxy J7 (2016)
` Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)
` Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018)
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Aura
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Metal
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`7
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 7/16
`
`

`

` Samsung Galaxy J7 Neo
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Perx
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Sky Pro
` Samsung Galaxy J7 Star
` Samsung Galaxy J8
`
`
`Samsung Galaxy Fold/Flip Products:
`
`
` Samsung Galaxy Fold
` Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 5G
` Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
` Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G
`
`
`Other Samsung Galaxy Products:
`
`
` Samsung Galaxy Amp 2
` Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime
` Samsung Galaxy Express 3
` Samsung Galaxy Express Prime
` Samsung Galaxy Sol 4G SM-J321
`
`Samsung has not yet provided its technical documents sufficient to show the operation of
`
`the Accused Products nor Samsung’s summary, annual sales information for the Accused
`
`Products for the two years preceding the filing of the Complaint. JOLED reserves the right to
`
`identify additional models of the Accused Products based on its review of Samsung’s technical
`
`documents, Samsung’s summary, annual sales information for the Accused Products for the two
`
`years preceding the filing of the Complaint, Samsung’s document production and discovery
`
`responses, the Court’s claim construction rulings, JOLED’s continuing investigation, and other
`
`circumstances, or as new models are released.
`
`C.
`
`Claim Charts for the Accused Products
`
`Submitted herewith as Exhibits 1-50 are claim charts that identify where each limitation
`
`of each Asserted Claim is found within certain representative models of the Accused Products
`
`based on the information currently available to JOLED:
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`8
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 8/16
`
`

`

`Exhibits
`1-5
`
`Representative Model
`Samsung Galaxy S10e
`
`6-10
`
`11-15
`
`16-20
`
`21-25
`
`Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G
`
`Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
`
`Samsung Galaxy S7
`
`Samsung Galaxy A51
`
`26-30
`
`Samsung Galaxy A20
`
`31-35
`
`Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
`
`36-40
`
`Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
`
`41-45
`
`Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
`
`46-50
`
`Samsung Galaxy Note 8
`
`Asserted Patents
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`’130 Patent, ’597 Patent, ’108 Patent,
`’336 Patent, ’992 Patent, respectively
`
`
`Based on a reasonable inquiry, JOLED identifies the charted models as representative of
`
`the Accused Products. JOLED has torn down and charted ten different Samsung smartphone
`
`models with a range of screen sizes, display resolutions, display driver chips, product families,
`
`and release dates. JOLED found very similar infringement for each Asserted Patent in each of
`
`the representative models that were charted. JOLED reserves the right to amend or supplement
`
`this list of representative models of Accused Products as new information becomes available,
`
`whether through Samsung’s production of technical documents sufficient to show the operation
`
`of the Accused Products, Samsung’s production of summary, annual sales information for the
`
`Accused Products for the two years preceding the filing of the Complaint, JOLED’s ongoing
`
`investigation, discovery, or otherwise, and as new models are released.
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`9
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 9/16
`
`

`

`JOLED reserves the right to supplement or amend the accompanying claim charts based
`
`on its review of Samsung’s technical documents, Samsung’s summary, annual sales information
`
`for the Accused Products for the two years preceding the filing of the Complaint, and Samsung’s
`
`document production and discovery responses, based on JOLED’s continuing investigation,
`
`based on the Court’s claim construction rulings or other circumstances, and as new models are
`
`released.
`
`D.
`
`Nature of Infringement.
`
`JOLED asserts that each limitation of each Asserted Claim of the Asserted Patents is
`
`literally present in the Accused Products unless specifically identified in the chart directly below
`
`in this Section I.D. To the extent that any limitation of the Asserted Claims is not found to have
`
`literal correspondence in the Accused Products, any such limitations are present under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents, and JOLED reserves the right to amend and/or supplement the
`
`information and contentions in the accompanying claim charts accordingly. Based on the
`
`information currently available to JOLED, JOLED asserts infringement under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents for the following Asserted Claims and Accused Products as described in the
`
`corresponding claim charts:
`
`Asserted Claims
`
`Accused Products
`
`Claim 8, ’130 Patent
`
`Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, S10E, S9
`
`Plus, Z Flip, Note 8, Note 10 Plus, Note 20
`
`Ultra 5G
`
`Claims 1, 4-11, 13-14, 16-19, ’597 Patent
`
`Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra 5G
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`10
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 10/16
`
`

`

`These preliminary infringement contentions are based upon JOLED’s investigation to
`
`date, without the benefit of any discovery from the Defendant and without the benefit of the
`
`Court’s claim construction rulings. JOLED reserves the right to add, delete, substitute, or
`
`otherwise amend this list of Asserted Claims based on discovery, the Court’s claim construction
`
`rulings, JOLED’s ongoing investigation, or other circumstances, or as new models are released,
`
`in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court’s Orders, including
`
`OGP version 3.2, and the Court’s rules, including the Local Court Rules for the Western District
`
`of Texas. For example, JOLED reserves the right to substitute a doctrine of equivalents theory in
`
`place of a literal infringement theory based on developments in this case, including, but not
`
`limited to, the production of technical information by Samsung and the Court’s claim
`
`construction rulings. JOLED also reserves the right to substitute a literal infringement theory in
`
`place of a doctrine of equivalents theory based on developments in this case, including, but not
`
`limited to, the production of technical information by Samsung and the Court’s claim
`
`construction rulings.
`
`E.
`
`Priority Dates.
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’130, ’336, and ’992 Patents are entitled to a priority date of
`
`at least as early as September 7, 2001, i.e., the filing date of Japanese Patent Application
`
`No. 2001-271311. JOLED also reserves the right to rely upon any of the following priority
`
`dates: September 25, 2001 (the filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-291598);
`
`November 13, 2001 (the filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-347014); May 10,
`
`2002 (the filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-136117); and/or September 6,
`
`2002 (the filing date of Application No. PCT/JP02/09111).
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’597 and ’108 Patents are entitled to a priority date of at least
`
`as early as May 10, 2002 (the filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-136117).
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`11
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 11/16
`
`

`

`JOLED also reserves the right to rely upon any of the following priority dates: September 7,
`
`2001 (the filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-271311); September 25, 2001 (the
`
`filing date of Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-291598); November 13, 2001 (the filing date
`
`of Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-347014); and/or September 6, 2002 (the filing date of
`
`Application No. PCT/JP02/09111).
`
`The Court has not yet entered a Claim Construction Order and JOLED’s investigation is
`
`ongoing. JOLED reserves the right to assert that one or more of the Asserted Claims are entitled
`
`to an invention date that is different from the above dates.
`
`II.
`
`DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ACCOMPANYING PRELIMINARY
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS.
`A.
`Documents Evidencing Conception and Reduction to Practice.
`
`JOLED has produced copies of the following documents that may be relevant to
`
`conception or reduction to practice for one or more of the claimed inventions of the Asserted
`
`Patents:
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`Production Bates No.
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-271311
`
`JOLED_00002630 –
`
`JOLED_00002799
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-291598
`
`JOLED_00002800 –
`
`JOLED_00003022
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-347014
`
`JOLED_00003023 –
`
`JOLED_00003421
`
`Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-136117
`
`JOLED_00003422 –
`
`JOLED_00003842
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`12
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 12/16
`
`

`

`
`
`JOLED reserves the right to supplement its production with additional readily accessible
`
`information in its possession, custody, or control.
`
`B.
`
`File History for the Asserted Patents.
`
`JOLED has produced copies of each of the file histories for the Asserted Patents as
`
`specified below:
`
`Asserted Patent
`
`Patent Application No.
`
`Production Bates No.
`
`U.S Patent No. 10,198,992
`
`15/858,692
`
`U.S Patent No. 10,134,336
`
`15/335,901
`
`U.S Patent No. 9,922,597
`
`15/335,932
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,728,130
`
`14/341,620
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,997,108
`
`15/879,899
`
`
`
`JOLED_00000001 –
`
`JOLED_00000388
`
`JOLED_00000389 –
`
`JOLED_00001054
`
`JOLED_00001055 –
`
`JOLED_00001399
`
`JOLED_00001400 –
`
`JOLED_00002297
`
`JOLED_00002298 –
`
`JOLED_00002629
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`13
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 13/16
`
`

`

`Dated: November 16, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`Vincent J. Belusko (pro hac vice)
`California State Bar No. 100282
`David L. Fehrman (pro hac vice)
`California State Bar No. 87400
`Dylan J. Raife (pro hac vice)
`California State Bar No. 288346
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 6000
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-3543
`213-892-5200
`213-892-5454 (Fax)
`vbelusko@mofo.com
`dfehrman@mofo.com
`draife@mofo.com
`
`Richard D. Milvenan
`Texas State Bar No. 14171800
`McGinnis Lochridge LLP
`600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100
`Austin, TX 78701-2986
`512-495-6000
`512-495-6093 (Fax)
`rmilvenan@mcginnislaw.com
`
`A. Max Olson (pro hac vice)
`California State Bar No. 155510
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`Shin-Marunouchi Building, 29th Floor
`5-1 Marunouchi 1-chome
`Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6529
`Japan
`+81-3-3214-6522
`+81-3-3214-6512 (Fax)
`aolson@mofo.com
`
`
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`14
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 14/16
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Diek O. Van Nort (pro hac vice)
`California State Bar No. 273823
`Morrison & Foerster LLP
`425 Market Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
`415-268-6971
`415-268-7522 (Fax)
`dvannort@mofo.com
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Belusko
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`15
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 15/16
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing JOLED INC.’S
`
`PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS is today being served upon the following
`
`by email:
`
`Jeffrey H. Lerner
`David A. Garr
`Jared R. Frisch
`Derek J. Andros
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth St. NW
`Washington, DC 20001-4956
`jlerner@cov.com
`dgarr@cov.com
`jfrisch@cov.com
`dandros@cov.com
`Phone: (202) 662-6000
`Fax: (202) 662-6291
`
`Robert T. Haslam
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112
`rhaslam@cov.com
`Phone: (650) 632-4700
`Fax: (650) 632-4800
`
`Barry K. Shelton
`SHELTON COBURN LLP
`311 RR 620, Suite 205
`Austin, TX 78734-4775
`bshelton@sheltoncoburn.com
`Phone: (512) 263-2165
`Fax: (512) 263-2166
`Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc., Samsung Display Co., Ltd.,
`and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`Date: November 16, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_/s/ Dylan J. Raife___
`Dylan J. Raife
`
`
`sf-4368928
`
`16
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1022 - 16/16
`
`