throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TCT MOBILE (US), INC.; TCT MOBILE (US) HOLDINGS, INC.;
`HUIZHOU TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO. LTD.; AND TCL
`COMMUNICATION, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,834,586
`Issue Date: November 16, 2010
`Title: MULTIFUNCTIONAL CHARGER SYSTEM AND METHOD
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00599
`
`PETITIONERS’ OBJECTIONS TO
`PATENT OWNER’S SUR-REPLY EVIDENCE
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`PO Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioners TCT Mobile (US), Inc.;
`
`TCT Mobile (US) Holdings, Inc.; Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.;
`
`and TCL Communication, Inc. hereby object to the below exhibit, cited and relied
`
`upon in Patent Owner’s April 18, 2022 Sur-Reply, on the following grounds. For
`
`each objected-to exhibit, the pertinent Federal Rule of Evidence (“FRE”) or other
`
`rule that gives rise to the objection is provided, along with a brief summary of the
`
`basis for the objection.
`
`Exhibit 2030 – document purported to be excerpts from Dr. Baker’s
`
`district court report. Untimeliness and Beyond the Proper Scope for a Sur-
`
`Reply: Exhibit 2030 is untimely and beyond the proper scope for a sur-reply. The
`
`2019 Trial Practice Guide Update at 73-74 states that a “sur-reply may not be
`
`accompanied by new evidence other than deposition transcripts of the cross-
`
`examination of any reply witness.” Exhibit 2030 accompanies Patent Owner’s
`
`Sur-Reply and is not a deposition transcript of any reply witness.”
`
`Dated: April 25, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`
`/Jeffrey Johnson/
`By:
`Jeffrey Johnson, Reg. No. 53,078
`Email: 3J6PTABDocket@orrick.com
`609 Main Street, 40th Floor
`Houston, TX 77002-3106
`Main: (713) 658-6400
`Fax: (713) 658-6401
`
`1
`
`

`

`Robert J. Benson (to be admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: R75PTABDocket@orrick.com
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`Main: (949) 567-6700
`Fax: (949) 567-6710
`Jeremy Jason Lang
`USPTO Reg. No. 73,604
`Email: PTABDocketJJL2@orrick.com
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`Main: (650) 614-7400
`Fax: (650) 614-7401
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`The undersigned certifies that on April 25, 2022, a copy of the foregoing
`
`was served in its entirety by filing through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End
`
`to End System, as well as via electronic mail, upon the following attorneys of
`
`record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Hong Annita Zhong
`Jason Sheasby
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`
`hzhong@irell.com
`jsheasby@irell.com
`FundamentalIPRs@irell.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC
`
` /Karen Johnson/
` Karen Johnson
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket