`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`KOSS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2021-00600
`Patent 10,298,451
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF SETH M. SPROUL
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00600
`Docket No. 50095-0020IP2
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), the Petitioner, Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
`
`respectfully requests that the Board recognize Seth M. Sproul as counsel pro hac
`
`vice in this proceeding. Apple seeks the counsel of Seth M. Sproul due to his
`
`experience in representing Apple Inc. in other patent-related matters and
`
`particularly due to his familiarity with the substantive and technical issues involved
`
`in this proceeding. This motion is authorized by the Notice of Filing Date
`
`Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response that
`
`was mailed on March 16, 2021.
`
`Statement of Facts
`I.
`Seth M. Sproul is a patent litigation attorney with more than 20 years of
`
`experience representing clients in cases involving computer networking, computer
`
`software, semiconductors, and medical devices. Mr. Sproul regularly litigates
`
`patent cases before various Federal District Courts, and the International Trade
`
`Commission. Through his practice in such cases, Mr. Sproul has gained
`
`substantial experience in jury trials, bench trials, discovery, Markman hearings,
`
`and appeals. Mr. Sproul has spent his entire career at Fish & Richardson P.C.,
`
`focusing on patent litigation and patent issues. Apple provides Exhibit A, as
`
`evidence, Mr. Sproul’s biography.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00600
`Docket No. 50095-0020IP2
`Seth M. Sproul also has particular experience and familiarity with the
`
`substantive and technical issues involved in this inter partes review proceeding
`
`and other inter partes review proceedings challenging other patents that have
`
`been asserted against Apple in KOSS Corporation v. Apple Inc., 6:2020cv00665
`
`(W.D.Tex.) (IPR2021-00305, IPR2021-00381, IPR2021-00592, IPR2021-
`
`00255). Apple has invested significant financial resources in each of these
`
`proceedings, and Mr. Sproul will be taking a leading role with respect to the
`
`patent that is the subject of the present proceeding. Moreover, through his
`
`representation in the IPR proceedings, Apple has developed a particular
`
`relationship with Mr. Sproul such that Apple desires to continue the relationship
`
`with Mr. Sproul for the purpose of this proceeding.
`
`II.
`
`Affidavit of Individual Seeking to Appear
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by an Affidavit
`
`of Seth M. Sproul. Accordingly, Apple submits that there is good cause under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c) for the Board to recognize Seth M. Sproul as counsel pro hac
`
`vice during this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Date: 11/2/2021
`
`Case IPR2021-00600
`Docket No. 50095-0020IP2
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Roberto Devoto/
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Roberto Devoto, Reg. No. 55,108
`Ryan Chowdhury, Reg. No. 74,466
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza, 60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: 202-783-5070
`F: 877-769-7945
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00600
`Docket No. 50095-0020IP2
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on November 2,
`
`2021, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Seth M. Sproul, and its exhibit, were provided via email, to the
`
`Patent Owner by serving the correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`Mark G. Knedeisen
`Laurén Murray
`Brian P. Bozzo
`
`K&L GATES LLP
`K&L Gates Center, 210 Sixth Avenue
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`
`Email: mark.knedeisen@klgates.com
`Email: lauren.murray@klgates.com
`Email: brian.bozzo@klgates.com
`
` /Crena Pacheco/
`Crena Pacheco
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(617) 956-5938
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
