throbber
From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel, 
`
`Knedeisen, Mark G. <Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com>
`Tuesday, August 10, 2021 2:42 PM
`David Holt; IPR50095-0020IP1; PTAB Inbound; AXF-PTAB; Roberto Devoto;
`IPR50095-0022IP1; IPR50095-0019IP1; Hyun Jin In; IPR50095-0021IP1;
`IPR50095-0018IP1; IPR50095-0020IP2; Joel Henry; IPR50095-0021IP2;
`IPR50095-0022IP2; IPR50095-0019IP2; IPR50095-0018IP2
`Bozzo, Brian P.; Weaver, Michelle L.; Ghabrial, Ragae; Murray, Laurén S.
`RE: Apple v Koss IPRs - Routine Discovery
`IPR2021-00255 - 451 Patent - Document Requests_USW_Active01_505041917_1.DOCX;
`IPR2021-00305 - 325 Patent - Document Requests_USW_Active01_505041898_1.DOCX;
`IPR2021-00381 - _982 Patent - Document Requests_USW_Active01_505041881_1.DOCX
`
`Patent Owner disagrees that Patent Owner’s requests are neither specific nor known by Petitioner to be 
`contradictory to its positions.  The requests are specific because they seek sales information about a limited 
`number of specific products.  The requests seek information known by Petitioner to be contradictory to its 
`positions because Petitioner takes the position that the challenged claims are obvious; significant sales are 
`evidence of commercial success; and commercial success is relevant to nonobviousness.  If Petitioner 
`nevertheless refuses to produce the information through routine discovery, please advise whether Petitioner 
`agrees to the following additional discovery under 37 CFR 42.51(b)(2).  Specifically, in IPRs 2021‐00255, 2021‐
`00305 and 2021‐00381, Patent Owner seeks, within 14 of days: 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For IPR2021‐00255, sales revenue and quantity of units sold, by calendar quarter, for the HomePod
`and HomePod Mini since the commercial introduction of those products;
`For IPR2021‐00305, sales revenue and quantity of units sold, by calendar quarter, for the Powerbeats
`Pro since the commercial introduction of that product; and
`For IPR2021‐00381, sales revenue and quantity of units sold, by calendar quarter, for the AirPods (1st
`and 2nd generations) and AirPods Pro since the commercial introduction of those products.
`
`If Petitioner does not agree to this additional discovery, Patent Owner intends to move the Board for the 
`additional discovery under 37 CFR 42.51(b)(2).  Attached are document requests that Patent Owner intends to 
`file with the motions.   
`
`This website (https://www.businessofapps.com/data/apple‐statistics/) estimates that Apple has sold at least 
`15 million Apple AirPods units per year since 2017 (and more than 100 million in 2020); and that Apple has 
`sold at least 4 million HomePod units per year since 2018.   This website 
`(https://www.patentlyapple.com/patently‐apple/2019/11/apple‐airpods‐powerbeats‐pro‐is‐keeping‐apple‐in‐
`the‐hearables‐market‐leadership‐with‐over‐50‐market‐share‐1.html) says that the “market share of their new 
`premium models, such as Beat Powerbeats Pro in May [2019], have increased significantly, boosted by 
`favorable market reviews of sound quality and design by customers.”  Thus, there is more than a possibility 
`and mere allegation that Apple experienced significant sales of these products.  Further: 
`The request do not seek Petitioner’s litigation positions;
`
` Apple does not publicly disclose sales figures for these products;
`The requests are easy to understand; and
`
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1032
`Apple v. Koss
`IPR2021-00592
`
`

`

`
`
`The requests are not overly burdensome to answer.
`
`Please let us know if Petitioner agrees to the additional discovery and/or whether Petitioner opposes the 
`motions for additional discovery. 
`
`Regards, 
`
`Mark Knedeisen
`K&L Gates LLP
`210 Sixth Avenue
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`Phone: 412.355.6342
`Fax: 412.355.6501
`mark.knedeisen@klgates.com
`www.klgates.com 
`
`From: David Holt <DTH@fr.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 5:08 PM 
`To: Knedeisen, Mark G. <Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com>; IPR50095‐0020IP1 <IPR50095‐0020IP1@fr.com>; PTAB 
`Inbound <PTABInbound@fr.com>; AXF‐PTAB <AXF‐PTAB@fr.com>; Roberto Devoto <devoto@fr.com>; IPR50095‐
`0022IP1 <IPR50095‐0022IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0019IP1 <IPR50095‐0019IP1@fr.com>; Hyun Jin In <in@fr.com>; 
`IPR50095‐0021IP1 <IPR50095‐0021IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0018IP1 <IPR50095‐0018IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0020IP2 
`<IPR50095‐0020IP2@fr.com>; Joel Henry <jhenry@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0021IP2 <IPR50095‐0021IP2@fr.com>; IPR50095‐
`0022IP2 <IPR50095‐0022IP2@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0019IP2 <IPR50095‐0019IP2@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0018IP2 <IPR50095‐
`0018IP2@fr.com> 
`Cc: Bozzo, Brian P. <Brian.Bozzo@klgates.com>; Weaver, Michelle L. <Michelle.Weaver@klgates.com>; Ghabrial, Ragae 
`<ragae.ghabrial@klgates.com>; Murray, Laurén S. <Lauren.Murray@klgates.com> 
`Subject: RE: Apple v Koss IPRs ‐ Routine Discovery 
`
`Counsel, 
`
`“Routine discovery under 37 C.F.R. § 41.51(b)(1)(iii) is narrowly directed to specific information known to the responding 
`party to be inconsistent with a position advanced by that party in the proceeding, and not broadly directed to any 
`subject area in general within which the requesting party hopes to discover such inconsistent information.”  Garmin Int’l, 
`Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Tech. LLC, IPR2012‐00001, Paper 26, slip. op. 4 (PTAB Mar. 5, 2013) (informative).  The information 
`identified in Patent Owner’s request is neither specific nor known by Petitioner to be contradictory to any positions 
`advanced in the petitions.  Indeed, Petitioner is not currently aware of any specific information that is inconsistent with 
`the positions advanced in the petitions.  However, if Patent Owner is aware of specific information that it knows is 
`inconsistent with the positions advanced in the petition, please identify that information and Petitioner will consider 
`such a request. 
`
`Sincerely, 
`
`2
`
`

`

`David Holt 
`Principal
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`1000 Maine Ave. SW, Washington DC 20024
`Direct: +1-202-626-7783 :: Facsimile: +1-877-769-7945
`DTH@fr.com :: fr.com 
`
`From: Knedeisen, Mark G. <Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com>  
`Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 5:09 PM 
`To: IPR50095‐0020IP1 <IPR50095‐0020IP1@fr.com>; PTAB Inbound <PTABInbound@fr.com>; AXF‐PTAB <AXF‐
`PTAB@fr.com>; Roberto Devoto <devoto@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0022IP1 <IPR50095‐0022IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0019IP1 
`<IPR50095‐0019IP1@fr.com>; David Holt <DTH@fr.com>; Hyun Jin In <in@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0021IP1 <IPR50095‐
`0021IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0018IP1 <IPR50095‐0018IP1@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0020IP2 <IPR50095‐0020IP2@fr.com>; 
`Joel Henry <jhenry@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0021IP2 <IPR50095‐0021IP2@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0022IP2 <IPR50095‐
`0022IP2@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0019IP2 <IPR50095‐0019IP2@fr.com>; IPR50095‐0018IP2 <IPR50095‐0018IP2@fr.com> 
`Cc: Bozzo, Brian P. <Brian.Bozzo@klgates.com>; Weaver, Michelle L. <Michelle.Weaver@klgates.com>; Ghabrial, Ragae 
`<ragae.ghabrial@klgates.com>; Murray, Laurén S. <Lauren.Murray@klgates.com> 
`Subject: Apple v Koss IPRs ‐ Routine Discovery 
`
`[This email originated outside of F&R.]
`
`Counsel – Rule (37 CFR) 42.51(b)(1)(iii) states that, as part of routine discovery, “a party must serve relevant 
`information that is inconsistent with a position advanced by the party during the proceeding concurrent with 
`the filing of the documents or things that contain the inconsistency.”  In IPR2021‐00255, IPR2021‐00305, 
`IPR2021‐00381, IPR2021‐00546, IPR2021‐00592, IPR2021‐00600, IPR2021‐00626, IPR2021‐00679, IPR2021‐
`00686 and IPR2021‐00693, Petitioner took the position that the Challenged Claims are obvious in these IPR 
`petitions.  Commercial success is relevant to assessing obviousness.  Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 
`(1966).  Sales are relevant to commercial success.  J.T. Eaton & Co. v. Atlantic Paste & Glue Co., 106 F.3d 1563, 
`1571 (Fed.Cir.1997).   Accordingly, Patent Owner requests that you produce sales information (U.S. and 
`worldwide) under Petitioner’s routine discovery obligations per Rule 42.51(b)(1)(iii) for the following products 
`of Petitioner: 
`
` HomePod and HomePod Mini (for IPR2021‐00255 and IPR2021‐00600)
`
` Beats PowerBeats Pro (for IPR2021‐00305 and IPR2021‐00679)
`
` Apple AirPods 1st Generation, Apple AirPods 2nd Generation and AirPods Pro (for IPR2021‐00381,
`IPR2021‐00546, IPR2021‐00592, IPR2021‐00626, IPR2021‐00686, and IPR2021‐00693).
`
`The sales information should include sales by year by product since the first date of sale of each above‐
`identified product.  Petitioner’s response should also include any and all additional documents and 
`information inconsistent with Petitioner’s positions. 
`
`Please confirm promptly that Petitioner will produce the routine discovery requested above by August 13, 
`2021.  If you have questions or issues with this request, we are available to meet and confer this week. 
`
`3
`
`

`

`Mark Knedeisen
`K&L Gates LLP
`210 Sixth Avenue
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`Phone: 412.355.6342
`Fax: 412.355.6501
`mark.knedeisen@klgates.com
`www.klgates.com 
`
`This electronic message contains information from the law firm of K&L Gates LLP. The contents may be privileged and confidential and are intended for
`the use of the intended addressee(s) only. If you are not an intended addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of
`this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact me at Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com.-4
`
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
`and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`
`This electronic message contains information from the law firm of K&L Gates LLP. The contents may be privileged and confidential and are intended for
`the use of the intended addressee(s) only. If you are not an intended addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of
`this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact me at Mark.Knedeisen@klgates.com.-4
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket