`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD., §
`
`Plaintiff, §
`
`v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00152-JRG
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., §
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., §
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, §
`INC., §
`
`Defenda ts. §
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court s Final Jury
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Jury Instructions. You should refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answer the questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 14853
`
`As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`• Solas refers to Solas OLED Ltd.
`
`• “Samsung refers collectively to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
`
`• The “ 450 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450.
`
`• The “ 338 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338.
`
`• The “’311 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,256,311.
`
`• The “Patents-in-Suit refers collectively to the ’450 Patent, the ’338 Patent,
`and the ’311 Patent.
`
`• The “Asserted Claims refers collectively to Claims 4 and 5 of the ’450 Patent,
`Claims 5 and 9 of the ’338 Patent, and Claims 7 and 12 of the ’311 Patent.
`
`2
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 14854
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 3 of 9 PagelD #: 14854
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`
`3
`3
`
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`Ex. 2006
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 14855
`
`QUESTION NO. 1:
`
`Did Solas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung infringed ANY
`
`of the Asserted Claims?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`4
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 14856
`
`QUESTION NO. 2;
`
`Did Samsung prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid?
`
`Check either Yes or “No for each Asserted Claim listed below:
`
`Claim 4 of the 450 Patent Yes: Z No:
`
`Claim 5 of the 450 Patent Yes: / No:
`
`Claim 7 of the ’311 Patent Yes: No:
`
`Claim 12 of the ’311 Patent Yes: No:
`
`5
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 14857
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1, OR YES to BOTH CLAIMS of the
`311 Patent listed in Question 2, then DO NOT ans er Question No. 3.
`
`Answer Question No. 3 ONLY as to any Asserted Claim of the ’311 Patent that
`you have found BOTH to be infringed AND not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 3
`
`Did Solas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung willfully infringed
`
`ANY of the Asserted Claims of the 311 Patent that you found were infringed?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`6
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 14858
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1, then DO NOT answer Question No. 4a
`or Question No. 4b.
`
`Answer Question No. 4a and 4b ONLY as to an Asserted Claim that you have
`found BOTH to be infringed AND (if applicable) not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 4a:
`
`What sum of money, if any, paid now in cash, has Solas proven by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence would compensate Solas for its damages resulting from
`
`infringement?
`
`Answer separately for each Patent-in-Suit in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`450 Patent $ 0.00
`
`’338 Patent $ 3
`
`311 Patent $
`
`7
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 14859
`
`QUESTION NO. 4b:
`
`Are each of the amounts you awarded in Question No. 4a a lump-sum representing
`
`damages for past and future sales, or are each of the amounts you awarded in
`
`Question No. 4a a running royalty representing damages through January 2021?
`
`Check one of the following:
`
`Lump Sum
`
`OR
`
`Running Royalty
`
`8
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 14860
`
`FINAL PAGE OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`should then sign and date the Verdict Form in the spaces below. Once this is done,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Foreperson should keep the Verdict Form and bring it when the jury is brought back
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the courtroom.
`
`this i-U, day ofMarch,
`Signed
`2021.
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`9
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`