`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`TCT MOBILE (US), INC.; TCT MOBILE (US) HOLDINGS, INC.;
`HUIZHOU TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO. LTD.; AND TCL
`COMMUNICATION, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,834,586
`Issue Date: November 16, 2010
`Title: MULTIFUNCTIONAL CHARGER SYSTEM AND METHOD
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00599
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`PO Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order dated
`
`August 7, 2021 (Paper No. 9), Petitioners TCT Mobile (US), Inc.; TCT Mobile
`
`(US) Holdings, Inc.; Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd.; and TCL
`
`Communication, Inc. (“Petitioners”) request Oral Argument on issues related to the
`
`patentability of claims 1-2 and 8-9 of U.S. Patent No. 7,834,586.
`
`Petitioners request to present arguments on the following issues:
`
` All grounds on which trial was instituted, including all issues raised
`
`by the parties’ papers;
`
` Any issue raised by either party in a motion to exclude (if any),
`
`objections to demonstrative exhibits (if any), or any other motion or
`
`paper filed by either party before oral argument;
`
` Rebuttal to any issue raised by either party in its presentation at the
`
`oral argument; and
`
` Any additional issue on which the Board seeks clarification.
`
`In the Scheduling Order dated August 27, 2021 (Paper No. 9), the Board
`
`scheduled Oral Argument for June 7, 2022. Petitioners respectfully propose that
`
`they be provided 45 minutes of argument time, inclusive of any rebuttal time
`
`Petitioners wish to reserve at the hearing.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Petitioners also respectfully request the ability to use audio-visual equipment
`
`to display demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, a projector,
`
`an overhead projector (“Elmo”), and a screen.
`
`To the extent the Oral Argument is conducted remotely by video or telephone,
`
`Petitioners respectfully request permission to file their demonstratives with the
`
`Board and to refer to their demonstratives during argument.
`
`Dated: April 18, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`By:
`/Jeffrey Johnson/
`
`Jeffrey Johnson, Reg. No. 53,078
`Email: 3J6PTABDocket@orrick.com
`609 Main Street, 40th Floor
`Houston, TX 77002-3106
`Main: (713) 658-6400
`Fax: (713) 658-6401
`
`Robert J. Benson (to be admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: R75PTABDocket@orrick.com
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`Main: (949) 567-6700
`Fax: (949) 567-6710
`Jeremy Jason Lang
`USPTO Reg. No. 73,604
`Email: PTABDocketJJL2@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE,
`LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`Main: (650) 614-7400
`Fax: (650) 614-7401
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE ON PATENT OWNER
`The undersigned certifies that on April 18, 2022, a copy of the foregoing
`
`was served in its entirety by filing through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End
`
`to End System, as well as via electronic mail, upon the following attorneys of
`
`record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Hong Annita Zhong
`Jason Sheasby
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`
`hzhong@irell.com
`jsheasby@irell.com
`FundamentalIPRs@irell.com
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC
`
` /Karen Johnson/
` Karen Johnson
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
