throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 24
`Entered: September 26, 2022
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2021-00591
`Patent 7,868,880 B2
`____________
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, and
`JULIA HEANEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HEANEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`Granting Joint Request to Keep Separate
`35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00591
`Patent 7,868,880 B2
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`On August 12, 2022, with Board authorization, the parties filed a Joint
`Motion to Terminate (Paper 22, “Joint Motion”). With the Joint Motion, the
`parties filed a Patent License Agreement and Release Agreement
`(Exhibit 1015) and their Escrow Agreement (Exhibit 1016) (collectively
`“Settlement Agreement”) that resolves the disputes between the parties
`related to the above-identified proceeding. Joint Motion 1. The parties also
`filed a Joint Request to Keep Separate (Paper 23, “Joint Request”) that
`requests the Board to treat the Settlement Agreement as business
`confidential information and to keep it separate from the publicly available
`files in the above-identified proceeding. Paper 23, 1.
` II. DISCUSSION
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” It is
`also provided in 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) that if no petitioner remains in the inter
`partes review, the Office may terminate the review.
`In the Joint Motion, the parties represent that they have reached an
`agreement to jointly seek termination of the above-identified proceeding, the
`filed copy of the Settlement Agreement is a true copy, and “[t]here are no
`other collateral agreements between the parties made in connection with, or
`in contemplation of, the termination sought.” Joint Motion 1. Further, the
`parties represent that they filed all agreements between themselves,
`including all collateral agreements referred to, made in connection with, or
`in contemplation of, the termination of this proceeding, as 35 U.S.C.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00591
`Patent 7,868,880 B2
`
`§ 317(b) requires.
`The Board generally expects that a case “will terminate after the filing
`of a settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits.”
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 86 (Nov. 2019); see also 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(a); 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74. The Board has not decided the merits
`of this proceeding, and this proceeding involves no other parties.
`Accordingly, under these circumstances, we determine that good cause
`exists to terminate this proceeding. Id.
`Further, we find that the Settlement Agreement contains confidential
`business information regarding the terms of settlement. We determine that
`good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreement as business confidential
`information and keep it separate from the file of Patent 7,868,880 pursuant
`to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`III. ORDER
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion is granted, and IPR2021-00591 is
`terminated; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Request is granted, and the
`Settlement Agreement shall be kept separate from the file of Patent
`7,868,880, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on
`written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2021-00591
`Patent 7,868,880 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Nicholas Whilt
`Ryan Yagura
`Brian Cook
`Ben Haber
`Mark Liang
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`nwhilt@omm.com
`ryagura@omm.com
`bcook@omm.com
`bhaber@omm.com
`mliang@omm.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Neil Rubin
`Philip Wang
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`nrubin@raklaw.com
`pwang@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket