throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 19
`Date: October 1, 2021
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`TENNANT COMPANY,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OXYGENATOR WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2021-00625
`Patent RE 45,415 E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before KRISTINA M. KALAN, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, and
`WESLEY B. DERRICK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KALAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Conditionally Granting Patent Owner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Todd S. Werner
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00625
`Patent RE 45,415 E
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`On September 22, 2021, Patent Owner, Oxygenator Water
`
`Technologies, Inc. (“Patent Owner”), filed a motion for pro hac vice
`
`admission of Todd S. Werner the above-captioned proceeding. Paper 15
`
`(“Motion”). Petitioner, Tennant Company, has not filed an opposition. The
`
`parties have conferred, and the Petitioner does not oppose this Motion.
`
`Motion 2.
`
`For the reasons provided below, Patent Owner’s Motion is
`
`conditionally granted. The grant is conditioned upon Patent Owner filing a
`
`Power of Attorney and Mandatory Notices that identify Mr. Werner as
`
`back-up counsel. Petitioner’s current Power of Attorney (Paper 6) and
`
`Mandatory Notices (Paper 5) do not identify Mr. Werner.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. The
`
`representative Order authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission requires
`
`a statement of facts showing there is good cause for us to recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to
`
`appear. See Paper 3, 2 (citing Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC,
`
`IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (representative “Order –
`
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”)).
`
`In this proceeding, lead counsel for Patent Owner, J. Derek
`
`Vandenburgh, is a registered practitioner. Motion 5. Patent Owner asserts
`
`that there is good cause for us to recognize Mr. Werner pro hac vice in this
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00625
`Patent RE 45,415 E
`
`proceeding. Motion 2–4. Patent Owner’s assertions in this regard are
`
`supported by a Declaration of Mr. Werner. Ex. 2112 (“Declaration”).
`
`Mr. Werner declares that he is a member in good standing of the State
`
`Bar of Minnesota. Declaration ¶ 2. Mr. Werner also declares that he is
`
`familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding, including U.S.
`
`Patent No. RE 45,415 E and the prior art references that are asserted by
`
`Patent Owner. Id. ¶¶ 10–11. Moreover, the facts alleged in Mr. Werner’s
`
`Declaration comply with all the requirements set forth in our representative
`
`Order authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission. See id. ¶¶ 1–12.
`
`On this record, we determine that Mr. Werner has sufficient legal and
`
`technical qualifications to represent Patent Owner in this proceeding.
`
`Accordingly, Patent Owner has established that there is good cause for the
`
`pro hac vice admission of Mr. Werner in this proceeding.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`
`of Todd S. Werner is conditionally granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Werner is authorized to represent
`
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00625
`Patent RE 45,415 E
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Werner shall comply with the
`
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide1 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of
`
`Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Werner shall be subject to the
`
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), as well as the
`
`Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101
`
`et seq.;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file, within ten (10)
`
`business days of the date of this order, updated Mandatory Notices
`
`identifying Mr. Werner as back-up counsel in accordance with 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.8(b)(3); and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner shall submit, within
`
`ten (10) business days of the date of this order, a Power of Attorney for
`
`Mr. Werner in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00625
`Patent RE 45,415 E
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert Johnson
`FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.
`rsjohnson@fredlaw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Derek Vandenburgh
`Aaron Pederson
`Nathan Louwagie
`CARLSON, CASPERS, VANDENBURGH, & LINDQUIST, P.A.
`dvandenburgh@carlsoncaspers.com
`apederson@carlsoncaspers.com
`nlouwagie@carlsoncaspers.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket