throbber
Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 14852
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD., §
`
`Plaintiff, §
`
`v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00152-JRG
`
`SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., §
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., §
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, §
`INC., §
`
`Defenda ts. §
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court s Final Jury
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Jury Instructions. You should refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answer the questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 14853
`
`As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`• Solas refers to Solas OLED Ltd.
`
`• “Samsung refers collectively to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
`
`• The “ 450 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 6,072,450.
`
`• The “ 338 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 7,446,338.
`
`• The “’311 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,256,311.
`
`• The “Patents-in-Suit refers collectively to the ’450 Patent, the ’338 Patent,
`and the ’311 Patent.
`
`• The “Asserted Claims refers collectively to Claims 4 and 5 of the ’450 Patent,
`Claims 5 and 9 of the ’338 Patent, and Claims 7 and 12 of the ’311 Patent.
`
`2
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 14854
`Case 2:19-cv-00152—JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 14854
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`
`3
`3
`
`RingCentral, Inc. V. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`EX. 2006
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 14855
`
`QUESTION NO. 1:
`
`Did Solas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung infringed ANY
`
`of the Asserted Claims?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`4
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 14856
`
`QUESTION NO. 2;
`
`Did Samsung prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid?
`
`Check either Yes or “No for each Asserted Claim listed below:
`
`Claim 4 of the 450 Patent Yes: Z No:
`
`Claim 5 of the 450 Patent Yes: / No:
`
`Claim 7 of the ’311 Patent Yes: No:
`
`Claim 12 of the ’311 Patent Yes: No:
`
`5
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 14857
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1, OR YES to BOTH CLAIMS of the
`311 Patent listed in Question 2, then DO NOT ans er Question No. 3.
`
`Answer Question No. 3 ONLY as to any Asserted Claim of the ’311 Patent that
`you have found BOTH to be infringed AND not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 3
`
`Did Solas prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Samsung willfully infringed
`
`ANY of the Asserted Claims of the 311 Patent that you found were infringed?
`
`Yes: No:
`
`6
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 14858
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1, then DO NOT answer Question No. 4a
`or Question No. 4b.
`
`Answer Question No. 4a and 4b ONLY as to an Asserted Claim that you have
`found BOTH to be infringed AND (if applicable) not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 4a:
`
`What sum of money, if any, paid now in cash, has Solas proven by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence would compensate Solas for its damages resulting from
`
`infringement?
`
`Answer separately for each Patent-in-Suit in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`450 Patent $ 0.00
`
`’338 Patent $ 3
`
`311 Patent $
`
`7
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 14859
`
`QUESTION NO. 4b:
`
`Are each of the amounts you awarded in Question No. 4a a lump-sum representing
`
`damages for past and future sales, or are each of the amounts you awarded in
`
`Question No. 4a a running royalty representing damages through January 2021?
`
`Check one of the following:
`
`Lump Sum
`
`OR
`
`Running Royalty
`
`8
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-00152-JRG Document 341 Filed 03/08/21 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 14860
`
`FINAL PAGE OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`should then sign and date the Verdict Form in the spaces below. Once this is done,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Foreperson should keep the Verdict Form and bring it when the jury is brought back
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`into the courtroom.
`
`this i-U, day ofMarch,
`Signed
`2021.
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`9
`
`Ex. 2006
`RingCentral, Inc. v. Estech Systems, Inc.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket